List of landing ellipses on extraterrestrial bodies

Last updated

Comparison of landing ellipses of NASA Mars landers in 1997, 2008, 2012, and 2021, respectively. ImprovingMartianEllipses.png
Comparison of landing ellipses of NASA Mars landers in 1997, 2008, 2012, and 2021, respectively.
Shaded ellipses of Skylab's reentry on 1979-07-11. Included for purposes of comparison. Skylab reentry map.svg
Shaded ellipses of Skylab's reentry on 1979-07-11. Included for purposes of comparison.
Deorbit of Mir, 23 March 2001. The debris field (in red) is +-1,500 x +-100 km, smaller than predicted due atmospheric reentry being slightly steeper than anticipated Mir reentry map.svg
Deorbit of Mir, 23 March 2001. The debris field (in red) is ±1,500 x ±100 km, smaller than predicted due atmospheric reentry being slightly steeper than anticipated
The 150 x 20 km landing footprint of Opportunity rover on Meridiani Planum, Mars in 2004 Opportunity rover's landing site.jpg
The 150 x 20 km landing footprint of Opportunity rover on Meridiani Planum, Mars in 2004
Suggested landing ellipses for Luna-25. Primary ellipses are 1, 4, 6 and secondary ellipses are 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and B1, B2. Suggested landing ellipses for Luna-Glob.png
Suggested landing ellipses for Luna-25. Primary ellipses are 1, 4, 6 and secondary ellipses are 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and B1, B2.

This is a list of the projected landing zones on extraterrestrial bodies. The size of the ellipse or oval graphically represents statistical degrees of uncertainty, i.e. the confidence level of the landing point, with the center of the ellipse being calculated as the most likely given the plethora of variables. [3] Their accuracy has improved from the early attempts in the 1960s; active research continues in the 21st century. [4] [5] [6] [7]

