Reconsideration of a motion

Last updated

In parliamentary procedure, reconsideration of a motion (or reconsideration of a question) may be done on a matter previously decided. The motion to "reconsider" is used for this purpose. This motion originated in the United States and is generally not used in parliaments. [1] [2] A special form of this motion is reconsider and enter on the minutes.

Contents

Explanation and use

Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised

Reconsider (RONR)
Class Motion that brings a question again before the assembly
In order when another has the floor?When another has been assigned the floor, but not after he has begun to speak
Requires second?Yes
Debatable?If motion to be reconsidered is debatable, in which case debate can go into that question
May be reconsidered?No
Amendable?No
Vote required Majority

A matter that was voted on could be brought back again through the motion to reconsider. Under Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (RONR), this motion must be made within a limited time after the action on the original motion: either on the same day or in the case of a multi-day session (such as a convention), on the next day within the session in which business is conducted. [3]

Until the motion to reconsider is disposed of or lapses, the effect of the original vote is suspended, and no action may be taken to implement it. [4] This is in contrast to the motion to rescind, which may be made at any later meeting, but until passed, has no effect on the original decision.

The motion to reconsider may be made only by a member who voted on the prevailing side in the original vote (such as someone who voted "yes" if the motion had passed or voted "no" if the motion was defeated). [1] If another member disputes an assertion by the maker of the motion to reconsider that he voted on the prevailing side, the member moving to reconsider is to be believed unless the record of a roll call vote says otherwise. [5]

The motion to reconsider is debatable to the extent that the motion being reconsidered is debatable. [6]

The making of the motion to reconsider takes precedence over all other motions and yields to nothing. [7] It is not, however, considered at the time it is made if other business is pending, and the timing of its consideration depends on the ranking of the motion that led to the vote to be reconsidered. [8] If it could not be considered at the time, a member could call up the motion to reconsider when it is appropriate to do so. [9]

Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure

The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure (TSC) treats the motion to reconsider differently in the following ways. This motion could be made by any member (not just one who voted on the prevailing side). [10] It is debatable only as to the reasons for reconsideration, and the original motion is opened for debate only if the motion for reconsideration passes. [11] Only votes on main motions may be reconsidered (not secondary motions). [12] If made while other business is pending, the motion to reconsider is taken up as soon as the other business is disposed of (it does not wait for someone to call up the motion). [13]

Legislative use

In American legislative bodies, there is a strong tradition of affirming the right to reconsider with almost no restrictions. [14] As with the case in other assemblies, reconsideration is not allowed if another motion would accomplish the result more directly (e.g. take from the table instead of reconsidering the motion to lay on the table). It is also not possible to reconsider if vested rights have been acquired because of the action, or the subject is otherwise beyond the control or out of reach of the body taking the original action. [15]

Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure states that there are no time limits with the motion to reconsider other than the practical limits of the item being within the reach of the assembly. [16]

The rules in these bodies may provide that any member can make the motion to reconsider, not just someone who voted on the prevailing side (such as California Senate Rule No. 43 and New York Senate Rule No. VI). [17] [18]

Mason's Manual permits a member to give notice of the motion to reconsider. [19]

In the U.S. Congress, there are specific limits to the motion to reconsider. [20] In addition, a custom that is followed in this body is that following a vote, the speaker or speaker pro tempore (in the US House of Representatives) or president or acting president pro tempore (in the US Senate) typically announces that, "without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid upon the table." [21] Although no motion to reconsider (or to table) have actually been made, the making of this statement (unless there is objection) precludes the making of a future motion for reconsideration and makes the vote final.

