James Price Dillard

Last updated

James Price Dillard is a distinguished professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Department at Penn State University. He has authored and co-authored over 50 manuscripts primarily on the role of emotion and persuasive influence. Dillard graduated in 1976 from the University of Kansas with a Bachelor's degree in Speech Communication and Psychology. In 1978, he earned his Master's degree in Communication from Arizona State University and in 1983, he received a Ph.D. in Communication from Michigan State University. Dillard is currently teaching Measurement in Communication Science and Persuasive Message Processing classes at Penn State University. His awards include the NCA Golden Anniversary Award for the most outstanding, Distinguished Book Award, Communication and Social Cognition Division of the National Communication Association and many others.

Contents

Dillard is most known in the academic world for his views on affect and persuasion. His research aims to enhance understanding of the role of emotion in persuasion and interpersonal influence. [1]

Views on Affect

Dillard has done many studies of the use of affect in our social and environmental interactions. [2] [3] [4] [5] He theorizes how mood and emotion guide our behavior in our everyday interactions. Dillard concludes that affect affects human behavior in three main ways: [6]

  1. The primary function of affect is to guide behavior. Affect evolved because it enabled successful interaction with the environment.
  2. For human beings, the most important environment was the social environment. Affect evolved in the presence and service of social interaction.
  3. Human beings strategically manage their affective states. The relative utility of these efforts can be judged only by reference to the environment.

Dillard explains how affect is "phasic" and "tonic" or baseline, each one affecting the other. Affect as "phasic" acting with emotion. If someone feels fear from a stimulus, then they run away from that stimulus. If someone feels happiness when around a certain stimulus, then they would approach that stimulus. But Dillard concludes that emotions more involved than just approach and withdrawal: "If we view emotions as phasic responses to the environment, the other side of the solution is the tonic (baseline) state of the organism. Any decision as to the appropriate course of action (i.e., engagement versus withdrawal) must depend on the resources available to the organism at the time the action is required. The experiential aspect of moods can be thought of as a readout of the operating level of the organism's various biopsychological systems." [6]

"Affect enables organisms to address the challenges posed by interaction with the environment. One fundamental problem is how to acquire the resources that enable survival and reproduction. Social life-forms have adopted a strategy for solving that problem, which depends on cooperation and role specialization." [6]

Dillard takes on a Darwinian perspective on affect: it evolved out of a need for survival.

Perspectives on affect

  1. Affect might proceed and serve as the basis of communication.
  2. Communication is emotion-manifesting when it provides information about the internal state of the actor.
  3. Communication can be emotion-inducing.

[6]

Views on mood

Dillard concludes that mood is a complex phenomenon, but it may be simplified as being either positive or negative. If a person is in a negative mood, then his or her reactions will be skewed towards the negative. A negative mood assumes that resources are seemingly depleted and takes into account challenging interactions with one's environment. If a person is in a positive mood then one feels he has ample resources to react to environmental stimulus. Be it a positive or a negative mood, Dillard considers this state to be a person's "tonic" state, or baseline mood. When the "phasic" and "tonic" states are combined, a reaction to stimulus is considered to be natural.

"Dominance and affiliation relations are efficient means of regulating resource distribution and arguably the defining ingredients in the human experience. The communication of emotion is central to the development, maintenance, and modification of these structures." [6]

Academic Timeline

1971-76 B.A., Speech Communication & Psychology. University of Kansas.

1976-78 M.A., Communication. Arizona State University.

1978-83 Ph.D., Communication. Michigan State University.

1982-83 Visiting Assistant Professor. Department of Communication Arts. University of Wisconsin–Madison.

1983-1989 Assistant Professor. Department of Communication Arts. University of Wisconsin–Madison.

1989-1994 Associate Professor. Department of Communication Arts. University of Wisconsin–Madison.

1992 Special Member of the Graduate Faculty. University of Maryland, College Park-College Park.

1993-2003 Director. Center for Communication Research. University of Wisconsin–Madison.

1994-2004 Professor. Department of Communication Arts. University of Wisconsin–Madison.

