National Intelligence Strategy of the United States of America

Last updated June 19, 2023

The National Intelligence Strategy of the United States of America (NIS) is a product of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI).^[1] Drafted and implemented in 2005 while John Negroponte served as the DNI, it describes the drastic overhaul the United States (US) intelligence community will carry out. According to this strategy, the US intelligence community will create a new system for sharing information, while integrating its existing enterprises to meet its mission objectives and enterprise objectives. The changes to the intelligence community, including changes in tasking, derive from the 2002 US National Security Strategy . The legal basis for the new strategy is derived from the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 .

Legal basis for a New Intelligence Strategy

The legal basis for the NIS is the US Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act . The NIS identifies fifteen strategic objectives from the new legislation, grouping them into two separate sets of objectives.

Mission objectives

The NIS states that Mission Objectives^[4]^: 4

Relate to our efforts to predict, penetrate, and preempt threats to our national security and to assist all who make and implement US national security policy, fight our wars, protect our nation, and enforce our laws in the implementation of national policy goals.

There are five different Mission Objectives:^[4]^: 6–10

Defeat terrorists: To accomplish this goal, the primary focus is disrupting their leadership and support systems. The NIS also states that the US will "deny terrorist operational have, sanctuary, and political legitimacy."^[4]^: 7 Responsibility for carrying out this objective falls under the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). The Director of the NCTC is responsible for tasking to the individual intelligence agencies.^[4]^: 7
Counter the spread of weapons of mass destruction: The NIS states that there can be no single approach to countering the spread of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Therefore, stopping the spread of WMDs will likely take a multi-facet approach. The NIS does not give explicit details to further answer how the intelligence community will counter the spread of WMDs; however, it does indicate that the community will focus on the movement and transportation of the weapons.^[4]^: 7 Focusing on the transportation of WMDs will require integration of the "analytic effort within the intelligence community, under the leadership of the National Counter-Proliferation Center."^[4]^: 7
Support democratic, or aspiring democratic, governments: The NIS states that "failed states are a refuge and breeding ground of extremism."^[4]^: 8 Therefore, the intelligence community must work to support new democracies, by providing predictive intelligence about potential threats to their governments and economies, and assist policymakers with "opportunities for promoting democracy."^[4]^: 8
Better existing analytical capabilities: In response to the changing type of adversary the US now faces, the US intelligence community will focus on traditional dictatorships and "amorphous groups or networks."^[4]^: 9 Doing so will require new methodologies, improving human intelligence collection, and assessing the adversary’s own intelligence capabilities. Meeting this goal will be the responsibility of the Directorate of National Intelligence for Collection, the Directorate of National Intelligence for Analysis, NCTC, and the National Counterintelligence Executive.^[4]^: 9
Increase the role of strategic forecasting: According to the NIS, the intelligence community cannot just respond to requests by policymakers, but must also provide predictive intelligence. Giving policymakers a "heads-up" to potential problem is required. To do so, it is necessary that the intelligence community promotes a "deeper cultural understanding, better language proficiency, and scientific and technological knowledge."^[4]^: 10 Identifying the gaps in an area, region, or expertise is the responsibility of the Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analysis.

Enterprise objectives

The National Intelligence Strategy states that Enterprise Objectives "relate to our capacity to maintain competitive advantages over states and forces that threaten the security of our nation."^[4]^: 4 There are ten different Enterprise Objectives:

