1904 Cambridge Springs International Chess Congress

Last updated
Cambridge Springs 1904 tournament poster Cambridge springs poster.jpg
Cambridge Springs 1904 tournament poster

The 1904 Cambridge Springs International Chess Congress was the first major international chess tournament in America in the twentieth century. It featured the participation of World Champion Emanuel Lasker, who had not played a tournament since 1900 and would not play again until 1909. After the tournament Lasker moved to America and started publishing Lasker's Chess Magazine, which ran from 1904 to 1907. However, that was not the only chess magazine spawned by the tournament. The Daily Bulletins produced by Hermann Helms proved so popular that Helms started the American Chess Bulletin as a direct consequence of the tournament. Volume 1, Issue 1 of the magazine was devoted to Cambridge Springs. Helms was somewhat more successful than Lasker as a publisher and American Chess Bulletin would be edited and published by Helms from 1904 until his death in 1963. The surprising upset victory of Frank Marshall marked his rise to prominence in American chess and he would eventually reign as champion of the United States for twenty-six years.

Contents

Cambridge Springs 1904 marked the end of Harry Nelson Pillsbury's chess career. He would not play another tournament before his death in 1906 at the age of 33.

Background

Hotel Rider ad Hotel Rider Ad.JPG
Hotel Rider ad

A small town in northwestern Pennsylvania, Cambridge Springs seems like an unlikely location to hold an international chess tournament. However, back in the early 1900s Cambridge Springs was a flourishing resort town due to a couple of geographic oddities. The primary factor was location. At first glance nothing seems remarkable about the town, but in fact it is located on the Erie Railroad line, halfway between New York and Chicago, which made it an ideal stopover location for railway patrons. The secondary factor was the local mineral springs which were visited by numerous people seeking to improve their health.

In 1895 William D. Rider Jr. started construction on what he hoped would be the greatest hotel between Chicago and New York City. The mammoth hotel was not completed until 1897. When finished, the hotel featured over five hundred rooms in a seven-story structure spanning five acres. Features included a theater for five hundred, where the chess tournament was held, a ballroom, a solarium, two gymnasiums, bowling alleys and an indoor pool. The hotel grounds were equally impressive, featuring a nine-hole golf course and a man-made lake. [1]

Rider was a successful publicist for his hotel, and the chess tournament of 1904 was an outgrowth of those efforts. Over two hundred reporters from around the world were present at the Rider Hotel. Financed primarily by Rider and the Erie Railroad Company, the tournament received additional support from Professor Isaac Leopold Rice as well as by selling tournament bulletins to chess clubs around the country. [2] It was originally intended that the chess tournament be a yearly affair; however, Rider died in 1905 and the prospect of future tournaments died with him.

Cambridge Springs was the most important chess tournament that took place in the year 1904. [3] It was the first major international tournament in America since the Sixth American Chess Congress of 1889. [4] There would not be another tournament of the same stature in America until the New York 1924 chess tournament. In 1988 the U.S. Chess Championship returned to Cambridge Springs and the tournament was held in one of the few hotels remaining from the railroad resort era, the Riverside Inn.

Participants

The players and organizers of Cambridge Springs 1904, created for Isaac Rice by the noted New York artist, Franz Frenzel

(From top to bottom:) H. Helms, H. Cassel, J. Redding, W. Van Antwerp, C. Schlechter, F.J. Marshall, Em. Lasker, M. Chigorin, J. Mieses, G. Marco, I. Rice, D. Janowsky, J.W. Showalter, A.B. Hodges, A.W. Fox, H.N. Pillsbury, T.F. Lawrence, W.E. Napier, R. Teichmann, H. Ridder, E. Delmar, J. Barry Cambridge springs.jpg
The players and organizers of Cambridge Springs 1904, created for Isaac Rice by the noted New York artist, Franz Frenzel

