Matthew Daniels

Last updated

Matthew Daniels
BornNew York City
OccupationAcademic, political activist
Alma mater Dartmouth College
University of Pennsylvania Law School
Brandeis University

Matthew Daniels is an American academic and human rights scholar. [1]

Contents

In the late 1990s through the 2000s, Daniels campaigned against the proposed recognition of same-sex marriage in the United States, which he viewed as a threat to the traditional family. Daniels led the drafting of the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment and unsuccessfully lobbied for its passage during the administration of President George W. Bush. Daniels' advocacy was controversial among some social conservatives, concerned by his de-emphasis of gay marriage as an issue of Christian morality.

He teaches at The Institute of World Politics where he is the Chair of Law and Human Rights and founder of the Center for Human Rights and International Affairs. [2]

Early life and education

Daniels was born in 1963 in Spanish Harlem, New York City. His father was Guy Daniels, a poet and translator of Russian literature. [3]

Daniels has described his childhood as "miserable"; his father deserted Daniels' mother when he was a toddler. [4] She continued to raise him in Spanish Harlem, [4] working as a secretary. [3] In 1971, she was assaulted by four men, leaving her with a broken back. [3] She was unable to work and went on welfare, and became depressed [4] and alcoholic. [3]

Daniels states that his close relationship with his Black half-brother gave him a firsthand look at racial discrimination. [4] After college, Daniels worked for homeless services run by Black churches, and under their influence became a born-again Christian. [3] These churches also heavily influenced his view of marriage and family and homosexuality. [3]

Daniels earned a scholarship to Dartmouth College. [3] He graduated from Dartmouth in 1985, the University of Pennsylvania Law School in 1993, and earned a Ph.D. in politics from Brandeis University in 2003. [4]

Career

1990s

After graduating from Penn Law, in 1996, Daniels became the director of the Massachusetts Family Institute in Boston, affiliated with social conservative activist and author James Dobson. Daniels' work stressed the importance of fathers; he commissioned research demonstrating the negative impacts of single-mother families and advocated making divorce more difficult to obtain. "Above all," according to The Atlantic in 2004, Daniels "dedicated himself to opposing gay marriage, which he sees as the biggest threat to the traditional family." [3]

Daniels cited his childhood without a reliable father figure as a reason for his opposition to same-sex marriage. He told USA Today that he is not anti-gay, but rather, wanted to make sure that children have both a mother and father, which recognition of same-sex marriage would jeopardize. [4] The Atlantic in 2004 noted that while highly critical of gay marriage, he was "careful not to condemn gays themselves" and generally avoided working closely with leading social conservatives because of their polarizing language. [3]

Daniels was a founder of the Alliance for Marriage in 1999. [5] He was troubled by legal developments in states like Vermont and Hawaii, fearing the prospect of gay marriage legalized through the judiciary (Hawaii's Supreme Court delivered the first major legal victory to American gay marriage advocates in 1993; see Baehr v. Miike [6] ). [7] Daniels' concerns led him to believe that only a constitutional amendment could prevent this. [8]

2000s and Federal Marriage Amendment

In 2001, Daniels led the drafting of the Federal Marriage Amendment through the Alliance for Marriage, [4] [8] working with conservative legal scholars, including former Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork, Robert P. George, and Gerard V. Bradley, over several months in the spring and summer. [9] It was announced in July, and the profile of the Alliance was raised significantly, as was its fundraising intake. [10] Daniels presented it to President George W. Bush that year. [3]

According to Daniels, the Amendment was crafted so as to prohibit same-sex marriages but allow room for civil unions and other similar arrangements, which had been established in states like California at the time. [3] (Some co-authors disagreed; Robert George and Gerard Bradley maintained that it would also prohibit at least some forms of non-marriage unions for same-sex couples. [9] )

The draft Amendment did not gain much momentum initially. At the time, it was considered by some conservatives moot because of their established victory with the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act. [3] Activists were generally more concerned with stem cell research, and the September 11 attacks further realigned political priorities away from other social issues. [10]

Daniels continued to lobby for the draft to be taken up in Congress. He convinced conservative Mississippi Democratic congressman Ronnie Shows to introduce the draft amendment as a bill in May 2002. 22 co-sponsors signed on, but the bill did not advance in the House of Representatives. Shows lost his subsequent election; Daniels then worked with Republican freshman from Colorado Marilyn Musgrave, who introduced the bill again on May 21, 2003, but it received less support than the previous year. [10]

