Gerhard Weinberg

Last updated
Gerhard Weinberg
Gerhard Weinberg.jpg
Weinberg in January 2003
Born (1928-01-01) 1 January 1928 (age 96)
Hanover, German Reich
(now Germany)
Academic work
Notable students Doris Bergen

Norman J.W. Goda

Alan E. Steinweis
Main interestsHistory of the Third Reich, diplomatic history and military history
Notable worksA World at Arms: A Global History of World War II and other books

Gerhard Ludwig Weinberg (born 1 January 1928) is a German-born American diplomatic and military historian noted for his studies in the history of Nazi Germany and World War II. Weinberg is the William Rand Kenan, Jr. Professor Emeritus of History at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He has been a member of the history faculty at UNC-Chapel Hill since 1974. Previously he served on the faculties of the University of Michigan (1959–1974) and the University of Kentucky (1957–1959).

Contents

Youth and education

Weinberg was born in Hanover, Germany, and resided there the first ten years of his life. As Jews living in Nazi Germany, he and his family suffered increasing persecution. They emigrated in 1938, first to the United Kingdom and then in 1941 to New York State. Weinberg became a U.S. citizen, served in the U.S. Army during its Occupation of Japan in 1946–1947 and became a corporal. He returned to receive a BA (1948) in social studies from the New York State College for Teachers at Albany. He received his MA (1949) and PhD (1951) in history from the University of Chicago. [1] Weinberg recounted some of his childhood memories and experiences in a two-hour long oral history interview for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. [2]

Early career

Weinberg has studied the foreign policy of National Socialist Germany and the Second World War for his entire professional life. His doctoral dissertation (1951), directed by Hans Rothfels, was "German Relations with Russia, 1939–1941," subsequently published in 1954 as Germany and the Soviet Union, 1939–1941. From 1951 to 1954 Weinberg was a Research Analyst for the War Documentation Project at Columbia University and was Director of the American Historical Association Project for Microfilming Captured German Documents in 1956–1957. After joining the project to microfilm captured records at Alexandria, Virginia, in the 1950s, Weinberg published the Guide to Captured German Documents (1952). [3] In 1958, Weinberg made the discovery of Hitler’s so-called Zweites Buch (Second Book), an unpublished sequel to Mein Kampf , among captured German files. His find led to his publication in 1961 of Hitlers zweites Buch: Ein Dokument aus dem Jahr 1928 , later published in English as Hitler's Second Book: The Unpublished Sequel to Mein Kampf (2003).

In 1953–1954, Weinberg was involved in a scholarly debate with Hans-Günther Seraphim  [ de ] and Andreas Hillgruber on the pages of the Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte journal over the question of whether Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, was a preventive war forced on Hitler by fears of an imminent Soviet attack. In a 1956 review of Hillgruber's book Hitler, König Carol und Marschall Antonescu, Weinberg accused Hillgruber of engaging at times in a pro-German apologia such as asserting that World War II began with the Anglo–French declarations of war against Germany on September 3, 1939, rather than the German invasion of Poland on September 1, 1939. [4] In his 1980 monograph The Foreign Policy of Hitler's Germany Starting World War II 1937–1939, Weinberg noted that about the question of the war's origins that "my view is somewhat different" from Hillgruber's. [5] In his 1981 book World in the Balance, Weinberg stated that "Hillgruber's interpretation is not, however, followed here". [6] In his 1994 book A World At Arms, Weinberg called Hillgruber's thesis presented in his book Zweierlei Untergang – Die Zerschlagung des Deutschen Reiches und das Ende des europäischen Judentums (Two Kinds of Ruin – The Smashing of the German Reich and the End of European Jewry) "... a preposterous reversal of the realities". [7] Weinberg sarcastically commented that if the German Army had held out longer against the Red Army in 1945 as Hillgruber had wished, the result would not have been the saving of more German lives as Hillgruber had claimed, but rather an American atomic bombing of Germany. [7]