(From top to bottom:) H. Helms, H. Cassel, J. Redding, W. Van Antwerp, C. Schlechter, F.J. Marshall, Em. Lasker, M. Chigorin, J. Mieses, G. Marco, I. Rice, D. Janowsky, J.W. Showalter, A.B. Hodges, A.W. Fox, H.N. Pillsbury, T.F. Lawrence, W.E. Napier, R. Teichmann, H. Ridder, E. Delmar, J. Barry

All of the world's top players were invited to the tournament. Géza Maróczy was unable to attend due to his career as a mathematics teacher. Siegbert Tarrasch, having finished behind Lasker at Hastings and Nuremberg, was carefully avoiding tournaments in which Lasker was participating. [6] In fact the two would not face each other in a tournament until the St. Petersburg 1914 chess tournament, eighteen years after their last meeting at Nuremberg.

While most of the players were seasoned international veterans, four of the competitors, Barry, Fox, Hodges and Lawrence, participated in an international tournament for the first time at Cambridge Springs. [7]

The players could be roughly divided into two groups, eight Europeans and eight Americans.

The Europeans:

The Americans:

The Europeans and Marshall would all arrive in America on a single steamship, the S.S. Pretoria.

Main tournament

Participants of the tournament on the steps of the Hotel Rider, 1904 Cambridge Springs 1904.jpg
Participants of the tournament on the steps of the Hotel Rider, 1904

The tournament started on April 25, 1904, and ended on May 19, 1904. It was a single-round-robin tournament where each player would play one game against the other players, for a total of fifteen games. Games were played on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday. Wednesday was for adjourned games and Saturdays were for Rice Gambit consultation games. Games started at 10:00 am and played until 3:00 pm and then continued at 5:00 pm to 7:00 pm if necessary. The time control was 30 moves in 2 hours, then 15 moves per hour. There was a "grandmaster draw" rule that prohibited draws of less than 30 moves, unless the draw was forced. [8]

Janowski, Marshall and Teichmann all started the tournament very strongly. After six rounds Janowski led with 5½ points, followed closely by Marshall and Teichmann with 5. Teichmann became ill and would only score an additional 1½ points in the remaining nine rounds. [9] Marshall and Janowski continued their torrid pace through the ninth round where they both had eight points, followed by Lasker in third with 6½. In the tenth round however, Janowski started to falter and lost two games in a row, including one to Fox.

Going into the 15th and final round Marshall was in first place with 12 points, but he was only one point ahead of Janowski, who in turn was only one point ahead of Lasker. Marshall played black against Fox who was up a pawn after 20 moves. However, Fox quickly blundered a rook and Marshall won. [10] Meanwhile, Janowski and Lasker were playing against each other for second place. Janowski, with a one-point lead, only needed a draw with the white pieces to clinch the second prize. Janowski launched a very spirited attack against Lasker's king, which was stuck in the center of the board. Lasker was up to the challenge though, and built a defense that turned back Janowski's attack and eventually won the game. [11]

Marshall finished first, undefeated with 13/15, and with his last round victory Lasker tied Janowski for second place with 11/15.

Tournament crosstable

Tournament winner, Frank Marshall Frank Marshall 1904.jpg
Tournament winner, Frank Marshall
Cambridge Springs 1904
#PlayerCountry12345678910111213141516ScorePrize
1 Frank Marshall USAX1½½11½11111½11113$1000
2 Dawid Janowski POL0X0½½1111011111111$450
3 Emanuel Lasker GER½1X½½01101111½1111$450
4 Georg Marco AUT½½½X½½10½101½½119$200
5 Jackson Showalter USA0½½½X½111½0½½½½1$165
6 Carl Schlechter AUT001½½X0½½0½11½1½$67.50
7 Mikhail Chigorin RUS½00001X1½01½1101$67.50
8 Jacques Mieses GER00010½0X11101½107
9 Harry Pillsbury USA001½0½½0X1½0½1½17
10 Albert Fox USA0100½1100X110100
11 Richard Teichmann GER00011½00½0X½1011
12 Thomas Lawrence UK0000½0½110½X1½0½
13 William Napier USA½00½½000½100X11½
14 John Barry USA00½½½½0½001½0X015
15 Albert Hodges USA0000½010½10101X05
16 Eugene Delmar USA00000½01010½½01X

In addition $700 was distributed among the non-prize winners, in accordance with the number of points scored by each player.

