Adultification

Last updated

Adultification is a form of racial bias where children of minority groups, such as Black American children, are treated by adults as being more mature than they actually are. [1] [2]

Contents

Many studies have found that Black children are more susceptible to discipline from authority figures, such as police officers and educators. [1] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Black children are also overlooked or their intentions are misrepresented in healthcare settings, contributing to "medical mistrust" in the Black community. [8] Scholars from the Georgetown Law Center on Poverty and Law have argued that adultification bias can trace its roots to slavery and stereotypes of African Americans. [3] [5] [9] Adultification bias can affect the language used when describing children or adolescences of minority groups in the media. [1] This bias may perpetuate the school-to-prison pipeline. [1] [4] [10]

Educators and authority figures can address adultification bias by improving their cultural competence and communication. [11] [12]

History

Adultification was originally a psychology term describing children who act more mature than their peers as a result of being handed adult responsibilities from a young age. [3] This adultification is often forced by circumstances outside of the Black youth's control. maturity usually comes with increased autonomy, Black children are frequently denied this right while still facing the expectations of others.

Slavery in the United States

Many Black children were treated like adults during slavery. [13] [10] Treatment of enslaved children varied throughout the United States. Some plantations would not assign jobs to children until they became adolescents. [14] Others put Black children to work as early as 2 to 3-years-old. [3] [6] [14] Slave owners would then decide when enslaved children made the transition from doing light chores to working hard-labor jobs assigned to adults. [14] Typically, this transition occurred by the time they were eight to nine. [14] [15] Adultification also occurred due to hyper-sexualization of Black children by slave owners. [16]

Media representation

Although White adolescence is frequently pictured through films, Black adolescence is not commonly portrayed. [17] [18] This lack of media representation contributes to the ignorance surrounding Black youth and their struggles with forced adultification. The aging of Black youth prevents them from having the same privileges as White youth. [18]

Consequences

Education

Black students may face hypercriticism from authority figures, especially while in school. [1] [2] Teachers can perceive Black girls as being loud or "sassy" compared to white girls and punish them over being "unladylike". [4] [5] Teachers are less likely to help Black students when they need help in school since they are assumed to be delinquents and incapable of success. [1] [9] Because of their perceived maturity, Black children are seen as less in need of access to mentorship and leadership opportunities. [1] [3] Black children are treated to "know better" by teachers and are not seen as having one of the main characteristics of childhood: innocence. [1] [2] [9] Black students may also be penalized more over mistakes on schoolwork. [9]

Black girls are more likely to be disciplined in school than white girls for subjective infractions including, but not limited to dress code violations, fighting, loitering, and harassment. [3] They are more susceptible to verbal and physical violence by authority figures in schools. The United States Department of Education found that Black girls are six times more likely to be suspended than white girls. [4] Not only are Black girls found to have high rate of discipline in school over white girls, they tend to have higher rates than boys belonging to other racial/ethnic groups, further highlighting this bias in Black students. [9]

Some schools, however, do have Black and other minority boys consistently being disciplined over other groups of children. [5] Black boys are three times more likely than other students to be suspended from school. [1] Overall, black boys have the highest suspension and drop out rates from both elementary and high school. [1] According to the National Center for Education Statistics, the largest group with out-of-school suspensions from public schools is black boys, accounting for 17.6 percent of suspensions from 2013 to 2014. From that same study, they found that Black girls account for the second largest percentage of out-of-school suspensions at 9.6 percent. [19]

During the 1980s and 1990s, more schools started to rely on policies like drug-sniffing dogs and armed police officers in response to student misbehavior. [1] Some say that these policies may actually exacerbate anti-Blackness through school policies such as these because they create environments in which Black girls learn their feelings do not matter and that they will not receive the benefit of the doubt over misbehavior. [9] Some of the students can tell when these teachers treat Black students differently from white students and are left isolated from students and teachers because of this treatment. [2] [9] When Black children speak up over the bias, they are seen as "talking back" or being too assertive rather than expressing their concerns and usually receive some type of disciplinary action. [5] [7] [9] Witnessing the harsh discipline of these students in schools can desensitize others to situations when Black students are given worse punishments. [9]

