Algorithmic management

Last updated

Algorithmic management is a term used to describe certain labor management practices in the contemporary digital economy. In scholarly uses, the term was initially coined in 2015 by Min Kyung Lee, Daniel Kusbit, Evan Metsky, and Laura Dabbish to describe the managerial role played by algorithms on the Uber and Lyft platforms, [1] [2] but has since been taken up by other scholars to describe more generally the managerial and organisational characteristics of platform economies. [3] [4] However, digital direction of labor was present in manufacturing already since the 1970s and algorithmic management is becoming increasingly widespread across a wide range of industries. [5]

Contents

The concept of algorithmic management can be broadly defined as the delegation of managerial functions to algorithmic and automated systems. [6] Algorithmic management has been enabled by recent advances in digital technologies which allow for the real-time and "large-scale collection of data" which is then used to "improve learning algorithms that carry out learning and control functions traditionally performed by managers". [7]

In the contemporary workplace, firms employ an ecology of accounting devices, such as “rankings, lists, classifications, stars and other symbols’ in order to effectively manage their operations and create value without the need for traditional forms of hierarchical control.” [8] Many of these devices fall under the label of what is called algorithmic management, and were first developed by companies operating in the sharing economy or gig economy, functioning as effective labor and cost cutting measures. [9] The Data&Society [10] explainer of the term, for example, describes algorithmic management as ‘a diverse set of technological tools and techniques that structure the conditions of work and remotely manage workforces. [9] Data&Society also provides a list of five typical features of algorithmic management:

Proponents of algorithmic management claim that it “creates new employment opportunities, better and cheaper consumer services, transparency and fairness in parts of the labour market that are characterised by inefficiency, opacity and capricious human bosses.” [11] On the other hand, critics of algorithmic management claim that the practice leads to several issues, especially as it impacts the employment status of workers managed by its new array of tools and techniques. [2] [12] [13]

History of the term

“Algorithmic management” was first described by Lee, Kusbit, Metsky, and Dabbish in 2015 in their study of the Uber and Lyft platforms. [1] In their study, Lee et al. termed “software algorithms that assume managerial functions and surrounding institutional devices that support algorithms in practice” algorithmic management. Software algorithms, it was said, are increasingly used to “allocate, optimize, and evaluate work” by platforms in managing their vast workforces. In Lee et al.’s paper on Uber and Lyft this included the use of algorithms to assign work to drivers, as mechanisms to optimise pricing for services, and as systems for evaluating driver performance. In 2016, Alex Rosenblat and Luke Stark sought to extend on this understanding of algorithmic management “to elucidate on the automated implementation of company policies on the behaviours and practices of Uber drivers.” Rosenblat and Stark found in their study that algorithmic management practices contributed to a system beset by power asymmetries, where drivers had little control over “critical aspects of their work”, whereas Uber had far greater control over the labor of its drivers. [2]

Since this time, studies of algorithmic management have extended the use of the term to describe the management practices of various firms, where, for example, algorithms “are taking over scheduling work in fast food restaurants and grocery stores, using various forms of performance metrics ad even mood... to assign the fastest employees to work in peak times.” [14] Algorithmic management is seen to be especially prevalent in gig work on platforms, such as on Upwork [15] and Deliveroo, [14] and in the sharing economy, such as in the case of Airbnb. [16]

Furthermore, recent research has defined sub-constructs that fall under the umbrella term of algorithmic management, for example, "algorithmic nudging". A Harvard Business Review article by Mareike Möhlmann published in 2021 explains: "Companies are increasingly using algorithms to manage and control individuals not by force, but rather by nudging them into desirable behavior — in other words, learning from their personalized data and altering their choices in some subtle way." [17] While the concept builds on nudging theory popularized by University of Chicago economist Richard Thaler and Harvard Law School professor Cass Sunstein, "due to recent advances in AI and machine learning, algorithmic nudging is much more powerful than its non-algorithmic counterpart. With so much data about workers’ behavioral patterns at their fingertips, companies can now develop personalized strategies for changing individuals’ decisions and behaviors at large scale. These algorithms can be adjusted in real-time, making the approach even more effective." [17]

