Abolitionism (abortion)

Last updated

Abortion abolitionism is an absolutist anti-abortion philosophy, often in disagreement with mainstream anti-abortion positions and organizations that are largely incrementalistic. Abortion abolitionists are in opposition to incrementalism, often opposing or criticizing laws that fall short of the complete abolition and prohibition of abortion. Abortion abolitionists have adopted the term "abolitionist" to separate themselves from being classified as simply "pro-life" and to make a moral comparison between abortion and slavery.

Contents

Philosophy

Abortion abolitionists argue that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and—in regards to the United States—the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution entitles embryos and fetuses to equal protection from murder, which they believe abortion to be. [1] In accordance with this view, abortion abolitionists support the criminalization of abortion to be similar or equal to the criminalization of murder of people after birth. [2] This includes the belief that abortion patients ought to be prosecuted for intentionally procuring or inducing an abortion, something that the mainstream anti-abortion movement opposes. [3]

In calling themselves "abolitionists", those in this movement intend to compare the rights of embryos and fetuses to the rights of chattel slaves, arguing that both groups of individuals are people that have been dehumanized by society. [3] [4] [5] [6] To defend such claim against widespread criticism, abolitionists say that the historic abolitionist position on slavery was once also seen as radical and unpopular.

Abortion abolitionists often oppose or criticize laws that fall short of the complete abolition of abortion. [7] [8] Arguing that the "pro-life movement" is reformist, abortion abolitionists believe that abortion ought to be abolished, not simply restricted or regulated. [4] Abolitionists oppose exceptions for rape and incest. [9] [10] Abolitionists also tend to oppose in vitro fertilization, citing the frequent disposal of excess embryos. [11]

Activities

Abortion abolitionists tend to be a vocal minority within the anti-abortion movement. Many abolitionists are strong critics of Donald Trump, the Republican Party, and mainstream anti-abortion groups who they argue are too soft on and complicit for abortion. [11]

In May 2022, a law was proposed in the Louisiana State Legislature that would enshrine equal protection to embryos and fetuses, and it would have punished abortion under homicide laws. [12] This law included provisions that allowed for women to be prosecuted for procuring abortions, something most mainstream anti-abortion groups don't support. [13] More than 70 mainstream anti-abortion organizations signed a letter that opposed the measure, saying that it was their “longstanding policy that abortion-vulnerable women should not be treated as criminals.” [14]

Groups

The majority of abolitionist organizations within the United States are Christian-based. Some secular organizations, however, also describe themselves as abolitionist. Groups calling themselves abolitionist include the Oklahoma-based organization Abolitionists Rising, [15] Abolish Human Abortion, [16] and Operation Save America. [17] These groups have gained political support following overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022. [4] Some abolitionist groups filed amicus curiae briefs in support of the overturning of the decision. [1] As of 2023, state legislators in almost 20 U.S. states had introduced abortion abolitionist bills that permit the criminalization of women who procure abortions. [4] [3] [6] [1] There are abolitionist campaign groups in 21 states, [4] and abolition of abortion is included in the platform of the Republican Party of Texas. [4]

Criticism

Abortion abolitionism is criticized by both the abortion-rights movement and mainstream anti-abortion groups.

Proponents of abortion rights criticize abortion abolitionists for attempting to co-opt the imagery of the civil rights movement. [6] Abortion abolitionism has been described as extreme and radical due to its support for the criminalization of women who obtain abortions. [3]

Mainstream anti-abortion activists also criticize abortion abolitionists for what they see as a hindrance to passing "pro-life legislation." [13] They see the abolitionist position as a threat to gaining support and winning elections, and they instead favor an incrementalistic approach to abortion that involves compromise. [18] Many abolitionists distance themselves from being described as "pro-life" in order to emphasize their dissent from the mainstream movement.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States abortion-rights movement</span> Support for womens right to elective abortion

The United States abortion-rights movement is a sociopolitical movement in the United States supporting the view that a woman should have the legal right to an elective abortion, meaning the right to terminate her pregnancy, and is part of a broader global abortion-rights movement. The movement consists of a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body.

