Anscombe Bioethics Centre

Last updated

The Anscombe Bioethics Centre is a Catholic academic institute based in Oxford, which engages in scholarship, public debate, and education. Established in 1977, it is the oldest bioethical research institution in the United Kingdom.

Contents

The Anscombe Centre was formerly known as the Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics and was based in London at the Hospital of St John and St Elizabeth.. [1] Upon moving to Oxford in 2010, it was renamed in honour of Elizabeth Anscombe, who had died in 2001 and was notable for her contribution to moral philosophy both in relation to the understanding of intention [2] and in relation to practical ethical issues such as contraception, abortion, and euthanasia. [3] [4] [5] [6] While alive, Anscombe had contributed to the Centre, most notably drafting a key section of its 1982 report on Euthanasia and Clinical Practice.

Other academics associated with the Centre include John Finnis and John Keown, both of whom were Governors for more than a decade and both of whom contributed to multiple Centre publications (see below).

Anthony Fisher has described the Centre as “not just as the premier Christian bioethics institute in Britain, but as one of the finest in the world, Christian or secular”. [7]

The Anscombe Bioethics Centre is not attached to any Institute of Higher Education but regularly collaborates with St Mary’s University in Twickenham and with Blackfriars Hall in Oxford. The Centre hosts lectures, seminars, conferences and courses, often in collaboration with other institutions. It engages with consultations by governmental and nongovernmental bodies and gives advice to healthcare professionals and others concerned about ethical issues in biomedicine. It produces reports and briefing papers and Centre staff publish books, book chapters and journal articles.

The current director (January to July 2001 and 2010 to present), is Professor David Albert Jones [8] who is also Professor of Bioethics at St Mary's University in Twickenham [9] and Research Fellow at Blackfriars Oxford [10] Its previous directors were:

Present and former academic staff include Teresa Iglesias (Research Fellow 1981-1985), Fred Fitzpatrick (Education and Research Officer 1984-1990), Agneta Sutton (Research Fellow 1986-1989 and Deputy Director 1989-1994), Hugh Henry (Education Officer 2003-2004), Patrick Carr (Education Officer 2005-2006), Anthony McCarthy (Research Fellow 2002-2010), Stephen Barrie (Education and Research Officer 2007-2016), Michael Wee (Education and Research Officer 2016-2021), and Chris Wojtulewicz (Education and Research Officer 2021-).

Publications

Notable associates of the Centre

In addition to a small in-house staff, other academics have been associated with the Centre through co-writing, co-editing, or contributing to reports or publications or through acting as Governors of the Centre, Associate Research Fellows, Visiting Research Fellows, members of the Academic Review Panel or Anscombe Memorial Lecturers. These have included (with reference to notable association though they have also have collaborated in other ways):

Examples of public policy engagement

House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics 1993

According to Keown the substantial submission of the Centre, drafted by Gormally and Finnis, was said by one member of the committee to have been “the best submission the Committee received” and the subsequent report of the committee “reflected several of the key points made in the submission”. [62]

House of Lords Select Committee on Stem Cell research 2001

A submission by Jones as director to the House of Lords Select Committee on Stem Cell Research 2001 was co-signed by twenty-three theologians including Cahal Daley, Kallistos Ware and Rowan Williams. Though the Committee did not reference this submission, it devoted an appendix to providing an alternative account of the Christian tradition. [63] The submission was subsequently published as a journal article [64] and in two edited collections [65] [66] and was the starting point for the book The Soul of the Embryo [67] which was described by Michael J Gorman as “perhaps the first attempt at a full history of the theological status of the embryo” [68] and by Julia Neuberger as “a surprisingly calm look at what Christians and others have had to say”. [69] It was shortlisted for the Michael Ramsey Prize for Theological Writing. [70]

Brüstle stem cell ruling 2011

Jones was author of a letter published in Nature, co-signed by an international group of 25 bioethicists, arguing that the question of whether to permit patenting of technologies derived from human embryo research “ought to be more than a question of European commercial interest”. [71] He welcomed the subsequent decision of the European Court of Justice ruling against patentability, [72] and later expressed the view that one positive consequence of Brexit was that it would “remove the 'malign influence' of the UK over human embryo research policy in Europe”. [73]