By late 2003, gay marriage had become a major national political concern. The month after Musgraves introduced the bill, Canada began issuing marriage licenses to gay couples (specifically, in Ontario; see same-sex marriage in Canada), and shortly thereafter the United States Supreme Court struck down anti-sodomy laws in Lawrence v. Texas . [10] Finally, Massachusetts became the first state to legalize gay marriage in November after a decision by its Supreme Court. [10] [3]

Daniels became controversial among American social conservative activists who did not like the Federal Marriage Amendment's allowance of civil unions and Daniels' de-emphasis of homosexuality as a Biblical sin. [3] [11] Many of these critics, including James Dobson and Reverend Jerry Falwell, coalesced around the Arlington Group. [3] [7] The Wall Street Journal reported that most of those opposed were eventually persuaded by Daniels and Musgrave to accept the proposed amendment on the grounds that more strict prohibitions of civil unions would be politically impossible pass. [10]

Going into the 2004 presidential elections, President Bush sought to court socially conservative voters by taking a formal stance against gay marriage while being able to position himself as a relative moderate. [7] [3] In January 2004, [10] the Bush campaign thus embraced Daniels and the Alliance for Marriage position and formally backed the FMA. [12] [3]

The Federal Marriage Amendment failed in the Senate with 47 votes, 19 fewer than needed to pass a constitutional amendment. Daniels vowed to continue the fight, stating that the bill had already succeeded in raising public awareness and getting politicians on the record in the run up to the 2004 elections. [13] [14] Daniels continued to campaign in support of the amendment in 2006, which was also defeated in both the House and Senate. [15]

Daniels' activism also drew intense criticism from gay rights' activists and civil rights organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union and Human Rights Campaign, both of which strongly opposed the Federal Marriage Amendment. [4]

Daniels is creator and producer of the Human Rights Network, a digital public education campaign to promote human rights awareness through entertainment media. [16] Daniels also launched the Digital Human Rights Ambassador Program at the University of Costa Rica. [17]

GreatAmericans.com

Daniels was a director of GreatAmericans.com, founded in 2008. The project was unrelated to his previous activism and focused on highlighting "positive role models" such as military service members, firefighters, and police officers. The site was an affiliate of the Funny or Die network with support from Sequoia Capital. [18] The website now redirects to the group's YouTube channel. [19]

Human rights

Daniels is the Chair of Law and Human Rights at the Institute of World Politics in Washington, D.C. He is also an adjunct professor at Handong International Law School, Handong Global University. He has founded a number of projects that focus on promoting human rights. [20] Daniels founded Human Liberty, [21] a non-profit to raise awareness of extreme human rights violations in countries such as North Korea.

Daniels is the author of Human Liberty 2.0: Advancing Universal Rights in the Digital Age. [22] He has published opinion pieces on threats to digital privacy, [23] women's rights in Afghanistan, [24] and against the use of torture as antithetical to democracy. [25]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT movements</span> Social movements

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) movements are social movements that advocate for LGBT people in society. Although there is not a primary or an overarching central organization that represents all LGBT people and their interests, numerous LGBT rights organizations are active worldwide. The first organization to promote LGBT rights was the Scientific-Humanitarian Committee, founded in 1897 in Berlin.

The Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA), also referred to by proponents as the Marriage Protection Amendment, was a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would legally define marriage as a union of one man and one woman. The FMA would also prevent judicial extension of marriage rights to same-sex (gay) or other unmarried homosexual couples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage in Canada</span>

Same-sex marriage was progressively introduced in several provinces and territories of Canada by court decisions beginning in 2003 before being legally recognized nationwide with the enactment of the Civil Marriage Act on July 20, 2005. On June 10, 2003, the Court of Appeal for Ontario issued a decision immediately legalizing same-sex marriage in Ontario, thereby becoming the first province where it was legal. The introduction of a federal gender-neutral marriage definition made Canada the fourth country in the world, and the first country outside Europe, to legally recognize same-sex marriage throughout its borders. Before the federal recognition of same-sex marriage, court decisions had already introduced it in eight out of ten provinces and one of three territories, whose residents collectively made up about 90 percent of Canada's population. More than 3,000 same-sex couples had already married in those areas before the Civil Marriage Act was passed. Most legal benefits commonly associated with marriage had been extended to cohabiting same-sex couples since 1999.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage in the United States</span> Marriage between members of the same gender within the United States of America

The availability of legally recognized same-sex marriage in the United States expanded from one state (Massachusetts) in 2004 to all fifty states in 2015 through various court rulings, state legislation, and direct popular votes. States each have separate marriage laws, which must adhere to rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States that recognize marriage as a fundamental right guaranteed by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as first established in the 1967 landmark civil rights case of Loving v. Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human Rights Campaign</span> LGBTQ civil rights advocacy group