1997-1999 Associate Chair. Department of Communication Arts, University of Wisconsin–Madison.

1999-fall Visiting Professor. Department of Communication. Michigan State University.

2001-spring Visiting Professor. Department of Communication. Kent State University.

2004-2007 Visiting Professor. Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin–Madison.

2004–present Professor, Department of Communication Arts & Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University [7]

Books and Journals

Awards and honors

1978 - First Place in the Interpersonal/Organizational division of the Western Speech Communication Association. Phoenix. Mode of uncertainty reduction as a determinant of the amount of communication during initial interactions. (co-authored with Stinnett, W., Malandro, L., Hutchinson, D., Schlecter, J., & Stewart, J.)

1981 - Top Three Award in the Organizational Communication division of the International Communication Association, Philadelphia. Communicator competence in the workplace: Model testing and scale development.(co-authored with P. Monge, S. Bachman, & E. Eisenberg)

1987 - Top Four Award in the Interpersonal/Small Group division of the Speech Communication Association, Boston. Empathy, communication, and prosocial behavior. (co-authored with J. Stiff, B. Somera, H. Kim, & C. Sleight)

1988 - Top Three in the Interpersonal Communication Interest Group of the Western Speech Communication Association,Spokane. Compliance-gaining message selection: What is our dependent variable? (sole author)

1989 - First Place in the Interpersonal Communication Interest Group of the Western Speech Communication Association, San Diego. Types of influence goals in personal relationships. (sole author)

1993 - Top Four in the Information Systems Division of the International Communication Association, Washington, D.C. Rethinking the study of fear appeals. (sole author)

1995 - John E. Hunter Meta-Analysis Award, Information Systems Division of the International Communication Association.

1994-1996 - Vilas Associate Professorship.

1996 - Top Four in the Information Systems Division of the International Communication Association, Chicago. The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. (co-authored with P. Sopory) 5

1996 - Top Four in the Interpersonal/Small Group division of the Speech Communication Association. San Diego. The sounds of dominance: Vocal precursors to dominance judgments during interpersonal influence. (co-authored with K. Tusing)

1998 - First Place in the Health Communication Division of the National Communication Association, New York. Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. (co-authored with E. Peck)

2001 - Top Three in the Health Communication Division of the International Communication Association, Washington, D.C. Persuasion and the structure of affect: Dual systems and discrete emotions as complementary models. (co-authored with E. Peck)

2001 - Top Three in the Interpersonal Division of the International Communication Association, Washington, D.C. Environmental factors governing the absolute and relative activation of relational communication frames. (co-authored with K. Tusing and J. Morrill).

2001 - Top Three in the Communication & Social Cognition Division of the National Communication Association, Atlanta. Single- and multi-motive processing of a fear appeal: Encouraging influenza vaccinations. (co-authored with J.W. Anderson).

2002 - NCA Golden Anniversary Award for Dillard & Peck (2001). This award is given for "the most outstanding scholarly monograph published during the previous calendar year" (National Communication Association website).

2004 - John E. Hunter Meta-Analysis Award, Information Systems Division of the International Communication Association.

2004 - Distinguished Book Award, Communication and Social Cognition Division of the National Communication Association. For Dillard & Pfau's The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice. [8]

2006 - Top Three in the Communication & Social Cognition Division of the National Communication Association, San Antonio. The influence of behavioral inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. (co-authored with L. Shen).

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emotion</span> Conscious subjective experience of humans

Emotions are mental states brought on by neurophysiological changes, variously associated with thoughts, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of pleasure or displeasure. There is no scientific consensus on a definition. Emotions are often intertwined with mood, temperament, personality, disposition, or creativity.

In psychology, a mood is an affective state. In contrast to emotions or feelings, moods are less specific, less intense and less likely to be provoked or instantiated by a particular stimulus or event. Moods are typically described as having either a positive or negative valence. In other words, people usually talk about being in a good mood or a bad mood. There are many different factors that influence mood, and these can lead to positive or negative effects on mood.