Another scholarly debate involving Weinberg occurred in 1962–1963 when Weinberg wrote a review of David Hoggan's 1961 book Der Erzwungene Krieg for the American Historical Review . The book claimed that the outbreak of war in 1939 had been due to an Anglo–Polish conspiracy against Germany. In his review, Weinberg suggested that Hoggan had probably engaged in forging documents (the charge was later confirmed). Weinberg noted that Hoggan's method comprised taking of all Hitler's "peace speeches" at face value, and simply ignoring evidence of German intentions for aggression such as the Hossbach Memorandum. [8] Moreover, Weinberg noted that Hoggan often rearranged events in a chronology designed to support his thesis such as placing the Polish rejection of the German demand for the return of the Free City of Danzig (modern Gdańsk, Poland) to the Reich in October 1938 instead of in August 1939, thereby giving a false impression that the Polish refusal to consider changing the status of Danzig was due to British pressure. [8]

Weinberg noted that Hoggan had appeared to engage in forgery by manufacturing documents and attributing statements that were not found in documents in the archives. [9] As an example, Weinberg noted during a meeting between Neville Chamberlain and Adam von Trott zu Solz in June 1939, Hoggan had Chamberlain saying that the British guarantee of Polish independence given on March 31, 1939 "did not please him personally at all. He thereby gave the impression that Halifax was solely responsible for British policy". [10] As Weinberg noted, what Chamberlain actually said was:

Do you [(vonTrott zu Solz)] believe that I undertook these commitments gladly? Hitler forced me into them! [10]

Subsequently, both Hoggan and his mentor Harry Elmer Barnes wrote a series of letters to the American Historical Review protesting Weinberg's review and attempting to rebut his arguments. Weinberg in turn published letters rebutting Barnes's and Hoggan's claims.

Major works

Weinberg's early work was the two-volume history of Hitler's diplomatic preparations for war: The Foreign Policy of Hitler's Germany (1970 and 1980; republished 1994). In this work, Weinberg portrayed a Hitler committed to his ideology, no matter how inane or stupid it might seem to others, and therefore as a leader determined to use foreign policy to effect a specific set of goals. Weinberg thus countered others, such as British historian A.J.P. Taylor, who had argued in The Origins of the Second World War (1962) that Hitler had acted like a traditional statesman in taking advantage of the weaknesses of foreign rivals. The first volume of The Foreign Policy of Hitler's Germany received the George Louis Beer Prize of the American Historical Association in 1971. [11]

Weinberg's attention then turned to the Second World War. He published dozens of articles on the war and volumes of collected essays such as World in the Balance: Behind the Scenes of World War II (1981). All of that work was preparation for the release in 1994 of his 1000-page one-volume history of the war, A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II, for which he won a second George Louis Beer Prize in 1994. [11] Weinberg continued his studies of the era of the war even after the publication of his general history by examining the conceptions of World War II's leaders about the world that they thought they were fighting to create. It was published in 2005 as Visions of Victory: The Hopes of Eight World War II Leaders. In that book, Weinberg looked at what eight leaders were hoping to see after the war ended. The eight leaders profiled were Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, General Hideki Tōjō, Chiang Kai-shek, Joseph Stalin, Winston Churchill, General Charles de Gaulle, and Franklin D. Roosevelt.

Weinberg has continued to be a critic of those who claim that Operation Barbarossa was a "preventive war" forced on Hitler. In a review of Stalin's War by Ernst Topitsch  [ de ], Weinberg called those who promote the preventive war thesis as believers in "fairy tales". [12] In 1996, Weinberg was somewhat less harsh in his review of Topitsch's book but was still very critical in his assessment of the Czech historian R.C. Raack's Stalin's Drive to the West. (The latter book did not accept the preventive war thesis, but Raack still argued that Soviet foreign policy was far more aggressive than many other historians would accept and that Western leaders were too pliant in their dealings with Stalin.) [13]

