Freedom of Choice Act

Last updated

In United States politics, the Freedom of Choice Act was a bill which sought to codify into law for women a "fundamental right to choose to bear a child; terminate a pregnancy prior to fetal viability; or terminate a pregnancy after viability when necessary to protect her life or her health". It sought to prohibit a federal, state, or local governmental entity from denying or interfering with a woman's right to exercise such choices; or discriminating against the exercise of those rights in the regulation or provision of benefits, facilities, services, or information. Provides that such prohibition shall apply retroactively. It also authorizes an individual aggrieved by a violation of this Act to obtain appropriate relief, including relief against a governmental entity, in a civil action". [1]

Contents

The bill was introduced to the Congress in 1989, 1993, [2] 2004 [3] and 2007 (H.R. 1964/S. 1173).

Findings sections

The bill asserts in its findings section that Congress has the affirmative power to legislate abortion based, in part, on the crossing of state lines by abortion providers, women seeking abortions, and medical supplies used in abortions. [4]

Status and sponsorship

The bill was first introduced to the Congress in 1989 and again in 1993. [2] It was reintroduced in 2004 in the 108th Congress, [3] on January 21 in the House of Representatives and on January 22 in the Senate.[ citation needed ]

The 2004[ citation needed ] version was sponsored in the House of Representatives by Jerrold Nadler, and originally[ clarification needed ] co-sponsored by James Greenwood, Louise Slaughter, and Diana Degette. In the Senate, it was sponsored by Barbara Boxer, and originally co-sponsored by Senators Jon Corzine, Patty Murray, Frank Lautenberg, Hillary Clinton, Maria Cantwell, Jim Jeffords, Joseph Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Paul Sarbanes, and Barbara Mikulski.

The bills were referred to the Judiciary Committees of the respective Houses. Neither bill received further action in the 108th Congress. The bills were reintroduced on April 19 2007 in the 110th Congress (H.R. 1964/S. 1173), but, like their predecessors, were referred to committee without further action.

During his tenure in the United States Senate, Barack Obama co-sponsored the 2007 Senate version of the Freedom of Choice Act (S. 1173). Responding to a question regarding how he would preserve reproductive rights in a speech given to the Planned Parenthood Action Fund on July 17, 2007, Obama declared, "The first thing I'd do, as president, is sign the Freedom of Choice Act. That's the first thing that I'd do." [5]

In a press conference on April 29, 2009, President Obama said that although he supports a woman's right to choose to have an abortion, passage of the Freedom of Choice Act was not his "highest legislative priority". [6] Although Democrats controlled both the House and Senate during the 111th Congress, protecting abortion rights was not prioritized since six of the nine sitting Supreme Court Justices supported upholding Roe v. Wade . Instead, Democrats focused on passing the Affordable Care Act. It would not be until the 113th Congress in 2013 that another abortion rights bill would be introduced, the Women's Health Protection Act. [7] [8]

Description and criticism

The bill is described by NARAL Pro-Choice America president Nancy Keenan as a bill to "codify Roe v. Wade" which would "repeal the Bush-backed Federal Abortion Ban", referring to the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, and "other federal restrictions". [9] Opponents of FOCA assert that it would, if passed, invalidate every restriction on abortion nationwide, including parental notification laws, informed consent laws, and bans on partial birth abortion. [10] However, the bill would still prohibit partial birth abortions due to the wording of the bill and the stated definition of viability, the stage of pregnancy when there is a reasonable likelihood of the sustained survival of the fetus outside of the woman. [11]

Two days after Barack Obama's inauguration, a protester in the March for Life holds a "No FOCA" sign. No FOCA crop.jpg
Two days after Barack Obama's inauguration, a protester in the March for Life holds a "No FOCA" sign.