Appeal to emotion or argumentum ad passiones is an informal fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence. This kind of appeal to emotion is irrelevant to or distracting from the facts of the argument and encompasses several logical fallacies, including appeal to consequences, appeal to fear, appeal to flattery, appeal to pity, appeal to ridicule, appeal to spite, and wishful thinking.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intrapersonal communication</span> Communication with oneself

Intrapersonal communication is communication with oneself or self-to-self communication. Examples are thinking to oneself "I'll do better next time" after having made a mistake or imagining a conversation with one's boss in preparation for leaving work early. It is often understood as an exchange of messages in which the sender and the receiver is the same person. Some theorists use a wider definition that goes beyond message-based accounts and focuses on the role of meaning and making sense of things. Intrapersonal communication can happen alone or in social situations. It may be prompted internally or occur as a response to changes in the environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Communication studies</span> Academic discipline

Communication studies or communication science is an academic discipline that deals with processes of human communication and behavior, patterns of communication in interpersonal relationships, social interactions and communication in different cultures. Communication is commonly defined as giving, receiving or exchanging ideas, information, signals or messages through appropriate media, enabling individuals or groups to persuade, to seek information, to give information or to express emotions effectively. Communication studies is a social science that uses various methods of empirical investigation and critical analysis to develop a body of knowledge that encompasses a range of topics, from face-to-face conversation at a level of individual agency and interaction to social and cultural communication systems at a macro level.

Harold Kelley was an American social psychologist and professor of psychology at the University of California, Los Angeles. His major contributions have been the development of interdependence theory, the early work of attribution theory, and a lifelong interest in understanding close relationships processes. A Review of General Psychology survey, published in 2002, ranked Kelley as the 43rd most cited psychologist of the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dietram Scheufele</span> American academic

Dietram A. Scheufele is a German-American social scientist and the Taylor-Bascom Chair in the Department of Life Sciences Communication at the University of Wisconsin–Madison. He is also a Distinguished Research Fellow at the University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg Public Policy Center. Prior to joining UW, Scheufele was a tenured faculty member in the Department of Communication at Cornell University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark L. Knapp</span>

Mark L. Knapp is the Jesse H. Jones Centennial Professor Emeritus and a Distinguished Teaching Professor Emeritus at the University of Texas at Austin. He is internationally known for his research and writing on nonverbal communication and communication in developing relationships. He has also done research and published books on lying and deception. The Mark L. Knapp Award for career contributions to the study of interpersonal communication is awarded annually by the National Communication Association. The Mark L. Knapp Professorship, Moody College of Communication, University of Texas at Austin, was established in 2017.

Communicology is the scholarly and academic study of how people create and use messages to affect the social environment. Communicology is an academic discipline that distinguishes itself from the broader field of human communication with its exclusive use of scientific methods to study communicative phenomena. The goals of these scientific methods are to create and extend theory-based knowledge about the processes and outcomes of communication. Practitioners in the communicology discipline employ empirical and deductive research methods, such as cross-sectional and longitudinal surveys, experiments, meta-analyses, and content analyses, to test theoretically-derived hypotheses. Correlational and causal relationships between communication variables are tested in these studies.

Language expectancy theory (LET) is a theory of persuasion. The theory assumes language is a rules-based system, in which people develop expected norms as to appropriate language usage in given situations. Furthermore, unexpected linguistic usage can affect the receiver's behavior resulting from attitudes towards a persuasive message.

Charles R. Berger was an American professor emeritus of communication at the University of California, Davis. Berger died on September 25, 2018, from health complications arising from cancer.

The School of Communication and Information (SC&I) is a professional school within the New Brunswick Campus of Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. The school was created in 1982 as a result of a merger between the Graduate School of Library and Information Studies, the School of Communication Studies, and the Livingston Department of Urban Journalism. The school has about 2,500 students at the undergraduate, masters, and doctoral levels, and about 60 full-time faculty.

