2010 Queensland Health payroll system implementation

Last updated

The 2010 Queensland Health payroll system implementation was a disastrous payroll and HR system replacement project that affected Queensland Health, the public health system in Queensland, Australia. [1] The new payroll system was delivered by IBM based on SAP and WorkBrain technology, and replaced the former LATTICE payroll system.

Contents

The new system went live on 14 March 2010 despite known issues with the system and incomplete testing. Almost 78,000 Queensland Health staff received inaccurate pay, or no pay at all, for a number of months due to serious system defects. These defects, delays and other issues resulted in the total end-of-project cost being $181 million, with an estimated ongoing cost to repair, maintain and operate the system of around $1.2 billion over eight years.

In 2012, the newly elected Liberal National government through the governor-in-council opened the Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry to investigate the cause and consequences of the troubled system and processes. In his final report, the commissioner, The Hon Richard Chesterman AO RFD QC, stated that "The replacement of the QH payroll system must take a place in the front rank of failures in public administration in this country. It may be the worst."

History and parties

Context

On 1 July 2003, the Queensland Government formally established the Shared Services Initiative to centralise payroll and human resources functions from across government under one agency. CorpTech, a business unit of the Queensland Treasury, was established to "design and build a whole-of-government human resources and finance solution with a capital budget of $125 million." Queensland Health was to be included in this whole-of-government platform, and by March 2006, management of the existing payroll system had been transferred to CorpTech.

A report in March 2007 found that CorpTech had failed to deliver any significant progress thus far, and had engaged an extreme number of contractors on favourable payment schedules from a number of private organisations, including Accenture, Logica and IBM. In response, government under-treasurer Gerard Bradley commissioned a review to investigate potential actions. From this review, the concept of a single private vendor for the new systems arose - called the "Prime Contractor Model".

Procurement

The procurement process for the whole-of-government systems replacement was complex and not-standardised. It consisted of three components: a "request for information", a "request for proposal", and a final "invitation to offer". The invitation to offer (ITO) stage represents the final procurement and contract-forming process. Of the ten companies approached during the request for information, only four responded: IBM, Logica, Accenture and SAP. These four companies were then presented with the request for proposal, which was confused for the contract-forming process. Finally, the ITO was issued on 12 September 2007, by which time SAP had withdrawn its proposal. IBM was the successful tenderer and entered into a $98 million contract with the state of Queensland on 5 December 2007.

By October 2008, the Prime Contractor Model had proven unsuccessful with IBM failing to have delivered any of the agreed products of the contract despite having already been paid almost a third of the contract value. IBM approached the state government, stating that it would need a total of $181 million, almost twice the original contract value, to deliver the scope of works required.

By 1 July 2008, the former Queensland Health LATTICE payroll system had fallen out of support from the vendor and was effectively unsupported outside of in-house technical capabilities. Replacement of the LATTICE system had become an urgent priority. The state government subsequently modified the scope of the contract to remain at $98 million, however only be for the delivery of an 'interim' Queensland Health payroll system to replace LATTICE until a new whole-of-government system was developed.

Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry

Following the disastrous system development and implementation works, the Queensland Government established a Commission of Inquiry. On 13 December 2012, the governor in council made order for the Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry (QHPSCI). The Inquiry sought to investigate and understand the factors that led to the failed payroll system implementation, and the extent of the damages to the Queensland Government and health staff. The Inquiry began on 1 February 2013, and delivered its final report to the premier on 31 July 2013.

The report detailed systematic failings at all levels and on both the procurer and vendor sides of the project, including a lack of governance. budgetary failings, system faults and incomplete testing and assurance.

The Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry (QHPSCI) was established by order of the Governor in Council on 13 December 2012. The Honourable Richard Chesterman AO RFD QC commenced the Inquiry on 1 February 2013. In his remarks at the directions hearing, Commissioner Chesterman explained the purpose of the inquiry "is to determine why such large amounts of money have been lost to the public, whether anything might be recovered; and why such distress was inflicted on the Queensland Health workforce." [2]

QHPSCI's public hearings began on Monday 11 March 2013 with phase one focusing on the "Tender Process". The second phase, examining the 'Contract' with IBM, commenced on 22 April 2013. The third and final phase, "Settlement", began on Monday 27 May 2013. The former Premier and two ex-ministers were called to give evidence during this phase. A special hearing was held on the 18 June 2013 to deal with late information submitted to the Commission. The QHPSCI presented its findings to the Premier on 31 July 2013. [3]

System development and implementation

On 14 March 2010, Queensland Health went live with the new payroll system. In the final report from the Commission of Inquiry, the commissioner states that:

The system did not perform adequately with terrible consequences for the employees of QH and equally serious financial consequences for the State. After many months of anguished activity during which employees of QH endured hardship and uncertainty, a functioning payroll system was developed, but it is very costly.

— The Honourable Richard N Chesterman AO RFD QC, Final Report of the Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry, page 12, section 2.14

The payroll system failed to accurately calculate or pay all 78,000 Queensland Health staff, resulting in over- and under-payments exceeding $300 million. The system performed exceptionally poorly, including paying staff that had left the organisation months prior, and exhibiting critical data errors that should not have been technically possible resulting in entire pay runs being frozen.

Causes

The Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry identified a large number of contributing factors and causes, all of which resulted in the eventual failed delivery of the payroll system and the under-, over- or non-payment of Queensland Health's workforce.

Project governance

Unfair and improper vendor bidding

It was discovered in the Commission of Inquiry that IBM, the successful tenderer of the payroll system, had acted improperly and corruptly in forming and submitting its tender to the government. The commission found that key IBM staff had been provided confidential information by CorpTech executives relating to the available budget, and that it had used its pre-existing system access from other projects to retrieve internal government documents related to the tender. Additionally, IBM staff improperly accessed the proposals of its competitors

The commission noted that had CorpTech been aware of these failures, IBM would have been automatically excluded from the procurement process. In August 2008, following the failures of the project, the Queensland Government barred IBM from tendering on all government contracts until it could demonstrate reformed governance and systematic organisational change.

Acceptance testing and product delivery

During acceptance testing, a core component of the 'hand over' of the solution from IBM to Queensland Health, several thousand system and technical defects were found. During testing stages three and four (the final two stages), more than 2,000 defects were identified, including some 14 critical "showstopper" defects and around 1500 severe defects. During the Commission of Inquiry, IBM insisted that the volume of defects was irrelevant and that the nature of the defects was the only important factor. IBM was found to have significantly misrepresented the quality and integrity of the system, and had not resolved defects as claimed when it had progressed to final stage acceptance testing.

Decision to go live

Despite knowledge from both the vendors and Queensland Health that the system was unlikely to accurately pay staff, the state continued to go live with the system in March 2010. In the Commission of Inquiry, Queensland Health noted that IBM stated it could correct all defects that would affect pay accuracy. It was also stated that this decision to go live was made on the balance of numerous known issues with the new system and the concern that the historic LATTICE system would fail in its entirety before another go live could occur.

At this stage, the go live of the system had already been delayed more than ten times.

Consequences

Pay accuracy

The problem was not resolved by May, with 35,000 wage anomalies to be fixed, but some progress had been made. [4]

Termination of contracts

Organisational efficiency

The system is very labor-intensive and requires ten times the staff as other systems. It is estimated to cost $1.2B before 2018 when it is recommended to be replaced. According to the 2013 Commission of Inquiry, "the QH payroll system must take a place in the front rank of failures in public administration in this country". [5]

The new payroll system requires around 1,000 payroll processing staff to operate for the magnitude of staff members required to be paid under the system, a 40% increase versus for former LATTICE system.