Assisted suicide and suicide rates 2015

After giving evidence Scottish Committee on Health and Sport in relation to the Assisted Suicide (Scotland) Bill [74] and producing an evidence guide [75] to inform debate in Westminster over Marris Bill, Jones published a paper, together with the economist David Paton, on impact of physician assisted suicide on rates of suicide. The paper concluded that legalising physician assisted suicide was associated with an increase in total suicides (inclusive if assisted suicide) of 6.3%, a result that was statistically significant after controlling for confounding factors and state and year effects. [76] The paper was quoted in the debate in Germany over a law to restrict organised forms of assisted suicide [77] and was also quoted in the context of the debate over voluntary assisted dying in New Zealand [78] and in Western Australia. [79] The paper has been subject to scholarly criticism [80] [81] to which Jones has responded. [82]

Criticism of the Centre

The utilitarian bioethicist John Harris in a highly critical review of the Linacre publication Ethics in Nursing Practice coined the term ‘linacracy’ for its approach: “If theodicy consists in justifying the ways of God to man, 'linacracy' is justifying the ways of Catholics to each other... [this book shows] once and for all the wickedness to which Catholic philosophy can lead”. [83]

John Walton, who chaired the 1993 House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics, found the Centre’s work on euthanasia to be “useful” but also “biased”: “Although this book is so closely argued that it is not recommended for light bedside reading, it repays careful study and represents a useful, if biased, contribution to a topical and highly emotive subject”. [84] Similarly, MacKenna Roberts of Progress Educational Trust, [85] found the approach taken by speakers at a conference on human embryo research hosted by the Anscombe Centre to be “uncompromising”. However, in contrast to Walton, while she registered her “disagreements”, she did not perceive the perspectives she disagreed with to be expressions of bias: “Catholic perspectives on the human embryo may be infamously uncompromising, but the intelligent and thought-provoking presentations at this conference allayed my concerns of bias, and demonstrated how taking account of the Catholic view can enrich and inform public debate and policy”. [86]

Related Research Articles

Applied ethics is the practical aspect of moral considerations. It is ethics with respect to real-world actions and their moral considerations in private and public life, the professions, health, technology, law, and leadership. For example, bioethics is concerned with identifying the best approach to moral issues in the life sciences, such as euthanasia, the allocation of scarce health resources, or the use of human embryos in research. Environmental ethics is concerned with ecological issues such as the responsibility of government and corporations to clean up pollution. Business ethics includes the duties of whistleblowers to the public and to their employers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Casuistry</span> Reasoning by extrapolation

In ethics, casuistry is a process of reasoning that seeks to resolve moral problems by extracting or extending abstract rules from a particular case, and reapplying those rules to new instances. This method occurs in applied ethics and jurisprudence. The term is also used pejoratively to criticise the use of clever but unsound reasoning, especially in relation to moral questions. It has been defined as follows:

Study of cases of conscience and a method of solving conflicts of obligations by applying general principles of ethics, religion, and moral theology to particular and concrete cases of human conduct. This frequently demands an extensive knowledge of natural law and equity, civil law, ecclesiastical precepts, and an exceptional skill in interpreting these various norms of conduct....

Euthanasia is the practise of intentionally ending life to eliminate pain and suffering.

Bioethics is both a field of study and professional practice, interested in ethical issues related to health, including those emerging from advances in biology, medicine, and technologies. It proposes the discussion about moral discernment in society and it is often related to medical policy and practice, but also to broader questions as environment, well-being and public health. Bioethics is concerned with the ethical questions that arise in the relationships among life sciences, biotechnology, medicine, politics, law, theology and philosophy. It includes the study of values relating to primary care, other branches of medicine, ethical education in science, animal, and environmental ethics, and public health.