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has been strongly opposed to the Freedom of Choice Act. According to the USCCB's Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, FOCA would not only "codify the Supreme Court's 1973 decision in Roe v. Wade " but "in allowing and promoting abortion, FOCA goes far beyond even Roe". [12]

Opponents of FOCA assert that the bill would force taxpayers to subsidize abortion and would jeopardize existing laws prohibiting abortions in public hospitals and barring non-physicians from performing abortions. [10] Others[ who? ] estimate that the passage of FOCA would result in approximately 125,000 more abortions being performed annually in the United States. [13] [14] [15] Some opponents argue that FOCA would effectively repeal the Hyde Amendment, a federal law which bars the use of federal funding for abortions in some cases.[ citation needed ] Legal scholar Douglas Kmiec, a pro-life Republican, disagrees with the latter assertion, noting that the Hyde Amendment is renewed annually by Congress; Kmiec argues that this legislation would not supersede it. [16]

Those who oppose the Act interpret it as an attempt to obligate religious hospitals to either "do abortions or close", [17] while FOCA supporters argue that existing conscience clause laws would protect religious hospitals. [18] [19] In early 2009, Catholic News Service asserted that in its interpretation of the legislation, FOCA neither poses any such risk to Catholic hospitals, nor would require religious hospitals to participate in abortion. [20] Opponents, however, assert that conscience clauses are weak and easily reinterpreted, and do not explicitly allow religious hospitals to ban the abortion procedure within the hospital. [21]

The election of Barack Obama, an advocate of the Freedom of Choice Act, to the presidency caused pro-life organizations to organize against the bill in early 2009. Notable campaigns that were organized include Americans United for Life's petition to Congress called Fight FOCA [22] and the "What the FOCA?!" campaign created by Students for Life of Illinois. [23] [24] [25] Although he promised Planned Parenthood in 2007 that “the first thing I’d do as president” would be to sign it, by May 2009 he said the bill is “not my highest legislative priority”. [26]

Related Research Articles

Intact dilation and extraction is a surgical procedure that terminates and removes an intact fetus from the uterus. The procedure is used both after miscarriages and for abortions in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shelley Moore Capito</span> American politician and educator (born 1953)

Shelley Wellons Moore Capito is an American politician and retired educator serving in her second term as the junior United States senator from West Virginia, a post she has held since 2015. A member of the Republican Party, Capito served seven terms as the U.S. representative from West Virginia's 2nd congressional district from 2001 to 2015. The daughter of three-term West Virginia governor Arch Alfred Moore Jr., she is the dean of West Virginia's congressional delegation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zoe Lofgren</span> American politician & lawyer (born 1947)

Susan Ellen "Zoe" Lofgren is an American lawyer and politician serving as a U.S. representative from California. A member of the Democratic Party, Lofgren is in her 15th term in Congress, having been first elected in 1994. Lofgren has long served on the House Judiciary Committee, and chaired the House Administration Committee in the 116th and 117th Congresses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Linda Sánchez</span> American lawyer & politician (born 1969)

Linda Teresa Sánchez is an American politician and former labor lawyer serving as the U.S. representative for California's 38th congressional district since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, she was first elected to Congress in 2002 in California's 39th congressional district. Sánchez serves on the Ways and Means Committee; she was the ranking member on the House Ethics Committee until 2017. In the 114th Congress, she chaired the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unborn Victims of Violence Act</span> Law that recognizes an embryo or fetus as a legal victim

The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 is a United States law that recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."

Conscience clauses are legal clauses attached to laws in some parts of the United States and other countries which permit pharmacists, physicians, and/or other providers of health care not to provide certain medical services for reasons of religion or conscience. It can also involve parents withholding consenting for particular treatments for their children.

Catholic Democrats is an American not-for-profit organization of Catholics to support the Democratic Party, based in Boston, United States. The Catholic Democrats have more than 60,000 members in all 50 American states and Puerto Rico. It claims no authorization from the Catholic Church, or any Catholic bishop, Catholic diocese, candidate or candidate committee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Americans United for Life</span> Public interest law firm

Americans United for Life (AUL) is an American anti-abortion law firm and advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1971, the group opposes abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, embryonic stem cell research, and certain contraceptive methods. The organization has led campaigns and been involved in judicial actions to prevent the passage and implementation of legislation that permits abortion, or may increase prevalence of abortion, including successfully defending the Hyde Amendment in the U.S. Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Douglas Kmiec</span> American lawyer (born 1951)