Reconsider and enter on the minutes

The motion to reconsider and enter on the minutes is a special form of the motion to reconsider that automatically halts a passed motion from taking effect until it is called up at another meeting, which cannot be held on the same day. [22] Its purpose is to delay a temporary majority from taking action on a measure until there is time to notify absent members. [23] [24]

This motion is needed in large societies with frequent meetings and small quorums. For example, at a long meeting, many members may have left, leaving a quorum consisting mostly of a group determined to take certain action. In this case, this motion prevents the vote on that action from becoming final. [23]

This motion cannot be applied to motions whose object would be defeated by the delay. [23]

Demeter's Manual notes, "If the motion to reconsider and enter a question is not called up before adjournment of the next meeting, the objectionable act then goes into effect upon adjournment. To reconsider and enter is out of order when its purpose is obviously dilatory." [25] It is allowed to withdraw the motion to reconsider and enter before the end of the meeting in which it is made.

The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure does not have this motion. [26]

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Roberts Rules of Order</i> Book on parliamentary procedure by Henry Martyn Robert

Robert's Rules of Order, often simply referred to as Robert's Rules, is a manual of parliamentary procedure by U.S. Army officer Henry Martyn Robert. "The object of Rules of Order is to assist an assembly to accomplish the work for which it was designed [...] Where there is no law [...] there is the least of real liberty." The term Robert's Rules of Order is also used more generically to refer to any of the more recent editions, by various editors and authors, based on any of Robert's original editions, and the term is used more generically in the United States to refer to parliamentary procedure. It was written primarily to help guide voluntary associations in their operations of governance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cloture</span> Parliamentary procedure forcing a quick end to a debate

Cloture, closure or, informally, a guillotine, is a motion or process in parliamentary procedure aimed at bringing debate to a quick end. The cloture procedure originated in the French National Assembly, from which the name is taken. Clôture is French for "the act of terminating something". It was introduced into the Parliament of the United Kingdom by William Ewart Gladstone to overcome the obstructionism of the Irish Parliamentary Party and was made permanent in 1887. It was subsequently adopted by the United States Senate and other legislatures. The name cloture remains in the United States; in Commonwealth countries it is usually closure or, informally, guillotine; in the United Kingdom closure and guillotine are distinct motions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliamentary procedure</span> Guidelines to conduct meetings

Parliamentary procedure is the accepted rules, ethics, and customs governing meetings of an assembly or organization. Its object is to allow orderly deliberation upon questions of interest to the organization and thus to arrive at the sense or the will of the majority of the assembly upon these questions. Self-governing organizations follow parliamentary procedure to debate and reach group decisions, usually by vote, with the least possible friction.

In parliamentary procedure, an adjournment ends a meeting. It could be done using a motion to adjourn. A time for another meeting could be set using the motion to fix the time to which to adjourn.

A censure is an expression of strong disapproval or harsh criticism. In parliamentary procedure, it is a debatable main motion that could be adopted by a majority vote. Among the forms that it can take are a stern rebuke by a legislature, a spiritual penalty imposed by a church, or a negative judgment pronounced on a theological proposition. It is usually non-binding, unlike a motion of no confidence.

In deliberative bodies, a second to a proposed motion is an indication that there is at least one person besides the mover that is interested in seeing the motion come before the meeting. It does not necessarily indicate that the seconder favors the motion.

A repeal is the removal or reversal of a law. There are two basic types of repeal; a repeal with a re-enactment is used to replace the law with an updated, amended, or otherwise related law, or a repeal without replacement so as to abolish its provisions altogether.

A parliamentary authority is a book of rules for conducting business in deliberative assemblies. Several different books have been used by legislative assemblies and by organizations' deliberative bodies.

In US parliamentary procedure, the previous question is generally used as a motion to end debate on a pending proposal and bring it to an immediate vote. The meaning of this specialized motion has nothing to do with any question previously considered by the assembly.

Deliberative assemblies – bodies that use parliamentary procedure to arrive at decisions – use several methods of voting on motions. The regular methods of voting in such bodies are a voice vote, a rising vote, and a show of hands. Additional forms of voting include a recorded vote and balloting.

In parliamentary procedure, an objection to the consideration of a question is a motion that is adopted to prevent an original main motion from coming before the assembly. This motion is different from an objection to a unanimous consent request.