Medical ethics is an applied branch of ethics which analyzes the practice of clinical medicine and related scientific research. Medical ethics is based on a set of values that professionals can refer to in the case of any confusion or conflict. These values include the respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. Such tenets may allow doctors, care providers, and families to create a treatment plan and work towards the same common goal. It is important to note that these four values are not ranked in order of importance or relevance and that they all encompass values pertaining to medical ethics. However, a conflict may arise leading to the need for hierarchy in an ethical system, such that some moral elements overrule others with the purpose of applying the best moral judgement to a difficult medical situation. Medical ethics is particularly relevant in decisions regarding involuntary treatment and involuntary commitment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Geach</span> British philosopher

Peter Thomas Geach was a British philosopher who was Professor of Logic at the University of Leeds. His areas of interest were philosophical logic, ethics, history of philosophy, philosophy of religion and the theory of identity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">G. E. M. Anscombe</span> British analytic philosopher (1919–2001)

Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe, usually cited as G. E. M. Anscombe or Elizabeth Anscombe, was a British analytic philosopher. She wrote on the philosophy of mind, philosophy of action, philosophical logic, philosophy of language, and ethics. She was a prominent figure of analytical Thomism, a Fellow of Somerville College, Oxford, and a professor of philosophy at the University of Cambridge.

Jonathan Glover is a British philosopher known for his books and studies on ethics. He currently teaches ethics at King's College London. Glover is a fellow of the Hastings Center, an independent bioethics research institution in the United States, and is a Distinguished Research Fellow at the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics.

David Braine was a British analytic philosopher with interests in analytic philosophy of religion and metaphysics, who sought to marry the techniques and insights of analytical philosophy and phenomenology to the metaphysics of classical Thomism. His The Reality of Time and the Existence of God set out to prove the existence of God from the fact that the world enjoys continuity in time. He argued that nothing in the world could be the cause of this continuity, whence God came into the picture.

Govert A. den Hartogh is a Dutch moral, legal and political philosopher. He studied theology in Kampen and philosophy in Leiden and Oxford. He received his PhD in philosophy in 1985 from the University of Amsterdam. From 1974 on he worked at the University of Amsterdam as assistant and associate professor of ethics and jurisprudence in the Philosophy Department and the Faculty of Law, as an extra-ordinary professor of medical ethics in the Faculty of Medicine, and as a full professor of ethics and its history in the Philosophy Department. In 1992 he took the initiative of founding the Netherlands School for Research in Practical Philosophy, together with Robert Heeger and Bert Musschenga, and functioned as the school's first director. He retired in 2008. At his retirement his former Ph.D. students published a Festschrift.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arthur Schafer</span>

Arthur Schafer is a Canadian ethicist specializing in bioethics, philosophy of law, social philosophy and political philosophy. He is Director of the Centre for Professional and Applied Ethics, at the University of Manitoba. He is also a full professor in the Department of Philosophy and an ethics consultant for the Department of Paediatrics and Child Health at the Health Sciences Centre in Winnipeg. For ten years he was head of the Section of Bio-Medical Ethics in the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Manitoba. He has also served as visiting scholar at Green College, Oxford.

Helga Kuhse is an Australian utilitarian philosopher and bioethicist.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to ethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philosophy of healthcare</span>

The philosophy of healthcare is the study of the ethics, processes, and people which constitute the maintenance of health for human beings. For the most part, however, the philosophy of healthcare is best approached as an indelible component of human social structures. That is, the societal institution of healthcare can be seen as a necessary phenomenon of human civilization whereby an individual continually seeks to improve, mend, and alter the overall nature and quality of their life. This perennial concern is especially prominent in modern political liberalism, wherein health has been understood as the foundational good necessary for public life.

The Nuffield Council on Bioethics is a UK-based independent charitable body, which examines and reports on bioethical issues raised by new advances in biological and medical research. Established in 1991, the Council is funded by the Nuffield Foundation, the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust. The Council has been described by the media as a 'leading ethics watchdog', which 'never shrinks from the unthinkable'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Selgelid</span>

Michael J. Selgelid is a bioethicist and moral philosopher who has written on ethics and public health, biotechnology, and infectious diseases. He is the current director of the Centre for Human Bioethics at Monash University and of the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Bioethics therein.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Francoise Baylis</span> Canadian bioethicist

Françoise Elvina BaylisFISC is a Canadian bioethicist whose work is at the intersection of applied ethics, health policy, and practice. The focus of her research is on issues of women's health and assisted reproductive technologies, but her research and publication record also extend to such topics as research involving humans, gene editing, novel genetic technologies, public health, the role of bioethics consultants, and neuroethics. Baylis' interest in the impact of bioethics on health and public policy as well as her commitment to citizen engagement]and participatory democracy sees her engage with print, radio, television, and other online publications.