Brilliancy prize

Brilliancy Prize winner, Carl Schlechter Carl Schlechter (profile).png
Brilliancy Prize winner, Carl Schlechter

The Baron von Rothschild contributed $100 for a brilliancy prize. Initially it was voted to split this into two prizes of $60 and $40. [12] However, in the end four prizes were actually awarded:

First prize ($40) was won by Schlechter for his defeat of Lasker. Second prize ($25) went to Napier for his win against Barry. Third and fourth prizes ($35) were split by Janowski for his victory over Chigorin, and by Delmar for his victory over Hodges. [13]

The game that won third place, Chigorin vs. Janowski, was not one of the games initially submitted for the prize.

Ten games were submitted for the prize (winners are in bold): [14]

Pillsbury's revenge

abcdefgh
8
Chessboard480.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess qdt45.svg
Chess kdt45.svg
Chess bdt45.svg
Chess rdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess ndt45.svg
Chess pdt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess qlt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess nlt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess plt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
Chess klt45.svg
Chess blt45.svg
Chess rlt45.svg
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
Eight years later Pillsbury finally has the chance to play 7.Bxf6! rather than 7.Qh4?

One of the most famous games of the tournament was Pillsbury's revenge against Lasker. This game is actually more famous for the folklore that surrounds it than for the game itself.

The story starts in St. Petersburg, 1896 when Lasker beat Pillsbury in a magnificent game which won the brilliancy prize. Immediately after the game Pillsbury is convinced his 7th move was a mistake and an alternate move would have led to an advantage. [16] Dr. J. Hannak, Lasker's biographer, describes Pillsbury's preparation: [17]

That very night, after his shattering defeat, Pillsbury sat down for many hours, analysing his new idea and satisfying himself that indeed it would have given him the advantage. During the next weeks and months he burned a good deal more midnight oil in the privacy of his room, analysing his new variation as thoroughly as he knew how; but he did not tell anybody about it. Since the opening concerned was a variation of the Queen's Gambit very popular in those days, Pillsbury had countless opportunities to give his new line the practical test; but he would not waste his precious discovery on any of the small fry, thereby divulging his great secret; he would spring that surprise on no one less than Lasker.

J. Hannak, Emanuel Lasker

Finally, eight years after his initial defeat, Pillsbury has the opportunity to unveil his improvement against Lasker.

1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 c5 5. Bg5 cxd4 6. Qxd4 Nc6 (see diagram) 7. Bxf6! gxf6 8. Qh4 dxc4 9. Rd1 Bd7 10. e3 Ne5 This knight move is a mistake. Tarrasch recommends (10...f5 11.Qxc4 Bg7 12.Qb3 Bxc3+ 13.Qxc3 Qa5) while modern engines prefer (10...f5 11.Qxc4 Qb6 12.Rd2 0-0-0) 11. Nxe5 fxe5 12. Qxc4 Qb6 13. Be2 A positional pawn sacrifice that Black probably should have declined with Rc8. 13... Qxb2 14. 0-0 Rc8 15. Qd3 Rc7 16. Ne4 Be7 17. Nd6+ Kf8 18. Nc4 Qb5 This move is given incorrectly as Qb4 by some sources. [18] 19. f4 exf4? 20. Qd4! White now has a large advantage. 20... f6 21. Qxf4 Qc5 22. Ne5 Be8 23. Ng4 f5 24. Qh6+ Kf7 25. Bc4 Rc6 26. Rxf5+ Qxf5 27. Rf1 Qxf1+ 28. Kxf1 Bd7 29. Qh5+ Kg8 30. Ne5 1–0 Black will get mated in six moves at most.

Cambridge Springs Defense

The Cambridge Springs Defense of the Queen's Gambit Declined takes its name from this 1904 tournament. It was played in three games: Marshall–Teichmann, Hodges–Barry and Schlechter–Teichmann. The results were not good as Black only scored a single draw and two losses.

