Furry's theorem

Last updated
This triangle diagram is forbidden by Furry's theorem in quantum electrodynamics. Triangle diagram.svg
This triangle diagram is forbidden by Furry's theorem in quantum electrodynamics.

In quantum electrodynamics, Furry's theorem states that if a Feynman diagram consists of a closed loop of fermion lines with an odd number of vertices, its contribution to the amplitude vanishes. As a corollary, a single photon cannot arise from the vacuum or be absorbed by it. The theorem was first derived by Wendell H. Furry in 1937, [1] as a direct consequence of the conservation of energy and charge conjugation symmetry.

Contents

Theory

Quantum electrodynamics has a number of symmetries, one of them being the discrete symmetry of charge conjugation. This acts on fields through a unitary charge conjugation operator which anticommutes with the photon field as , while leaving the vacuum state invariant . Considering the simplest case of the correlation function of a single photon operator gives

so this correlation function must vanish. [2] For photon operators, this argument shows that under charge conjugation this picks up a factor of and thus vanishes when is odd. More generally, since the charge conjugation operator also anticommutes with the vector current , Furry's theorem states that the correlation function of any odd number of on-shell or off-shell photon fields and/or currents must vanish in quantum electrodynamics.

Since the theorem holds at the non-perturbative level, it must also hold at each order in perturbation theory. [3] At leading order this means that any fermion loop with an odd number of vertices must have a vanishing contribution to the amplitude. An explicit calculation of these diagrams reveals that this is because the diagram with a fermion going clockwise around the loop cancels with the second diagram where the fermion goes anticlockwise. The vanishing of the three vertex loop can also be seen as a consequence of the renormalizability of quantum electrodynamics since the bare Lagrangian does not have any counterterms involving three photons. [4]

Applications and limitations

Furry's theorem allows for the simplification of a number of amplitude calculations in quantum electrodynamics. [5] In particular, since the result also holds when photons are off-shell, all Feynman diagrams which have at least one internal fermion loops with an odd number of vertices have a vanishing contribution to the amplitude and can be ignored. Historically the theorem was important in showing that the scattering of photons by an external field, known as Delbrück scattering, does not proceed via a triangle diagram and must instead proceed through a box diagram. [1]

In the presence of a background charge density or a nonzero chemical potential, Furry's theorem is broken, although if both these vanish then it does hold at nonzero temperatures as well as at zero temperatures. [6] It also does not apply in the presence of a strong background magnetic field where photon splitting interactions are allowed, a process that may be detected in astrophysical settings such as around neutron stars. [7] The theorem also does not hold when Weyl fermions are involved in the loops rather than Dirac fermions, resulting in non-vanishing odd vertex number diagrams. In particular, the non-vanishing of the triangle diagram with Weyl fermions gives rise to the chiral anomaly, with the sum of these having to cancel for a quantum theory to be consistent.

While the theorem has been formulated in quantum electrodynamics, a version of it holds more generally. For example, while the Standard Model is not charge conjugation invariant due to weak interactions, the fermion loop diagrams with an odd number of photons attached will still vanish since these are equivalent to a purely quantum electrodynamical diagram. Similarly, any diagram involving such loops as sub-diagrams will also vanish. It is however no longer true that all odd number photon diagrams need to vanish. For example, relaxing the requirement of charge conjugation and parity invariance of quantum electrodynamics, as occurs when weak interactions are included, allows for a three-photon vertex term. [8] While this term does give rise to interactions, they only occur if two of the photons are virtual; searching for such interactions must be done indirectly, such as through bremsstrahlung experiments from electron-positron collisions. [9]

In non-Abelian Yang–Mills theories, Furry's theorem does not hold since these involve noncommuting color charges. For example, the quark triangle diagrams with three external gluons are proportional to two different generator traces and so they do not cancel. [10] [11] However, charge conjugation arguments can still be applied in limited cases such as to deduce that the triangle diagram for a color neutral spin boson vanishes. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum field theory</span> Theoretical framework

