2010 Oregon Ballot Measures 66 and 67

Last updated

Measure 66
Flag of Oregon.svg
Raises tax on household income at and above $250,000 (and $125,000 for individual filers). Reduces income taxes on unemployment benefits in 2009. Provides funds currently budgeted for education, health care, public safety, other services.
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svgYes692,68754.27%
Light brown x.svgNo583,70745.73%
Total votes1,276,394100.00%
Registered voters/turnout2,044,04262.44%

Oregon 2010 Measures 66 and 67.svg
Results by county
Source: Oregon Secretary of State [1] [2]

Measures 66 and 67 are two ballot referendums that were on the January 26, 2010 special election ballot in the US state of Oregon, which proposed tax increases on corporations and on households making US$250,000 and individuals making $125,000 to help balance the state's budget. The measures referred two bills passed by the Oregon state legislature on June 11, 2009, and signed by Governor Ted Kulongoski on July 20, 2009, to the voters for approval. They were approved and became effective February 25, 2010. [3]

Contents

Background

The recession that greatly affected the American economy starting in late 2008 caused a budget shortfall in Oregon that the state legislature had to make up for. A critical factor in this process was that the 2008 general election gave Democrats a three-fifths majority in both chambers of the legislature, which is the supermajority needed to pass any bills calling for revenue increases. Among other actions, the legislature passed House Bills 2649 and 3405, raising taxes on corporations and on wealthy individuals and households, respectively. Some Oregon citizens [4] [note 1] started a drive to force a referendum on these bills, believing they would hurt the state's economy.

While 55,179 valid signatures from registered voters on each referendum petition were needed to qualify the referendum for the ballot, [5] [note 2] about 99,000 valid signatures were filed. Don Hamilton, spokesman for the Oregon Secretary of State's office, remarked that "it's unusually high for a statewide ballot measure." [6] On October 8, 2009, the Secretary of State's office announced that both measures qualified for the January 26, 2010 ballot.

Campaign

Businesses largely opposed the two measures, with groups such as the Associated Oregon Industries campaigning against both. [7] The top individual donor was Phil Knight of Nike, who gave $150,000.

The yes vote was supported by educators and public employee unions. [7] Politically, the Oregon Democratic Party supported the measures while the Oregon Republican Party opposed the measures.[ citation needed ] The campaigns for and against these measures spent the second most money ever waged on a ballot measure campaign in the state. [8] Only Ballot Measure 50 in 2007 was more expensive than the $12.5 million spent on the yes and no campaigns of Measures 66 and 67. [8]

Results

Measure 67
Raises $10 corporate minimum tax, business minimum tax, corporate profits tax. Provides funds currently budgeted for education, health care, public safety, other services.
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svgYes682,72053.59%
Light brown x.svgNo591,18846.41%
Total votes1,273,908100.00%
Registered voters/turnout2,044,04262.32%

Oregon 2010 Measures 66 and 67.svg
Results by county
Source: Oregon Secretary of State [1] [2]
Measure 66
ChoiceVotes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes692,68754.27
No583,70745.73
Total votes1,276,394100.00
Registered voters/turnout2,044,04262.7
Source: Oregon State Elections Division [1] [2]
Measure 67
ChoiceVotes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes682,72053.59
No591,18846.41
Total votes1,273,908100.00
Registered voters/turnout2,044,04262.7
Source: Oregon State Elections Division [1] [2]

Notes

  1. Current funding sources of the campaign against the ballot measures can be found at this link.
  2. More precisely, supporters of a referendum must file a number of valid signatures from registered voters equal to four percent of votes cast in the last gubernatorial election – in this case, the 2006 gubernatorial election.

See also

Sign campaigning for a no vote on the measures in rural Yamhill County No on 66 and 67 January 2010 election sign.JPG
Sign campaigning for a no vote on the measures in rural Yamhill County

Related Research Articles

The Oregon tax revolt is a political movement in Oregon which advocates for lower taxes. This movement is part of a larger anti-tax movement in the western United States which began with the enactment of Proposition 13 in California. The tax revolt, carried out in large part by a series of citizens' initiatives and referendums, has reshaped the debate about taxes and public services in Oregon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California ballot proposition</span> Statewide referendum item in California

In California, a ballot proposition is a referendum or an initiative measure that is submitted to the electorate for a direct decision or direct vote. If passed, it can alter one or more of the articles of the Constitution of California, one or more of the 29 California Codes, or another law in the California Statutes by clarifying current or adding statute(s) or removing current statute(s).

In the politics of the United States, the process of initiatives and referendums allow citizens of many U.S. states to place new legislation, or to place legislation that has recently been passed by a legislature on a ballot for a popular vote. Initiatives and referendums, along with recall elections and popular primary elections, are signature reforms of the Progressive Era; they are written into several state constitutions, particularly in the West. It is a form of direct democracy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1998 Oregon Ballot Measure 67</span> Ballot measure in Oregon legalizing marijuana

The Oregon Medical Marijuana Act, a law in the U.S. state of Oregon, was established by Oregon Ballot Measure 67 in 1998, passing with 54.6% support. It modified state law to allow the cultivation, possession, and use of marijuana by doctor recommendation for patients with certain medical conditions. The Act does not affect federal law, which still prohibits the cultivation and possession of marijuana.

Term limits legislation – term limits for state and federal office-holders – has been a recurring political issue in the U.S. state of Oregon since 1992. In that year's general election, Oregon voters approved Ballot Measure 3, an initiative that enacted term limits for representatives in both houses of the United States Congress and the Oregon Legislative Assembly, and statewide officeholders. It has been described as the strictest term limits law in the country.

