Hunterian transliteration

Last updated

The Hunterian transliteration system is the "national system of romanization in India" and the one officially adopted by the Government of India. [1] [2] [3] Hunterian transliteration was sometimes also called the Jonesian transliteration system because it derived closely from a previous transliteration method developed by William Jones (1746–1794). [4] [5] Upon its establishment, the Sahitya Akademi (India's National Academy of Letters) also adopted the Hunterian method, with additional adaptations, as its standard method of maintaining its bibliography of Indian-language works. [6]

Contents

History

Max Muller's 1866 anusvara transliterations Huntadapt04.png
Max Muller's 1866 anusvara transliterations

The original precursor to the Hunterian system was a transliteration method developed by Charles Wilkins, who is sometimes called the "father of Devanagari typography" because he was also the creator of the first Devanagari typeface. [5] [7] William Jones, who also founded the Asiatic Society, further developed the transliteration method. [5] It was given a more complete form in the late nineteenth century by William Wilson Hunter, then Surveyor General of India. [8] When it was proposed, it immediately met with opposition from supporters of the phonetic Dowler system, which climaxed in a dramatic showdown in an India Council meeting on 28 May 1872 where the new Hunterian method carried the day. The Hunterian method was inherently simpler and extensible to several Indic scripts because it systematized grapheme transliteration, and it came to prevail and gain government and academic acceptance. [8] Opponents of the grapheme transliteration model continued to mount unsuccessful attempts at reversing government policy until the turn of the century, with one critic calling appealing to "the Indian Government to give up the whole attempt at scientific (i.e. Hunterian) transliteration, and decide once and for all in favour of a return to the old phonetic spelling." [9]

Additional languages and adaptations

Over time, the Hunterian method extended in reach to cover several Indic scripts, including Burmese and Tibetan. [10] [11] The Hunterian system was used to establish writing systems that used the Latin alphabet for some Indian languages that were previously not associated with a written script, such as Mizo. In the case of Mizo, the Hunterian-based writing system "has proved hugely successful." [12] Provisions for schwa deletion in Indo-Aryan languages were also made where applicable, e.g. the Hindi कानपुर is transliterated as kānpur (and not kānapura) but the Sanskrit क्रम is transliterated as krama (and not kram). The system has undergone some evolution over time. For instance, long vowels were marked with an acute accent in the original version, but this was later replaced in the 1954 Government of India update with a macron. [13] Thus, जान ('life') was previously romanized as ján but began to be romanized as jān. Additional diacritics have been proposed for various purposes, such as disambiguating Urdu letters which map to a single Devanagari grapheme (e.g. ث ,س and ص which all map to ). [14] Some languages of the region are tonal, such as Mizo and Punjabi, and accent marks over vowels have been repurposed to indicate tone for some of them.

Vowels

An 1848 adaptation of the Jonesian/Hunterian system with both Devanagari and Perso-Arabic characters Huntadapt03.png
An 1848 adaptation of the Jonesian/Hunterian system with both Devanagari and Perso-Arabic characters

Main Hindustani vowels with their various representations: [1] [15]

Devanagari Urdu [note 1] IPA HunterianProposed diacritic formsNotes
ا [ə] aa
آaā
اِɪii
یiī
اُʊuu
اوuū
رِɾɪ, ɻ̍riṛĭ [16]
رِɾiː, ɻ̍ːriṟĭ [16]
اےeē
اےɛː, ai, æaiaiRarely [æ] in Standard Hindi, but diphthongal pronunciation [ai] (like the 'i' in bike) in Bihari/Eastern Hindi [17] [18]
اوoō
اوɔː, auauauPronounced as the diphthong [au] (like 'ou' in house) in Bihari/Eastern Hindi
अंں, ن, مŋ, mn, mṅ, ṁDifferentiation between dental and labial anusvara
अःحhh [16]
اےæNo Hunterian symbol defined; almost never written phonetically in Hindi except for loanwords; more rigorous usage in Nepali
اوɒNo Hunterian symbol defined; sound occurs in words like गौना ( [gɒnaː] ; 'engagement'), but never written phonetically except for loanwords

Consonants

An 1879 Hunterian adaptation that uses italics Huntadapt01.png
An 1879 Hunterian adaptation that uses italics
An 1895 Hunterian adaptation that uses diacritics Huntadapt02.png
An 1895 Hunterian adaptation that uses diacritics
Many devices have been used to represent halants including small slashes Huntadapt05.png
Many devices have been used to represent halants including small slashes

In the Hunterian system, implicit schwas are denoted by the transliterated schwa vowel in Devanagari, a (अ), and excluded as necessary under schwa deletion rules. Aspirations are represented by h. [1] [15] Retroflex graphemes are often represented by a diacritic dot under the Latin consonant that represents the equivalent dental graphemes in proposals [16] (some of which predate even the Hunterian method), [19] [20] though this has not officially been accepted by the Indian government. Halants are indicated by either leaving out a vowel after the transliterated consonant [21] or, in new proposals (not formally approved by the Indian government), with a period after the applicable consonant (e.g. जल्दी – jal.di). Initially, italics were sometimes used to differentiate consonants such as ख ("kh") and ख़ ("kh"), [22] but later macrons and diacritics began to be used more extensively.