Increase the role of the Department of Justice within the community: The primary focus for this enterprise objective is integrating the intelligence units within the Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) into the intelligence community. Streamlining the information-sharing process, while observing civil liberates, is the goal. It will require cooperation among state, local, and private sector entities.^[4]^: 11
Create a new culture that promotes alternative viewpoints and uses expertise: Changing the internal culture of the intelligence community is essential for avoiding strategic failures. It is necessary to create an intellectual culture that promotes discussion as well as dissenting opinion. It will require the use of collaborative technology, where subject expertise is maximized, increased cross-agency communication, and the exploration of alternative analysis. The responsibility for meeting this objection falls under the Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analysis.^[4]^: 12
Optimize Collection Capabilities: It is necessary that the US intelligence community maintains its technological edge in the world, however, it must also become more agile in its deployment.^[4]^: 12 Doing so requires an increase in collection from open-sources, human sources, and better utilization of technology among the entire intelligence community.^[4]^: 13
Hire results-focused employees with various skill sets: Although the intelligence community will hire employees from a diverse background, they will have certain common attributes. The intelligence community will deploy its workforce in a way which maximizes their skills and abilities. The end result should produce a "community-wide culture that values the abilities of the each of its members."^[4]^: 13 Creating a reward system and maintain employee retention within the intelligence community is also a feature of this enterprise objective.^[4]^: 14
Change the culture from ‘need-to-know’ to ‘need-to-share’: Increasing collaboration at all levels requires reversing the perception of how information is disseminated. The intelligence community must embrace a "need-to-share" mentality rather than a "need-to-know," with the purpose of allowing policymakers to find and access intelligence in a timely manner.^[4]^: 14–15 New collaborative tools are likely required to accomplish this objective.
Increase cooperation among allies’ intelligence services: The NIS seeks to increase collaboration and coordination among other nations’ intelligence agencies.^[4]^: 15 The US and other nations face certain common threats, and therefore, increasing cooperation among other nations is desirable. However, intelligence gained from such partnerships is to be scrutinized against US-collected intelligence - for the purpose of corroboration.^[4]^: 15–16
Create new uniform security practices: To accomplish this objective, the NIS requires reclassifying data to make it easier to share. There must be a "smaller body of ‘restricted’ information" and a "reciprocal" policy of security clearances among agencies.^[4]^: 16 In addition, counterintelligence efforts conducted by different agencies are to increase in their collaboration efforts. The National Counterintelligence Strategy further explains how this will happen.^[4]^: 16
Establish a uniform process for scientific and technological activities: The NIS requires that new trends in technological advancement be identified by "establishing a centrally led, but de-centrally executed, process" within the intelligence community.^[4]^: 17 While this objective seems to overlap with other stated enterprise objectives, it differs, as it calls for the creation of a unified research and development body within the intelligence community – or at least increased communication between the different entities with various agencies.
Create a reward system to promote competence: This objective will create a system that rewards performance while simultaneously vet underperforming programs. The creation of this system is the responsibility of the Deputy Director of National Intelligence for management.^[4]^: 18
Eliminate redundant systems while streamlining existing programs: In order to avoid overlap – and wasting resources – the NIS states that the intelligence community must "examine [sic] national security priorities...and revise its financial procedures and processes" accordingly.^[4]^: 19 Agencies with overlapping programs are not allocating their resources in a conservative manner. Doing so will allow resources to be re-allocated and address new threats. Therefore, it is necessary that the intelligence community can "ensure that new systems are developed in compliance with an Intelligence Community Enterprise Architecture," as defined by the Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Management.^[4]^: 19

NIS execution

100-Day Plan

Initiated in April 2007, the 100-Day Plan creates the platform for the implementation of the NIS. The plan focuses on integration and collaboration. Key features of the 100-Day Plan accomplishments are:^[5]

A conceptual model of the new security clearance process
Increased information sharing among intelligence agencies
Increased collaborative communication system among key foreign allies

500-Day Plan

In October 2007, the NIS began execution under the 500-Day Plan. Like the 100-Day Plan, its focus was on integration and collaboration. According to the 500-Day Plan, it aimed to drive integration and foster collaboration, "ultimately leading to better mission performance."^[6]^: 2 Integration is at the heart of the NIS and the 500-Day Plan was how the transition would be executed. The Plan was a program targeted at managers, which addressed "long-standing modes, practices, and behaviors."^[6]^: 16 Another key feature of the 500-Day Plan was the implementation of an EXCOM, which was to be provided to leadership through this transformation period. According to Dr. Donald Kerr, Principle Deputy Director of National Intelligence, the 500-Day Plan took "into account the recommendations already made, [and] build[s] on the progress already achieved" by the 100-Day Plan.^[7]

Related Research Articles

The director of national intelligence (DNI) is a senior, cabinet-level United States government official, required by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 to serve as executive head of the United States Intelligence Community (IC) and to direct and oversee the National Intelligence Program (NIP). All IC agencies report directly to the DNI. The DNI also serves, upon invitation, as an advisor to the president of the United States, the National Security Council and the Homeland Security Council on all intelligence matters. The DNI, supported by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), produces the President's Daily Brief (PDB), a top-secret document including intelligence from all IC agencies, handed each morning to the president of the United States.