Relationships with other labor management practices

Algorithmic management has been compared and contrasted with other forms of management, such as Scientific management approaches, as pioneered by Frederick Taylor in the early 1900s. Henri Schildt has called algorithmic management “Scientific management 2.0”, where management “is no longer a human practice, but a process embedded in technology.” [14] Similarly, Kathleen Griesbach, Adam Reich, Luke Elliott-Negri, and Ruth Milkman suggest that, while “algorithmic control over labor may be relatively new, it replicates many features of older mechanisms of labor control.” [3]

On the other hand, some commentators have argued that algorithmic management is not simply a new form of Scientific management or digital Taylorism, but represents a distinct approach to labor control in platform economies. David Stark and Ivana Pais, for example, state that,

"In contrast to Scientific Management at the turn of the twentieth century, in the algorithmic management of the twenty-first century there are rules but these are not bureaucratic, there are rankings but not ranks, and there is monitoring but it is not disciplinary. Algorithmic management does not automate bureaucratic structures and practices to create some new form of algorithmic bureaucracy. Whereas the devices and practices of Taylorism were part of a system of hierarchical supervision, the devices and practices of algorithmic management take place within a different economy of attention and a new regime of visibility. Triangular rather than vertical, and not as a panopticon, the lines of vision in algorithmic management are not lines of supervision." [4]

Similarly, Data&Society’s explainer for algorithmic management claims that the practice represents a marked departure from earlier management structures that more strongly rely on human supervisors to direct workers. [9]

Issues

Algorithmic management can provide an effective and efficient means of workforce control and value creation in the contemporary digital economy. However, commentators have highlighted several issues that algorithmic management poses, especially for the workers it manages. Criticisms of the practice often highlight several key issues pertaining to algorithmic management practices, such as the imperfection and scope of its surveillance and control measures, which also threaten to lock workers out of key decision-making processes; its lack of transparency for users and information asymmetries; its potential for bias and discrimination; its dehumanizing tendencies; and its potential to create conditions which sidestep traditional employer-employee accountability. [9] [18] This last point has been especially contentious, as algorithmic management practices have been utilised by firms to reclassify workforces as independent contractors rather than employees. These negative consequences particularly affect migrant workers, who are integrated into existing labour processes under worse conditions utilising linguistically configurable algorithmic management. [19] Another critical issue is related to the lack of transparency of these devices, which is worse in the employment context as it increases the already existent information asymmetries between the parties to a contract of employment. [20] These issues in some cases led to public criticism, lawsuits, [21] and wildcat strikes by workers. [11] However, employment and data protection laws, at least in Europe, seems to have many regulatory antibodies to foster algorithmic transparency in the workplace and consequently uncover the violation of those rules already limiting abuses of managerial prerogatives by employers. [22]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Automation</span> Use of various control systems for operating equipment

Automation describes a wide range of technologies that reduce human intervention in processes, mainly by predetermining decision criteria, subprocess relationships, and related actions, as well as embodying those predeterminations in machines. Automation has been achieved by various means including mechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic, electrical, electronic devices, and computers, usually in combination. Complicated systems, such as modern factories, airplanes, and ships typically use combinations of all of these techniques. The benefit of automation includes labor savings, reducing waste, savings in electricity costs, savings in material costs, and improvements to quality, accuracy, and precision.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Temporary work</span> Type of employment

Temporary work or temporary employment refers to an employment situation where the working arrangement is limited to a certain period of time based on the needs of the employing organization. Temporary employees are sometimes called "contractual", "seasonal", "interim", "casual staff", "outsourcing", "freelance"; or the words may be shortened to "temps". In some instances, temporary, highly skilled professionals refer to themselves as consultants. Increasingly, executive-level positions are also filled with interim executives or fractional executives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hiring hall</span> Labor organization

In organized labor, a hiring hall is an organization, usually under the auspices of a labor union, which has the responsibility of furnishing new recruits for employers who have a collective bargaining agreement with the union. It may also refer to a physical union hall, the office from which the union may conduct its activities.