Despite these results and the fact that the variation did not truly originate at Cambridge Springs, the name Cambridge Springs Defense is still used today to refer to this variation. [19]

Rice Gambit Tournament

Chess patron, Professor Isaac L. Rice Isaac Leopold Rice.jpg
Chess patron, Professor Isaac L. Rice

Along with the main tournament a special Rice Gambit consultation tournament [20] was contested on three consecutive Saturdays, April 30, May 7 and May 14. This is widely attributed to Rice's sponsorship of the main tournament. It is not clear if the players received additional compensation for playing in the Rice Gambit tournament or if it was considered part of their responsibilities for entering the main tournament.

Overall, the Rice Gambit "won" the tournament with a score of four wins, one loss and two draws.

Round one

WhiteResultBlack
Mieses, Lasker, Showalter and Barry1–0Chigorin, Schlechter and Fox
Delmar, Teichmann, Napier and Lawrence0–1Marco, Pillsbury, Marshall and Hodges

Round two

WhiteResultBlack
Mieses, Lasker, Showalter and Barry1–0Delmar, Teichmann, Napier and Lawrence
Chigorin, Schlechter, Fox and Janowski1–0Marco, Pillsbury, Marshall and Hodges

In the third round the four man teams dissolved and three two man consultation games were played instead.

Round three

WhiteResultBlack
Marshall & Barry½–½Lasker & Mieses
Chigorin & Showalter½–½Marco & Hodges
Schlechter & Teichmann1–0Delmar & Lawrence

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emanuel Lasker</span> World Chess Champion from 1894 to 1921

Emanuel Lasker was a German chess player, mathematician, and philosopher who was World Chess Champion for 27 years, from 1894 to 1921, the longest reign of any officially recognised World Chess Champion in history. In his prime, Lasker was one of the most dominant champions, and he is still generally regarded as one of the strongest players in history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jackson Showalter</span>

Jackson Whipps Showalter was a five-time U.S. Chess Champion: 1890, 1892, 1892–1894, 1895–96 and 1906–1909.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frank Marshall (chess player)</span> American chess player (1877–1944)

Frank James Marshall was the U.S. Chess Champion from 1909 to 1936, and one of the world's strongest chess players in the early part of the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry Nelson Pillsbury</span> American chess player

Harry Nelson Pillsbury was a leading American chess player. At the age of 22, he won the Hastings 1895 chess tournament, one of the strongest tournaments of the time, but his illness and early death prevented him from challenging for the World Chess Championship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mikhail Chigorin</span> Russian chess player (1850–1908)

Mikhail Ivanovich Chigorin was a chess player from the Russian Empire. He played two World Championship matches against Wilhelm Steinitz, losing both times. The last great player of the Romantic chess style, he also served as a major source of inspiration for the "Soviet chess school", which dominated the chess world in the middle and latter parts of the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dawid Janowski</span> Belarusian-French chess player

Dawid Markelowicz Janowski was a French chess player. Several openings variations are named after Janowski.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carl Schlechter</span> Austro-Hungarian chess player

Carl Schlechter was a leading Austro-Hungarian chess master and theoretician at the turn of the 20th century. He is best known for drawing a World Chess Championship match with Emanuel Lasker.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Géza Maróczy</span> Hungarian chess player

Géza Maróczy was a Hungarian chess player, one of the leading players in the world in his time. He was one of the inaugural recipients of the International Grandmaster title from FIDE in 1950.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oldřich Duras</span> Czech chess player

Oldřich Duras was a leading Czech chess master of the early 20th century. FIDE awarded him the title of International Grandmaster in 1950, when the title was first introduced, in recognition of his achievements in the early twentieth century. While still a young man and playing at a near-peak level, Duras suddenly retired from active play after 1914.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siegbert Tarrasch</span> German chess player, chess writer, and chess theoretician

