Area defense

Last updated
Area defense requires the defending party to have a good knowledge of the terrain and the ability to work with cartographic information Defense.gov News Photo 991020-F-9661A-501.jpg
Area defense requires the defending party to have a good knowledge of the terrain and the ability to work with cartographic information

Area defense is a method of positional defensive warfare described in the U.S. Army's combat manuals of the 1960s and 1970s. [1] After 1982 the term "positional defense" replaced it. [2]

Contents

Basic provisions

Area defense consisted of stubbornly holding tactically advantageous positions with careful equipping of defense lines, engineering barriers, and the fullest possible use of all available firepower of the troops. [2] [3] [4] [5] As a rule, area defense was used to cause the maximum damage to the enemy and to preserve the integrity of the defensive belt in conditions of inadequate depth of defense and in types of terrain which limited the maneuvering of forces. [2] The use of units that were inferior in mobility to enemy troops was considered advisable for district defense, [2] [5] and district defense could also be used in combination with mobile defense techniques, especially at the operational level. [2]

American military theorists consider this method of warfare a classic. [5] When defending an area, an American mechanized division could operate in a band up to 19 miles (30 km) deep and 12–19 miles (20–30 km) wide at the front. [3]

Organizational features

When beginning area defense, it was supposed to create a forward defense area and a reserve area in all links from brigade upwards. According to American experts, the backbone of the entire defensive system was the anti-tank defenses. [4]

The forward defense area was intended to deploy first-line troops and was considered the main element of the whole defensive complex. [2] Within it were erected defensive lines, firing positions of field artillery and air defense facilities, position areas of missile troops, command posts, systems of engineering barriers, etc. [2] Units of the first echelon built their positions in the form of platoon and company strongpoints, which were prepared for a all around defense. [4] If there were no direct contact between the defending forces and the enemy, a 15–25 km deep supply strip was created in front of the location of the forward defense area. [2] [3] On it there were positions for corps cover troops, division general and combat guard forces of the first echelon, and various obstacles and mine blast obstacles were arranged. [2]

The Reserve area had to ensure their dispersed and concealed deployment, as well as the ability to move quickly to solve the whole range of tasks (counterattacks, etc.). [2] Its engineering preparation consisted in setting up barriers, defensive lines, cut-off positions and deployment lines. [2]

Combat order and fire system

The troops were usually arranged in two echelons, the first of which was to have at least two-thirds of all forces and means, while the second, with the rest of the troops, was to act as a reserve. [2] [3] [4]

Compounds and units of the first echelon were tasked with taking the enemy's onslaught, repelling it, and stopping the advance of enemy troops and holding the lines they occupied. [2] At this time the second echelon was to strengthen the defense in crisis areas, as well as - to block and eliminate the enemy breakthrough groups by counterattacks and causing them fire damage. [2] [4]

Fire system was built with the expectation of coordinated by tasks, place and time use of all fire weapons for the purpose of a constant and growing fire impact on the enemy. [2] It was supposed to link the fire of all means of destruction (including nuclear strikes, airstrikes by tactical and army aviation, field artillery, etc.) with the nature of the terrain and the system of obstacles. [2]

Usage scenario

To successfully implement the area defense and disrupt the enemy's offensive before their forces reached the front line, it was planned to conduct combat operations on the far approaches, to launch preemptive strikes and artillery counterpreparation. [2] In the support zone his forces were to become a target for the covering troops, whose task was to disorganize the enemy offensive, slow it down, mislead about the true configuration of the defensive lines by means of laying mines, using counterattacks and all sorts of deterrent actions. [2] [3] With the emergence of the enemy at the leading edge was not excluded strikes on him by the advanced forces after conducting appropriate counterpreparation. [2] [3]

The most rimportant and difficult stage was the fighting for the forward defense area. During this the task of the first echelon was to hold their positions for a long time and inflict the maximum possible damage to enemy forces. [2] If part of the first echelon weas destroyed, it was assumed that the integrity of the combat order should be restored by the general reserve or second echelon units. [3] If the forward positions could not be held and the fighting spread deep into the occupied territory, the encroaching enemy groups were to be counterattacked to restore the defensive perimeter. [2] If this were unsuccessful, the tactic of blocking the enemy who had broken through was used to bring the higher-level reserves to bear. [2]