Personnel economics has been defined as "the application of economic and mathematical approaches and econometric and statistical methods to traditional questions in human resources management". It is an area of applied micro labor economics, but there are a few key distinctions. One distinction, not always clearcut, is that studies in personnel economics deal with the personnel management within firms, and thus internal labor markets, while those in labor economics deal with labor markets as such, whether external or internal. In addition, personnel economics deals with issues related to both managerial-supervisory and non-supervisory workers.

Employee scheduling software automates the process of creating and maintaining a schedule. Automating the scheduling of employees increases productivity and allows organizations with hourly workforces to re-allocate resources to non-scheduling activities. Such software will usually track vacation time, sick time, compensation time, and alert when there are conflicts. As scheduling data is accumulated over time, it may be extracted for payroll or to analyze past activity. Although employee scheduling software may or may not make optimization decisions, it does manage and coordinate the tasks. Today's employee scheduling software often includes mobile applications. Mobile scheduling further increased scheduling productivity and eliminated inefficient scheduling steps. It may also include functionality including applicant tracking and on-boarding, time and attendance, and automatic limits on overtime. Such functionality can help organizations with issues like employee retention, compliance with labor laws, and other workforce management challenges.

The digital economy is a portmanteau of digital computing and economy, and is an umbrella term that describes how traditional brick-and-mortar economic activities are being transformed by the Internet and World Wide Web technologies.

Nudge theory is a concept in behavioral economics, decision making, behavioral policy, social psychology, consumer behavior, and related behavioral sciences that proposes adaptive designs of the decision environment as ways to influence the behavior and decision-making of groups or individuals. Nudging contrasts with other ways to achieve compliance, such as education, legislation or enforcement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender pay gap</span> Average difference in remuneration amounts between men and women

The gender pay gap or gender wage gap is the average difference between the remuneration for men and women who are working. Women are generally found to be paid less than men. There are two distinct numbers regarding the pay gap: non-adjusted versus adjusted pay gap. The latter typically takes into account differences in hours worked, occupations chosen, education and job experience. In the United States, for example, the non-adjusted average woman's annual salary is 79–83% of the average man's salary, compared to 95–99% for the adjusted average salary.

The sharing economy is a socio-economic system whereby consumers share in the creation, production, distribution, trade and consumption of goods, and services. These systems take a variety of forms, often leveraging information technology and the Internet, particularly digital platforms, to facilitate the distribution, sharing and reuse of excess capacity in goods and services.

Digital labor or digital labour represents an emergent form of labor characterized by the production of value through interaction with information and communication technologies such as digital platforms or artificial intelligence. Examples of digital labor include on-demand platforms, micro-working, and user-generated data for digital platforms such as social media. Digital labor describes work that encompasses a variety of online tasks. If a country has the structure to maintain a digital economy, digital labor can generate income for individuals without the limitations of physical barriers.

A platform cooperative, or platform co-op, is a cooperatively owned, democratically governed business that establishes a two-sided market via a computing platform, website, mobile app or a protocol to facilitate the sale of goods and services. Platform cooperatives are an alternative to venture capital-funded platforms insofar as they are owned and governed by those who depend on them most—workers, users, and other relevant stakeholders.

Automated journalism, also known as algorithmic journalism or robot journalism, is a term that attempts to describe modern technological processes that have infiltrated the journalistic profession, such as news articles generated by computer programs. There are four main fields of application for automated journalism, namely automated content production, Data Mining, news dissemination and content optimization. Through artificial intelligence (AI) software, stories are produced automatically by computers rather than human reporters. These programs interpret, organize, and present data in human-readable ways. Typically, the process involves an algorithm that scans large amounts of provided data, selects from an assortment of pre-programmed article structures, orders key points, and inserts details such as names, places, amounts, rankings, statistics, and other figures. The output can also be customized to fit a certain voice, tone, or style.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gig worker</span> Independent on-demand temporary workers

Gig workers are independent contractors, online platform workers, contract firm workers, on-call workers, and temporary workers. Gig workers enter into formal agreements with on-demand companies to provide services to the company's clients.