Settlement

Following the troubled launch of the system, the state sought damages from IBM for failing to deliver the stated products of its contract. Advice provided by Queensland Government lawyers found that the government could sue IBM for damages totalling $88 million. [5]

On 23 November 2010, the Queensland Government announced that it had settled with IBM and will spend $209 million over three years to resolve the payroll problems. [6]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SAP</span> German multinational enterprise-software company

SAP SE is a German multinational software company based in Walldorf, Baden-Württemberg. It develops enterprise software to manage business operations and customer relations. The company is the world's leading enterprise resource planning (ERP) software vendor. Apart from ERP software, the company also sells database software and technology, cloud-engineered systems, and other ERP software products, such as human capital management (HCM) software, customer relationship management (CRM) software, enterprise performance management (EPM) software, product lifecycle management (PLM) software, supplier relationship management (SRM) software, supply chain management (SCM) software, business technology platform (BTP) software and programming environment SAP AppGyver for business.

McKesson Corporation is an American company distributing pharmaceuticals and providing health information technology, medical supplies, and care management tools. The company delivers a third of all pharmaceuticals used in North America and employs over 51,000 employees. McKesson had revenues of $276 billion in its fiscal year ending March 31, 2023.

E-procurement is the business-to-business or business-to-consumer or business-to-government purchase and sale of supplies, work, and services through the Internet as well as other information and networking systems, such as electronic data interchange and enterprise resource planning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Queensland Health</span> Public health system in Queensland, Australia

Queensland Health is the name of the overall public health service in the state of Queensland, Australia. The system is made up of 16 Hospital and Health Services (HHS'), and the Queensland Department of Health. Each HHS covers a certain geographical area of Queensland, with the exception of the state-wide service, Children's Health Queensland, and operates health facilities and other services. The Department of Health is responsible for the management and performance of the system, and support services like finance, centralised supply and procurement, HR, and IT services. Most HHS' also have associated foundations and authorities, which provide additional support.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oracle Cerner</span> American healthcare company

Oracle Cerner or Oracle Health, formerly Cerner Corporation, is a US-based, multinational provider of health information technology (HIT) platforms and services. In February 2018, more than 27,000 customers globally utilised Cerner products. The company has more than 29,000 employees globally, with over 13,000 at its headquarters in North Kansas City, Missouri.

INCIS was the name of the Integrated National Crime Information System designed to provide information to the New Zealand Police in the 1990s, but which was abandoned in 1999. Although the project was abandoned parts of its hardware and software infrastructure are still in use today.

Income taxes are the most significant form of taxation in Australia, and collected by the federal government through the Australian Taxation Office. Australian GST revenue is collected by the Federal government, and then paid to the states under a distribution formula determined by the Commonwealth Grants Commission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cúram Software</span> Irish software company

Cúram Software was an Irish software company headquartered in Dublin, Ireland with offices in Australia, Germany, India, the United Kingdom and the United States. The company produces Social Enterprise Management (SEM) software and offers consulting services, certification, and training. Their name is an Irish word for "Care and Protection". The company was founded in 1990.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stuart Robert</span> Australian politician (born 1970)

Stuart Rowland Robert is an Australian former politician who served as Minister for Employment, Workforce, Skills, Small and Family Business from 2021 to 2022, following his appointment as Minister for Government Services and Minister for the National Disability Insurance Scheme in 2019. He was also appointed Acting Minister for Education and Youth in December 2021 and was the Member of Parliament (MP) for Fadden upon winning the seat at the 2007 federal election, until his resignation in May 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Redcliffe Peninsula railway line</span> Railway line in Australia

The Redcliffe Peninsula line is a 12 km (7.5 mi) stretch of heavy gauge dual-track railway between Petrie and Kippa-Ring on the Redcliffe peninsula in Queensland, Australia. The new line is part of Queensland Rail's City suburban network, branching from the North Coast line. It starts 200 metres (656 ft) north of Petrie railway station, extending from.

Equifax Workforce Solutions, formerly known as TALX, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Equifax. It is based in St. Louis, Missouri. The company was originally founded in 1972 under the name Interface Technology Inc. The company maintains a database named "The Work Number" that holds and maintains employment and payroll information on 54 million American people. As of 2015, the company was the largest source of employment information in the United States, and collects information from over 7,000 employers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pauls (dairy)</span> Australian dairy brand name

Pauls is an Australian brand name for a range of dairy products. Pauls history can be traced back to 1923. The company has been known under various names, including Queensland United Foods Ltd (QUF), Pauls Ice Cream & Milk Ltd and Pauls Limited. In 1998, Pauls Limited was purchased by the Italian company Parmalat, and officially changed its name in 2003 to Parmalat Australia Ltd. The company currently has its headquarters in South Brisbane. Today, Pauls is an Australian brand name under the Parmalat umbrella; a subsidiary of the multinational French company Lactalis.

