State and local tax deduction

Last updated

The United States federal state and local tax (SALT) deduction is an itemized deduction that allows taxpayers to deduct certain taxes paid to state and local governments from their adjusted gross income.

Contents

The SALT deduction intent is to avoid double taxation by allowing taxpayers to deduct state and local taxes from their federal income. It disproportionately benefits wealthy and high-earning taxpayers in areas with comparatively high state and local taxes. [1] [2] [3]

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 put a $10,000 cap on the SALT deduction for the years 2018–2025. [4] The Tax Policy Center estimated in 2016 that fully eliminating the SALT deduction would increase federal revenue by nearly $1.3 trillion over 10 years. [5]

Definition

For United States Federal Income Tax purposes, state and local taxes are defined in section 164(a) of the Internal Revenue Code as taxes paid to states and localities in the forms of: (i) real property taxes; (ii) personal property taxes; (iii) income, war profits, and excess profits taxes; and (iv) general sales taxes. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 capped the use of this itemized deduction at $10,000 ($5,000 for married persons who file separately). [6]

How The State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction works?

The State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction allows U.S. taxpayers to deduct certain state and local taxes paid from their federal income tax returns. Eligible taxes include state and local income taxes, property taxes, and either state and local sales taxes or state and local general sales taxes. [7]

To claim the deduction, taxpayers must itemize their deductions on Schedule A of Form 1040. There is a $10,000 limit on the SALT deduction, or $5,000 for a married person filing a separate return. [8]

Effects

Tax savings from the SALT deduction flow disproportionately to those with high incomes. [9] According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, in 2014 88% of the benefit of the SALT deduction accrued to those with incomes above $100,000 and only 1% accrued to those making less than $50,000. [10]

The SALT deduction primarily benefits those in high-tax states, which tend to be those with consistent Democratic legislative majorities. In 2016, the ten counties with the largest SALT deductions per filer (on average) were in New York, California, Connecticut and New Jersey. [11] These ten counties are in the New York metropolitan area and San Francisco Bay Area, which have high concentrations of wealth and expensive real estate. Since the deduction was capped at $10,000 in 2017, many homeowners have been unable to deduct thousands of dollars that they previously could, beyond what they pay in property taxes, to state, county and local governments in these places. [12]

In 2017, only taxpayers in New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New Jersey (the states with the first, second, third, and ninth highest GDP per capita) on average sent more than $1,000 each to the federal government above what the state received per capita. [13] Capping the SALT deduction tends to increase this balance of payments deficit.

Economic modeling by the economists Gilbert E. Metcalf and Martin Feldstein suggests that eliminating the SALT deduction would have "little if any impact on state and local spending". [14] The economist Edward Gramlich has likewise concluded that eliminating the deduction would have little effect on state and local spending; he also finds that eliminating the deduction would likely not induce many high-income taxpayers to leave low-income communities. [15]

History

Precursor

A deduction on state and local taxes predates the establishment of the permanent federal income tax instituted by the Revenue Act of 1913. [16] To help fund the Civil War effort, President Abraham Lincoln signed the Revenue Act of 1862, which established a temporary income tax. [17] [18] The Revenue Act included a deduction for state and local taxes, as well as national taxes. [16] [19]

This Civil War-era income tax was repealed in 1871. A federal income tax was again introduced in 1894, and again included deductions for state and local taxes, [18] but in 1895 the Supreme Court ruled the income tax unconstitutional in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. [20] [21]

Creation: Revenue Act of 1913

The first permanent income tax was established by the Revenue Act of 1913, after the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution earlier that year. A deduction for state and local taxes, as well as for national taxes, was included in the Revenue Act. [lower-alpha 1] [16] The federal income tax has included a deduction for state and local taxes ever since. [19]

Various changes

During the Great Depression, states expanded the number of taxes they levied to make up for revenue shortfalls. This included an expansion in state income taxes (before 1930, only 14 states and Hawaii had state income taxes, which were imposed primarily on very high incomes at low rates) and state sales taxes (by 1940, sales taxes made up about 60% of state budgets). [16] In response to the growing use of state sales taxes, in 1942 Congress made an explicit allowance for a deduction of state and local retail sales taxes. [16]

The introduction of the standard deduction in 1944 limited the scope of the state and local tax deduction, as well as all other itemized deductions (taxpayers who choose to use the standard deduction may not use itemized deductions). [19]

