Actio Pauliana

Last updated

The Actio Pauliana is an action in Roman law intended to protect creditors from fraudulent legal transactions, specifically transactions intended to reduce a debtor's estate by transfers to third parties in bad faith. [1] [2]

Contents

Praetor involvement in shaping Roman law resulted in the creation of several delicts within jus praetorium , one of which was fraus creditorum, or defrauding creditors. This delict covered a wide variety of acts on behalf of the debtor, including transfers of property, freeing slaves or releasing their own debtors from their obligations - all intended to limit the creditor's ability to collect. Starting in the 1st century BCE, praetors began using their imperium to aid creditors affected by fraus creditorum, first by simple restitutio in integrum and a special interdict – interdictum fraudatorium. Eventually, a separate action was created for this purpose – Actio Pauliana, specifically focused on reversing fraudulent transactions undertaken to defraud creditors. [3]

Details of the action in ancient Roman law

The Actio Pauliana can be undertaken by the creditor within a year of the transaction in question taking place. The aim of the actio is the return of property transferred to third parties. The target of the actio can be the debtor themselves, but also any third party that has received property as part of fraus creditorum. Good faith is taken into account - third parties partaking in defrauding creditors with full knowledge are not granted any protection from potential loss as a result of the actio, although transfers at no cost to the third party are not protected even in good faith. [1] The overall aim of the action is the restoration of the material status quo ante - for this reason even the produce of defrauded property must be recovered. [4]

In modern law

The action has found its way (in modernized forms) into some modern legal systems, especially in Europe.

Poland

Article 527 of the Civil Code of Poland is often considered by scholars to be a modern form of the actio Pauliana, and it is commonly referred to as such in legal discourse. It serves the same purpose as the Roman institution, but defines the circumstances in which it can be applied more clearly, including exactly when a transaction by a debtor is fraudulent and a presumption of bad faith for transfers between persons in close contact with one another. [5] [6] [7] [8]

Switzerland

Article 285ff of Swiss insolvency law (Art. 285 ff. SchKG) has been likened to actio Pauliana, although it is tied strictly to insolvency rather to fraus creditorum on its own, and can only be invoked in case of bankruptcy. [9]

France

Articles 1341, 1341-1 though 4 of the French Civil Code contain elements reminiscent of the actio Pauliana, including the consideration of good faith on the part of receiving third parties. [10]

Netherlands

Dutch law distinguishes as many as three separate forms of actio Pauliana:

Belgium

Article 1167 of the old Belgian Civil Code makes a reference to fraus creditorum and constitutes a form of actio Pauliana. [14] Article 5.243 of the Belgian civil code references the actio Pauliana.

Italy

Article 2901 of the Italian Civil Code mirrors the actio Pauliana, with considerations of good faith both on the debtors as well as the receiving third party. [15]

Brazil

Section VI, Chapter IV, Title I of Book III the Brazilian Civil Code of 2002 is dedicated to fraud against creditors, and describes a form of actio Pauliana related to insolvency. [16]

Related Research Articles

Bankruptcy is a legal process through which people or other entities who cannot repay debts to creditors may seek relief from some or all of their debts. In most jurisdictions, bankruptcy is imposed by a court order, often initiated by the debtor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bankruptcy in the United States</span> Overview of bankruptcy in the United States of America

In the United States, bankruptcy is largely governed by federal law, commonly referred to as the "Bankruptcy Code" ("Code"). The United States Constitution authorizes Congress to enact "uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States". Congress has exercised this authority several times since 1801, including through adoption of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, as amended, codified in Title 11 of the United States Code and the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA).

Restitutio ad integrum, or restitutio in integrum, is a Latin term that means "restoration to original condition". It is one of the primary guiding principles behind the awarding of damages in common law negligence claims.

A fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer is an attempt to avoid debt by transferring money to another person or company. It is generally treated as a civil cause of action that arises in debtor/creditor relations, typically brought by creditors or by bankruptcy trustees against insolvent debtors, but in some jurisdictions there is potential for criminal prosecution.