Government by algorithm is an alternative form of government or social ordering where the usage of computer algorithms is applied to regulations, law enforcement, and generally any aspect of everyday life such as transportation or land registration. The term "government by algorithm" has appeared in academic literature as an alternative for "algorithmic governance" in 2013. A related term, algorithmic regulation, is defined as setting the standard, monitoring and modifying behaviour by means of computational algorithms – automation of judiciary is in its scope. In the context of blockchain, it is also known as blockchain governance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Workplace impact of artificial intelligence</span> Impact of artificial intelligence on workers

The impact of artificial intelligence on workers includes both applications to improve worker safety and health, and potential hazards that must be controlled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 22</span> Gig economy workers employment status ballot initiative

Proposition 22 was a ballot initiative in California that became law after the November 2020 state election, passing with 59% of the vote and granting app-based transportation and delivery companies an exception to Assembly Bill 5 by classifying their drivers as "independent contractors", rather than "employees". The law exempts employers from providing the full suite of mandated employee benefits while instead giving drivers new protections:

Artificial intelligence (AI) in hiring involves the use of technology to automate aspects of the hiring process. Advances in artificial intelligence, such as the advent of machine learning and the growth of big data, enable AI to be utilized to recruit, screen, and predict the success of applicants. Proponents of artificial intelligence in hiring claim it reduces bias, assists with finding qualified candidates, and frees up human resource workers' time for other tasks, while opponents worry that AI perpetuates inequalities in the workplace and will eliminate jobs. Despite the potential benefits, the ethical implications of AI in hiring remain a subject of debate, with concerns about algorithmic transparency, accountability, and the need for ongoing oversight to ensure fair and unbiased decision-making throughout the recruitment process.

A digital platform is a software-based online infrastructure that facilitates user interactions and transactions.

Automated decision-making (ADM) involves the use of data, machines and algorithms to make decisions in a range of contexts, including public administration, business, health, education, law, employment, transport, media and entertainment, with varying degrees of human oversight or intervention. ADM involves large-scale data from a range of sources, such as databases, text, social media, sensors, images or speech, that is processed using various technologies including computer software, algorithms, machine learning, natural language processing, artificial intelligence, augmented intelligence and robotics. The increasing use of automated decision-making systems (ADMS) across a range of contexts presents many benefits and challenges to human society requiring consideration of the technical, legal, ethical, societal, educational, economic and health consequences.

The Platform Work Directive is a proposed European Union Directive on the regulation of platform work in EU law.