In the globalist versus continentalist debate, concerning whether Hitler had ambitions to conquer the entire world or merely the continent of Europe, Weinberg takes a globalist view, arguing Hitler had plans for world conquest. On the question of whether Hitler intended to murder Europe's Jews before coming to power, Weinberg takes an intentionalist position, arguing that Hitler had formulated ideas for the Holocaust by the time he wrote Mein Kampf . In a 1994 article, Weinberg criticized the American functionalist historian Christopher Browning for arguing that the decision to launch the "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" was taken in September–October 1941. [14] In Weinberg's view, July 1941 was the more probable date. [14] In the same article, Weinberg praised the work of the American historian Henry Friedlander for arguing that the origins of the Holocaust can be traced to the Action T4 program, which began in January 1939. [15] Finally, Weinberg praised the thesis put forward by the American historian Richard Breitman that planning for the Shoah began during the winter of 1940–1941 but argued that Breitman missed a crucial point: because the T4 program had generated public protests, the Einsatzgruppen massacres of Jews in the Soviet Union were intended as a sort of "trial run" to gauge reaction of the German people to genocide. [16]

A major theme of Weinberg's work about the origins of the Second World War has been a revised picture of Neville Chamberlain and the Munich Agreement. Based on his study of German documents, Weinberg established that the demands made by Hitler on the cession of the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia were not intended to be accepted but were rather to provide a pretext for aggression against Czechoslovakia. [17] Weinberg has established that Hitler regarded the Munich Agreement as a diplomatic defeat, which deprived Germany of the war that was intended to begin on October 1, 1938. [18] Weinberg has argued against the thesis that Chamberlain was responsible for the failure of the proposed putsch in Germany in 1938. [19] Weinberg has argued that the three visits to London in the summer of 1938 of three messengers from the opposition, each bearing the same message (if only Britain would promise to go to war if Czechoslovakia was attacked, then a putsch would remove the Nazi regime, each ignorant of the other messengers' existence), presented a picture of a group of people apparently not very well organized and that it is unreasonable for historians to have expected Chamberlain to stake all upon uncorroborated words of such a badly-organized group. [19] In a 2007 review of Ian Kershaw's Fateful Choices, Weinberg, though generally favorable to Kershaw, commented that Chamberlain played a far more important role in the decision to fight on despite the great German victories in the spring of 1940 and in ensuring that Churchill was his successor, instead of the peace-minded Lord Halifax, than Kershaw gave him credit for in his book. [20] Weinberg's picture of Chamberlain has led to criticism; the American historian Williamson Murray condemned Weinberg for his "... attempts to present the British Prime Minister in as favorable a light as possible". [21]

Hitler diaries controversy

In 1983, when the German illustrated weekly magazine Der Stern reported its purchase of the alleged diaries of Adolf Hitler, the U.S. weekly magazine Newsweek asked Weinberg to examine them hurriedly in a bank vault in Zürich, Switzerland. Together with Hugh Trevor-Roper and Eberhard Jäckel, Weinberg was one of the three experts on Hitler asked to examine the alleged diaries. Having examined the documents for two hours, Weinberg reported in Newsweek that "on balance I am inclined to consider the material authentic." [22] [23] However, he expressed reservations by adding that more work would be needed to "make the verdict [of authenticity] airtight", [22] and said he "would feel more comfortable if a German expert on the Third Reich who has already made his reputation had been brought in to look at the material". [22] Weinberg also noted that the purported journals would likely add less to our understanding of the Second World War than many might have thought. When further work was undertaken by the German Federal Archives, the "diaries" were deemed forgeries.