<i>Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act</i>

The Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act is one of the statutes that regulates the law on bankruptcy and insolvency in Canada. It governs bankruptcies, consumer and commercial proposals, and receiverships in Canada.

The history of Roman law can be divided into three systems of procedure: that of legis actiones, the formulary system, and cognitio extra ordinem. Though the periods in which these systems were in use overlapped one another and did not have definitive breaks, the legis actio system prevailed from the time of the XII Tables until about the end of the 2nd century BC, the formulary procedure was primarily used from the last century of the Republic until the end of the classical period, and cognitio extra ordinem was in use in post-classical times.

An unfair preference is a legal term arising in bankruptcy law where a person or company transfers assets or pays a debt to a creditor shortly before going into bankruptcy, that payment or transfer can be set aside on the application of the liquidator or trustee in bankruptcy as an unfair preference or simply a preference.

An undervalue transaction is a transaction entered into by a company who subsequently goes into bankruptcy which the court orders be set aside, usually upon the application of a liquidator for the benefit of the debtor's creditors. This can occur where the transaction was seriously disadvantageous to the company and the company was insolvent or in immediate risk of becoming insolvent.

In company law, fraudulent trading is doing business with intent to defraud creditors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom insolvency law</span> Law in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

United Kingdom insolvency law regulates companies in the United Kingdom which are unable to repay their debts. While UK bankruptcy law concerns the rules for natural persons, the term insolvency is generally used for companies formed under the Companies Act 2006. Insolvency means being unable to pay debts. Since the Cork Report of 1982, the modern policy of UK insolvency law has been to attempt to rescue a company that is in difficulty, to minimise losses and fairly distribute the burdens between the community, employees, creditors and other stakeholders that result from enterprise failure. If a company cannot be saved it is liquidated, meaning that the assets are sold off to repay creditors according to their priority. The main sources of law include the Insolvency Act 1986, the Insolvency Rules 1986, the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986, the Employment Rights Act 1996 Part XII, the EU Insolvency Regulation, and case law. Numerous other Acts, statutory instruments and cases relating to labour, banking, property and conflicts of laws also shape the subject.

The insolvency law of Switzerland is the law governing insolvency, foreclosure, bankruptcy and debt restructuring proceedings in Switzerland. It is principally codified in the Federal Statute on Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy of 11 April 1889 as well as in ancillary federal and cantonal laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fraudulent Conveyances Act 1571</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Fraudulent Conveyances Act 1571, also known as the Statute of 13 Elizabeth, was an Act of Parliament in England, which laid the foundations for fraudulent transactions to be unwound when a person had gone insolvent or bankrupt. In the United Kingdom, the provisions contained in the 1571 Act were replaced by Part IX of the Law of Property Act 1925, which has since been replaced by Part XVI of the Insolvency Act 1986.

The collection of judgments in Virginia may be accomplished under a number of routes provided under Virginia law, depending on the amount of the judgment and the particular assets that the judgment creditor wishes to pursue.

Bankruptcy in Irish Law is a legal process, supervised by the High Court whereby the assets of a personal debtor are realised and distributed amongst his or her creditors in cases where the debtor is unable or unwilling to pay his debts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">South African property law</span> Important aspects of redistribution agreement

South African property law regulates the "rights of people in or over certain objects or things." It is concerned, in other words, with a person's ability to undertake certain actions with certain kinds of objects in accordance with South African law. Among the formal functions of South African property law is the harmonisation of individual interests in property, the guarantee and protection of individual rights with respect to property, and the control of proprietary management relationships between persons, as well as their rights and obligations. The protective clause for property rights in the Constitution of South Africa stipulates those proprietary relationships which qualify for constitutional protection. The most important social function of property law in South Africa is to manage the competing interests of those who acquire property rights and interests. In recent times, restrictions on the use of and trade in private property have been on the rise.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commercial insolvency in Canada</span> Business insolvency in Canada

Commercial insolvency in Canada has options and procedures that are distinct from those available in consumer insolvency proceedings. It is governed by the following statutes:

Damnum iniuria datum was a delict of Roman law relating to the wrongful damage to property. It was created by the Lex Aquilia in the third century BC, and consisted of two parts: chapter one, which dealt with the killing of another's slave or certain types of animal; and chapter three which related to other types of property. It was widely extended both by reference to the words of the statute themselves and by the Praetor.