In theoretical physics, quantum field theory (QFT) is a theoretical framework that combines classical field theory, special relativity, and quantum mechanics. QFT is used in particle physics to construct physical models of subatomic particles and in condensed matter physics to construct models of quasiparticles. The current standard model of particle physics is based on quantum field theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quantum electrodynamics</span> Quantum field theory of electromagnetism

In particle physics, quantum electrodynamics (QED) is the relativistic quantum field theory of electrodynamics. In essence, it describes how light and matter interact and is the first theory where full agreement between quantum mechanics and special relativity is achieved. QED mathematically describes all phenomena involving electrically charged particles interacting by means of exchange of photons and represents the quantum counterpart of classical electromagnetism giving a complete account of matter and light interaction.

Spontaneous emission is the process in which a quantum mechanical system transits from an excited energy state to a lower energy state and emits a quantized amount of energy in the form of a photon. Spontaneous emission is ultimately responsible for most of the light we see all around us; it is so ubiquitous that there are many names given to what is essentially the same process. If atoms are excited by some means other than heating, the spontaneous emission is called luminescence. For example, fireflies are luminescent. And there are different forms of luminescence depending on how excited atoms are produced. If the excitation is effected by the absorption of radiation the spontaneous emission is called fluorescence. Sometimes molecules have a metastable level and continue to fluoresce long after the exciting radiation is turned off; this is called phosphorescence. Figurines that glow in the dark are phosphorescent. Lasers start via spontaneous emission, then during continuous operation work by stimulated emission.

In particle physics, the Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation derived by British physicist Paul Dirac in 1928. In its free form, or including electromagnetic interactions, it describes all spin-12 massive particles, called "Dirac particles", such as electrons and quarks for which parity is a symmetry. It is consistent with both the principles of quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity, and was the first theory to account fully for special relativity in the context of quantum mechanics. It was validated by accounting for the fine structure of the hydrogen spectrum in a completely rigorous way.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renormalization</span> Method in physics used to deal with infinities

Renormalization is a collection of techniques in quantum field theory, statistical field theory, and the theory of self-similar geometric structures, that are used to treat infinities arising in calculated quantities by altering values of these quantities to compensate for effects of their self-interactions. But even if no infinities arose in loop diagrams in quantum field theory, it could be shown that it would be necessary to renormalize the mass and fields appearing in the original Lagrangian.

In physics, the Schwinger model, named after Julian Schwinger, is the model describing 1+1D Lorentzian quantum electrodynamics which includes electrons, coupled to photons.

In theoretical physics, a chiral anomaly is the anomalous nonconservation of a chiral current. In everyday terms, it is equivalent to a sealed box that contained equal numbers of left and right-handed bolts, but when opened was found to have more left than right, or vice versa.

In classical and quantum mechanics, geometric phase is a phase difference acquired over the course of a cycle, when a system is subjected to cyclic adiabatic processes, which results from the geometrical properties of the parameter space of the Hamiltonian. The phenomenon was independently discovered by S. Pancharatnam (1956), in classical optics and by H. C. Longuet-Higgins (1958) in molecular physics; it was generalized by Michael Berry in (1984). It is also known as the Pancharatnam–Berry phase, Pancharatnam phase, or Berry phase. It can be seen in the conical intersection of potential energy surfaces and in the Aharonov–Bohm effect. Geometric phase around the conical intersection involving the ground electronic state of the C6H3F3+ molecular ion is discussed on pages 385–386 of the textbook by Bunker and Jensen. In the case of the Aharonov–Bohm effect, the adiabatic parameter is the magnetic field enclosed by two interference paths, and it is cyclic in the sense that these two paths form a loop. In the case of the conical intersection, the adiabatic parameters are the molecular coordinates. Apart from quantum mechanics, it arises in a variety of other wave systems, such as classical optics. As a rule of thumb, it can occur whenever there are at least two parameters characterizing a wave in the vicinity of some sort of singularity or hole in the topology; two parameters are required because either the set of nonsingular states will not be simply connected, or there will be nonzero holonomy.