Professional accomplishments

Weinberg was elected president of the German Studies Association in 1996. Weinberg has been a fellow of the American Council of Learned Societies, a Fulbright professor at the University of Bonn, a Guggenheim Fellow, and a Shapiro Senior Scholar in Residence at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum among many other such honors. [1]

In June 2009, Weinberg was selected to receive the $100,000 Pritzker Military Library Literature Award for lifetime excellence in military writing, sponsored by the Chicago-based Tawani Foundation. [24] As part of his acceptance, he gave a webcast lecture at the library on "New Boundaries for the World: The Postwar Visions of Eight World War II Leaders." [25] He was awarded the 2011 Samuel Eliot Morison Prize, a lifetime achievement award given by the Society for Military History. [26]

Works

Books

Articles

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joachim von Ribbentrop</span> German politician and diplomat (1893–1946)

Ulrich Friedrich-Wilhelm Joachim von Ribbentrop was a German politician and diplomat who served as Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nazi Germany from 1938 to 1945.

<i>Mein Kampf</i> 1925 autobiographical manifesto by Adolf Hitler

Mein Kampf is a 1925 autobiographical manifesto by Nazi Party leader Adolf Hitler. The work describes the process by which Hitler became antisemitic and outlines his political ideology and future plans for Germany. Volume 1 of Mein Kampf was published in 1925 and Volume 2 in 1926. The book was edited first by Emil Maurice, then by Hitler's deputy Rudolf Hess.

<span title="German-language text"><i lang="de">Lebensraum</i></span> German "living space" ideas of settler colonialism (1890s–1940s)

Lebensraum is a German concept of expansionism and Völkisch nationalism, the philosophy and policies of which were common to German politics from the 1890s to the 1940s. First popularized around 1901, Lebensraum became a geopolitical goal of Imperial Germany in World War I (1914–1918), as the core element of the Septemberprogramm of territorial expansion. The most extreme form of this ideology was supported by the Nazi Party and Nazi Germany. Lebensraum was a leading motivation of Nazi Germany to initiate World War II, and it would continue this policy until the end of the conflict.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">A. J. P. Taylor</span> English historian of European diplomacy (1906–1990)

Alan John Percivale Taylor was a British historian who specialised in 19th- and 20th-century European diplomacy. Both a journalist and a broadcaster, he became well known to millions through his television lectures. His combination of academic rigour and popular appeal led the historian Richard Overy to describe him as "the Macaulay of our age". In a 2011 poll by History Today magazine, he was named the fourth most important historian of the previous 60 years.

Diplomatic history deals with the history of international relations between states. Diplomatic history can be different from international relations in that the former can concern itself with the foreign policy of one state while the latter deals with relations between two or more states. Diplomatic history tends to be more concerned with the history of diplomacy, but international relations concern more with current events and creating a model intended to shed explanatory light on international politics.

The Hossbach Memorandum is a summary of a meeting in Berlin on 5 November 1937 attended by German dictator Adolf Hitler and his military and foreign policy leadership in which Hitler outlined his expansionist policies. The meeting marked the beginning of Hitler's foreign policies becoming radicalised.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans-Ulrich Wehler</span> German historian (1931–2014)

Hans-Ulrich Wehler was a German left-liberal historian known for his role in promoting social history through the "Bielefeld School", and for his critical studies of 19th-century Germany.

Andreas Fritz Hillgruber was a conservative German historian who was influential as a military and diplomatic historian who played a leading role in the Historikerstreit of the 1980s. In his controversial book Zweierlei Untergang, he wrote that historians should "identify" with the Wehrmacht fighting on the Eastern Front and asserted that there was no moral difference between Allied policies towards Germany in 1944 and 1945 and the genocide waged against the Jews. The British historian Richard J. Evans wrote that Hillgruber was a great historian whose once-sterling reputation was in ruins as a result of the Historikerstreit.

Klaus Hildebrand is a German liberal-conservative historian whose area of expertise is 19th–20th-century German political and military history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herbert von Dirksen</span> German diplomat (1882–1955)

Eduard Willy Kurt Herbert von Dirksen was a German diplomat who was the last German ambassador to Britain before World War II.