<i>Twynes Case</i>

Twyne's case (1601) 76 ER 809; 3 Co. Rep. 80b is a UK insolvency law case, concerning a fraudulent conveyance. Representative of earlier English law, it was considered that any transfer of property from a debtor to a creditor, after which the debtor remained in possession of that property, was a fraudulent act intended to defraud creditors. At the time, the law only recognised the mortgage and the pledge. A charge on property in possession of another was not allowed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cayman Islands bankruptcy law</span>

Cayman Islands bankruptcy law is principally codified in five statutes and statutory instruments:

In Roman law, obligatio ex delicto is an obligation created as a result of a delict. While "delict" itself was never defined by Roman jurisprudents, delicts were generally composed of injurious or otherwise illicit actions, ranging from those covered by criminal law today such as theft (furtum) and robbery (rapina) to those usually settled in civil disputes in modern times such as defamation, a form of iniuria. Obligationes ex delicto therefore can be characterized as a form of private punishment, but also as a form of loss compensation.

References

  1. 1 2 Kolańczyk, Kazimierz (2007). Prawo rzymskie (in Polish) (5th ed.). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. p. 436. ISBN   978-83-7334-031-2.
  2. Scott, SP (1932). The Civil Law. Cincinnati: Central Trust Company. Retrieved 2 June 2021.38. Paulus, On Plautius, Book VI, (4). "In [...] the Paulian Action, by means of which property which has been disposed of for the purpose of defrauding creditors, is recovered [...]"
  3. Kolańczyk, p. 434-435
  4. Scott. 38. Paulus, On Plautius, Book VI, (4)."[...] the produce of [the defrauded] property must also be returned; for the Prætor uses his authority to place everything in the same condition as if nothing had been alienated [...]"
  5. KC - Kodeks cywilny (in Polish) (10th ed.). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. 2020. p. 144. ISBN   978-83-8223-180-9.
  6. Ciszewski, Jerzy; Nazaruk, Piotr (2019). Kodeks cywilny : komentarz (in Polish). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. pp. art. 527. ISBN   978-83-8160-233-4.
  7. Gudowski, Jacek (2019). Kodeks cywilny. Orzecznictwo. Piśmiennictwo. Tom III. Zobowiązania. Cz. 2 (in Polish). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. p. TYTUŁ X OCHRONA WIERZYCIELA W RAZIE NIEWYPŁACALNOŚCI DŁUŻNIKA. ISBN   978-83-8160-437-6.
  8. Zedler, Feliks (2019). "Z problematyki dochodzenia roszczeń pauliańskich w postępowaniu upadłościowym". Polski Proces Cywilny (in Polish) (2019/1): 9–23.
  9. "Anfechtung nach Art. 285 ff. SchKG" (PDF). University of Zurich (in German). Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  10. "Code Civil - art. 1341-2". www.legifrance.gouv.fr. Retrieved 2 June 2021.
  11. "Dutch Civil Law". www.dutchcivillaw.com.
  12. "Faillissementswet". Overheid.nl Wettenbank (in Dutch).
  13. "Dutch Civil Law". www.dutchcivillaw.com.
  14. "Code Civil. Art. 1167". www.ejustice.just.fgov.be (in French).
  15. "Art 2901 cc Approvazione del testo del Codice civile". Lexscripta (in Italian).
  16. "LEI N o 10.406, DE 10 DE JANEIRO DE 2002". www.planalto.gov.br (in Brazilian Portuguese). Presidência da República.