In quantum field theory, Wilson loops are gauge invariant operators arising from the parallel transport of gauge variables around closed loops. They encode all gauge information of the theory, allowing for the construction of loop representations which fully describe gauge theories in terms of these loops. In pure gauge theory they play the role of order operators for confinement, where they satisfy what is known as the area law. Originally formulated by Kenneth G. Wilson in 1974, they were used to construct links and plaquettes which are the fundamental parameters in lattice gauge theory. Wilson loops fall into the broader class of loop operators, with some other notable examples being 't Hooft loops, which are magnetic duals to Wilson loops, and Polyakov loops, which are the thermal version of Wilson loops.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Propagator</span> Function in quantum field theory showing probability amplitudes of moving particles

In quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, the propagator is a function that specifies the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one place to another in a given period of time, or to travel with a certain energy and momentum. In Feynman diagrams, which serve to calculate the rate of collisions in quantum field theory, virtual particles contribute their propagator to the rate of the scattering event described by the respective diagram. Propagators may also be viewed as the inverse of the wave operator appropriate to the particle, and are, therefore, often called (causal) Green's functions.

In lattice field theory, fermion doubling occurs when naively putting fermionic fields on a lattice, resulting in more fermionic states than expected. For the naively discretized Dirac fermions in Euclidean dimensions, each fermionic field results in identical fermion species, referred to as different tastes of the fermion. The fermion doubling problem is intractably linked to chiral invariance by the Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem. Most strategies used to solve the problem require using modified fermions which reduce to the Dirac fermion only in the continuum limit.

In quantum field theory, the theta vacuum is the semi-classical vacuum state of non-abelian Yang–Mills theories specified by the vacuum angleθ that arises when the state is written as a superposition of an infinite set of topologically distinct vacuum states. The dynamical effects of the vacuum are captured in the Lagrangian formalism through the presence of a θ-term which in quantum chromodynamics leads to the fine tuning problem known as the strong CP problem. It was discovered in 1976 by Curtis Callan, Roger Dashen, and David Gross, and independently by Roman Jackiw and Claudio Rebbi.

In physics, the Majorana equation is a relativistic wave equation. It is named after the Italian physicist Ettore Majorana, who proposed it in 1937 as a means of describing fermions that are their own antiparticle. Particles corresponding to this equation are termed Majorana particles, although that term now has a more expansive meaning, referring to any fermionic particle that is its own anti-particle.

Resonance fluorescence is the process in which a two-level atom system interacts with the quantum electromagnetic field if the field is driven at a frequency near to the natural frequency of the atom.

The neutrino theory of light is the proposal that the photon is a composite particle formed of a neutrino–antineutrino pair. It is based on the idea that emission and absorption of a photon corresponds to the creation and annihilation of a particle–antiparticle pair. The neutrino theory of light is not currently accepted as part of mainstream physics, as according to the Standard Model the photon is an elementary particle, a gauge boson.

In physics, Berry connection and Berry curvature are related concepts which can be viewed, respectively, as a local gauge potential and gauge field associated with the Berry phase or geometric phase. The concept was first introduced by S. Pancharatnam as geometric phase and later elaborately explained and popularized by Michael Berry in a paper published in 1984 emphasizing how geometric phases provide a powerful unifying concept in several branches of classical and quantum physics.

In quantum field theory, and especially in quantum electrodynamics, the interacting theory leads to infinite quantities that have to be absorbed in a renormalization procedure, in order to be able to predict measurable quantities. The renormalization scheme can depend on the type of particles that are being considered. For particles that can travel asymptotically large distances, or for low energy processes, the on-shell scheme, also known as the physical scheme, is appropriate. If these conditions are not fulfilled, one can turn to other schemes, like the minimal subtraction scheme.

In lattice field theory, the Nielsen–Ninomiya theorem is a no-go theorem about placing chiral fermions on a lattice. In particular, under very general assumptions such as locality, hermiticity, and translational symmetry, any lattice formulation of chiral fermions necessarily leads to fermion doubling, where there are the same number of left-handed and right-handed fermions. It was first proved by Holger Bech Nielsen and Masao Ninomiya in 1981 using two methods, one that relied on homotopy theory and another that relied on differential topology. Another proof provided by Daniel Friedan uses differential geometry. The theorem was also generalized to any regularization scheme of chiral theories. One consequence of the theorem is that the Standard Model cannot be put on a lattice. Common methods for overcoming the fermion doubling problem is to use modified fermion formulations such as staggered fermions, Wilson fermions, or Ginsparg–Wilson fermions, among others.