Douglas William Kmiec is an American legal scholar, author, and former U.S. ambassador. He is the Caruso Family Chair and Professor of Constitutional Law at Pepperdine University School of Law. Kmiec came to prominence during the 2008 United States presidential election when, although a Republican, he endorsed Democrat Barack Obama. In July 2009, he was nominated by President Obama to serve as U.S. Ambassador to Malta. He was confirmed by the Senate and served for close to two years as ambassador to Malta. He resigned his post effective May 31, 2011.

The Employee Free Choice Act is the name for several legislative bills on US labor law which have been proposed and sometimes introduced into one or both chambers of the U.S. Congress.

The proposed Sanctity of Life Act was a bill first introduced in the United States House of Representatives by Rep. Steve Stockman (R-TX) on July 20, 1995, and co-sponsored by Rep. Barbara Cubin (R-WY). It was reintroduced with similar text by Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) in 2005 in the 109th United States Congress, 110th United States Congress, 111th United States Congress, and the 112th United States Congress. The repeatedly introduced bill sparked advocacy from anti-abortion activists and opposition from abortion-rights activists. The bill has never become law.

The proposed America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 was an unsuccessful bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 14, 2009. The bill was introduced during the first session of the 111th Congress as part of an effort of the Democratic Party leadership to enact health care reform. The bill was not approved by the House, but was superseded by a similar bill, the proposed Affordable Health Care for America Act, which was passed by the House in November 2009, by a margin of 220-215 votes but later abandoned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Respect for Marriage Act</span> 2022 U.S. federal law

The Respect for Marriage Act is a landmark United States federal law passed by the 117th United States Congress and signed into law by President Joe Biden. It repeals the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), requires the U.S. federal government and all U.S. states and territories to recognize the validity of same-sex and interracial civil marriages in the United States, and protects religious liberty. Its first version in 2009 was supported by former Republican U.S. Representative Bob Barr, the original sponsor of DOMA, and former President Bill Clinton, who signed DOMA in 1996. Iterations of the proposal were put forth in the 111th, 112th, 113th, 114th, and 117th Congresses.

The Affordable Health Care for America Act was a bill that was crafted by the United States House of Representatives of the 111th United States Congress on October 29, 2009. The bill was sponsored by Representative Charles Rangel. At the encouragement of the Obama administration, the 111th Congress devoted much of its time to enacting reform of the United States' health care system. Known as the "House bill,” HR 3962 was the House of Representatives' chief legislative proposal during the health reform debate.

The Stupak–Pitts Amendment was a proposed amendment to the Affordable Health Care for America Act of 2010 (AHCAA). It was submitted by Representatives Bart Stupak and Joseph R. Pitts. Its stated purpose was to prohibit the use of federal funds "to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion" except in cases of rape, incest or danger to the life of the mother. It was adopted by the House but not included in the Senate's version, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Representatives who support abortion rights said they would oppose AHCAA with the Stupak-Pitts language, and proposed to adopt PPACA. Stupak and several supporters said they would oppose PPACA without the amendment, but withdrew their opposition after President Obama promised an executive order to bar such funding. Anti-abortion groups criticized this action, saying that the executive order would not be effective.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bob Casey Jr.</span> American lawyer and politician (born 1960)

Robert Patrick Casey Jr. is an American lawyer and politician who is the senior United States senator from Pennsylvania, a seat he has held since 2007. He is a member of the Democratic Party.