In parliamentary procedure, a motion to appeal from the decision of the chair is used to challenge a ruling of the chair.

In certain countries, a motion in parliamentary procedure is a formal proposal by a member of a deliberative assembly that the assembly take certain action. Such motions, and the form they take are specified by the deliberate assembly and/or a pre-agreed volume detailing parliamentary procedure, such as Robert's Rules of Order; The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure; or Lord Citrine's The ABC of Chairmanship. Motions are used in conducting business in almost all legislative bodies worldwide, and are used in meetings of many church vestries, corporate boards, and fraternal organizations.

In United States parliamentary procedure, a suspension of the rules allows a deliberative assembly to set aside its normal rules to do something that it could not do otherwise. However, there are rules that cannot be suspended.

In parliamentary procedure in the United States, a motion to postpone to a certain time is used to delay action on a pending question until a different day, meeting, hour or until after a certain event. Then, when that time comes, the consideration of the question is picked up where it was left off when it was postponed.

Debate in parliamentary procedure refers to discussion on the merits of a pending question; that is, whether it should or should not be agreed to. It is also commonly referred to as "discussion".

In parliamentary procedure, requests and inquiries are motions used by members of a deliberative assembly to obtain information or to do or have something done that requires permission of the assembly. Except for a request to be excused from a duty, these requests and inquiries are not debatable nor amendable.

Parliamentary procedure is the body of rules, ethics, and customs governing meetings and other operations of clubs, organizations, legislative bodies, and other deliberative assemblies. General principles of parliamentary procedure include rule of the majority with respect for the minority.

In parliamentary procedure, the verb to table has the opposite meaning in the United States from that of the rest of the world:

References

  1. 1 2 Robert, Henry M.; et al. (2011). Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Da Capo Press. p. 315. ISBN   978-0-306-82020-5.
  2. Bagley, Toni (October 10, 1976). "Americans Reconsider Motions". Lakeland Ledger. Retrieved 2016-02-20 via Google News.
  3. Robert 2011 , p. 316
  4. Robert 2011 , p. 321
  5. Demeter, George (1969). Demeter's Manual of Parliamentary Law and Procedure, Blue Book, p. 229
  6. Robert 2011 , p. 320
  7. Robert 2011 , p. 317
  8. Robert 2011 , p. 318
  9. Robert 2011 , p. 323
  10. Sturgis, Alice (2001). The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure, 4th ed., p. 40–41,236
  11. TSC, p. 42,236
  12. TSC, p. 39, 236
  13. TSC, p. 39–40
  14. National Conference of State Legislatures (2000). Mason's Manual of Legislative Procedure, p. 299–300
  15. Mason, p. 301
  16. Mason, p. 310
  17. "Standing Rules of the Senate" (PDF). www.legislature.ca.gov. California State Legislature. Retrieved 2016-02-20.
  18. "R5, Adopts the Rules of the Senate for the 2015 - 2016 Session". NY State Senate. Retrieved 2016-02-20.
  19. Mason, p. 465
  20. "Constitution, Jefferson's Manual, and the Rules of the House of Representatives, 105th Congress-Rule XVIII.Reconsideration". www.gpo.gov. Retrieved 2016-02-21. When a motion has been made and carried or lost, it shall be in order for any member of the majority, on the same or succeeding day, to move for the reconsideration thereof, and such motion shall take precedence of all other questions except the consideration of a conference report or a motion to adjourn, and shall not be withdrawn after the said succeeding day without the consent of the House, and thereafter any Member may call it up for consideration: Provided, That such motion, if made during the last six days of a session, shall be disposed of when made.
  21. "THE MOTION TO RECONSIDER". archives-democrats-rules.house.gov. Retrieved 2016-02-20.
  22. Robert 2011 , p. 333
  23. 1 2 3 Robert 2011 , p. 334
  24. Demeter, George (1969). Demeter's Manual of Parliamentary Law and Procedure, Blue Book, p. 160
  25. Demeter's, p. 162
  26. TSC, p. 237