Justice system

Between 1985 and 1997, the number of Black girls in the juvenile justice system was growing at a rate higher than any other population. [4] Black girls are 2.7 times more likely to be referred to juvenile justice over white girls, and young Black girls are 1.2 times more likely to be detained by the police. [3] [20]

Adultification bias may contribute to the school-to-prison pipeline by having Black children punished in schools and increasing their chances of being placed in prison or wrongfully imprisoned. [1] [10] Students that have been suspended are three times more likely to drop out of school and those who drop out are three times more likely to be incarcerated. [1] Black youth are three times more likely than White youth to be put in residential placement. [11] A study showed that participants viewed Black juveniles as more similar to adults than to White juveniles when blamed for a crime. [21] This can impact teens being detained as being treated like adults, despite the precedent that shows that juveniles are less culpable than adult offenders. [3] [21]

Healthcare

Black teens are often tested for sexually transmitted diseases when presenting with abdominal symptoms despite reporting no sexual activity due to the assumption of Black promiscuity. [12] [22] A 2020 study found that Black youth were less likely to be promptly diagnosed and treated for appendicitis, revealing implicit and structural racial bias in hospitals. [23]

Academic study

A 2017 study on Black girls by the Georgetown Center on Gender Justice & Opportunity includes one of the first studies of "adultification bias", showing that adults perceive Black girls as more adult-like than their white peers. That study followed a 2014 study by Philip Goff on Black boys, showing that Black boys are viewed as older and more culpable for crimes than white boys of the same age.[ citation needed ]

See also

Related Research Articles

Racial discrimination is any discrimination against any individual on the basis of their race, ancestry, ethnic or national origin, and/or skin color and hair texture. Individuals can discriminate by refusing to do business with, socialize with, or share resources with people of a certain group. Governments can discriminate explicitly in law, for example through policies of racial segregation, disparate enforcement of laws, or disproportionate allocation of resources. Some jurisdictions have anti-discrimination laws which prohibit the government or individuals from being discriminated based on race in various circumstances. Some institutions and laws use affirmative action to attempt to overcome or compensate for the effects of racial discrimination. In some cases, this is simply enhanced recruitment of members of underrepresented groups; in other cases, there are firm racial quotas. Opponents of strong remedies like quotas characterize them as reverse discrimination, where members of a dominant or majority group are discriminated against.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Juvenile delinquency</span> Illegal behavior by minors

Juvenile delinquency, also known as juvenile offending, is the act of participating in unlawful behavior as a minor or individual younger than the statutory age of majority. These acts would otherwise be considered crimes if the individuals committing them were older. The term delinquent usually refers to juvenile delinquency, and is also generalised to refer to a young person who behaves an unacceptable way.

Discrimination based on skin tone, also known as colorism or shadeism, is a form of prejudice and discrimination in which people of certain ethnic groups, or people who are perceived as belonging to a different-skinned racial group, are treated differently based on their different skin tone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">School discipline</span> Types of disciplinary actions used by schools against students

School discipline relates to actions taken by teachers or school organizations toward students when their behavior disrupts the ongoing educational activity or breaks a rule created by the school. Discipline can guide the children's behavior or set limits to help them learn to take better care of themselves, other people and the world around them.

Achievement gaps in the United States are observed, persistent disparities in measures of educational performance among subgroups of U.S. students, especially groups defined by socioeconomic status (SES), race/ethnicity and gender. The achievement gap can be observed through a variety of measures, including standardized test scores, grade point average, dropout rates, college enrollment, and college completion rates. The gap in achievement between lower income students and higher income students exists in all nations and it has been studied extensively in the U.S. and other countries, including the U.K. Various other gaps between groups exist around the globe as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Youth detention center</span> Type of prison for people under the age of majority

In criminal justice systems, a youth detention center, known as a juvenile detention center (JDC), juvenile detention, juvenile jail, juvenile hall, or more colloquially as juvie/juvy or the Juvey Joint, also sometimes referred to as observation home or remand home is a prison for people under the age of majority, to which they have been sentenced and committed for a period of time, or detained on a short-term basis while awaiting trial or placement in a long-term care program. Juveniles go through a separate court system, the juvenile court, which sentences or commits juveniles to a certain program or facility.

Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is listed in the DSM-5 under Disruptive, impulse-control, and conduct disorders and defined as "a pattern of angry/irritable mood, argumentative/defiant behavior, or vindictiveness." This behavior is usually targeted toward peers, parents, teachers, and other authority figures, including law enforcement officials. Unlike conduct disorder (CD), those with ODD do not generally show patterns of aggression towards random people, violence against animals, destruction of property, theft, or deceit. One-half of children with ODD also fulfill the diagnostic criteria for ADHD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American juvenile justice system</span> Aspect of American justice system

The American juvenile justice system is the primary system used to handle minors who are convicted of criminal offenses. The system is composed of a federal and many separate state, territorial, and local jurisdictions, with states and the federal government sharing sovereign police power under the common authority of the United States Constitution. The juvenile justice system intervenes in delinquent behavior through police, court, and correctional involvement, with the goal of rehabilitation. Youth and their guardians can face a variety of consequences including probation, community service, youth court, youth incarceration and alternative schooling. The juvenile justice system, similar to the adult system, operates from a belief that intervening early in delinquent behavior will deter adolescents from engaging in criminal behavior as adults.

Juvenile delinquency in the United States refers to crimes committed by children or young people, particularly those under the age of eighteen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Race in the United States criminal justice system</span>

Race in the United States criminal justice system refers to the unique experiences and disparities in the United States in regard to the policing and prosecuting of various races. There have been different outcomes for different racial groups in convicting and sentencing felons in the United States criminal justice system. Although prior arrests and criminal history is also a factor. Experts and analysts have debated the relative importance of different factors that have led to these disparities.

Educational Inequality is the unequal distribution of academic resources, including but not limited to school funding, qualified and experienced teachers, books, physical facilities and technologies, to socially excluded communities. These communities tend to be historically disadvantaged and oppressed. Individuals belonging to these marginalized groups are often denied access to schools with adequate resources and those that can be accessed are so distant from these communities. Inequality leads to major differences in the educational success or efficiency of these individuals and ultimately suppresses social and economic mobility. Inequality in education is broken down into different types: regional inequality, inequality by sex, inequality by social stratification, inequality by parental income, inequality by parent occupation, and many more.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Youth incarceration in the United States</span>

The United States incarcerates more of its youth than any other country in the world, through the juvenile courts and the adult criminal justice system, which reflects the larger trends in incarceration practices in the United States. In 2010, approximately 70,800 juveniles were incarcerated in youth detention facilities alone. As of 2006, approximately 500,000 youth were brought to detention centers in a given year. This data does not reflect juveniles tried as adults. As of 2013, around 40% were incarcerated in privatized, for-profit facilities.

In the United States, the school-to-prison pipeline (SPP), also known as the school-to-prison link, school–prison nexus, or schoolhouse-to-jailhouse track, is the disproportionate tendency of minors and young adults from disadvantaged backgrounds to become incarcerated because of increasingly harsh school and municipal policies. Additionally, this is due to educational inequality in the United States. Many experts have credited factors such as school disturbance laws, zero-tolerance policies and practices, and an increase in police in schools in creating the "pipeline". This has become a hot topic of debate in discussions surrounding educational disciplinary policies as media coverage of youth violence and mass incarceration has grown during the early 21st century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">School corporal punishment in the United States</span> United States corporal punishment in schools

Corporal punishment, sometimes referred to as "physical punishment" or "physical discipline", has been defined as the use of physical force, no matter how light, to cause deliberate bodily pain or discomfort in response to undesired behavior. In schools in the United States, corporal punishment takes the form of a school teacher or administrator striking a student's buttocks with a wooden paddle.

Discrimination in education is the act of discriminating against people belonging to certain demographics in enjoying full right to education. It is a violation of human rights. Education discrimination can be on the basis of ethnicity, nationality, age, gender, race, economic condition, language spoken, caste, disability and religion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Educational inequality in the United States</span> History of educational inequality in the US, possible causes and solutions

Unequal access to education in the United States results in unequal outcomes for students. Disparities in academic access among students in the United States are the result of multiple factors including government policies, school choice, family wealth, parenting style, implicit bias towards students' race or ethnicity, and the resources available to students and their schools. Educational inequality contributes to a number of broader problems in the United States, including income inequality and increasing prison populations. Educational inequalities in the United States are wide-ranging, and many potential solutions have been proposed to mitigate their impacts on students.