Bernadette Tobin is an Australian Catholic ethicist and professor of philosophy. She is the daughter of political activist and journalist B.A. Santamaria.

Motsamai Molefe is a South African philosopher, one of the thinkers to have popularised African philosophy, and specifically Applied Ethics in context of Ubuntu philosophy. Molefe is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Fort Hare in Alice, Eastern Cape.

References

  1. "'About us', Anscombe Bioethics Centre website". www.bioethics.org.uk/about-us/..
  2. G.E.M. Anscombe, Intention (1957).
  3. G.E.M. Anscombe, Papers Vol III, Ethics Religion and Politics, (1983).
  4. Luke Gormally and Mary Geach (eds), Human life Human Life, Action and Ethics: Essays by G.E.M. Anscombe (2006).
  5. Luke Gormally and Mary Geach (eds), Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics by G.E.M. Anscombe (2008).
  6. Luke Gormally, Roger Teichmann and David Albert Jones, The Moral Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe, Exeter: Imprint Academic (2016).
  7. A Fisher, ‘Review of Luke Gormally (ed) Euthanasia, Clinical Practice and the Law’, New Blackfriars, 76, 893 (May 1995): 258-260.
  8. "Professor David Albert Jones".
  9. "St Mary's University in Twickenham".
  10. "Blackfriars Oxford".
  11. Euthanasia and Clinical Practice: trends, principles and alternatives (London: Linacre Centre, 1982)
  12. F Fitzpatrick, Ethics in Nursing Practice: Basic Principles and their application (London: Linacre Centre, 1988)
  13. T Iglesias, IVF and Justice London: Linacre Centre, 1990.
  14. A Sutton, Prenatal Diagnosis: Confronting the Ethical Issues (London: Linacre Centre, 1990).
  15. L Gormally (ed), The Dependent Elderly: Autonomy, Justice and Quality of Care (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
  16. A Sutton, Infertility and Assisted Conception (London: Linacre Centre 1993). (Published on behalf of the Bioethics Committee of the Catholic Bishops Conference of England and Wales.)
  17. Luke Gormally (ed), Euthanasia, Clinical Practice and the Law (London: Linacre Centre, 1994).
  18. Joint Bishops Bioethics Committee (Helen Watt, secretary), Genetic Intervention on Human Subjects: The Report of a Working Party (London: Linacre Centre, 1996).
  19. L Gormally (ed), Issues for a Catholic Bioethic (London: Linacre Centre, 1999).
  20. H Watt, Life and Death in Healthcare Ethics: A Short Introduction (London: Routledge, 2000).
  21. A Fisher and L Gormally (eds), Healthcare Allocation: an ethical framework for public policy (London: Linacre Centre, 2001).
  22. L Gormally (ed), Culture of Life – Culture of Death (London: Linacre Centre, 2002).
  23. H Watt (ed), Cooperation, Complicity and Conscience. Problems in Healthcare, Science, Law and Public Policy (London: Linacre Centre, 2006).
  24. H Watt (ed), Incapacity and Care. Controversies in Healthcare and Research (London: Linacre Centre, 2009).
  25. H Watt (ed), Fertility and Gender. Issues in Reproductive and Sexual Ethics (Oxford: Anscombe Centre, 2011).
  26. Papers from conference on ‘Human Embryo Research: Law, Ethics and Public Policy’ published in a special issue of Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17.1 (2011).
  27. D.A. Jones and C MacKellar (eds), Chimera’s Children: Ethical, Philosophical and Religious Perspectives on Human / Non-human Experimentation (London: Continuum, 2012).
  28. M Jarmulowicz (chair) D.A. Jones (secretary) et al, On the ethics of organ transplantation: a Catholic perspective The Report of The report of a working party (Oxford: Anscombe Bioethics Centre, 2014.)
  29. D.A. Jones and S Barrie, Thinking Christian ethos: the meaning of Catholic education (London: CTS, 2015).
  30. Luke Gormally, David Albert Jones, and Roger Teichmann (eds), The Moral Philosophy of Elizabeth Anscombe (St Andrews Studies in Philosophy and Public Affairs) (Imprint Academic, 2016).
  31. H Watt, The Ethics of Pregnancy, Abortion and Childbirth (London: Routledge 2016).
  32. D.A. Jones, C Gastmans, and C MacKellar (eds), Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Lessons from Belgium (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).