The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) is an American LGBTQ advocacy group. It is the largest LGBTQ political lobbying organization within the United States. Based in Washington, D.C., the organization focuses on protecting and expanding rights for LGBTQ individuals, most notably advocating for same-sex marriage, anti-discrimination and hate crimes legislation, and HIV/AIDS advocacy. The organization has a number of legislative initiatives as well as supporting resources for LGBTQ individuals. The organization is attached to a number of scandals regarding its treatment of women and transgender humans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marilyn Musgrave</span> American politician (born 1949)

Marilyn Neoma Musgrave, American politician, is a former Republican member of the United States House of Representatives who served from 2003 to 2009, representing the 4th District of Colorado.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maggie Gallagher</span> American writer (born 1960)

Margaret Gallagher is an American writer, socially conservative commentator, and activist. She wrote a syndicated column for Universal Press Syndicate from 1995 to 2013 and has written several books. Gallagher founded the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy, a small, socially conservative think tank. She is also a co-founder of the National Organization for Marriage (NOM), an advocacy group which opposes same-sex marriage and other legal recognition of same-sex partnerships; she has served as president and as chairman of the board of NOM.

The Log Cabin Republicans (LCR) is an organization affiliated with the Republican Party which advocates for equal rights for LGBT+ Americans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions</span>

Prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges (2015), U.S. state constitutional amendments banning same-sex unions of several different types passed, banning legal recognition of same-sex unions in U.S. state constitutions, referred to by proponents as "defense of marriage amendments" or "marriage protection amendments." These state amendments are different from the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment, which would ban same-sex marriage in every U.S. state, and Section 2 of the Defense of Marriage Act, more commonly known as DOMA, which allowed the states not to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. The amendments define marriage as a union between one man and one woman and prevent civil unions or same-sex marriages from being legalized, though some of the amendments bar only the latter. The Obergefell decision in June 2015 invalidated these state constitutional amendments insofar as they prevented same-sex couples from marrying, even though the actual text of these amendments remain written into the state constitutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ken Mehlman</span> American lawyer

Kenneth Brian Mehlman is an American social entrepreneur and businessman. He serves as a member, global head of public affairs, and co-head of KKR global impact at investment firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts. He oversees the firm's responsible investment efforts, leading the firm's Environmental Social Governance programs. Prior to joining KKR, Mehlman spent a year as an attorney and partner at law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. In January 2017, Mehlman announced that he would act as chairman of the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Policy Advisory Board.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in the United States</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights in the United States rank among the highest in the world, with public opinion and jurisprudence changing significantly since the late 1980s.

The legal status of same-sex marriage has changed in recent years in numerous jurisdictions around the world. The current trends and consensus of political authorities and religions throughout the world are summarized in this article.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Kosovo</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) rights in Kosovo have improved in recent years, most notably with the adoption of the new Constitution, banning discrimination based on sexual orientation. Kosovo remains one of the few Muslim-majority countries where LGBT pride parades are held annually.

The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) is an American non-profit political organization established to work against the legalization of same-sex marriage in the United States. It was formed in 2007 specifically to pass California Proposition 8, a state prohibition of same-sex marriage. The group has opposed civil union legislation and gay adoption, and has fought against allowing transgender individuals to use bathrooms that accord with their gender identity. Brian S. Brown has served as the group's president since 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Wyoming</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Wyoming may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity has been legal in Wyoming since 1977, and same-sex marriage was legalized in the state in October 2014. Wyoming statutes do not address discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBT people is illegal under federal law. In addition, the cities of Jackson, Casper, and Laramie have enacted ordinances outlawing discrimination in housing and public accommodations that cover sexual orientation and gender identity.

South Korea does not recognize same-sex marriage, civil unions or any other form of legal union for same-sex couples.

LGBT conservatism refers to LGBT individuals with conservative political views. It is an umbrella term used for what is bifurcated into two specific sub-categories, each with its own term and meaning. The first sub-categorical term, Pre-Stonewall LGBT Conservatives, refers to LGBT individuals embracing and promoting the ideology of a traditional and often anti-LGBT conservatism in either a general or specifically-LGBT social context or environment. The second sub-categorical term, Post-Stonewall LGBT Conservatives, refers to self-affirming LGBT persons with fiscally, culturally, and politically conservative views. These post-Stonewall conservatives' social views, though generally conservative too, at the same time reflect a self-determination-stemmed and more recent socio-historical "gay-affirmation" on issues like marriage equality for same-sex couples, gay family recognition, civic equality generally for LGBT people in society, and also a positive role for (gay-affirming) religion in LGBT life, though there is not complete unanimity of opinion among them on all issues, especially those regarding the dynamics and politics of the closet and "identity management," and various legal and political issues The first term can include LGBT people who are actually opposed to same-sex marriage or other LGBTQ rights while the second term, contrastingly, usually refers to self-affirming gay people who unequivocally favor marriage as a legal institution for both hetero- and homosexuals and who simultaneously prefer economic and political conservatism more generally. The number of self-affirming LGBT advocates for conservative ideas and policies became more apparent only after the advent of the modern LGBT civil rights movement in the 1970s even as many gay conservatives then did remain closeted in areas where (antigay) socially conservative politicians led the most organized opposition to LGBT rights. The Realpolitik and ideology situations for LGBT conservatives today vary by their own self-definition, and each country's sociopolitical, cultural, and legal LGBT rights landscape.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 Maine Question 1</span> Referendum on same-sex marriage