On a number of occasions, Congress has restricted the types of state and local taxes that can be used with the SALT deduction. The Revenue Act of 1964 restricted the SALT deduction to state and local taxes on real property, personal property, income, general sales, and gasoline and other motor fuels. [16] Amid the 1970s energy crisis, Congress passed the Revenue Act of 1978, which eliminated the deduction for state and local taxes on gasoline and motor vehicle fuel. [16] [19] The Tax Reform Act of 1986 disallowed sales taxes from being deducted, while the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 gave taxpayers the option of deducting either state and local income taxes or state and local sales taxes. [19]

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, signed into law by President Donald Trump, capped the total SALT deduction at $10,000 for the tax years 2018 through 2025. [4] The bill also increased the standard deduction, which significantly reduced the number of taxpayers who claim the SALT deduction. [23] As a result of the bill, the cost of the SALT deduction decreased from $104 billion in 2017 [24] to $10.4 billion in 2019. [25]

In January 2018, the states of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut (whose wealthy residents benefit disproportionately from the SALT deduction) sued the federal government over the constitutionality of the SALT cap, arguing that it unfairly restricts their ability to pursue their own preferred tax policies. [26] In October 2019, a federal court dismissed the suit; [27] appeal was declined by the Supreme Court on April 18, 2022. [28]

Build Back Better Act

In July 2021, House Representative Tom Suozzi and Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer, both Democrats from New York, pushed legislation in the U.S. House of Representatives to repeal the deduction limit. [29] In April 2021, as the Build Back Better Act was being debated in the House, a bipartisan group of House lawmakers formed the "SALT caucus" to advocate for the repeal of the $10,000 limit on the state and local tax deduction. [30] They later threatened to block the bill if a raise on the SALT deduction was not included. [31]

Ultimately, the version of the Build Back Better Act that the House passed on November 19, 2021, would have increased the SALT deduction cap to $80,000 until 2030, after which the increase would expire. Jared Golden was the only Democrat to vote against the act, because of his opposition to benefiting high-income taxpayers by raising the cap. [32] The Build Back Better Act stalled in the Senate. [33]

The Tax Policy Center concluded that more than 96% of the tax cut from raising the deduction cap to $80,000 would go to the highest-income 20% of households. [34]

Support

Advocates of the SALT deduction argue that it "helps state and local governments fund public services" because "higher-income filers are more willing to support state and local taxes" if they can deduct them from their federal tax liability. For instance, former Governor of New York Andrew Cuomo contended in 2017 that "New York would be destroyed" if the deduction were substantially reduced. [35] But several studies have concluded that the effect of eliminating the deduction on state and local spending would be small. [14] [15] [36]

Advocates also argue that, while the benefit flows disproportionately to high-income taxpayers, it also provides tax relief to some middle-class taxpayers, particularly those residing in states with high state and local tax rates. [37]

Criticism

Detractors of the SALT deduction, both on the political left and right, often point out that the deduction primarily benefits high earners: [2] [38] according to the Tax Policy Center, the top 20% of taxpayers by income would receive 96% of the benefit of repealing the SALT cap. [39] Some critics also contend that the deduction in effect results in low-tax states and cities subsidizing the federal tax payments of high-tax states and cities, though this is a contentious argument. [lower-alpha 2] [42]

Some conservative critics of the deduction argue that it encourages "wasteful spending" by state governments because it "insulates governments from negative consequences when they spend taxpayer dollars inefficiently". [43]

Notes

  1. ↑ The various exemptions and deductions were so generous that less than 1 percent of the population paid income taxes at the rate of only 1 percent of net income. [22]
  2. ↑ Arguments that some states "subsidize" others—whether arguments that wealthier (often Democratic) states "subsidize" poorer (often Republican) states because the people in wealthier states collectively contribute more in federal taxes than they receive in federal benefits, or arguments that the SALT deduction results in low tax (generally Republican) states "subsidizing" high tax (generally Democratic) states—are based on the contentious premise that the taxes paid by the people of a state can be viewed as that state paying those taxes. An Associated Press "fact-checker", for instance, considers the fact that the residents of blue states collectively contribute more in taxes than they receive in federal benefits, while residents of red states collectively receive more in federal benefits than they pay in federal taxes, to mean that blue states "subsidize" red states. [40] Two researchers at the Brookings Institution, however, argue that it is mistaken to act as if federal taxes paid by people within a state are equivalent to the state paying those taxes. [41] They say, "The impression [that New York subsidizes other states] is that the Treasurer of New York State writes a big check to the Secretary of the Treasury. But of course, that is not what is happening. The IRS taxes people, not states. And rich people pay more taxes. So, a 'donor state' is just a state with lots of rich people living [in] it."[ original research? ]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Form 1040</span> IRS tax record