Contents

Ellipse table

MissionCountry/AgencyDestinationDate of Impact/LandingAxesNotes
Surveyor 1 Flag of the United States.svg NASAMoon196650 km [8] Landing error ~18.96 km [9]
Surveyor 3 Flag of the United States.svg NASAMoon196715.1 x 10.6 km [8] Initial landing ellipse was 30 km, was corrected in-flight after midcourse correction. [8] Landing error ~2.76 km [9]
Apollo 11 Flag of the United States.svg NASAMoon196918.5 x 4.8 km [10] [11] First crewed landing. Landing error ~6.6 km [9]
Apollo 12 Flag of the United States.svg NASAMoon1969~1 km, [12] or 13.3 x 4.8 km [lower-alpha 1] [13] Second crewed landing. Landing error ~160 m [9] Landed in ~200 m from Surveyor 3, its target. Landing was very precise and not intended to be closer. [12]
Apollo 14 Flag of the United States.svg NASAMoon1971~1 km [12]
Apollo 15 Flag of the United States.svg NASAMoon1971~1 km [12]
Apollo 16 Flag of the United States.svg NASAMoon1972~1 km [12]
Apollo 17 Flag of the United States.svg NASAMoon1972~1 km, [12] or 15 x 5 km [14] Last crewed landing. Landing error ~400 m [9]
Viking Flag of the United States.svg NASAMars1976280 x 100 km [15] Retrorocket
n/a Shoemaker-Levy 9 (comet)Jupiter1994-07-16n/aAs per IAUC in 1993 May 22; 0.0003 AU (45,000 km) from the center of Jupiter, i.e. within the planet's radius of 0.0005 AU (69,911 km) on 1994 July 25.4. (sic) [16] Actual train of impacts as finally projected occurred beyond Jupiter's limb. [17] Included for purposes of comparison.
Mars Pathfinder Flag of the United States.svg NASAMars1997200 x 70 km [18] or 200 x 100 km [19] [20] Airbags
Mars Polar Lander Flag of the United States.svg NASAMars1999200 x 20 km [21] Communications failed before landing attempt.
Mars Exploration Rovers Flag of the United States.svg NASAMars2003150 x 20 km [22] Airbags
Beagle 2 Flag of Europe.svg ESAMars2003174 x 106 km [23] Successful landing, communications failure.
Huygens Flag of Europe.svg ESATitan20051200 x 200 km [24] [25]
Phoenix Flag of the United States.svg NASAMars2008100 x 19 km [3] or "70 km long" [26]
Mars Science Laboratory Flag of the United States.svg NASAMars201225 x 20 km [18] Sky crane
Chang'e 3 Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg CNSAMoon20136 x 6 km [9] Landed with a landing error of ~89 m, [9] 2 m targeting precision [12]
Philae Flag of Europe.svg ESA 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko 20140.5 km [27]
Falcon 9 first-stage booster Flag of the United States.svg SpaceXEarth2015~20 m [28] [29] First reusable rocket, and the most precise landing system to date. Included for comparison.
Schiaparelli EDM Flag of Europe.svg ESAMars2016100 x 15 km [30] [31] Crash landing.
Cassini Flag of the United States.svg NASASaturn2017-09-17TBDRotation brought entry area into view.
InSight Flag of the United States.svg NASAMars2018130 x 27 km [18]
Hayabusa2 Flag of Japan.svg JAXA 162173 Ryugu 20182 or 3 m [12] Sampling occurred in ~1 m from a target. [12]
OSIRIS-REx Flag of the United States.svg NASA 101955 Bennu 20206.5 m [12] Sampling occurred in ~1 m from a target. [12]
Mars 2020 Flag of the United States.svg NASAMars20217.7 x 6.6 km [32] Sky crane. Landed 1.7 km from center of ellipse. [33]
Tianwen-1 Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg CNSAMars202156 x 22 km [12] [34]
ExoMars 2020 Flag of Europe.svg Flag of Russia.svg ESA/RoscosmosMars2023104 x 19 km [35] [36] [37] or 120 x 19 km [38] Mission postponed until 2028.
Luna 25 Flag of Russia.svg RoscosmosMoon2023-08-1930 x 15 km [2] [39] [40] Mission failed before landing attempt.
Chandrayaan-3 Flag of India.svg ISROMoon2023-08-234.5 x 2.5 km [41] or 4 x 2.4 km [42]
OSIRIS-REx return capsule Flag of the United States.svg NASAEarth2023-09-2430 x 80 km, [43] 14 x 58 km, [44] or 12 x 30 km [45] Sample return from an asteroid. Capsule landed ~ 8 km from the center. [45]
Peregrine Mission One Flag of the United States.svg Astrobotic, Inc. Moon2024-01-1824 x 6 km [42] [46] First U.S. lunar lander built since Apollo Program (1972). Aborted to Point Nemo.
SLIM Flag of Japan.svg JAXAMoon2024-01-19100 m [47] [42] Dubbed "Moon Sniper" for its accuracy (despite having landed upside-down). [48] Landed ~55 m from target point. [49]
IM-1 Nova-C Odysseus Flag of the United States.svg NASAMoon2024-02-22Landed ~1.5 km from the target. [50]
Cassini retirement, Saturn, 9.4degN 15 W, 15 September 2017, at the southern edge of the North Equatorial Belt (itself approximately 15,000 km wide); the blander Equatorial Zone is immediately below. PIA21896-Saturn-Cassini-ImpactSite-20170915.jpg
Cassini retirement, Saturn, 9.4°N 15 W, 15 September 2017, at the southern edge of the North Equatorial Belt (itself approximately 15,000 km wide); the blander Equatorial Zone is immediately below.