Jennifer Lynn Eberhardt is an American social psychologist who is currently a professor in the Department of Psychology at Stanford University. Eberhardt has been responsible for major contributions on investigating the consequences of the psychological association between race and crime through methods such as field studies and laboratory studies. She has also contributed to research on unconscious bias, including demonstrating how racial imagery and judgment affect culture and society within the domain of social justice. The results from her work have contributed to training law enforcement officers and state agencies to better their judgments through implicit bias training. She has also provided directions for future research in this domain and brought attention to mistreatment in communities due to biases.

Racial-ethnic socialization describes the developmental processes by which children acquire the behaviors, perceptions, values, and attitudes of an ethnic group, and come to see themselves and others as members of the group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Youth control complex</span> Criminology theory

The youth control complex is a theory developed by Chicano scholar Victor M. Rios to describe what he refers to as the overwhelming system of criminalization that is shaped by the systematic punishment that is applied by institutions of social control against boys of color in the United States. Rios articulates that there are many components of this complex which are enacted upon youth throughout their daily lives. For example, "while being called a 'thug' by a random adult may seem trivial to some people, when a young person is called a 'thug' by a random adult, told by a teacher that they will never amount to anything, and frisked by a police officer, all in the same day, this combination becomes greater than the sum of its parts." Scholars trace the origins of the youth control complex back to the mid-1970s. In addition, the criminalization and surveillance of Black and Latino bodies increased in the post-9/11 era.