Datacom Group Limited is an Information Technology services company, offering management and consulting, cloud services, ITO, data centre services, custom software development, and payroll services. Datacom is the largest technology company in New Zealand. The company was started in New Zealand in 1965, but has expanded to operate in Australia, Malaysia, the Philippines, the United States and the United Kingdom, employing over 6,500 people across 26 offices globally.

The Commission of Inquiry on the Awarding and Management of Public Contracts in the Construction Industry was a public inquiry in Quebec, Canada into potential corruption in the management of public construction contracts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Novopay</span>

Novopay is a web-based payroll system for state and state integrated schools in New Zealand, processing the pay of 110,000 teaching and support staff at 2,457 schools. It was purchased by the New Zealand Ministry of Education for $182 million over ten years, and was implemented in August 2012 after seven years of planning and development by Australian human resources company Talent2. From the outset, the system led to widespread problems with over 8,000 teachers receiving the wrong pay and in some cases no pay at all; within a few months, 90% of schools were affected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kawasaki Heavy Industries & CRRC Qingdao Sifang T251</span> Class of electric multiple units in Singapore

The Kawasaki Heavy Industries & CRRC Qingdao Sifang T251 is the first generation electric multiple unit rolling stock in operation on the Thomson–East Coast line of Singapore's Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system, manufactured by a consortium of Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) and CRRC Qingdao Sifang under Contract T251.

The Queensland Health Systems Review or Forster Inquiry was a 2005 Queensland inquiry "to undertake a review of the performance of Queensland Health’s administrative and workforce management systems with a focus on improving health outcomes for Queenslanders." It was conducted by Peter Forster who formerly consulted to the Fitzgerald Inquiry.

The Phoenix pay system is a payroll processing system for Canadian federal government employees, provided by IBM in June 2011 using PeopleSoft software, and run by Public Services and Procurement Canada. The Public Service Pay Centre is located in Miramichi, New Brunswick. It was first introduced in 2009 as part of Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Transformation of Pay Administration Initiative, intended to replace Canada's 40-year old system with a new, cost-saving "automated, off-the-shelf commercial system."

The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety is a royal commission established on 8 October 2018 by the Australian government pursuant to the Royal Commissions Act 1902. The Honourable Richard Tracey and Ms Lynelle Briggs were appointed as Royal Commissioners. The Commissioners were required to provide an interim report by 31 October 2019, and a final report by 30 April 2020. Tracey died of cancer in October 2019 and was replaced by Tony Pagone. The final report was tabled on 1 March 2021.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom, the British government decided in March 2020 to rapidly place contracts and recruit a number of individuals. Shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) were a particular political issue for the second Johnson ministry. This led to the awarding of a number of contracts without a competitive tendering process, and friends of political figures and people who had made political donations were quickly given contracts. As a result, accusations of cronyism were made against the government.

References

  1. ↑ Stone, Lucy (30 January 2019). "'No lessons learned' from payroll disaster, Queensland Health was warned". Brisbane Times . Archived from the original on 12 November 2023. Retrieved 12 November 2023.
  2. ↑ "Commissioner's directions hearing remarks" (PDF). Healthpayrollinquiry.qld.gov.au. 1 February 2013. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
  3. ↑ "Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry". Healthpayrollinquiry.qld.gov.au. 2013. Retrieved 13 March 2021.
  4. ↑ Kym Agius (5 May 2010). "Qld Health payroll system in chaos: ASU". The Australian. News Limited. Retrieved 22 January 2012.
  5. 1 2 "Queensland Health Payroll System Commission of Inquiry Report" (PDF). State of Queensland. 31 July 2013. Retrieved 28 October 2017. pg216
  6. ↑ Chris O'Brien (23 November 2010). "More than $200m to fix health payroll system". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 22 January 2012.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.