See also

Notes

  1. 7.2 nautical miles (13.3 km) x 2.6 nautical miles (4.8 km) per source

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars rover</span> Robotic vehicle for Mars surface exploration

A Mars rover is a remote-controlled motor vehicle designed to travel on the surface of Mars. Rovers have several advantages over stationary landers: they examine more territory, they can be directed to interesting features, they can place themselves in sunny positions to weather winter months, and they can advance the knowledge of how to perform very remote robotic vehicle control. They serve a different purpose than orbital spacecraft like Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. A more recent development is the Mars helicopter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exploration of Mars</span> Overview of the exploration of Mars

The planet Mars has been explored remotely by spacecraft. Probes sent from Earth, beginning in the late 20th century, have yielded a large increase in knowledge about the Martian system, focused primarily on understanding its geology and habitability potential. Engineering interplanetary journeys is complicated and the exploration of Mars has experienced a high failure rate, especially the early attempts. Roughly sixty percent of all spacecraft destined for Mars failed before completing their missions, with some failing before their observations could even begin. Some missions have been met with unexpected success, such as the twin Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, which operated for years beyond their specification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Discovery Program</span> Ongoing solar system exploration program by NASA

The Discovery Program is a series of Solar System exploration missions funded by the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) through its Planetary Missions Program Office. The cost of each mission is capped at a lower level than missions from NASA's New Frontiers or Flagship Programs. As a result, Discovery missions tend to be more focused on a specific scientific goal rather than serving a general purpose.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ExoMars</span> Astrobiology programme

ExoMars is an astrobiology programme of the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Russian space agency (Roscosmos).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lunar lander</span> Spacecraft intended to land on the surface of the Moon

A lunar lander or Moon lander is a spacecraft designed to land on the surface of the Moon. As of 2023, the Apollo Lunar Module is the only lunar lander to have ever been used in human spaceflight, completing six lunar landings from 1969 to 1972 during the United States' Apollo Program. Several robotic landers have reached the surface, and some have returned samples to Earth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sample-return mission</span> Spacecraft mission

A sample-return mission is a spacecraft mission to collect and return samples from an extraterrestrial location to Earth for analysis. Sample-return missions may bring back merely atoms and molecules or a deposit of complex compounds such as loose material and rocks. These samples may be obtained in a number of ways, such as soil and rock excavation or a collector array used for capturing particles of solar wind or cometary debris. Nonetheless, concerns have been raised that the return of such samples to planet Earth may endanger Earth itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rover (space exploration)</span> Space exploration vehicle designed to move across the surface of a planet or other celestial body

A rover is a planetary surface exploration device designed to move over the rough surface of a planet or other planetary mass celestial bodies. Some rovers have been designed as land vehicles to transport members of a human spaceflight crew; others have been partially or fully autonomous robots. Rovers are typically created to land on another planet via a lander-style spacecraft, tasked to collect information about the terrain, and to take crust samples such as dust, soil, rocks, and even liquids. They are essential tools in space exploration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jezero (crater)</span> Crater on Mars

Jezero is a crater on Mars in the Syrtis Major quadrangle, about 45.0 km (28.0 mi) in diameter. Thought to have once been flooded with water, the crater contains a fan-delta deposit rich in clays. The lake in the crater was present when valley networks were forming on Mars. Besides having a delta, the crater shows point bars and inverted channels. From a study of the delta and channels, it was concluded that the lake inside the crater probably formed during a period in which there was continual surface runoff.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trace Gas Orbiter</span> Mars orbiter, part of ExoMars programme

The ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter is a collaborative project between the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Russian Roscosmos agency that sent an atmospheric research orbiter and the Schiaparelli demonstration lander to Mars in 2016 as part of the European-led ExoMars programme.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Endeavour (crater)</span> Crater on Mars

Endeavour is an impact crater located in the Meridiani Planum extraterrestrial plain within the Margaritifer Sinus quadrangle (MC-19) region of the planet Mars. Endeavour is about 22 kilometers (14 mi) in diameter. Using Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter data, phyllosilicate-bearing outcrops have been detected along its rim. These minerals may have formed under wet conditions in a low-acidic environment during the early history of Mars. There are raised rim segments to the north, east, and southwest. The rim has become worn, rounded and degraded, with infilling of plains material in a manner similar to the Victoria crater.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars Astrobiology Explorer-Cacher</span> Cancelled NASA Mars rover concept

The Mars Astrobiology Explorer-Cacher (MAX-C), also known as Mars 2018 mission, was a NASA concept for a Mars rover mission, proposed to be launched in 2018 together with the European ExoMars rover. The MAX-C rover concept was cancelled in April 2011 due to budget cuts.