The Catholic Church and abortion in the United States deals with the views and activities of the Catholic Church in the United States in relation to the abortion debate. The Catholic Church opposes abortion and has campaigned against abortion in the United States, both saying that it is immoral and making statements and taking actions in opposition to its classification as legal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political positions of Paul Ryan</span> Political positions of Paul Ryan, U.S. Representative from Wisconsin

The political positions of Paul Ryan, the U.S. representative from Wisconsin's 1st congressional district from 1999 to 2019 and the 54th speaker of the United States House of Representatives from 2015 to 2019, were generally conservative, with a focus on fiscal policy. Ryan was Chairman of the House Budget Committee from 2011 to 2015 and of Ways and Means in 2015. Ryan was the Republican nominee for Vice President as the running mate of Mitt Romney in the 2012 presidential election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act</span> Congressional bill

The Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act is a congressional bill that would, in most cases, make it unlawful to perform an abortion if the estimated post-fertilization age of a fetus is 20 weeks or more. The bill is based upon the assertion that a fetus is capable of feeling pain during an abortion at and after that point in a pregnancy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women's Health Protection Act</span>

The Women's Health Protection Act is a piece of legislation introduced in the United States House of Representatives aimed at expanding abortion rights established in Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992). It was first introduced in 2013 by Congresswoman Judy Chu and sponsored by U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal. In the 117th Congress, the act was re-introduced in response to Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson and later Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. In September 2021, it passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 218-211, and again by a vote of 219-210 in July 2022, but it was defeated in the Senate on a 46–48 vote in February 2022 and a 49–51 vote in May 2022.

References

  1. Congressional Research Services (CRS) Summary of H.R. 1964.
  2. 1 2 [ permanent dead link ]
  3. 1 2 "Catholics wary of possible bill on abortion" Archived November 29, 2018, at the Wayback Machine .
  4. American Center for Law and Justice. Executive Summary of the Freedom of Choice Act Archived 2008-11-28 at the Wayback Machine May 1, 2007
  5. Barack Obama Promises to Sign FOCA YouTube.com, posted July 9, 2008.
  6. "Obama on FOCA 2.0". April 30, 2009.
  7. "Women's Health Protection Act of 2013 (2013 - S. 1696)". GovTrack.us. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  8. McCormack, John (30 June 2022). "Why Didn't Democrats Codify Roe When They Had the Chance?". National Review. Retrieved 17 May 2023.
  9. Choice Chat transcript Archived 2008-10-12 at the Wayback Machine NARAL Pro Choice America
  10. 1 2 "Pro-Life Activities". www.usccb.org.
  11. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.1173%5B%5D:
  12. "The "Freedom of Choice Act:" Most Radical Abortion Legislation in U.S. History" (PDF). USCCB. 2008-09-30. Retrieved 2008-11-08.
  13. Kumpel, Robert. "Why Pro-Lifers Fear FOCA" Archived 2009-02-17 at the Wayback Machine The National Catholic Register
  14. Bowman, Matt. "Obama's Gift to America" Archived 2009-04-06 at the Wayback Machine The American Spectator. October 2, 2008.
  15. "Cardinal George Warns Catholic Members of Congress About FOCA -- Opinion Central -- GOPUSA". Archived from the original on 2008-12-28. Retrieved 2009-02-11.
  16. Kmiec Responds to Criticism on Abortion Reduction "Scam" Beliefnet
  17. "Obama's Threat to Catholic Hospitals" Melinda Henneberger writing in Slate
  18. "Sterilization or Abortion" US Code § 300a–7.
  19. "What Would FOCA Really Do?" Emily Douglas writing at RH Reality Check
  20. "Rumors aside, FOCA legislation no threat to Catholic health care" Archived 2009-04-03 at the Wayback Machine Nancy Frazier O'Brien, Catholic News Service, January 27, 2009
  21. "Obama's Threat to Catholic Hospitals" Page 2
  22. Yoest, Charmaine, Ph.D. "An Open Letter to Senator Obama on Behalf of All Ohio Parents" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-11-08.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  23. "Catholic Vote". Archived from the original on 2015-02-25. Retrieved 2014-06-22.
  24. "Jill Stanek".[ permanent dead link ]
  25. "Illinois Federation for Right to Life - Students: 'What the FOCA?!'". www.ifrl.org.
  26. Stolberg, Sheryl (2009-05-14). "On Abortion, Obama Is Drawn Into Debate He Had Hoped to Avoid". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 2022-05-05. Retrieved 2022-05-06.