Judee K. Burgoon is a professor of communication, family studies and human development at the University of Arizona, where she serves as director of research for the Center for the Management of Information and site director for the NSF-sponsored Center for Identification Technology Research. She is also involved with different aspects of interpersonal and nonverbal communication, deception, and new communication technologies. She is also director of human communication research for the Center for the Management of Information and site director for Center for Identification Technology Research at the university, and recently held an appointment as distinguished visiting professor with the department of communication at the University of Oklahoma, and the Center for Applied Social Research at the University of Oklahoma. Burgoon has authored or edited 13 books and monographs and has published nearly 300 articles, chapters and reviews related to nonverbal and verbal communication, deception, and computer-mediated communication. Her research has garnered over $13 million in extramural funding from the National Science Foundation, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Counterintelligence Field Activity, and the National Institutes of Mental Health. Among the communication theories with which she is most notably linked are: interpersonal adaptation theory, expectancy violations theory, and interpersonal deception theory. A recent survey identified her as the most prolific female scholar in communication in the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Paul Forgas</span> Australian social psychologist (born 1947)

Joseph Paul Forgas is an Australian social psychologist, currently Scientia Professor at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. He was born in Budapest, Hungary and emigrated to Australia at the age of 22. He is married with two children, and lives in Sydney's Eastern Suburbs.

Interpersonal emotion regulation is the process of changing the emotional experience of one's self or another person through social interaction. It encompasses both intrinsic emotion regulation, in which one attempts to alter their own feelings by recruiting social resources, as well as extrinsic emotion regulation, in which one deliberately attempts to alter the trajectory of other people's feelings.

Marshall Scott Poole is an American communication researcher and professor of communication at the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.

Lauren Bernstein Adamson was a developmental psychologist known for her research on communicative development, parent-child interaction, and joint attention in infants with typical and atypical developmental trajectories. She was a Regents' Professor Emerita of Psychology at Georgia State University.

The Goals, Plans, Action theory explains how people use influence over others to accomplish their goals. This theory is prominent in the field of interpersonal communication. The theory is a model for how individuals gain compliance from others. There can be multiple goals related to the need for compliance. These goals are separated into primary and secondary categories. These goals are then translated into plans, both strategic and tactical, and finally carried out in actions. Goals motivate plans, and actions deliver the effort to accomplish goals. The model is rooted in the scientific tradition, with scientific realism, the assumption that “much of the world is patterned, knowable, and objective." The Goals, Plans, Action theory has shown application in academic and personal relationships.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Honeycutt</span> American academic

James M. Honeycutt is an American academic who is currently a lecturer on the faculty of Organizational Behavior, Coaching, and Consulting at the UT-Dallas Naveen Jindal School of Management. A Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Communication Studies at Louisiana State University, he is best known for his Theory of Imagined Interactions (IIs). IIs are a form of social cognition in which an individual imagines and therefore indirectly experiences themselves in anticipated and/or past communicative encounters with others. IItheory appears in communication encyclopedias, handbooks and graduate and undergraduate textbooks.

References

  1. "Department of Communication Arts & Sciences - Penn State University". Archived from the original on 2009-04-01. Retrieved 2009-04-14.
  2. Dillard, J.P., & Wilson, B.J. (1993). Communication and affect: Thoughts, feelings, and issues for the future. Communication Research, 20, 637-646.
  3. Dillard, J.P. (1997). The role of affect in communication, biology, and social relationships. In P.R. Andersen & L.Guerrero (Eds.), Communication and emotion (pp. xvii-xxxii). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  4. Dillard, J.P., & Meijnders, A. (2002). Persuasion and the structure of affect. In J.P. Dillard & M.W. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp.309-328). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  5. Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2006). An overview of reactance proneness assessment. In R. A. Reynolds, R. Woods, & J. D. Baker (Eds.). Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (pp. 323-329). Hershey, PA. Idea Group.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Dillard, J. P. (1998). The role of affect in communication, biology, and social relationships. In P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.) Handbook of communication and emotion. (pp. xvii-xxxii). San Diago: Academic Press.
  7. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-06-21. Retrieved 2009-04-14.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  8. Sopory, P., & Dillard, J.P. (2002). Figurative language and persuasion. In J.P. Dillard & M.W. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 407-426). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.