See also

Notes

  1. "Chapter 9. The Area Defense". Field Manual No. 3-90. Tactics. Washington, DC: Headquarters Department of the Army. 2001.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Sergeyev, Igor Dmitriyevich, ed. (2001). Оборона района. Военная энциклопедия (in Russian). Vol. 5. Moscow, Russia: Voenizdat. p. 536.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Оборона района. Советская военная энциклопедия (in Russian). Vol. 5. Moscow, Russia: Voenizdat. 1978. p. 665.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Малаховский, Е.К. (1978). §1. Характерные черты и принципы построения современной обороны в армиях основных стран НАТО. Стрельба на поражение опорных пунктов (in Russian). Moscow, Russia: Voenizdat. p. 112.
  5. 1 2 3 Grishin, Sergey Vladimirovich (1985). Позиционная оборона. Соединения и части в бою. Иностранные армии (in Russian). Moscow, Russia: Voenizdat. p. 279.

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hedgehog defence</span>

The hedgehog defence is a military tactic in which a defending force creates multiple mutually supporting strongpoints ("hedgehogs") in a defence in depth, designed to sap the strength and break the momentum of an attack. The hedgehogs are designed to be both strong in defence, and thus expensive for an attacker to assault, and capable of mounting counterattacks. The intention is that the attacker will instead bypass them. This will divide his front, expose his forward units to enfilading fire as they pass between hedgehogs followed by attack from the rear when they have passed them, and leave his rear echelons and lines of communication open to counterattack.

Deep operation, also known as Soviet Deep Battle, was a military theory developed by the Soviet Union for its armed forces during the 1920s and 1930s. It was a tenet that emphasized destroying, suppressing or disorganizing enemy forces not only at the line of contact but also throughout the depth of the battlefield.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smolensk operation</span> Recapture of the city by the Soviet 39th, 43rd and 10th Guards armies

The second Smolensk operation was a Soviet strategic offensive operation conducted by the Red Army as part of the Summer-Autumn Campaign of 1943. Staged almost simultaneously with the Lower Dnieper Offensive, the offensive lasted two months and was led by General Andrei Yeremenko, commanding the Kalinin Front, and Vasily Sokolovsky, commanding the Western Front. Its goal was to clear the German presence from the Smolensk and Bryansk regions. Smolensk had been under German occupation since the first Battle of Smolensk in 1941.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mobile Defense</span>

Mobile defense is a manoeuvre by military units that repulses an attack by the use of well-planned counter-attacks by the defender, which seeks to avoid a pitched battle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">252nd Rifle Division</span> Military unit

The 252nd Rifle Division was an infantry division of the Red Army during World War II.

The 333rd Rifle Division began forming in the North Caucasus Military District in August, 1941, as a standard Red Army rifle division, as part of the massive mobilization of reserve forces very shortly after the German invasion. In 1942 it served in the late winter and early spring fighting near Kharkov, taking a beating both then and during the opening stages of the German summer offensive. Withdrawn into the reserves, the division was rebuilt in time to take part in the Soviet counteroffensive at Stalingrad in November, and played an important role in driving the German forces out of the Caucasus region during the winter. In the autumn of 1943 the division shared credit with the 25th Guards Rifle Division for the liberation of Sinelnikovo in the Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, receiving that place name as an honorific. After battling through Ukraine and into the Balkan states, the 333rd completed its combat path on a relatively quiet note doing garrison duties in the Balkans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">390th Rifle Division</span> Soviet WW II infantry division

The 390th Rifle Division was an infantry division of the Soviet Union's Red Army during World War II. It was formed twice, first in August 1941, and after its destruction in 1942, re-formed in 1944.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flexible defense</span>

The flexible defense is a military theory about the design of modern fortifications. The examples of "flexible" defense-lines are not based on dense lines of heavily armed, large and expensive concrete fortifications as the systems such as the Maginot Line were. Their protective capacity hinges on multiple lines of obstacles and small shelters fitting into the environment. They are "flexible" because soldiers are not locked in pillboxes, but fight instead in easily replaceable open earth-wood made positions, while bunkers serve only as shelters during bombardments. As a result, they are able to adapt to the opponent's movements, and there are no easily targeted large buildings in these lines.