Form 1040, officially, the U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, is an IRS tax form used for personal federal income tax returns filed by United States residents. The form calculates the total taxable income of the taxpayer and determines how much is to be paid to or refunded by the government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taxation in the United States</span> United States tax codes

The United States has separate federal, state, and local governments with taxes imposed at each of these levels. Taxes are levied on income, payroll, property, sales, capital gains, dividends, imports, estates and gifts, as well as various fees. In 2020, taxes collected by federal, state, and local governments amounted to 25.5% of GDP, below the OECD average of 33.5% of GDP.

A flat tax is a tax with a single rate on the taxable amount, after accounting for any deductions or exemptions from the tax base. It is not necessarily a fully proportional tax. Implementations are often progressive due to exemptions, or regressive in case of a maximum taxable amount. There are various tax systems that are labeled "flat tax" even though they are significantly different. The defining characteristic is the existence of only one tax rate other than zero, as opposed to multiple non-zero rates that vary depending on the amount subject to taxation.

A tax deduction or benefit is an amount deducted from taxable income, usually based on expenses such as those incurred to produce additional income. Tax deductions are a form of tax incentives, along with exemptions and tax credits. The difference between deductions, exemptions, and credits is that deductions and exemptions both reduce taxable income, while credits reduce tax.

Under United States tax law, itemized deductions are eligible expenses that individual taxpayers can claim on federal income tax returns and which decrease their taxable income, and are claimable in place of a standard deduction, if available.

Under United States tax law, the standard deduction is a dollar amount that non-itemizers may subtract from their income before income tax is applied. Taxpayers may choose either itemized deductions or the standard deduction, but usually choose whichever results in the lesser amount of tax payable. The standard deduction is available to individuals who are US citizens or resident aliens. The standard deduction is based on filing status and typically increases each year, based on inflation measurements from the previous year. It is not available to nonresident aliens residing in the United States. Additional amounts are available for persons who are blind and/or are at least 65 years of age.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Payroll tax</span> Tax imposed on employers or employees

Payroll taxes are taxes imposed on employers or employees, and are usually calculated as a percentage of the salaries that employers pay their employees. By law, some payroll taxes are the responsibility of the employee and others fall on the employer, but almost all economists agree that the true economic incidence of a payroll tax is unaffected by this distinction, and falls largely or entirely on workers in the form of lower wages. Because payroll taxes fall exclusively on wages and not on returns to financial or physical investments, payroll taxes may contribute to underinvestment in human capital, such as higher education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Income tax in the United States</span> Form of taxation in the United States

The United States federal government and most state governments impose an income tax. They are determined by applying a tax rate, which may increase as income increases, to taxable income, which is the total income less allowable deductions. Income is broadly defined. Individuals and corporations are directly taxable, and estates and trusts may be taxable on undistributed income. Partnerships are not taxed, but their partners are taxed on their shares of partnership income. Residents and citizens are taxed on worldwide income, while nonresidents are taxed only on income within the jurisdiction. Several types of credits reduce tax, and some types of credits may exceed tax before credits. Most business expenses are deductible. Individuals may deduct certain personal expenses, including home mortgage interest, state taxes, contributions to charity, and some other items. Some deductions are subject to limits, and an Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) applies at the federal and some state levels.

Income taxes in Canada constitute the majority of the annual revenues of the Government of Canada, and of the governments of the Provinces of Canada. In the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018, the federal government collected just over three times more revenue from personal income taxes than it did from corporate income taxes.

The United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) uses forms for taxpayers and tax-exempt organizations to report financial information, such as to report income, calculate taxes to be paid to the federal government, and disclose other information as required by the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). There are over 800 various forms and schedules. Other tax forms in the United States are filed with state and local governments.