Mike McConnell is a former vice admiral in the United States Navy. During his naval career he served as Director of the National Security Agency from 1992 to 1996. His civilian career includes serving as the United States Director of National Intelligence from 20 February 2007 to 27 January 2009 during the Bush administration and also seven days of the Obama administration. He is currently Vice Chairman at Booz Allen Hamilton.

The United States Intelligence Community (IC) is a group of separate United States government intelligence agencies and subordinate organizations that work both separately and collectively to conduct intelligence activities which support the foreign policy and national security interests of the United States. Member organizations of the IC include intelligence agencies, military intelligence, and civilian intelligence and analysis offices within federal executive departments.

The Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) is an intelligence agency in the United States Department of State. Its central mission is to provide all-source intelligence and analysis in support of U.S. diplomacy and foreign policy. INR is the oldest civilian element of the U.S. Intelligence Community and among the smallest, with roughly 300 personnel. Though lacking the resources and technology of other U.S. intelligence agencies, it is "one of the most highly regarded" for the quality of its work.

The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (IRTPA) is a 235-page Act of Congress, signed by President George W. Bush, that broadly affects United States federal terrorism laws. The act comprises several separate titles with varying subject issues. It was enacted in response to the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.

The National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) is a United States government organization responsible for national and international counterterrorism efforts. It is based in Liberty Crossing, a modern complex near Tysons Corner in McLean, Virginia. NCTC advises the United States on terrorism.

National Intelligence Estimates (NIEs) are United States federal government documents that are the authoritative assessment of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) on intelligence related to a particular national security issue. NIEs are produced by the National Intelligence Council and express the coordinated judgments of the United States Intelligence Community, the group of 18 U.S. intelligence agencies. NIEs are classified documents prepared for policymakers.

The National Intelligence Board (NIB), formerly the National Foreign Intelligence Board and before that the United States Intelligence Board is a body of senior U.S. Intelligence Community leaders currently led by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). The Board is tasked with reviewing and approving National Intelligence Estimates (NIEs).

The under secretary of defense for intelligence and security or USD(I&S) is a high-ranking civilian position in the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) within the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) that acts as the principal civilian advisor and deputy to the secretary of defense (SecDef) and deputy secretary of defense (DepSecDef) on matters relating to military intelligence and security. The under secretary is appointed as a civilian by the president and confirmed by the Senate to serve at the pleasure of the president.

The Open Source Enterprise (OSE) is a United States Government organization dedicated to open-source intelligence that was established by Assistant Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Open Source (ADDNI/OS), Eliot A. Jardines. They provide material to the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) and other government officials through the online news service World News Connection.

The Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence (OICI), also abbreviated IN, DOE-IN, DOE/IN, I&CI, or OIC, was established in 2006 by the merger of pre-existing Energy Department intelligence and security organizations. It is an office of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) responsible for all intelligence and counterintelligence activities throughout the DOE complex; due to this central role, OICI is designated DOE's Headquarters Intelligence. As a component of the United States Intelligence Community in addition to the Department of Energy, OICI reports to both the Director of National Intelligence and Secretary of Energy.

The United States government's Information Sharing and Customer Outreach office or ISCO was one of five directorates within the office of the chief information officer (CIO) under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). ISCO changed its name and function to Information Technology Policy, Plans, and Requirements (ITPR) in July 2007. Established by at least February 2006, ISCO is led by the Deputy Associate Director of National Intelligence for Information Sharing and Customer Outreach, which is currently Mr. Richard A. Russell. ISCO's information sharing and customer outreach responsibilities extend beyond the United States Intelligence Community and cross the entire U.S. government.

The National Counterintelligence and Security Center (NCSC) leads national counterintelligence (CI) for the United States government. It is part of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).

Michael E. Leiter was the director of the United States National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), having served in the Bush Administration and been retained in the Obama Administration. A statement released by the White House announced his resignation, effective July 8, 2011. His successor, Matthew G. Olsen, was sworn in on August 16, 2011. In September 2017, Leiter joined international law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom in Washington, D.C. as a partner in its national security practice.