Libertarians promote individual liberty and seek to minimize the role of the state. The abortion debate is mainly within right-libertarianism between cultural liberals and social conservatives as left-libertarians generally see it as a settled issue regarding individual rights, as they support legal access to abortion as part of what they consider to be a woman's right to control her body and its functions. Religious right and intellectual conservatives have attacked such libertarians for supporting abortion rights, especially after the demise of the Soviet Union led to a greater divide in the conservative movement between libertarians and social conservatives. Libertarian conservatives claim libertarian principles such as the non-aggression principle (NAP) apply to human beings from conception and that the universal right to life applies to fetuses in the womb. Thus, some of those individuals express opposition to legal abortion. According to a 2013 survey, 5.7/10 of American Libertarians oppose making it more difficult for a woman to get an abortion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in the United States</span>

In the United States, abortion is a divisive issue in politics and culture wars, though a majority of Americans support access to abortion. Abortion laws vary widely from state to state.

The abortion debate is a longstanding, ongoing controversy that touches on the moral, legal, medical, and religious aspects of induced abortion. In English-speaking countries, the debate most visibly polarizes around adherents of the self-described "pro-choice" and "pro-life" movements. Pro-choice supporters uphold that individuals have the right to make their own decisions about their reproductive health, and that they should have the option to end a pregnancy if they choose to do so, taking into account various factors such as the stage of fetal development, the health of the woman, and the circumstances of the conception. Pro-life advocates, on the other hand, maintain that a fetus is a human being with inherent rights that cannot be overridden by the woman's choice or circumstances, and that abortion is morally wrong in most or all cases. Both terms are considered loaded words in mainstream media, where terms such as "abortion rights" or "anti-abortion" are generally preferred.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in Canada</span>

Abortion in Canada is legal throughout pregnancy and is publicly funded as a medical procedure under the combined effects of the federal Canada Health Act and provincial health-care systems. However, access to services and resources varies by region. While some restrictions exist, Canada is one of the few nations with no criminal restrictions on abortion. Abortion is subject to provincial healthcare regulatory rules and guidelines for physicians. No provinces offer abortion on request at 24 weeks and beyond, although there are exceptions for certain medical complications.

Abortion in Brazil is a crime, with penalties of one to three years of imprisonment for the recipient of the abortion, and one to four years of imprisonment for the doctor or any other person who performs the abortion on someone else. In three specific situations in Brazil, induced abortion is not punishable by law: in cases of risk to the pregnant person's life; when the pregnancy is the result of rape; and if the fetus is anencephalic. In these cases, the Brazilian government provides the abortion procedure free of charge through the Sistema Único de Saúde. This does not mean that the law regards abortion in these cases as a right, but only that women who receive abortions under these circumstances, and the doctors, will not be punished. The punishment for a woman who performs an abortion on herself or consents to an abortion performed by another outside these legal exceptions is one to three years of detention. The base penalty for a third party that performs an illegal abortion with the consent of the patient, ranges from one to four years of detention, with the possibility of increase by a third if the woman comes to any physical harm, and can be doubled if she dies. Criminal penalties fixed at four years or less can be converted to non-incarceration punishments, such as community service and compulsory donation to charity.

Pro-life feminism is the opposition to abortion by some feminists. Pro-life feminists may believe that the principles behind women's rights also call them to oppose abortion on right to life grounds and that abortion hurts women more than it benefits them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States anti-abortion movement</span> Movement in the United States opposing abortion

The United Statesanti-abortion movement is a movement in the United States that opposes induced abortion and advocates for the protection of fetal life. Advocates support legal prohibition or restriction on ethical, moral, or religious grounds, arguing that human life begins at conception and that the human zygote, embryo or fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. The anti-abortion movement includes a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body. There are diverse arguments and rationales for the anti-abortion stance. Some allow for some permissible abortions, including therapeutic abortions, in exceptional circumstances such as incest, rape, severe fetal defects, or when the woman's health is at risk.