The marriage penalty in the United States refers to the higher taxes required from some married couples with both partners earning income that would not be required by two otherwise identical single people with exactly the same incomes. There is also a marriage bonus that applies in other cases. Multiple factors are involved, but in general, in the current U.S. system, single-income married couples usually benefit from filing as a married couple, while dual-income married couples are often penalized. The percentage of couples affected has varied over the years, depending on shifts in tax rates.

In the United States tax law, an above-the-line deduction is a deduction that the Internal Revenue Service allows a taxpayer to subtract from his or her gross income in arriving at "adjusted gross income" for the taxable year. These deductions are set forth in Internal Revenue Code Section 62. A taxpayer's gross income minus his or her above-the-line deductions is equal to the adjusted gross income. Because these deductions are taken before adjusted gross income is calculated, they are designated "above-the-line". Thus, those deductions allowed in computing "taxable income" under section 63 of the IRC are "below-the-line deductions". Above-the-line deductions may be more valuable to high-income taxpayers than below-the-line deductions. Since tax year 2018, above-the-line deductions are reported on Schedule 1 of IRS Form 1040.

A casualty loss is a type of tax loss that is a sudden, unexpected, or unusual event. Damage or loss resulting from progressive deterioration of property through a steadily operating cause would not be a casualty loss. “Other casualty” are events similar to “fire, storm, or shipwreck.” It is generally held that wherever force is applied to property which the owner-taxpayer is either unaware of because of the hidden nature of such application or is powerless to act to prevent the same because of the suddenness thereof or some other disability and damage results.

In the United States tax system, the two-percent haircut, otherwise known as the two-percent floor, is a limitation on miscellaneous itemized income tax deductions and is codified under Internal Revenue Code IRC § 67(a).

Commissioner v. Banks, 543 U.S. 426 (2005), together with Commissioner v. Banaitis, was a case decided before the Supreme Court of the United States, dealing with the issue of whether the portion of a money judgment or settlement paid to a taxpayer's attorney under a contingent-fee agreement is income to the taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. The Supreme Court held when a taxpayer's recovery constitutes income, the taxpayer's income includes the portion of the recovery paid to the attorney as a contingent fee. Employment cases are an exception to this Supreme Court ruling because of the Civil Rights Tax Relief in the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. The Civil Rights Tax Relief amended Internal Revenue Code § 62(a) to permit taxpayers to subtract attorney's fees from gross income in arriving at adjusted gross income.

A home mortgage interest deduction allows taxpayers who own their homes to reduce their taxable income by the amount of interest paid on the loan which is secured by their principal residence. The mortgage deduction makes home purchases more attractive, but contributes to higher house prices.

Taxation in Puerto Rico consists of taxes paid to the United States federal government and taxes paid to the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Payment of taxes to the federal government, both personal and corporate, is done through the federal Internal Revenue Service (IRS), while payment of taxes to the Commonwealth government is done through the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury.

The alternative minimum tax (AMT) is a tax imposed by the United States federal government in addition to the regular income tax for certain individuals, estates, and trusts. As of tax year 2018, the AMT raises about $5.2 billion, or 0.4% of all federal income tax revenue, affecting 0.1% of taxpayers, mostly in the upper income ranges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tax return</span> List of individuals monetary gains and losses over 12 months submitted to government each year

A tax return is the completion of documentation that calculates an entity or individual's income earned and the amount of taxes to be paid to the government or government organizations or, potentially, back to the taxpayer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tax Cuts and Jobs Act</span> U.S. federal tax legislation

The Act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2018, Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law  115–97 (text)(PDF), is a congressional revenue act of the United States originally introduced in Congress as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), that amended the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The legislation is commonly referred to in media as the Trump tax cuts, as it was a key agenda piece of the Trump adminstration. Major elements of the changes include reducing tax rates for businesses and individuals, increasing the standard deduction and family tax credits, eliminating personal exemptions and making it less beneficial to itemize deductions, limiting deductions for state and local income taxes and property taxes, further limiting the mortgage interest deduction, reducing the alternative minimum tax for individuals and eliminating it for corporations, doubling the estate tax exemption, and reducing the penalty for violating the individual mandate of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to $0. The New York Times has described the TCJA as "the most sweeping tax overhaul in decades".

