American political development

Last updated

American political development (often abbreviated as APD) is a subfield of political science that studies the historical development of politics in the United States. [1] [2] In American political science departments, it is considered a subfield within American politics and is closely linked to historical institutionalism.

Scholarship in American political development focuses on "the causes, nature, and consequences of key transformative periods and central patterns in American political history." [3] Karen Orren and Stephen Skowronek, co-founders of the subfield's flagship journal, define American political development as the study of "durable shifts in governing authority" in the United States. [4] The subfield emerged within American political science in the 1980s, alongside a general renewal of work in historical institutionalism, as an "insurgent movement" that sought to refocus attention on the study of historical American politics and to use such historical study to recast the study of contemporary political phenomena. [5]

APD shares overlaps with the research agendas of comparative politics (particularly comparative historical analysis), historical sociology, and political history. [6] However, scholarship in APD differs from political history in that the former's "primary concerns are analytical, conceptual, and theoretical rather than historical." [7] Methodologically, the subfield tends to use within-case analysis and conduct causes-of-effects research (as opposed to effects-of-causes research). [7]

Major journals in the subfield include the flagship journal Studies in American Political Development , founded in 1986, and The Journal of Political History, founded in 1989. As of 2005, the Politics and History section (founded in 1989) of the American Political Science Association was the eighth-largest in membership out of 35 total sections. [3] [8]

Major works

Some major works in the subfield, as indicated by reading lists for comprehensive exams in graduate schools, [9] [10] [11] are as follows:

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International relations</span> Study of relationships between two or more states

International relations (IR) are the interactions among sovereign states. The scientific study of those interactions is also referred to as international studies, international politics, or international affairs. In a broader sense, the study of IR, in addition to multilateral relations, concerns all activities among states—such as war, diplomacy, trade, and foreign policy—as well as relations with and among other international actors, such as intergovernmental organizations (IGOs), international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs), international legal bodies, and multinational corporations (MNCs). There are several schools of thought within IR, of which the most prominent are realism, liberalism, and constructivism.

New institutionalism is an approach to the study of institutions that focuses on the constraining and enabling effects of formal and informal rules on the behavior of individuals and groups. New institutionalism traditionally encompasses three major strands: sociological institutionalism, rational choice institutionalism, and historical institutionalism. New institutionalism originated in work by sociologist John Meyer published in 1977.

International political economy (IPE) is the study of how politics shapes the global economy and how the global economy shapes politics. A key focus in IPE is on the distributive consequences of global economic exchange. It has been described as the study of "the political battle between the winners and losers of global economic exchange."

American politics is a field of study within the academic discipline of political science. It is primarily, but not exclusively, studied by researchers in the United States. Along with comparative politics, international relations, and political theory, it is one of the major fields of political science that are studied in American academic institutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparative politics</span> Field in political science

Comparative politics is a field in political science characterized either by the use of the comparative method or other empirical methods to explore politics both within and between countries. Substantively, this can include questions relating to political institutions, political behavior, conflict, and the causes and consequences of economic development. When applied to specific fields of study, comparative politics may be referred to by other names, such as comparative government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theda Skocpol</span> American sociologist and political scientist (born 1947)

Theda Skocpol is an American sociologist and political scientist, who is currently the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. She is best known as an advocate of the historical-institutional and comparative approaches, as well as her "state autonomy theory". She has written widely for both popular and academic audiences. She has been President of the American Political Science Association and the Social Science History Association.

Historical institutionalism (HI) is a new institutionalist social science approach that emphasizes how timing, sequences and path dependence affect institutions, and shape social, political, economic behavior and change. Unlike functionalist theories and some rational choice approaches, historical institutionalism tends to emphasize that many outcomes are possible, small events and flukes can have large consequences, actions are hard to reverse once they take place, and that outcomes may be inefficient. A critical juncture may set in motion events that are hard to reverse, because of issues related to path dependency. Historical institutionalists tend to focus on history to understand why specific events happen.

Rogers M. Smith is an American political scientist and author noted for his research and writing on American constitutional and political development and political thought, with a focus on issues of citizenship and racial, gender, and class inequalities. His work identifying multiple, competing traditions of national identity including “liberalism, republicanism, and ascriptive forms of Americanism” has been described as "groundbreaking." Smith is the Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania. He was the president of the American Political Science Association (APSA) for 2018–2019.

Stephen Skowronek is an American political scientist, noted for his research on American national institutions and the U.S. presidency, and for helping to stimulate the study of American political development.

Michael Nathan Barnett is a professor of international relations at George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs. Known for his Constructivist approach, his scholarship and research has been in the areas of international organizations, international relations theory, and Middle Eastern politics.

Karen Orren is an American political scientist, noted for her research on American political institutions and social movements, analyzed in historical perspective, and for helping to stimulate the study of American political development.