  33. "Professor David Albert Jones".
  34. M Jarmulowicz (chair) D.A. Jones (secretary) et al, On the ethics of organ transplantation: a Catholic perspective The Report of The report of a working party (Oxford: Anscombe Bioethics Centre, 2014.)
  35. H Watt (ed), Fertility and Gender. Issues in Reproductive and Sexual Ethics (Oxford: Anscombe Centre, 2011).
  36. L Gormally (ed), The Dependent Elderly: Autonomy, Justice and Quality of Care (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
  37. Luke Gormally (ed), Euthanasia, Clinical Practice and the Law (London: Linacre Centre, 1994).
  38. L Gormally (ed), Culture of Life – Culture of Death (London: Linacre Centre, 2002).
  39. H Watt (ed), Cooperation, Complicity and Conscience. Problems in Healthcare, Science, Law and Public Policy (London: Linacre Centre, 2006).
  40. H Watt (ed), Incapacity and Care. Controversies in Healthcare and Research (London: Linacre Centre, 2009).
  41. Luke Gormally and Mary Geach (eds), Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics by G.E.M. Anscombe (2008).
  42. A Fisher and L Gormally (eds), Healthcare Allocation: an ethical framework for public policy (London: Linacre Centre, 2001).
  43. L Gormally (ed), Culture of Life – Culture of Death (London: Linacre Centre, 2002).
  44. H Watt (ed), Fertility and Gender. Issues in Reproductive and Sexual Ethics (Oxford: Anscombe Centre, 2011).
  45. Luke Gormally and Mary Geach (eds), Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics by G.E.M. Anscombe (2008).
  46. H Watt, The Ethics of Pregnancy, Abortion and Childbirth (London: Routledge 2016).
  47. L Gormally (ed), Culture of Life – Culture of Death (London: Linacre Centre, 2002).
  48. L Gormally (ed), Issues for a Catholic Bioethic (London: Linacre Centre, 1999).
  49. L Gormally (ed), The Dependent Elderly: Autonomy, Justice and Quality of Care (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
  50. Luke Gormally (ed), Euthanasia, Clinical Practice and the Law (London: Linacre Centre, 1994).
  51. L Gormally (ed), Issues for a Catholic Bioethic (London: Linacre Centre, 1999).
  52. D.A. Jones and C MacKellar (eds), Chimera’s Children: Ethical, Philosophical and Religious Perspectives on Human / Non-human Experimentation (London: Continuum, 2012).
  53. H Watt, The Ethics of Pregnancy, Abortion and Childbirth (London: Routledge 2016).
  54. Luke Gormally and Mary Geach (eds), Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics by G.E.M. Anscombe (2008).
  55. H Watt (ed), Fertility and Gender. Issues in Reproductive and Sexual Ethics (Oxford: Anscombe Centre, 2011).
  56. D.A. Jones and S Barrie, Thinking Christian ethos: the meaning of Catholic education (London: CTS, 2015).
  57. Luke Gormally and Mary Geach (eds), Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics by G.E.M. Anscombe (2008).
  58. Papers from conference on ‘Human Embryo Research: Law, Ethics and Public Policy’ published in a special issue of Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 17.1 (2011).
  59. H Watt, The Ethics of Pregnancy, Abortion and Childbirth (London: Routledge 2016).
  60. Luke Gormally and Mary Geach (eds), Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics by G.E.M. Anscombe (2008).
  61. M Jarmulowicz (chair) D.A. Jones (secretary) et al, On the ethics of organ transplantation: a Catholic perspective The Report of The report of a working party (Oxford: Anscombe Bioethics Centre, 2014.)
  62. J Keown and R.P. George, Reason, Morality, and Law: The Philosophy of John Finnis. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 301).
  63. Report from the Select Committee Stem Cell Research (HL 83(i); 27 February 2002, Appendix 4). https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200102/ldselect/ldstem/83/8301.htm
  64. Jones D. (Autumn 2001). "A theologian's brief: on the place of the human embryo within the Christian tradition and the theological principles for evaluating its moral status". Ethics Med. 17 (3): 143–53. PMID   15080145.