References

  1. ↑ Rappeport, Alan; McGeehan, Patrick (18 November 2021). "Tax Deduction That Benefits the Rich Divides Democrats Before Vote". The New York Times . Archived from the original on March 3, 2022.
  2. 1 2 Pulliam, Christopher; Reeves, Richard V. (September 4, 2020). "The SALT tax deduction is a handout to the rich. It should be eliminated not expanded". Brookings Institution . Archived from the original on November 10, 2021. Retrieved November 11, 2021.
  3. ↑ Bellafiore, Robert (October 5, 2018). "Who Benefits from the State and Local Tax Deduction?". Tax Foundation . Archived from the original on October 8, 2021. Retrieved November 11, 2021.
  4. 1 2 "How did the TCJA change the standard deduction and itemized deductions?". Tax Policy Center . May 2020. Archived from the original on January 17, 2022. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  5. ↑ Sammartino, Frank; Rueben, Kim (March 31, 2016). "Revisiting the State and Local Tax Deduction" (PDF). Tax Policy Center . Archived (PDF) from the original on November 6, 2021. Retrieved November 11, 2021.
  6. ↑ "Forthcoming Regulations Regarding the Deductibility of Payments by Partnerships and S Corporations for Certain State and Local Income Taxes" (PDF). Internal Revenue Service . 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on January 26, 2022.
  7. ↑ "What is the State and Local Tax (SALT) Deduction?". Tax Foundation. 2023-04-21. Retrieved 2023-09-14.
  8. ↑ Mellerio, Paige; Silvan, Maxx (1 March 2023). "Legislation to restore the state and local tax (SALT) deduction introduced in 118th Congress | National Association of Counties". www.naco.org. National Association of Counties. Retrieved 25 November 2023.
  9. ↑ Walczak, Jared (March 2017). "The State and Local Tax Deduction: A Primer" (PDF). Tax Foundation . Archived (PDF) from the original on October 22, 2021. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  10. ↑ "Estimates of Federal Tax Expenditures for Fiscal Years 2015–2019". Joint Committee on Taxation . December 7, 2015. Archived from the original on August 12, 2021. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  11. ↑ Bellafiore, Robert (October 5, 2018). "The Benefits of the State and Local Tax Deduction by County". Tax Foundation . Archived from the original on January 23, 2022.
  12. ↑ Picchi, Aimee (April 9, 2019). "Middle-class homeowners hit by the new tax law: "This is going to wipe us out"". CBS News . Archived from the original on November 30, 2021. Retrieved July 13, 2021.
  13. ↑ "Who Gives and Who Gets?". Rockefeller Institute of Government . State University of New York. March 11, 2022.
  14. 1 2 Metcalf, Gilbert E. (June 2011). "Assessing the Federal Deduction for State and Local Tax Payments" (PDF). National Tax Journal. 64 (2): 565–590. doi:10.17310/ntj.2011.2S.06. S2CID   232211237. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 15, 2021 – via National Bureau of Economic Research.
  15. 1 2 Gramlich, Edward M. (December 1985). "The Deductibility of State and Local Taxes" . National Tax Journal. 38 (4): 447–465. doi:10.1086/NTJ41792106. S2CID   232211421 – via The University of Chicago Press Journals.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Surane, Julianne (2018). "Legislative History of the SALT Deduction" (PDF). American Bar Association . Archived (PDF) from the original on December 2, 2021. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  17. ↑ Hill, Joseph A. (July 1894). "The Civil War Income Tax 003". Quarterly Journal of Economics . 8 (4): 416–452. doi:10.2307/1885603. JSTOR   1885603.
  18. 1 2 Pollack, Sheldon D. (Winter 2014). "The First National Income Tax, 1861–1872" (PDF). The Tax Lawyer. 67 (2): 311–330.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 Hemel, Daniel J. (2019). "The Death and Life of the State and Local Tax Deduction". Tax Law Review. 72: 151–196. SSRN   3256012 – via Social Science Research Network.
  20. ↑ Jones, Francis R. (October 1895). "Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Company". Harvard Law Review . 9 (3): 198–211. doi:10.2307/1321669. JSTOR   1321669.