<i>Studies in American Political Development</i> Academic journal

Studies in American Political Development (SAPD) is a political science journal founded in 1986 and presently published by Cambridge University Press. It is the flagship journal of the American political development (APD) subfield in political science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ira Katznelson</span> American political scientist and historian

Ira I. Katznelson is an American political scientist and historian, noted for his research on the liberal state, inequality, social knowledge, and institutions, primarily focused on the United States. His work has been characterized as an "interrogation of political liberalism in the United States and Europe—asking for definition of its many forms, their origins, their strengths and weaknesses, and what kinds there can be".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vivien A. Schmidt</span> American academic

Vivien A. Schmidt is an American academic of political science and international relations. At Boston University, she is the Jean Monnet Chair of European Integration Professor of International Relations in the Pardee School of Global Studies, and Professor of Political Science. She is known for her work on political economy, policy analysis, democratic theory, and new institutionalism. She is a 2018 recipient of a Guggenheim Fellowship and has been named a Chevalier in the French Legion of Honor.

Richard Franklin Bensel is a professor of American politics at Cornell University. Bensel has attempted to bridge the gap between American economic and political history, with an eye toward comparative implications. Bensel is best known as a scholar of political economy. His most recent work, Passions and Preferences: William Jennings Bryan and the 1896 Democratic National Convention, attempts to bring American political development into a conversation with rational choice theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert C. Lieberman</span> American political scientist (born 1964)

Robert C. Lieberman is an American political scientist and the former provost of the Johns Hopkins University. A scholar of American political development, Lieberman focuses primarily on race and politics and the American welfare state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Blyth</span> Scottish-American political scientist

Mark McGann Blyth is a Scottish-American political economist. He is currently the William R. Rhodes Professor of International Economics and Professor of International and Public Affairs at Brown University. At Brown, Blyth additionally directs the William R. Rhodes Center for International Economics and Finance at the Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Suzanne Mettler</span> American political scientist and author

Suzanne Mettler is an American political scientist and author, known for her research about the way Americans view and respond to the government in their lives, and helping to stimulate the study of American political development.

State capacity is the ability of a government to accomplish policy goals, either generally or in reference to specific aims. A state that lacks capacity is defined as a fragile state or, in a more extreme case, a failed state. Higher state capacity has been strongly linked to long-term economic development, as state capacity can establish law and order, private property rights, and external defense, as well as support development by establishing a competitive market, transportation infrastructure, and mass education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jeffrey K. Tulis</span> American Political Scientist

Jeffrey K. Tulis is an American political scientist known for work that conjoins the fields of American politics, political theory, and public law.

References

  1. Sheingate, Adam (2014). "Institutional Dynamics and American Political Development". Annual Review of Political Science. 17 (1): 461–477. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-040113-161139 . ISSN   1094-2939.
  2. Galvin, Daniel J.; Thurston, Chloe N. (2022). "American Political Development as a Problem-Driven Enterprise". Studies in American Political Development. 36 (2): 156–158. doi: 10.1017/S0898588X22000098 . ISSN   0898-588X. S2CID   250579351.
  3. 1 2 Kersh, Rogan (2005-01-01). "The Growth of American Political Development: The View from the Classroom". Perspectives on Politics. 3 (2): 335–345. doi:10.1017/s1537592705050243. JSTOR   3688034. S2CID   144958631.
  4. The Search for American Political Development . Cambridge University Press. 2004-05-24. ISBN   9780521547642.
  5. Mettler, Suzanne; Valelly, Richard (2016). "Distinctiveness and Necessity of American Political Development". In Richard M. Valelly; Suzanne Mettler; Robert C. Lieberman (eds.). Oxford Handbook of American Political Development. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697915.013.21. ISBN   978-0-19-969791-5.
  6. "American Political Development: Department of Political Science - Northwestern University". www.polisci.northwestern.edu. Archived from the original on 2016-03-11. Retrieved 2016-03-10.
  7. 1 2 Galvin, Daniel J. (2015-07-09). Valelly, Richard; Mettler, Suzanne; Lieberman, Robert (eds.). Qualitative Methods and American Political Development. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697915.013.36. ISBN   978-0-19-969791-5.
  8. "MEMBERSHIP > Organized Sections by Title > Politics and History (Section 24)". American Political Science Association. Retrieved 2016-03-09.
  9. "APReadingListJune2005". faculty.virginia.edu. Retrieved 2017-04-14.
  10. Princeton University, Department of Politics. "Reading List for Ph.D. General Examination in the Politics of the United States" (PDF). Retrieved April 13, 2017.
  11. "American Politics Reading List". politicalscience.yale.edu. Department of Political Science, Yale. Retrieved 2017-04-14.