Devanagari Urdu [note 1] IPA HunterianProposed diacritic forms
[ citation needed ]
Notes
کkkk
کھkhkh
گggg
گھɡʱghgh
نŋn [16]
چchch
چھtʃʰchhcẖ, čh [16]
جjj
جھdʒʱjhjh
نɲnñ [16]
ٹʈt [16]
ٹھʈʰthṭh [16]
ڈɖd [16]
ڈھɖʱdhḍh [16]
نɳn [16]
تtt
تھt̪ʰthth
دdd
دھd̪ʱdhdh
نnnn
پppp
پھphph
بbbb
بھbhbh
مmmm
یjyy
رrrr
لlll
وv, ʋ, wv, wvIn Marathi, [w] , except [v] before [i] ; [v] , [ʋ] , [w] allophony in Hindi
شʃshshIn Nepali, [s] or [sh] can be used
شʃ, ʂshṣh [16] Commonly pronounced [ʃ] in Hindi; [ʂ] in Sanskrit and in Hindi before retroflex consonants
سsss
حɦhh
क़قqqq
ख़خxkhḳh, k͟h [14]
ग़غɣghg͟h [14]
ड़ڑɽr [14]
ढ़ڑھɽʱrhṛh [14]
फ़فfff
ज़زzzz
झ़ژʒzhzh
क्षکشkʃ, kʂkshkṣh [16]
त्रترt̪rtrtr
ज्ञگیہgj, dʑɲgy, jngy, jñCommonly pronounced [gj] in Hindi and [dʑɲ] in Sanskrit and occasionally in Hindi. Transliterated as gy for Hindi and jn for Sanskrit.
श्रشرʃrshrshr

Examples

Example: मैं अपने संबंधी से कारख़ाने में मिला और उसने मुझे चाय पिलाई। वह बारिश के कारण फ़सलों को हुए नुक़सान की वजह से चिंतित था। मैंने उसे अपनी ख़बर सुनाई। क्योंकि मुझे निकलना था, इसीलिए कुछ देर बाद मैंने क्षमा माँगी और वहाँ से रवाना हुआ।

With diacritics: mãĩ apne sambandhī se kārk͟hāne mẽ milā aur usne mujhe chāy pilāī. vo bāriś ke kāraṇ faslõ ko hue nuqsān kī vajah se cintit thā. maĩne use apnī k͟habar sunāī. kyõki mujhe nikalnā thā, isilie kuchh der bād mãĩne kṣhamā māṅgī aur vahā̃ se ravānā huā.

Without any diacritics: main apne sambandhi se karkhane men mila aur usne mujhe chay pilayi. wo barish ke karan faslon ko hue nuqsan ki vajah se chintit tha. maine use apni khabar sunayi. kyonki mujhe nikalna tha, isilie kuchh der bad maine kshama mangi aur vahan se ravana hua.

Notes: संबंधी can interchangeably be written in two different ways: संबंधी and सम्बन्धी.

Example: इस साल ग्रीष्मकालीन वर्षा ज़्यादा होने से अमरूद और बेर की क़िल्लत देखी गई। मज़े की बात यह है कि सेब और ख़ुबानी की क़ीमतें कम हैं क्योंकि उत्तराखंड में गोदाम भरें हैं.

With diacritics: is sāl grīṣmkālīn varṣā zyādā hone se amrūd aur ber kī qillat dekhī gaī. maze kī bāt ye hai ki seb aur k͟hubānī kī qīmtẽ kam hãĩ kyõki uttarākhaṇḍ mẽ godām bharẽ haĩ.

Without any diacritics: is sal grishmkalin varsha zyada hone se amrud aur ber ki qillat dekhi gayi. maze ki bat ye hai ki seb aur khubani ki qimten kam hain kyonki uttarakhand men godam bharen hain.