Siegbert Tarrasch was a German chess player, considered to have been among the strongest players and most influential theoreticians of the late 19th and early 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Teichmann</span> German chess player (1868–1925)

Richard Teichmann was a German chess master. He was known as "Richard the Fifth" because he often finished in fifth place in tournaments. But in Karlsbad 1911, he scored a convincing win, crushing Akiba Rubinstein and Carl Schlechter with the same line of the Ruy Lopez. José Raúl Capablanca called him "one of the finest players in the world". Edward Lasker recounted the witty way in which Teichmann demonstrated the Schlechter win in his book Chess Secrets I learned from the Masters, and generally admired Teichmann's mastery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leó Forgács</span> Hungarian chess player

Leó Forgács was a Hungarian chess player.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Julius Perlis</span> Austrian chess player

Julius Perlis was an Austrian chess player.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Jaffe</span> Chess master and writer from the Russian Empire

Charles Jaffé (Jaffe) was a Russian Empire born master and chess writer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Ewart Napier</span>

William Ewart Napier was an American chess master of English birth.

The Rice Gambit is a chess opening that arises from the King's Gambit Accepted. An offshoot of the Kieseritzky Gambit, it is characterized by the moves 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6 6. Bc4 d5 7. exd5 Bd6 8. 0-0. White offers the sacrifice of the knight on e5 in order to get his king to safety and prepare a rook to join the attack against Black's underdeveloped position.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heinrich Wolf</span>

Heinrich Wolf was an Austrian journalist and chess master of Jewish origin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hermann Helms</span> American chess player

Hermann Helms was an American chess player, writer, and promoter. He is a member of the United States Chess Hall of Fame, organized as part of the World Chess Hall of Fame.

Events in chess in 1904:

References

  1. Crisman, Sharon (2003). Around Cambridge Springs. Arcadia Publishing. pp. 30–35. ISBN   978-0738513270.
  2. Munro, James (Winter 1993). "The Cambridge Springs International Chess Congress, 1904". Western Pennsylvania History: 185.
  3. Harding, Tim. "Chess in the Year 1904" (PDF). Retrieved 21 May 2013.
  4. Hannak, J (1991). Emanuel Lasker. Dover. p. 106. ISBN   0-486-26706-7.
  5. Helms, Hermann (October 1904). American Chess Bulletin. 1 (5): 95.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link)
  6. Spraggett, Kevin. "Tidbits on Cambridge Springs 1904". SPRAGGETT ON CHESS. Archived from the original on 9 October 2009. Retrieved 21 May 2013.
  7. Helms, Hermann (1904). American Chess Bulletin. 1 (1): 27.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link)
  8. Helms, Hermann (1904). American Chess Bulletin. 1 (1): 32–33.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link)
  9. "The Players". Archived from the original on 2013-03-28. Retrieved 6 May 2013.
  10. "Fox – Marshall: Cambridge Springs, 1904". Archived from the original on 2013-01-19. Retrieved 6 May 2013.
  11. "One Hundred Years Ago: Chess in the Year 1904" (PDF). Retrieved 6 May 2013.
  12. Helms, Hermann (1904). American Chess Bulletin. 1 (1): 33.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link)
  13. Wall, Bill. "Cambridge Springs 1904". Archived from the original on 11 November 2012. Retrieved 1 May 2013.
  14. Helms, Hermann. American Chess Bulletin. 1 (1): 27.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link)
  15. Hannak, J. (January 1991). Emanuel Lasker. Dover. p. 110. ISBN   0486267067.
  16. Brandreth, Dale (1960). Lasker vs. Pillsbury. p. 63.
  17. Hannak, J (1991). Emanuel Lasker. Dover. p. 107. ISBN   0-486-26706-7.
  18. Harding, Tim. "Chess in the Year 1904" (PDF). Retrieved 24 May 2013.
  19. Harding, Tim. "Chess in the Year 1904" (PDF). Retrieved 22 May 2013.
  20. Helms, Hermann. American Chess Bulletin. 1 (1): 34–35.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: untitled periodical (link)

Further reading