References

  1. 1 2 Lee, Min Kyung; Kusbit, Daniel; Metsky, Evan; Dabbish, Laura (2015-04-18). "Working with Machines: The Impact of Algorithmic and Data-Driven Management on Human Workers". Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI '15. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery: 1603–1612. doi:10.1145/2702123.2702548. ISBN   978-1-4503-3145-6.
  2. 1 2 3 Rosenblat, Alex; Stark, Luke (2016-07-27). "Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber's Drivers". International Journal of Communication. 10 (0): 27. ISSN   1932-8036.
  3. 1 2 Griesbach, Kathleen; Reich, Adam; Elliott-Negri, Luke; Milkman, Ruth. "Algorithmic Control in Platform Food Delivery Work". Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World. 5: 237802311987004. doi: 10.1177/2378023119870041 . ISSN   2378-0231.
  4. 1 2 Stark, David; Pais, Ivana (2020). "Algorithmic Management in the Platform Economy". Sociologica. 14 (3): 47–72. doi:10.6092/issn.1971-8853/12221. ISSN   1971-8853.
  5. ↑ Schaupp, Simon (2022-05-23). "COVID‐19, economic crises and digitalisation: How algorithmic management became an alternative to automation". New Technology, Work and Employment: ntwe.12246. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12246. ISSN   0268-1072. PMC   9347406 . PMID   35936383.
  6. ↑ Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein; Newlands, Gemma; Lee, Min Kyung; Wolf, Christine T.; Kinder, Eliscia; Sutherland, Will (2021). "Algorithmic management in a work context". Big Data & Society. July–December (2): 1–14. doi: 10.1177/20539517211020332 . hdl: 11250/2976736 . S2CID   237760709.
  7. ↑ Möhlmann, Mareike; Zalmanson, Lior; Henfridsson, Ola; Gregory, Robert Wayne (2021). "Algorithmic Management of Work on Online Labor Platforms: When Matching Meets Control". MIS Quarterly. 45 (4): 1999–2022. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2021/15333. S2CID   227184033.
  8. ↑ Kornberger, Martin; Pflueger, Dane; Mouritsen, Jan. "Evaluative infrastructures: Accounting for platform organization". Accounting, Organizations and Society. 60: 79–95. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2017.05.002. hdl: 20.500.11820/1147b691-a371-4a13-a3ab-746c8427dd37 . ISSN   0361-3682.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Mateescu, A. & Nguyen, A. (2019). Explainer: Algorithmic Management in the Workplace. Data&Society, datasociety.net, February 2019. Retrieved from: https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/DS_Algorithmic_Management_Explainer.pdf
  10. ↑ "Data & Society". Datasociety.net. Retrieved 2022-08-17.
  11. 1 2 O'Connor, Sarah (2016-09-08). "When your boss is an algorithm". Financial Times. Retrieved 2024-03-19.
  12. ↑ Rosenblat, A. (2018). Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting The Rules Of Work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  13. ↑ Ajunwa, I. (2018). Algorithms at Work: Productivity Monitoring Applications and Wearable Technology as the New Data-Centric Research Agenda for Employment and Labor Law. Saint Louis University Law Journal, 63(1): 21–54.
  14. 1 2 3 Schildt, Henri (2017-01-02). "Big data and organizational design – the brave new world of algorithmic management and computer augmented transparency". Innovation. 19 (1): 23–30. doi: 10.1080/14479338.2016.1252043 . ISSN   1447-9338.
  15. ↑ Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein; Sutherland, Will (2019). Taylor, Natalie Greene; Christian-Lamb, Caitlin; Martin, Michelle H.; Nardi, Bonnie (eds.). "Algorithmic Management and Algorithmic Competencies: Understanding and Appropriating Algorithms in Gig Work". Information in Contemporary Society. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 578–589. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_55. ISBN   978-3-030-15742-5.
  16. ↑ Cheng, Mingming; Foley, Carmel. "Algorithmic management: The case of Airbnb". International Journal of Hospitality Management. 83: 33–36. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.04.009. hdl: 10453/132787 . ISSN   0278-4319.
  17. 1 2 Möhlmann, Mareike (April 22, 2021). "Algorithmic Nudges Don't Have to Be Unethical". Harvard Business Review.
  18. ↑ Möhlmann, Mareike; Henfridsson, Ola (2019-08-30). "What People Hate About Being Managed by Algorithms, According to a Study of Uber Drivers". Harvard Business Review. ISSN   0017-8012 . Retrieved 2024-03-19.
  19. ↑ Schaupp, Simon (April 2022). "Algorithmic Integration and Precarious (Dis)Obedience: On the Co-Constitution of Migration Regime and Workplace Regime in Digitalised Manufacturing and Logistics". Work, Employment and Society. 36 (2): 310–327. doi:10.1177/09500170211031458. ISSN   0950-0170.
  20. ↑ Rosenblat, Alex; Stark, Luke (2016-07-27). "Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber's Drivers". International Journal of Communication. 10: 27. ISSN   1932-8036.
  21. ↑ "Uber drivers are workers not self-employed, Supreme Court rules". 2021-02-19. Retrieved 2024-03-19.
  22. ↑ Gaudio, Giovanni (2021-09-21). "Algorithmic Bosses Can't Lie! How to Foster Transparency and Limit Abuses of the New Algorithmic Managers". Rochester, NY. SSRN   3927954.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.