The soler model is a quantum field theory model of Dirac fermions interacting via four fermion interactions in 3 spatial and 1 time dimension. It was introduced in 1938 by Dmitri Ivanenko and re-introduced and investigated in 1970 by Mario Soler as a toy model of self-interacting electron.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Loop representation in gauge theories and quantum gravity</span> Description of gauge theories using loop operators

Attempts have been made to describe gauge theories in terms of extended objects such as Wilson loops and holonomies. The loop representation is a quantum hamiltonian representation of gauge theories in terms of loops. The aim of the loop representation in the context of Yang–Mills theories is to avoid the redundancy introduced by Gauss gauge symmetries allowing to work directly in the space of physical states. The idea is well known in the context of lattice Yang–Mills theory. Attempts to explore the continuous loop representation was made by Gambini and Trias for canonical Yang–Mills theory, however there were difficulties as they represented singular objects. As we shall see the loop formalism goes far beyond a simple gauge invariant description, in fact it is the natural geometrical framework to treat gauge theories and quantum gravity in terms of their fundamental physical excitations.

References

  1. 1 2 Furry, W. H. (1937-01-15). "A Symmetry Theorem in the Positron Theory". Physical Review. 51 (2): 125–129. Bibcode:1937PhRv...51..125F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.51.125. ISSN   0031-899X.
  2. Peskin, M.E.; Schroeder, D.V. (1995). "10". An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Westview Press. p. 318. ISBN   9780201503975.
  3. Weinberg, S. (1995). "10". The Quantum Theory of Fields: Foundations. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. p. 428. ISBN   9780521670531.
  4. Sterman, G. (1993). "11". An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge University Press. pp. 326–327. ISBN   978-0521311328.
  5. Berestetskii, V.B. (1982). "8". Quantum Electrodynamics: Volume 4 (Course of Theoretical Physics). Butterworth-Heinemann. pp. 315–316. ISBN   978-0750633710.
  6. Majumder, A.; Bourque, A.; Gale, C. (2004). "Broken symmetries and dilepton production from gluon fusion in a quark gluon plasma". Phys. Rev. C. 69 (6): 064901. arXiv: hep-ph/0311178 . Bibcode:2004PhRvC..69f4901M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.064901. S2CID   118879778.
  7. Adler, S.L. (1971). "Photon splitting and photon dispersion in a strong magnetic field". Annals of Physics. 67 (2): 599–647. Bibcode:1971AnPhy..67..599A. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(71)90154-0.
  8. Delbourgo, R. (1976). "The three-photon vertex". J. Phys. G. 2 (11): 787. Bibcode:1976JPhG....2..787D. doi:10.1088/0305-4616/2/11/003. S2CID   250863523.
  9. Basham, C.L.; Kabir, P.K. (1977). "Possible three-photon couplings". Phys. Rev. D. 15 (11): 3388–3393. Bibcode:1977PhRvD..15.3388B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.3388.
  10. Dissertori, G. (2009). "3". Quantum Chromodynamics High Energy Experiments and Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 85–86. ISBN   978-0199566419.
  11. Smolyakov, N. V. (1982). "Furry theorem for non-abelian gauge Lagrangians". Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. 50 (3): 225–228. Bibcode:1982TMP....50..225S. doi:10.1007/BF01016449. ISSN   0040-5779. S2CID   119765674.
  12. Englert, C.; Hackstein, C.; Spannowsky, M. (2010). "Measuring spin and CP from semihadronic ZZ decays using jet substructure". Phys. Rev. D. 82 (11): 114024. arXiv: 1010.0676 . Bibcode:2010PhRvD..82k4024E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.114024. S2CID   48357670.