Criticism

The Hunterian system has faced criticism over the years for not producing phonetically accurate results and being "unashamedly geared towards an English-language receiver audience." [13] Specifically, the lack of differentiation between retroflex and dental consonants (e.g. द and ड are both represented by d) has come in for repeated criticism and inspired several proposed modifications of Hunterian, including using a diacritic below retroflexes (e.g. making द=d and ड=, which is more readable but requires diacritic printing) or capitalizing them (e.g. making द=d and ड=D, which requires no diacritic printing but is less readable because it mixes small and capital letters in words). [23]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 This will only display in the Nastaliq script if you have a suitable Urdu font installed. If this نستعلیق and this نستعلیق looks like any of نستعلیق or نستعلیق, then you are probably seeing it written in the Naskh script.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abugida</span> Writing system

An abugida – sometimes also called alphasyllabary, neosyllabary, or pseudo-alphabet – is a segmental writing system in which consonant–vowel sequences are written as units; each unit is based on a consonant letter, and vowel notation is secondary, like a diacritical mark. This contrasts with a full alphabet, in which vowels have status equal to consonants, and with an abjad, in which vowel marking is absent, partial, or optional – in less formal contexts, all three types of script may be termed "alphabets". The terms also contrast them with a syllabary, in which a single symbol denotes the combination of one consonant and one vowel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diacritic</span> Modifier mark added to a letter

A diacritic is a glyph added to a letter or to a basic glyph. The term derives from the Ancient Greek διακριτικός, from διακρίνω. The word diacritic is a noun, though it is sometimes used in an attributive sense, whereas diacritical is only an adjective. Some diacritics, such as the acute ⟨á⟩, grave ⟨à⟩, and circumflex ⟨â⟩, are often called accents. Diacritics may appear above or below a letter or in some other position such as within the letter or between two letters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Devanagari</span> Writing script for many North Indian and Nepalese languages

Devanāgarī or Devanagari, also called Nāgari, is a left-to-right abugida, based on the ancient Brāhmi script, used in the northern Indian subcontinent. It is one of the official scripts of the Republic of India and Nepal. It was developed and in regular use by the 7th century CE and achieved its modern form by 1000 CE. The Devanāgari script, composed of 48 primary characters, including 14 vowels and 34 consonants, is the fourth most widely adopted writing system in the world, being used for over 120 languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sinhala script</span> Abugida writing system

The Sinhala script, also known as Sinhalese script, is a writing system used by the Sinhalese people and most Sri Lankans in Sri Lanka and elsewhere to write the Sinhala language as well as the liturgical languages Pali and Sanskrit. The Sinhalese Akṣara Mālāva, one of the Brahmic scripts, is a descendant of the Ancient Indian Brahmi script. It is also related to the Grantha script.

Devanagari is an Indic script used for many Indo-Aryan languages of North India and Nepal, including Hindi, Marathi and Nepali, which was the script used to write Classical Sanskrit. There are several somewhat similar methods of transliteration from Devanagari to the Roman script, including the influential and lossless IAST notation. Romanized Devanagari is also called Romanagari.

When used as a diacritic mark, the term dot refers to the glyphs "combining dot above", and "combining dot below" which may be combined with some letters of the extended Latin alphabets in use in a variety of languages. Similar marks are used with other scripts.

The International Alphabet of Sanskrit Transliteration (IAST) is a transliteration scheme that allows the lossless romanisation of Indic scripts as employed by Sanskrit and related Indic languages. It is based on a scheme that emerged during the 19th century from suggestions by Charles Trevelyan, William Jones, Monier Monier-Williams and other scholars, and formalised by the Transliteration Committee of the Geneva Oriental Congress, in September 1894. IAST makes it possible for the reader to read the Indic text unambiguously, exactly as if it were in the original Indic script. It is this faithfulness to the original scripts that accounts for its continuing popularity amongst scholars.

ISO 15919 is one of a series of international standards for romanization by the International Organization for Standardization. It was published in 2001 and uses diacritics to map the much larger set of consonants and vowels in Brahmic and Nastaliq scripts to the Latin script.

Roman Urdu is the name used for the Urdu language written with the Latin script, also known as Roman script.

Hindustani has been written in several different scripts. Most Hindi texts are written in the Devanagari script, which is derived from the Brāhmī script of Ancient India. Most Urdu texts are written in the Urdu alphabet, which comes from the Persian alphabet. Hindustani has been written in both scripts. In recent years, the Latin script has been used in these languages for technological or internationalization reasons. Historically, Kaithi script has also been used.

The phoneme inventory of the Marathi language is similar to that of many other Indo-Aryan languages. An IPA chart of all contrastive sounds in Marathi is provided below.

Hindustani is the lingua franca of northern India and Pakistan, and through its two standardized registers, Hindi and Urdu, a co-official language of India and co-official and national language of Pakistan respectively. Phonological differences between the two standards are minimal.