  21. ↑ Bishop-Henchman, Joseph (April 8, 2013). "Today in History: Income Tax Ruled Unconstitutional in Pollock v. Farmers Loan Trust Co". Tax Foundation . Archived from the original on June 16, 2021. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  22. ↑ "16th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Federal Income Tax (1913)". National Archives and Records Administration . 15 September 2021. Archived from the original on March 13, 2022. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  23. ↑ Driessen, Grant A.; Hughes, Joseph S. (March 6, 2020). "The SALT Cap: Overview and Analysis". Congressional Research Service . Archived from the original on January 8, 2022. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  24. ↑ "FY2019 Tax Expenditures" (PDF). United States Department of the Treasury . October 16, 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 28, 2022. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  25. ↑ "FY2021 Tax Expenditures" (PDF). United States Department of the Treasury . February 26, 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 28, 2022. Retrieved September 24, 2022.
  26. ↑ Kelly, Stephanie (January 26, 2018). "New York, New Jersey, Connecticut to sue over federal tax law". Reuters . Archived from the original on November 6, 2021. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  27. ↑ "Federal Court Dismisses States' Challenge to SALT Deduction Cap". Thomson Reuters . October 1, 2019. Archived from the original on November 8, 2021. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  28. ↑ Chung, Andrew (April 18, 2022). "U.S. Supreme Court snubs challenge to state and local tax deduction cap". Reuters . Archived from the original on April 27, 2022.
  29. ↑ Chiappino, Leah (July 1, 2021). "Long Island Congressman Suozzi Wants End to SALT Cap as Part of Infrastructure Deal". WSHU . Archived from the original on January 4, 2022.
  30. ↑ Jagoda, Naomi (April 15, 2021). "Lawmakers launch bipartisan caucus on SALT deduction". The Hill . Archived from the original on October 3, 2021. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  31. ↑ Dore, Kate (January 21, 2022). "'No SALT, no deal.' Some House Democrats say deduction must be in Build Back Better". CNBC . Archived from the original on March 14, 2022. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  32. ↑ Thanikachalam, Neya (November 29, 2021). "In Democrats' Build Back Better bill, increase in controversial limit on state and local tax deductions could help wealthier Mass. residents". The Boston Globe . Archived from the original on January 21, 2022.
  33. ↑ Nichols, Hans (April 5, 2022). "Scoop: Sinema throws cold water on Build Back Better revival". Axios . Archived from the original on April 9, 2022.
  34. ↑ Gleckman, Howard (September 24, 2018). "High-Income Households Would Benefit Most From Repeal of the SALT Deduction Cap". Tax Policy Center . Archived from the original on January 21, 2022. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  35. ↑ Matthews, Dylan (November 2, 2017). "The state and local tax deduction, explained". Vox . Archived from the original on October 27, 2021.
  36. ↑ Leachman, Michael; Lav, Iris J. (October 19, 2017). "Eliminating State and Local Tax Deduction to Pay for Tax Cuts for Wealthy a Bad Deal for Most Americans" (PDF). Center on Budget and Policy Priorities . Archived (PDF) from the original on January 27, 2021.
  37. ↑ Sahadi, Jeanne (September 26, 2017). "Millions in the middle class will feel it if GOP kills this tax break". CNN Business . Archived from the original on January 20, 2022.
  38. ↑ "Leave the Cap on the SALT". National Review . April 6, 2021. Archived from the original on April 12, 2021.
  39. ↑ "T18-0140 - Repeal $10,000 Limit on Deductible State and Local Taxes; Baseline: Current Law; Distribution of Federal Tax Change by Expanded Cash Income Percentile, 2018". Tax Policy Center . September 24, 2018. Archived from the original on January 28, 2022.
  40. ↑ Ohlemacher, Stephen (December 9, 2017). "AP FACT CHECK: Blue high-tax states fund red low-tax states". Associated Press . Archived from the original on May 16, 2022.
  41. ↑ Reeves, Richard V.; Pulliam, Christopher (June 24, 2021). "Note to Bernie: The 8 arguments for restoring the SALT deduction, and why they're all wrong". Brookings Institution . Archived from the original on December 22, 2021.
  42. ↑ Coy, Peter (April 5, 2021). "The SALT Deduction Isn't Just a Subsidy to High-Tax Blue States". Bloomberg Businessweek . Archived from the original on November 20, 2021.
  43. ↑ Brashers, Preston (December 6, 2021). "4 Problems With Left's Hypocritical Plan to Give Wealthy Constituents a Bigger SALT Deduction". The Heritage Foundation . Archived from the original on April 12, 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.