Hans Rothfels was a German historian. He supported an idea of authoritarian German state, dominance of Germany over Europe and was hostile to Germany's eastern neighbours. After his applications for honorary Aryan status were rejected, due to his Jewish ancestry and increased persecution of Jewish people by Nazis, he was forced to emigrate to the United Kingdom and later to the United States during the Second World War, after which he became opposed to the Nazi regime. Rothfels returned to West Germany after 1945 where he continued to influence history teaching and became an influential figure among West German scholars.

The functionalism–intentionalism debate is a historiographical debate about the reasons for the Holocaust as well as most aspects of the Third Reich, such as foreign policy. It essentially centres on two questions:

<i>Hitlers Zweites Buch</i> Hitlers unpublished second book, focusing on foreign policy

The Zweites Buch, published in English as Hitler's Secret Book and later as Hitler's Second Book, is an unedited transcript of Adolf Hitler's thoughts on foreign policy written in 1928; it was written after Mein Kampf and was not published in his lifetime.

Harry Elmer Barnes was an American historian who, in his later years, was known for his historical revisionism and Holocaust denial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bibliography of Adolf Hitler</span>

The bibliography of Adolf Hitler is an English only non-fiction bibliography. There are thousands of books written about Adolf Hitler; therefore, this is not an all-inclusive list. The list has been segregated into groups to make the list more manageable.

David Leslie Hoggan was an American author of The Forced War: When Peaceful Revision Failed and other works in the German and English languages. He was antisemitic, maintained a close association with various neo-Nazi groups, chose a publishing house run by an unregenerate Nazi, and engaged in Holocaust denial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">German rearmament</span> Military rearmament carried out in Germany during the interwar period (1918–1939)

German rearmament was a policy and practice of rearmament carried out by Germany from 1918 to 1939, in violation of the Treaty of Versailles which required German disarmament after WWI to prevent it starting another war. It began on a small, secret, and informal basis shortly after the treaty was signed, but was openly and massively expanded after the Nazi Party came to power in 1933.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact negotiations</span> Outline of negotiations of Nazi-Soviet non-aggression pact

The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact was an August 23, 1939, agreement between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany colloquially named after Soviet foreign minister Vyacheslav Molotov and German foreign minister Joachim von Ribbentrop. The treaty renounced warfare between the two countries. In addition to stipulations of non-aggression, the treaty included a secret protocol dividing several eastern European countries between the parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European foreign policy of the Chamberlain ministry</span>

The European foreign policy of the Chamberlain ministry from 1937 to 1940 was based on British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's commitment to "peace for our time" by pursuing a policy of appeasement and containment towards Nazi Germany and by increasing the strength of Britain's armed forces until, in September 1939, he delivered an ultimatum over the invasion of Poland, which was followed by a declaration of war against Germany.

The foreign relations of Third Reich were characterized by the territorial expansionist ambitions of Germany's dictator Adolf Hitler and the promotion of the ideologies of anti-communism and antisemitism within Germany and its conquered territories. The Nazi regime oversaw Germany's rise as a militarist world power from the state of humiliation and disempowerment it had experienced following its defeat in World War I. From the late 1930s to its defeat in 1945, Germany was the most formidable of the Axis powers - a military alliance between Imperial Japan, Fascist Italy, and their allies and puppet states.