A countermovement in sociology means a social movement opposed to another social movement. Whenever one social movement starts up, another group establishes themselves to undermine the previous group. Many social movements start out as an effect of political activism towards issues that a group disagrees with. “Researchers have used resource mobilization to study all manner of social and political movements such as environmentalism, father's rights groups, religious movements, and abortion rights”. The reason for the start of countermovement groups is that people are competing for resources for political influence. Countermovement groups are a part of American society that try to compete for government legislation to support their own views.

The genetics and abortion issue is an extension of the abortion debate and the disability rights movement. Since the advent of forms of prenatal diagnosis, such as amniocentesis and ultrasound, it has become possible to detect the presence of congenital disorders in the fetus before birth. Specifically, disability-selective abortion is the abortion of fetuses that are found to have non-fatal mental or physical defects detected through prenatal testing. Many prenatal tests are now considered routine, such as testing for Down syndrome. Women who are discovered to be carrying fetuses with disabilities are often faced with the decision of whether to abort or to prepare to parent a child with disabilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christianity and abortion</span> Christian denominational views on the issue of abortion

Christianity and abortion have a long and complex history. Condemnation of abortion by Christians goes back to the 1st century with texts such as the Didache, the Epistle of Barnabas, and the Apocalypse of Peter. In later years some Christian writers argued that abortion was acceptable under certain circumstances, such as when necessary to save the life of the mother, but these views did not become accepted teachings until some denominations changed their views in the 20th century. The Bible itself does not contain direct references to abortion.

In Judaism, views on abortion draw primarily upon the legal and ethical teachings of the Hebrew Bible, the Talmud, the case-by-case decisions of responsa, and other rabbinic literature. While all major Jewish religious movements allow or encourage abortion in order to save the life of a pregnant woman, authorities differ on when and whether it is permitted in other cases.

The Rainbow Pro-Life Alliance, formerly known as the Pro-Life Alliance of Gays and Lesbians (PLAGAL), is a United States-based interest group opposed to legalized elective abortion and supportive of alternatives to abortion.

The official teachings of the Catechism of the Catholic Church promulgated by Pope John Paul II in 1992 oppose all forms of abortion procedures whose direct purpose is to destroy a zygote, blastocyst, embryo or fetus, since it holds that "human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person – among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life". However, the Church does recognize as morally legitimate certain acts which indirectly result in the death of the fetus, as when the direct purpose is removal of a cancerous womb. Canon 1397 §2 of the 1983 Code of Canon Law imposes automatic excommunication on Latin Catholics who actually procure an abortion, if they fulfill the conditions for being subject to such a sanction. Eastern Catholics are not subject to automatic excommunication, but by canon 1450 of the Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches they are to be excommunicated by decree if found guilty of the same action, and they may be absolved of the sin only by the eparchial bishop. In addition to teaching that abortion is immoral, the Catholic Church also generally makes public statements and takes actions in opposition to its legality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion-rights movements</span> Social movement advocating for legal access to abortion

Abortion-rights movements are movements that advocate for legal access to induced abortion services, including elective abortion. They seek to represent and support women who wish to terminate their pregnancy without fear of legal or social backlash. These movements are in direct opposition to anti-abortion movements.

Abortion in Alabama is illegal. Historically, Alabama's abortion laws have evolved from strict regulations in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to a period of liberalization following the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide. However, Alabama has consistently enacted legislation aimed at restricting access to abortion.

Abortion in Illinois is legal. Laws about abortion dated to the early 1800s in Illinois; the first criminal penalties related to abortion were imposed in 1827, and abortion itself became illegal in 1867. As hospitals set up barriers in the 1950s, the number of therapeutic abortions declined. Following Roe v. Wade in 1973, Illinois passed a number of restrictions on abortion, many of which have subsequently been repealed. Illinois updated its existing abortion laws in June 2019. The state has seen a decline in the number of abortion clinics over the years, going from 58 in 1982 to 47 in 1992 to 24 in 2014.