Schwa deletion, or schwa syncope, is a phenomenon that sometimes occurs in Assamese, Hindi, Urdu, Bengali, Kashmiri, Punjabi, Gujarati, and several other Indo-Aryan languages with schwas that are implicit in their written scripts. Languages like Marathi and Maithili with increased influence from other languages through coming into contact with them—also show a similar phenomenon. Some schwas are obligatorily deleted in pronunciation even if the script suggests otherwise.

Konkani alphabets refers to the five different scripts currently used to write the Konkani language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bharati Braille</span> Braille system for languages of India

Bharati braille, or Bharatiya Braille, is a largely unified braille script for writing the languages of India. When India gained independence, eleven braille scripts were in use, in different parts of the country and for different languages. By 1951, a single national standard had been settled on, Bharati braille, which has since been adopted by Sri Lanka, Nepal, and Bangladesh. There are slight differences in the orthographies for Nepali in India and Nepal, and for Tamil in India and Sri Lanka. There are significant differences in Bengali Braille between India and Bangladesh, with several letters differing. Pakistan has not adopted Bharati braille, so the Urdu Braille of Pakistan is an entirely different alphabet than the Urdu Braille of India, with their commonalities largely due to their common inheritance from English or International Braille. Sinhala Braille largely conforms to other Bharati, but differs significantly toward the end of the alphabet, and is covered in its own article.

Similar braille conventions are used for three languages of India and Nepal that in print are written in Devanagari script: Hindi, Marathi, and Nepali. These are part of a family of related braille alphabets known as Bharati Braille. There are apparently some differences between the Nepali braille alphabet of India and that of Nepal.

The Velthuis system of transliteration is an ASCII transliteration scheme for the Sanskrit language from and to the Devanagari script. It was developed in about 1983 by Frans Velthuis, a scholar living in Groningen, Netherlands, who created a popular, high-quality software package in LaTeX for typesetting Devanāgarī. The primary documentation for the scheme is the system's clearly-written software manual. It is based on using the ISO 646 repertoire to represent mnemonically the accents used in standard scholarly transliteration. It does not use diacritics as IAST does. It may optionally use capital letters in a manner similar but not identical to the Harvard-Kyoto or ITRANS schemes.manual para 4.1

Ḍa is a consonant of Indic abugidas. In modern Indic scripts, Ḍa is derived from the early "Ashoka" Brahmi letter after having gone through the Gupta letter . As with the other cerebral consonants, ḍa is not found in most scripts for Tai, Sino-Tibetan, and other non-Indic languages, except for a few scripts, which retain these letters for transcribing Sanskrit religious terms.

Hindi–Urdu is the lingua franca of modern-day Northern India and Pakistan. Modern Standard Hindi is officially registered in Indian Republic as a standard written using Devanagari script, and Urdu is officially registered in Pakistan as a standard written using extended Perso-Arabic script.