Rosalind Franklin, previously known as the ExoMars rover, is a planned robotic Mars rover, part of the international ExoMars programme led by the European Space Agency and the Russian Roscosmos State Corporation. The mission was scheduled to launch in July 2020, but was postponed to 2022. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has caused an indefinite delay of the programme, as the member states of the ESA voted to suspend the joint mission with Russia; in July 2022, ESA terminated its cooperation on the project with Russia. As of May 2022, the launch of the rover is not expected to occur before 2028 due to the need for a new non-Russian landing platform.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hargraves (crater)</span> Crater on Mars

Hargraves is a Hesperian-age complex double-layered ejecta impact crater on Mars. It was emplaced near the crustal dichotomy in the vicinity of the Nili Fossae, the Syrtis Major volcanic plains, and the Isidis impact basin, and is situated within the Syrtis Major quadrangle. Hargraves has been the target of focused study because its ejecta apron is particularly well-preserved for a Martian crater of its size. It has been analogized to similar double-layered ejecta blankets on Earth, including that of the Ries impact structure, which was where the conceptual model for how such craters formed was first advanced.

<i>Schiaparelli</i> EDM Mars landing demonstration system

Schiaparelli EDM was a failed Entry, Descent, and Landing Demonstrator Module (EDM) of the ExoMars programme—a joint mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Russian Space Agency Roscosmos. It was built in Italy and was intended to test technology for future soft landings on the surface of Mars. It also had a limited but focused science payload that would have measured atmospheric electricity on Mars and local meteorological conditions.

<i>VIPER</i> (rover) Planned NASA lunar rover

VIPER is a lunar rover developed by NASA, and currently planned to be delivered to the surface of the Moon in November 2024. The rover will be tasked with prospecting for lunar resources in permanently shadowed areas in the lunar south pole region, especially by mapping the distribution and concentration of water ice. The mission builds on a previous NASA rover concept called Resource Prospector, which was cancelled in 2018.