According to the National Science Foundation (NSF), women and racial minorities are underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Scholars, governments, and scientific organizations from around the world have noted a variety of explanations contributing to this lack of racial diversity, including higher levels of discrimination, implicit bias, microaggressions, chilly climate, lack of role models and mentors, and less academic preparation.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Dancy, T. Elon (2014). "(Un)Doing Hegemony in Education: Disrupting School-to-Prison Pipelines for Black Males". Equity & Excellence in Education. 47 (4): 476–493. doi:10.1080/10665684.2014.959271. S2CID   145679452.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Goff, Phillip Atiba; Jackson, Matthew Christian; Di Leone, Brooke Allison Lewis; Culotta, Carmen Marie; Ditomasso, Natalie Ann (2014). "The essence of innocence: Consequences of dehumanizing Black children". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 106 (4): 526–545. doi:10.1037/a0035663. PMID   24564373.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Epstein, Rebecca; Blake, Jamilia J.; Gonzalez, Thalia. "Girlhood Interrupted: The Erasure of Black Girls' Childhood" (PDF). Georgetown Law Center on Poverty and Inequality. Retrieved 2022-06-13.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Reynolds, Aja; Hicks, Stephanie D. (2016). "Can We Live? Working Toward a Praxis of Support for Carefree Black Girls". Black History Bulletin. 79 (2): 12–17. doi:10.1353/bhb.2016.0000. JSTOR   10.5323/blachistbull.79.2.0012. S2CID   245666004.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Morris, Edward W. (2007). ""Ladies" or "Loudies"?". Youth & Society. 38 (4): 490–515. doi:10.1177/0044118X06296778. S2CID   143916502.
  6. 1 2 Dumas, Michael J.; Nelson, Joseph Derrick (2016). "(Re)Imagining Black Boyhood: Toward a Critical Framework for Educational Research". Harvard Educational Review. 86: 27–47. doi:10.17763/0017-8055.86.1.27.
  7. 1 2 Carter Andrews, Dorinda J.; Brown, Tashal; Castro, Eliana; Id-Deen, Effat (2019). "The Impossibility of Being "Perfect and White": Black Girls' Racialized and Gendered Schooling Experiences". American Educational Research Journal. 56 (6): 2531–2572. doi:10.3102/0002831219849392. S2CID   181408681.
  8. Hoffman, Kelly; Trawalter, Sophie; Axt, Jordan; Norman Oliver, M. (2016). "Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113 (16): 4296–4301. Bibcode:2016PNAS..113.4296H. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1516047113 . PMC   4843483 . PMID   27044069.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Smith-Purviance, Ashley L. (2021). "Masked Violence against Black Women and Girls". Feminist Studies. 47: 175–200. doi:10.1353/fem.2021.0000.
  10. 1 2 3 Hines, Erik; Fletcher, Edward; Ford, Donna; Moore, James (10 December 2021). "Preserving Innocence: Ending Perceived Adultification and Toxic Masculinity Toward Black Boys". Journal of Family Strengths. 21 (1). doi: 10.58464/2168-670X.1444 .
  11. 1 2 Guevara, Lori; Herz, Denise; Spohn, Cassia (2006). "Gender and Juvenile Justice Decision Making". Feminist Criminology. 1 (4): 258–282. doi:10.1177/1557085106292778. S2CID   146347745.
  12. 1 2 Koch, Amie; Kozhumam, Arthi (2022). "Addressing Adultification of Black Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Department: A Framework to Decrease Disparities". Health Promotion Practice. 23 (4): 555–559. doi:10.1177/15248399211049207. PMID   34693783. S2CID   239766430.
  13. Teshome, Tezeru; Yang, K. Wayne (2018). "Not Child but Meager". Small Axe: A Caribbean Journal of Criticism. 22 (3): 160–170. doi:10.1215/07990537-7249292. S2CID   149534656.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Pargas, Damian Alan (2011). "From the Cradle to the Fields: Slave Childcare and Childhood in the Antebellum South". Slavery & Abolition. 32 (4): 477–493. doi:10.1080/0144039X.2011.601618. S2CID   143877395.
  15. United States Work Projects Administration. Slave Narratives: A Folk History of Slavery in the United States from Interviews with Former Slaves. Administrative Files Records Bearing on the History of the Slave Narratives. 2004-10-25. Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/13847.
  16. Loft, Margaret. "Syrup, Stereotypes, and Sexualization: A Historical Analysis of the Hyper-Sexualization of the Black Female Body and the Predominating Stereotypes of Black Women". University of Portland History Program.
  17. Shannon, Linita (2008). "Deconstructing the Black Coming-of-Age Film and its Effect on the Negotiation of Black Identity". Syracuse University Honors Program.
  18. 1 2 Rodgers, Jimmonique R. S. (2022-06-11). "The Rage of Innocence: How America Criminalizes Black Youth". Crime Prevention and Community Safety. 24 (3): 304–306. doi:10.1057/s41300-022-00151-3. ISSN   1460-3780. S2CID   256506635.
  19. de Brey, C., Musu, L., McFarland, J., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., Diliberti, M., Zhang, A., Branstetter, C., and Wang, X. (2019). Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2018 (NCES 2019-038). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved 2022-06-14 from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/.
  20. Stevens, Tia; Morash, Merry; Chesney-Lind, Meda (2011). "Are Girls Getting Tougher, or Are We Tougher on Girls? Probability of Arrest and Juvenile Court Oversight in 1980 and 2000". Justice Quarterly. 28 (5): 719–744. doi:10.1080/07418825.2010.532146. S2CID   145506297.
  21. 1 2 Rattan, Aneeta; Levine, Cynthia S.; Dweck, Carol S.; Eberhardt, Jennifer L. (2012). "Race and the Fragility of the Legal Distinction between Juveniles and Adults". PLOS ONE. 7 (5): e36680. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...736680R. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036680 . PMC   3359323 . PMID   22649496.
  22. Johnson, Tiffani J.; Weaver, Matthew D.; Borrero, Sonya; Davis, Esa M.; Myaskovsky, Larissa; Zuckerbraun, Noel S.; Kraemer, Kevin L. (2013). "Association of Race and Ethnicity with Management of Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department". Pediatrics. 132 (4): e851–e858. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-3127. PMC   4074647 . PMID   24062370.
  23. Goyal, Monika K. (2021). "Racial and ethnic disparities in the delayed diagnosis of appendicitis among children". Academic Emergency Medicine. 28 (9): 949–956. doi: 10.1111/acem.14142 . PMID   32991770. S2CID   222167151.