References

  1. 1 2 3 United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2007), Technical reference manual for the standardization of geographical names, United Nations Publications, 2007, ISBN   978-92-1-161500-5, ... ISO 15919 ... There is no evidence of the use of the system either in India or in international cartographic products ... The Hunterian system is the actually used national system of romanization in India ...
  2. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (1955), United Nations Regional Cartographic Conference for Asia and the Far East, Volume 2, United Nations, 1955, ... In India the Hunterian system is used, whereby every sound in the local language is uniformly represented by a certain letter in the Roman alphabet ...
  3. National Library (India) (1960), Indian scientific & technical publications, exhibition 1960: a bibliography, Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, Government of India, 1960, ... The Hunterian system of transliteration, which has international acceptance, has been used ...
  4. Jones, William (1786). "A Dissertation on the Orthography of Asiatick Words in Roman Letters". Asiatick Researches. 1: 1–56.
  5. 1 2 3 Notes and queries, Oxford University Press, 1883, 1883, ... What is now culled the Jonesian or Hunterian system is due primarily to Sir Charles Wilkins ... The original Jonesian system had its merits; but the ignorance of phonology which prevailed in those days prevents it from being accepted as a scientific instrument for the reproduction of sounds outside the limited range ...
  6. D. S. Rao (2004), Five decades: the National Academy of Letters, India: a short history of Sahitya Akademi, Sahitya Akademi, 2004, ISBN   9788126020607, ... The Bibliography was to be in Roman script with annotations in English, so that it could serve as a tool of reference both in India and abroad. The Hunterian system of transliteration was to be adopted with suitable modifications. Every language section was to be divided into 8 major categories: 1. General works, eg important bibliographies, general encyclopaedias, dictionaries; 2. Philosophy and Religion, containing works of literary significance ...
  7. Bapurao S. Naik (1971), Typography of Devanagari, Volume 1, Directorate of Languages, Government of Maharashtra, India, 1971, ... Sir Charles Wilkins:The Father of Devanagari Typography. Charles Wilkins (born in 1749-50) arrived in India in 1770 and joined the service of the East India Company ...
  8. 1 2 Francis Henry Skrine (1901), Life of Sir William Wilson Hunter, K.C.S.I., M.A., LL.D., a vice-president of the Royal Asiatic society, etc, Longmans, Green, and co., 1901, ... phonetic or 'Sir Roger Dowler method' ... The Secretary of State and the great majority of his councillors gave an unqualified support to the Hunterian system ...
  9. The Fortnightly, Volume 68, Chapman and Hall, 1897, 1897, ... the Indian Government to give up the whole attempt at scientific (i.e. Hunterian) transliteration, and decide once and for all in favour of a return to the old phonetic spelling ...
  10. Mînn Latt Yêkháun (1966), Modernization of Burmese, Oriental Institute in Academia, Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 1966, ... There does exist a system df transcribing Burmese words in roman letters, one that is called the 'Government', or the 'Hunterian' method ...
  11. Kunwar Krishan Rampal (1993), Mapping and compilation, Concept Publishing Company, 1993, ISBN   978-81-7022-414-3, ... The Hunterian system has rules for transliteration into English the names form Hindi, Urdu, Arabic, Burmese, Chinese and Tibetan origin. These rules are described in Chapter VI, Survey of India, Handbook of Topographical Mapping ...
  12. Ram Narayan Prasad, Prithwipati Chakraborty (January 2006), Administration of justice in Mizoram, Mittal Publications, 2006, ISBN   978-81-8324-059-8, ... The first Christian Missionaries who came to Mizoram, namely the Revd. James Herbert Lorrain and the Revd. Frederick William Savidge, devised an alphabet using Roman lettering and based on the Hunterian system. It was later modified slightly, but in principle it has remained the same and has proved highly successful ...
  13. 1 2 The Romanization of Toponyms in the Countries of South Asia , retrieved 27 February 2011, ... In the late 19th century sources, the system marks long vowels with an acute accent, and renders the letters k and q both as k. However, when the system was again published in 1954, alterations had been made. Long vowels were now marked with a macron and the q-k distinction was maintained ...
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Duncan Forbes (1848), A dictionary, Hindustani and English: to which is added a reversed part, English and Hindustani, W.H. Allen, 1848, ... ب ब b ...
  15. 1 2 Lt. Col. St. George Corbet Gore, Handbook of Professional Instructions for the Topographical Branch, Survey of India Department, 1896, ... क k ख kh ग g घ gh ...
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 James Burgess (1895), The transliteration of oriental alphabets, E.J. Brill, 1895, ... the use of c alone for this sound ... though it may be easy for specialists to attach an arbitrary sound to a letter, the public can hardly be expected ... Every map and geographical text book has adopted 'ch', as does the roll of every Indian regiment and every revenue record ... chh is the analogous aspirate of this, unless we adopt for it čh ... Table: The Principal Indian Alphabets ...
  17. Manjari, Ohala (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet: Hindi. International Phonetic Association.
  18. George Cardona (26 July 2007), The Indo-Aryan languages, Psychology Press, 2003, ISBN   978-0-7007-1130-7, ... Table 7.1 Vowel Phonemes ... ai (ऐ) [æ] low front unrounded; diphthongal pronunciations in eastern and nonstandard dialects ... ...
  19. Calcutta School-Book Society (1861), Romanized school dictionary: English and Urdu, Calcutta School-Book Society Press, 1861, ... Anglo-Urdu Alphabet ... ḍ bad ... ḳh loch ...
  20. Max Muller (1866), A Sanskrit grammar for beginners, Longmans, Green & Co., 1866, ... ड ḍ ढ ḍh ...
  21. Transliteration of Hindi, Marathi & Nepali (PDF), ... ◌् halanta vowelless vowelless ...
  22. Royal Geographical Society (Great Britain) (1879), The journal of the Royal Geographic Society of London, Volume 49, J. Murray, 1879, ... the italic sign to mark certain peculiarities in the consonants ...
  23. Institution of Surveyors (India) (1991), Indian surveyor, Volumes 33-34, Institution of Surveyors., 1991, ... Suggested by Mr. GS Oberoi, Director, Survey of India, in lieu of the existing table 'Hunterian System of Transliteration' which does not distinguish between द and ड, र and ड़, त and ट ...