References

Notes

  1. 1 2 "Gerhard L. Weinberg: 2009 Pritzker Literature Award Winner". www.pritzkermilitary.org. Pritzker Military Museum & Library.
  2. ↑ Oral History Interview with Gerhard L. Weinberg, conducted by Astrid M. Eckert (Emory University) on behalf of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, March 2012. Available at http://collections.ushmm.org/search/catalog/irn74729
  3. ↑ On the history of the captured German archives and Weinberg's role, see Astrid M. Eckert, The Struggle for the Files: The Western Allies and the Return of German archives after the Second World War. Cambridge University Press, 2012. ISBN   978-0-521-88018-3, pp. 343–357.
  4. ↑ Weinberg, Gerhard. Review of Hitler, König Carol und Marschall Antonescu: die deutsch-rumänischen Beziehungen, 1938–1944 by Andreas Hillgruber, pages 80–82 in The Journal of Modern History, Volume 28, Issue # 1, March 1956 page 81
  5. ↑ Weinberg, Gerhard. 'The Foreign Policy of Hitler's Germany Starting World War II 1937–1939, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (UCP), 1980 page 657.
  6. ↑ Weinberg, Gerhard. World in the Balance. Hanover: Brandeis University Press 1981, page 82.
  7. 1 2 Weinberg, Gerhard. A World At Arms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1994, 2005, page 1124.
  8. 1 2 Weinberg, Gerhard. Review of Der Erzwungene Krieg, from The American Historical Review, Volume 68, No. 1, October 1962, page 104
  9. ↑ Weinberg, Gerhard. Review of Der Erzwungene Krieg, from The American Historical Review, Volume 68, Number 1, October 1962, pages 104–105
  10. 1 2 Weinberg, Gerhard. Review of Der Erzwungene Krieg, from The American Historical Review, Volume 68, No. 1, October 1962, page 105
  11. 1 2 "George Louis Beer Prize Recipients". American Historical Association . Retrieved December 24, 2017.
  12. ↑ Weinberg, Gerhard. Review of Stalin's War: A Radical New Theory of the Origins of the Second World War by Ernst Topitsch, pages 800–801 from The American Historical Review, Volume 94, Issue # 3, June 1989 page 800.
  13. ↑ Weinberg, Gerhard. Review of Stalin's Drive to the West: The Origins of the Cold War by R.C. Raack, pages 278–279 from Central European History , Volume 29, Issue #2, 1996.
  14. 1 2 Weinberg, Gerhard. "Comments on the Papers by Friedlander, Breitman, and Browning", pages 509–512 from German Studies Review, Volume 17, Issue # 3, October 1994, page 511.
  15. ↑ Weinberg, Gerhard. "Comments on the Papers by Friedlander, Breitman, and Browning", pages 509–512 from German Studies Review , Volume 17, Issue # 3, October 1994, page 509.
  16. ↑ Weinberg, Gerhard. "Comments on the Papers by Friedlander, Breitman, and Browning", pages 509–512 from German Studies Review, Volume 17, Issue # 3, October 1994, page 510.
  17. ↑ Weinberg, Gerhard. "Reflections on Munich After Sixty Years", pages 1–12 from The Munich Crisis, 1938, edited by Igor Lukes and Erik Goldstein, Frank Cass: London 1999, pages 3–5
  18. ↑ Weinberg, Gerhard (November 2002). "No Road From Munich To Iraq". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2011-05-16. Retrieved 2009-05-05.
  19. 1 2 Weinberg, Gerhard. The Foreign Policy of Hitler's Germany Starting World War II. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, Illinois, United States of America, 1980. page 396
  20. ↑ Weinberg, Gerhard (November 2007). "Review of Fateful Choices" (PDF). H-Diplo. Retrieved 2009-05-05.
  21. ↑ Murray, Williamson. The Change in the European Balance In Power, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984, page 471
  22. 1 2 3 Weinberg, Gerhard (2 May 1983). "A Scholar's Appraisal". Newsweek. p. 57.
  23. ↑ Newsweek, May 2, 1983; Robert Harris, Selling Hitler: The Extraordinary Story of the Con Job of the Century -- The Faking of the Hitler "Diaries" (New York: Pantheon, 1986), 272.
  24. ↑ 2009 award Archived 2013-07-02 at the Wayback Machine , official website.
  25. ↑ Webcast Lecture Archived 2012-04-02 at the Wayback Machine at the Pritzker Military Library on March 11, 2010
  26. ↑ "Samuel Eliot Morison Prize previous winners". Society for Military History . Retrieved December 25, 2017.

On Weinberg

By Weinberg

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.