The Independent Party of Oregon (IPO) is a centrist political party in the U.S. state of Oregon with more than 135,000 registrants since its inception in January 2007. The IPO is Oregon's third-largest political party and the first political party other than the Democratic Party and Republican Party to be recognized by the state of Oregon as a major political party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in Oregon</span> Overview of the procedure of elections in the U.S. state of Oregon

Elections in Oregon are all held using a Vote by Mail (VBM) system. This means that all registered voters receive their ballots via postal delivery and can vote from their homes. A state Voters’ Pamphlet is mailed to every household in Oregon about three weeks before each statewide election. It includes information about each measure and candidate in the upcoming election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">75th Oregon Legislative Assembly</span>

The 75th Oregon Legislative Assembly convened beginning on January 12, 2009, for its biennial regular session. All of the 60 seats in the House of Representatives and half of the 30 seats in the State Senate were up for election in 2008; the general election for those seats took place on November 4.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 Oregon Ballot Measure 64</span> Ballot measure in Oregon

Oregon Ballot Measure 64 was an initiated state statute ballot measure on the November 4, 2008 general election ballot in Oregon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 Oregon Ballot Measure 58</span> Ballot measure in Oregon

Oregon Ballot Measure 58 was an initiated state statute ballot measure sponsored by Bill Sizemore that appeared on the November 4, 2008 general election ballot in Oregon. It was rejected by voters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 Oregon Ballot Measure 59</span> Ballot measure in Oregon

Oregon Ballot Measure 59 was an initiated state statute ballot measure sponsored by Bill Sizemore that appeared on the November 4, 2008 general election ballot in Oregon, United States. If it had passed, Oregon would have join Alabama, Iowa, and Louisiana as the only states to allow federal income taxes to be fully deducted on state income tax returns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 Oregon Ballot Measure 56</span>

Oregon Ballot Measure 56 or House Joint Resolution 15 is a legislatively referred constitutional amendment that enacted law which provides that property tax elections decided at May and November elections will be decided by a majority of voters who are voting in the relevant election. It repealed the double majority requirement passed by the voters in the 1990s via Measures 47 and 50, which requires that, for non-general elections, all bond measures can pass only when a majority of registered voters turn out.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Washington Referendum 71</span> LGBT rights referendum

The 2009 Washington Referendum 71 (R-71) legalized domestic partnership in Washington state, the first statewide referendum in the United States that extended to LGBT people the rights and responsibility of domestic partnership. The bill had passed State Legislature, and it was signed into law by the Governor in May 2009, but opponents gathered enough signatures to put the measure before the voters, who returned ballots by mail over three weeks ending on November 3, 2009, approving the measure 53% to 47%. The new law went into effect 30 days later, on December 3, 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 Oregon elections</span>

General elections were held in Oregon on November 2, 2010. Primary elections took place on May 18, 2010.

Electoral reform in Oregon refers to efforts to change election and voting laws in the West Coast state of Oregon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massachusetts Sales Tax Relief Act</span> Ballot measure in Massachusetts

Massachusetts Question 3, filed under the name, the 3 percent Sales Tax Relief Act, appears on the November 2, 2010 ballot in the state of Massachusetts as an initiative. The measure, if enacted by voters, would reduce the state sales tax rate from 6.25 to 3 percent. The measure is being sponsored by the Alliance to Roll Back Taxes headed by Carla Howell. The measure would be enacted into a law 30 days after the election if approved by voters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 Ohio Issue 2</span>

The Ohio Collective Bargaining Limit Repeal appeared on the November 8, 2011 general election ballot in the state of Ohio as a veto referendum. Senate Bill 5 (SB5) was repealed by Ohio voters after a campaign by firefighters, police officers and teachers against the measure, which would have limited collective bargaining for public employees in the state. The formal title of the proposal that this measure nullified is Senate Bill 5. Among other provisions, SB 5 would have prevented unions from charging fair share dues to employees who opt out. The process to place the referendum on the ballot for voters to decide was completed by supporters, as signatures were certified by the Ohio Secretary of State. The group behind the referendum effort was the political action committee We Are Ohio.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 Washington Referendum 74</span>

Referendum 74 was a Washington state referendum to approve or reject the February 2012 bill that would legalize same-sex marriage in the state. On June 12, 2012, state officials announced that enough signatures in favor of the referendum had been submitted and scheduled the referendum to appear on the ballot in the November 6 general election. The law was upheld by voters in the November 6, 2012 election by a final margin of 7.4% and the result was certified on December 5.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Brown, Kate (February 25, 2010). "January 26, 2010, Special Election Abstracts of Votes" (PDF). Elections Division. Oregon Secretary of State . Retrieved April 3, 2010.
  2. 1 2 3 4 "HP Records Manager WebDrawer - 2010 Special Election Official Results". records.sos.state.or.us.
  3. David Steves (January 27, 2010). "Oregon voters firmly approve raising taxes". The Register-Guard. registerguard.com. Retrieved January 27, 2010.
  4. "Follow the Money for "No" on Measures 66 and 67 - Common Cause". Archived from the original on March 16, 2010. Retrieved December 28, 2009.
  5. "State of Oregon: Blue Book - Elections Process and History". sos.oregon.gov.
  6. "UPDATE: On tax measures, 'yes' means 'no' • Daily Journal of Commerce". October 8, 2009.
  7. 1 2 Walth, Brent (March 3, 2010). "The closing tally on the Measures 66 and 67 campaigns: $12.5 million". The Oregonian. Retrieved April 4, 2010.
  8. 1 2 Mapes, Jeff (April 3, 2010). "Only a few ballot initiatives look to qualify for Oregon ballot this November". The Oregonian . Retrieved April 4, 2010.