This article deals with activities of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, specifically dealing with arms control, weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and weapons proliferation. It attempts to look at the process of tasking and analyzing, rather than the problem itself, other than whether the CIA's efforts match its legal mandate or assists in treaty compliance. In some cases, the details of a country's programs are introduced because they present a problem in analysis. For example, if Country X's policymakers truly believe in certain history that may not actually be factual, an analyst trying to understand Country X's policymakers needs to be able to understand their approach to an issue.

The National Counterproliferation and Biosecurity Center (NCBC) is the primary organization within the United States Intelligence Community for combating the spread of weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems.

The Boren-McCurdy intelligence reform proposals were two legislative proposals from Senator David Boren and Representative Dave McCurdy in 1992. Both pieces of legislation proposed the creation of a National Intelligence Director. Neither bill passed into law.

The Information Sharing Environment (ISE) was established by the United States Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. Under Section 1016 of IRTPA, the Program Manager for the Information Sharing Environment (PM-ISE) was granted government wide authority to plan for, oversee the implementation of, and manage the ISE.

The White House released the United States' first strategy to address "ideologically inspired" violence in August 2011. Entitled Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States, the eight-page document outlines "how the Federal Government will support and help empower American communities and their local partners in their grassroots efforts to prevent violent extremism." The strategy was followed in December 2011 by a more detailed Strategic Implementation Plan for Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States. The National Strategy for Empowering Local Partners and the strategic implementation plan (SIP) resulted from the identification of violent extremism and terrorism inspired by "al-Qaeda and its affiliates and adherents" as the "preeminent security threats" to the United States by the 2010 National Security Strategy and the 2011 National Strategy for Counterterrorism. Regardless of the priorization of the threat from al-Qaeda's ideology, both the strategy and SIP are geared towards all types of extremism without focus on a particular ideology.

The National Counter Terrorism Centre (NCTC) was a proposed federal anti-terror agency to be created in India, modelled on the National Counterterrorism Center of the US. The proposal arose after the 2008 Mumbai attacks a.k.a. 26/11 attacks where several intelligence and operational failures revealed the need for a federal agency with real time intelligence inputs of actionable value specifically to counter terrorist acts against India. The proposal has however met with much criticism from the Chief Ministers of various states who see this as a means of weakening India's federalism.

References

↑ Remarks by the Director of National Intelligence, June 28, 2008, http://www.dni.gov/speeches/20060628_speech.htm
↑ 2009 NIS, http://www.dni.gov/reports/2009_NIS.pdf Archived 2010-12-24 at the Wayback Machine
↑ "DNI Unveils 2014 National Intelligence Strategy". www.dni.gov. Retrieved 2016-11-07.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 National Intelligence Strategy, October, 2005, http://www.dni.gov/publications/NISOctober2005.pdf
↑ Director of National Intelligence Moves Forward with Intelligence Reform. September 13, 2007, "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-10-26. Retrieved 2007-10-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
1 2 500-Day Plan: Integration and Collaboration, October 10, 2007, "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-10-26. Retrieved 2007-10-16.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
↑ House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 500 Day Plan Hearing, December 6, 2007, p. 3, http://www.dni.gov/testimonies/20071206_testimony.pdf

External links

Text of the current National Security Strategy of the United States

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] Remarks by the Director of National Intelligence, June 28, 2008, http://www.dni.gov/speeches/20060628_speech.htm

[2] 2009 NIS, http://www.dni.gov/reports/2009_NIS.pdf Archived 2010-12-24 at the Wayback Machine

[3] "DNI Unveils 2014 National Intelligence Strategy". www.dni.gov. Retrieved 2016-11-07.

[NIS-4] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 National Intelligence Strategy, October, 2005, http://www.dni.gov/publications/NISOctober2005.pdf

[5] Director of National Intelligence Moves Forward with Intelligence Reform. September 13, 2007, "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-10-26. Retrieved 2007-10-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

[integration-6] 1 2 500-Day Plan: Integration and Collaboration, October 10, 2007, "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-10-26. Retrieved 2007-10-16.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

[7] House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 500 Day Plan Hearing, December 6, 2007, p. 3, http://www.dni.gov/testimonies/20071206_testimony.pdf

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]