Maine Question 1 was a voter referendum on an initiated state statute that occurred on November 6, 2012. The referendum was held to determine whether or not to legalize same-sex marriage. The referendum passed with a 53-47% vote legalizing same-sex marriage in Maine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT conservatism in the United States</span> Movement with conservatism

LGBTQ+ conservatism in the United States is a social and political ideology within the LGBTQ+ community that largely aligns with the American conservative movement. LGBTQ+ conservatism is generally more moderate on social issues than social conservatism, instead emphasizing values associated with fiscal conservatism, libertarian conservatism, and neoconservatism.

References

  1. ↑ "Matthew". The Institute of World Politics. June 11, 2019. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  2. ↑ "Matthew Daniels to Hold New Chair of Law and Human Rights at IWP". Institute of World Politics. June 20, 2016. Retrieved July 29, 2017.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Foer, Franklin (March 1, 2004). "Marriage Counselor". The Atlantic. Retrieved March 2, 2022.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Peterson, Karen S. (April 12, 2004). "Man behind the marriage amendment". USA Today. Archived from the original on January 17, 2006. Retrieved March 2, 2022.
  5. ↑ "Commentary: What's a war-footage site like you doing in an online venture like this?". Hollywood Reporter. January 14, 2009. Retrieved March 2, 2022.
  6. ↑ Schmalz, Jeffrey (May 7, 1993). "In Hawaii, Step Toward Legalized Gay Marriage". The New York Times.
  7. 1 2 3 Cloud, John (February 8, 2004). "The Battle Over Gay Marriage". Time. Retrieved March 2, 2022.
  8. 1 2 Blunt, Sheryl Henderson (September 1, 2004). "The Man Behind the Marriage Amendment". Christianity Today. Retrieved March 2, 2022.
  9. 1 2 Cooperman, Alan (February 14, 2004). "Little Consensus on Marriage Amendment". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 2, 2022.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Schlesinger, Jacob M. (February 24, 2004). "How Gay Marriage Thrust 2 Outsiders Onto Center Stage". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
  11. ↑ Fiore, Faye (February 15, 2004). "Lawyer Was Ready for the Marriage Debate". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on August 19, 2014.
  12. ↑ Chung, Joanna (January 21, 2005). "Push for gay marriage ban may end in limbo". The Financial Times. Retrieved March 2, 2022.
  13. ↑ Maffei, Glenn (July 15, 2004). "Gay-marriage opponents vow to continue campaign". The Pueblo Chieftain. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
  14. ↑ Foust, Michael (October 13, 2004). "Q&A: An interview with the man behind the marriage amendment". Baptist Press. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
  15. ↑ "House Rejects Gay Marriage Amendment". CBS News. AP. July 18, 2006. Retrieved March 3, 2022.
  16. ↑ "Human Rights Network - YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
  17. ↑ "Amplifying Next Generation Voices for Human Rights in the Global South". Bot Populi. Retrieved November 17, 2022.
  18. ↑ Wetzstein, Cheryl (November 18, 2008). "Heroism starts at home". The Washington Times. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  19. ↑ "GreatAmericans DotCom - YouTube". www.youtube.com. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  20. ↑ "TELLING TALES OF ENGAGEMENT: RAISING AWARENESS OF HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES". Unbias. December 22, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2022.
  21. ↑ "About – Human Liberty" . Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  22. ↑ "Matthew Daniels". Institute of World Politics. June 11, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2022.
  23. ↑ Daniels, Matthew (September 29, 2016). "Data Overdosing And National Insecurity". HuffPost. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  24. ↑ Esar, Naheed; Daniels, Matthew (January 17, 2022). "Why Afghanistan should matter to us all". The Hill. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
  25. ↑ Daniels, Matthew (January 24, 2017). "Trump and Torture". HuffPost. Retrieved December 5, 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.