The 65th Anti-Aircraft Artillery Division was an anti-aircraft artillery division of the Soviet Union's Red Army during World War II and the early postwar period.

The 3rd Anti-Aircraft Artillery Division was an anti-aircraft artillery division of the Soviet Union's Red Army during World War II.

The 4th Anti-Aircraft Artillery Division was an anti-aircraft artillery division of the Soviet Union's Red Army during World War II and the Soviet Army in the early postwar years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">70th Rifle Division</span> Military unit

The 70th Rifle Division was an infantry division of the Red Army and briefly of the Soviet Army, formed twice.

The 12th Guards Rifle Division was reformed as an elite infantry division of the Red Army in January, 1942, based on the 1st formation of the 258th Rifle Division and served in that role until after the end of the Great Patriotic War. It was in 50th Army when it was redesignated but was soon assigned to the 49th Army, then to the 10th Army and finally to the 16th Army near the end of that month. In June it was assigned to the 9th Guards Rifle Corps of 61st Army where it remained almost continually for the duration of the war, serving under several Front commands but always on the central sector of the front. During the summer offensive in 1943 it fought through western Russia and into Belarus during the winter campaigns there. Along with the rest of 61st Army it took part in the second stage of Operation Bagration in the summer of 1944, advancing into the Pripyat marshes region, winning a battle honor and shortly thereafter the Order of the Red Banner. After a short time in the Reserve of the Supreme High Command it was moved to the 3rd Baltic and later the 1st Baltic Front driving into Latvia and Lithuania, being decorated with the Order of Suvorov for its part in the liberation of Riga. In December it was returned to the 1st Belorussian Front and took part in the offensives that propelled the Red Army into Poland and eastern Germany. After the fall of Berlin the division advanced to the Elbe River where it linked up with the US 84th Infantry Division. Following the German surrender it was disbanded in July, 1946.

The 88th Rifle Division was twice formed as an infantry division of the Red Army, first as part of the prewar buildup of forces. In its first formation in the far north it had an unusual shtat probably to facilitate its movement in the roadless tundra and forests of that region. During the Winter War against Finland it saw action in the fighting around Salla. Its organization again proved beneficial in the spring of 1942 during the first stages of the Great Patriotic War. It played a large role in holding and then pushing back the Finnish III Army Corps during Operation Silver Fox and for this success was redesignated as the 23rd Guards Rifle Division.

The 62nd Guards Rifle Division was formed as an elite infantry division of the Red Army in January, 1943, based on the 2nd formation of the 127th Rifle Division, and served in that role until after the end of the Great Patriotic War.

The 85th Guards Rifle Division was reformed as an elite infantry division of the Red Army in April 1943, based on the 2nd formation of the 118th Rifle Division, and served in that role until after the end of the Great Patriotic War. Late during the conflict it became known as one of the "Latvian Guards" rifle divisions due to its role in the liberation of that state.

The Donbas–Rostov Strategic Defensive Operation was a defensive operation of the Southern Front and the left wing of the South–Western Front of the Red Army on the territory of Donbas during the World War II. During it, the Donbas and Rostov front–line defensive operations were carried out.

The 95th Guards Rifle Division was reformed as an elite infantry division of the Red Army in May 1943, based on the 1st formation of the 226th Rifle Division, and served in that role until well after the end of the Great Patriotic War. It ended the war on the approaches to Prague and continued to serve well into the postwar era in the Central Group of Forces.

Barrage is a military term covering a wide range of structures, devices, or measures for destroying something to constrain or impede the movement of troops and forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mobile barrage squad</span>

Mobile barrages squad is an element of a combat or operational order in the form of a temporary military formation, which is created from units of engineering troops and army aviation.