  65. B Waters and Cole-Turner (eds) God and the Embryo: Religious Voices on Stem Cells and Cloning. (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003, pp. 190-203).
  66. T Lysaught and J.J. Kotva (eds), On Moral Medicine: Theological Perspectives in Medical Ethics. (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 2012, pp. 675-680).
  67. D.A. Jones, The Soul of the Embryo: An enquiry into the status of the human embryo in the Christian tradition. (London: Continuum, 2004).
  68. Gorman, M. J. (2006). "'Book Review: The Soul of the Embryo: An Enquiry into the Status of the Human Embryo in the Christian Tradition'". Studies in Christian Ethics. 19 (1): 125–128. doi:10.1177/095394680601900112. S2CID   170459510.
  69. J Neuberger (5 March 2005). "'Embryos and ensoulment: when does life begin?'". Lancet. 365 (9462): P837-838. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71025-4. S2CID   54376666.
  70. "Michael Ramsey Prize for Theological Writing, Books 2007". www.michaelramseyprize.org.uk.
  71. Jones, D. (2011). "'More at stake in stem-cell patents'". Nature. 474 (579): 579. doi: 10.1038/474579d . PMID   21720352. S2CID   205065558.
  72. "Michael Cook, 'Interview: David Albert Jones on Brüstle stem cell ruling', Bioedge (25 October 2011)". bioedge.org. 25 October 2011.
  73. "J Buxton, 'What's so special about the status of the embryo?', BioNews 886 (30 January 2017)". www.bionews.org.uk. 30 January 2017.
  74. "Health and Sport Committee Stage 1, Report on Assisted Suicide (Scotland) Bill, SP Paper 712 6th Report, Session 4 (2015), 30 April 2015. See paragraphs 79, 99, 186, 202, 242, and 274" (PDF). www.archive2021.parliament.scot.
  75. "Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: A Guide to the Evidence (May 2022)". www.bioethics.org.uk.
  76. Jones, David Albert; Paton, David (2015). "'How Does Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide Affect Rates of Suicide?'" (PDF). South Med J. 108 (10): 599–604. doi:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000349 (inactive 2023-08-09). ISSN   0038-4348. PMID   26437189.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of August 2023 (link)
  77. "Deutscher Bundestag debate of 6 November 2015, pages 13157 and 13159" (PDF). www.bundestag.de.
  78. New Zealand Ministry of Justice and Ministry of Health Departmental Report End of Life Choice Bill, December 2018. See page 18, paragraph 105: https://www.parliament.nz/resource/en-NZ/52SCJU_ADV_74307_JU65473/0ef8505fb4c7a82902a17f262f5f1d850a1057c2
  79. Joint Select Committee on End of Life Choices. My Life, My Choice: The Report of the Joint Select Committee on End of Life Choices; Government of Western Australia: Perth, Australia, 2018, pp. 179-180: https://www.parliament.wa.gov.au/parliament/Commit.nsf/(Report+Lookup+by+Com+ID)/71C9AFECD0FAEE6E482582F200037B37/$file/Joint+Select+Committe+on+the+End+of+Life+Choices+-+Report+for+Website.pdf
  80. Lowe MP, Downie J. (2017). "'Does legalization of medical assistance in dying affect rates of non-assisted suicide?'" (PDF). J Ethics Mental Health. 10. ISSN   1916-2405.
  81. Dembo J; Schuklenk U; Reggler J. (Jul 2018). "'"For Their Own Good": A Response to Popular Arguments Against Permitting Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) where Mental Illness Is the Sole Underlying Condition'". Can J Psychiatry. 63 (7): 451–456. doi:10.1177/0706743718766055. PMC   6099778 . PMID   29635929.
  82. D.A. Jones (2022). "'Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide, and Suicide Rates in Europe'". J Ethics Mental Health. 11. ISSN   1916-2405.
  83. J Harris (2022). "Review of FJ Fitzpatrick Ethics in Nursing Practice". Journal of Applied Philosophy. 6 (2): 240–243.
  84. J Walton (1994). "Review of Euthanasia, Clinical Practice and the Law". BMJ. 308 (989). doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6934.989. S2CID   72563063.
  85. "Our History (Progress Educational Trust)". www.progress.org.uk.
  86. "M Roberts, Event Review: Human Embryo Research - Law, Ethics and Public Policy". www.bionews.org.uk. 3 October 2011.