References

  1. "Landing Ellipse for the Opportunity Rover Mars mission | Time and Navigation". timeandnavigation.si.edu.
  2. 1 2 Krasilnikov, S. S.; Basilevsky, A. T.; Ivanov, M. A.; Krasilnikov, A. S. (1 March 2021). "Geological and Geomorphological Characteristics of High-Priority Landing Sites for the Luna-Glob Mission". Solar System Research. 55 (2): 83–96. doi: 10.1134/S0038094621010056 . ISSN   1608-3423.
  3. 1 2 "Landing ellipses". The Planetary Society.
  4. Zhang, Yuan-Long; Chen, Ke-Jun; Liu, Lu-Hua; Tang, Guo-Jian; Bao, Wei-Min (August 22, 2017). "Rapid generation of landing footprint based on geometry-predicted trajectory". Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 231 (10): 1851–1861. doi:10.1177/0954410016662066. S2CID   114089246 via CrossRef.
  5. "Zeroing in on the Target". NASA Mars Exploration.
  6. Saraf, Amitabh; Leavitt, James; Ferch, Mark; Mease, Kenneth (August 16, 2004). "Landing Footprint Computation for Entry Vehicles". AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi:10.2514/6.2004-4774. ISBN   978-1-62410-073-4 via CrossRef.
  7. Zhang, Yuan-long; Xie, Yu; Xu, Xin (February 1, 2023). "Generation of Landing Footprints for Re-entry Vehicles Based on Lateral Profile Priority". International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences. 24 (1): 261–273. Bibcode:2023IJASS..24..261Z. doi:10.1007/s42405-022-00503-1. S2CID   251945950 via Springer Link.
  8. 1 2 3 "Surveyor III Mission Report" (PDF).
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Li, Shuang; Jiang, Xiuqiang; Tao, Ting (2016). "Guidance Summary and Assessment of the Chang'e-3 Powered Descent and Landing". Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 53 (2): 258–277. Bibcode:2016JSpRo..53..258L. doi:10.2514/1.A33208.
  10. Eppler, Dean (2019). "Human Lunar Landing Experience On Project Apollo" (PDF).
  11. Chaikin, Andrew (2007). A Man on the Moon: The Triumphant Story Of The Apollo Space Program. New York: Penguin Group. p. 88. ISBN   978-0-14-311235-8.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lorenz, Ralph D. (1 January 2023). "Planetary landings with terrain sensing and hazard avoidance: A review". Advances in Space Research. 71 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.11.024 . ISSN   0273-1177.
  13. "Apollo 12 Image Library". www.nasa.gov.
  14. "The Mystery of Lunar Water Part 2 Instructor Guide" (PDF).
  15. "NASA technology enables precision landing without a pilot". phys.org.
  16. "IAUC 5800: 1993e". www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu.
  17. Watanabe, J.; Rogers, J. (July 1, 1994). "Periodic Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 (1993e)". International Astronomical Union Circular (6025): 1. Bibcode:1994IAUC.6025....1W via NASA ADS.
  18. 1 2 3 "Zeroing in on the Target". NASA Mars Exploration. Retrieved 22 January 2024.
  19. "MPF Landing Footprint Plots". mars.nasa.gov.
  20. "Mars Pathfinder Landing Ellipses". NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).
  21. "Mars Polar Lander and Deep Space 2 Landing Sites". nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov.
  22. "Image Gallery: Perseverance Rover - NASA". mars.nasa.gov. Retrieved 22 January 2024.
  23. Bridges, J. C.; Seabrook, A. M.; Rothery, D. A.; Kim, J. R.; Pillinger, C. T.; Sims, M. R.; Golombek, M. P.; Duxbury, T.; Head, J. W.; Haldemann, A. F. C.; Mitchell, K. L.; Muller, J.-P.; Lewis, S. R.; Moncrieff, C.; Wright, I. P.; Grady, M. M.; Morley, J. G. (2003). "Selection of the landing site in Isidis Planitia of Mars probe Beagle 2". Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 108 (E1): 5001. Bibcode:2003JGRE..108.5001B. doi:10.1029/2001JE001820.
  24. Lebreton, J. -P.; Matson, D. L. (1997). "1997ESASP1177....5L Page 5". Huygens: Science. 1177: 5. Bibcode:1997ESASP1177....5L.
  25. Lebreton, Jean-Pierre; Witasse, Olivier; Sollazzo, Claudio; Blancquaert, Thierry; Couzin, Patrice; Schipper, Anne-Marie; Jones, Jeremy B.; Matson, Dennis L.; Gurvits, Leonid I.; Atkinson, David H.; Kazeminejad, Bobby; Pérez-Ayúcar, Miguel (December 23, 2005). "An overview of the descent and landing of the Huygens probe on Titan". Nature. 438 (7069): 758–764. Bibcode:2005Natur.438..758L. doi:10.1038/nature04347. PMID   16319826. S2CID   4355742 via www.nature.com.