Abortion in Maine is legal, although terminations after fetal viability can only be performed if a physician determines it to be medically necessary. According to a poll by the Pew Research Center, 64% of adults said that abortion should be legal, with 33% stating that it should be illegal in all or most cases.

Abortion in California is legal up to the point of fetal viability. An abortion ban was in place by 1900, and by 1950, it was a criminal offense for a woman to have an abortion. In 1962, the American Law Institute published their model penal code, as it applied to abortions, with three circumstances where they believed a physician could justifiably perform an abortion, and California adopted a version of this code. In 2002, the California State Legislature passed a law guaranteeing women the right to have an abortion "prior to viability of the fetus, or when the abortion is necessary to protect the life or health of the woman". In 2022, California voters overwhelmingly approved Proposition 1, which amended the Constitution of California to explicitly protect the right to abortion and contraception by a margin of 33.76%.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Sherman, Carter (2023-12-14). "An 'abortion abolitionist' became an Oklahoma senator. The fringe is celebrating its big victory". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2024-07-14.
  2. ↑ "Abolitionism vs. Incrementalism: Why Can't We All Just Get Along?". Denny Burk. 2021-09-06. Retrieved 2024-07-13.
  3. 1 2 3 4 "Abortion 'abolitionists' in Kansas and other states want to charge women with murder". KCUR - Kansas City news and NPR. 2023-06-22. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Silver, Hannah; Cooper, Cloee (October 26, 2023). "101: Abortion Abolitionists". Political Research Associates.
  5. ↑ "Woke Christians Seethe and Rage, Say Viral Anti-Abortion Shirt is 'Racist'". Protestia. 2023-05-14. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  6. 1 2 3 Moseley-Morris, Kelcie (2023-09-02). "Anti-abortion 'abolitionists' take slavery rhetoric to the next level". Georgia Recorder. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  7. ↑ Andersen, Ericka (2022-08-01). "When 'Pro-Life' Isn't Enough: Abortion 'Abolitionists' Speak Up". News & Reporting. Retrieved 2024-07-14.
  8. ↑ "Anti-abortion groups are at odds on strategies ahead of Ohio vote. It could be a preview for 2024". AP News. 2023-09-30. Retrieved 2024-07-17.
  9. ↑ "No Exceptions - Abolitionists Rising". abolitionistsrising.com. 2023-05-24. Retrieved 2024-04-14.
  10. ↑ "The rise of 'abortion abolitionists' targeting women, doctors and Donald Trump". NBC News. 2024-05-26. Retrieved 2024-07-14.
  11. 1 2 "Republicans try to soften stance on abortion as 'abolitionists' go farther". WUSF. 2024-05-21. Retrieved 2024-07-14.
  12. ↑ "HB813". legis.la.gov. Retrieved 2024-07-14.
  13. 1 2 González, O. (2023, January 20). The post-Roe fight dividing anti-abortion activists. Axios. https://www.axios.com/2023/01/20/anti-abortion-roe-anniversary-divide-prosecution
  14. ↑ Durkee, Alison. "Anti-Abortion Groups Warn Lawmakers Against Criminalizing Having An Abortion". Forbes. Retrieved 2024-07-14.
  15. ↑ "Home - Abolitionists Rising". abolitionistsrising.com. Retrieved 2024-07-19.
  16. ↑ "Meet the rebels of the anti-abortion movement". MSNBC.com. 2014-03-08. Retrieved 2024-07-19.
  17. ↑ "Operation Save America". www.operationsaveamerica.org. 2017-01-01. Retrieved 2024-07-19.
  18. ↑ Stracqualursi, Veronica (2022-05-12). "Leading anti-abortion groups urge state lawmakers not to pass bills criminalizing women for abortions | CNN Politics". CNN. Retrieved 2024-07-14.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.