  26. "Zeroing in on Mars". Jet Propulsion Laboratory .
  27. Agle, D. C.; Laboratory, Jet Propulsion (October 16, 2014). "A Close Up View of the Primary Landing Site on Comet 67P".
  28. "SpaceX's self-landing rocket is a flying robot that's great at math". Quartz. 21 February 2017. Retrieved 23 January 2024.
  29. Blackmore, Lars (Winter 2016). "Autonomous Precision Landing of Space Rockets" (PDF). The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering. 46 (4): 15–20. ISSN   0737-6278. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 10, 2017. Retrieved January 15, 2017.
  30. Gibney, Elizabeth (October 17, 2016). "Europe and Russia prepare for historic landing on Mars". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.20812. S2CID   133443172 via www.nature.com.
  31. "Spotlight on Schiaparelli's landing site". www.esa.int.
  32. "Perseverance Rover Landing Ellipse in Jezero Crater". NASA Mars Exploration. Retrieved 22 January 2024.
  33. Foust, Jeff (February 18, 2021). "Perseverance lands on Mars".
  34. Wu, Bo; Dong, Jie; Wang, Yiran; Rao, Wei; Sun, Zezhou; Li, Zhaojin; Tan, Zhiyun; Chen, Zeyu; Wang, Chuang; Liu, Wai Chung; Chen, Long; Zhu, Jiaming; Li, Hongliang (2022). "Landing Site Selection and Characterization of Tianwen-1 (Zhurong Rover) on Mars". Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 127 (4). Bibcode:2022JGRE..12707137W. doi: 10.1029/2021je007137 .
  35. "ESA - Robotic Exploration of Mars - Choosing the ExoMars 2020 landing site". exploration.esa.int. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
  36. "ExoMars 2020 Landing Map". The Planetary Society. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
  37. Favaro, E. A.; Balme, M. R.; Davis, J. M.; Grindrod, P. M.; Fawdon, P.; Barrett, A. M.; Lewis, S. R. (April 2021). "The Aeolian Environment of the Landing Site for the ExoMars Rosalind Franklin Rover in Oxia Planum, Mars". Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets. 126 (4). doi:10.1029/2020JE006723. ISSN   2169-9097 . Retrieved 24 January 2024.
  38. "ExoMars landing site revealed | News". University of Leicester. 22 November 2018. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
  39. Ivanov, M.A.; Abdrakhimov, A.M.; Basilevsky, A.T.; Demidov, N.E.; Guseva, E.N.; Head, J.W.; Hiesinger, H.; Kohanov, A.A.; Krasilnikov, S.S. (November 2018). "Geological characterization of the three high-priority landing sites for the Luna-Glob mission". Planetary and Space Science. 162: 190–206. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2017.08.004.
  40. Ivanov, M.A.; Hiesinger, H.; Abdrakhimov, A.M.; Basilevsky, A.T.; Head, J.W.; Pasckert, J-H.; Bauch, K.; van der Bogert, C.H.; Gläser, P.; Kohanov, A. (November 2015). "Landing site selection for Luna-Glob mission in crater Boguslawsky". Planetary and Space Science. 117: 45–63. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2015.05.007.
  41. "India's Chandrayaan-3 Will Attempt Soft Lunar Landing | Aviation Week Network". aviationweek.com.
  42. 1 2 3 "小型月着陸実証機「SLIM」月着陸へ向けた今後の予定" [Small lunar landing demonstration vehicle "SLIM" Future plans for the moon landing](PDF). JAXA.
  43. "OSIRIS-REx Mission Profile – OSIRIS-REx | Spaceflight101" . Retrieved 24 January 2024.
  44. Warren, Haygen (24 September 2023). "Historic OSIRIS-REx asteroid samples successfully return to Earth". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
  45. 1 2 Foust, Jeff (24 September 2023). "OSIRIS-REx sample capsule lands in Utah". SpaceNews. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
  46. Wattles, Jackie (January 19, 2024). "Astrobotic's Peregrine lunar lander burns up over Pacific Ocean". CNN.
  47. "SLIMの月面ピンポイント着陸技術". 宇宙科学研究所.
  48. McCurry, Justin (26 January 2024). "Japan's 'moon sniper' probe made incredibly accurate landing, but is now upside down". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 February 2024.
  49. "Japan releases image of SLIM spacecraft upside down on moon". Nikkei Asia. Retrieved 7 February 2024.
  50. Foust, Jeff (26 February 2024). "Intuitive Machines expects early end to IM-1 lunar lander mission". SpaceNews. Retrieved 29 February 2024.