Arlene's Flowers lawsuit

Last updated

The Arlene's Flowers lawsuit was a group of merged civil suits brought against Arlene's Flowers of Richland, Washington, US, by a couple whose longtime florist declined service of their same-sex wedding, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and by Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson. The lawsuits gained national attention due to their religious and civil rights implications. [1] [2] [3] The Supreme Court of the United States let stand two unanimous verdicts by the Washington state Supreme Court that same-sex couples cannot be discriminated against on the basis of religious freedom. [4]

Contents

Stutzman opted to settle with Ingersoll in November 2021, paying him $5,000, as she was getting close to retirement and wanted to stop accumulating legal fees related to the case. While she had filed a petition for rehearing in September 2021 to the Supreme Court, she withdrew it following the settlement. [4] During 2022, Stutzman sold the shop to Kim Solheim, who changed the store's policies to welcome LGBTQ+ clients. [5]

The first two legal cases, Ingersoll v. Arlene's Flowers and State of Washington v. Arlene's Flowers were consolidated by Benton County Superior Court Judge Salvador Mendoza into a single case for purposes of discovery. [6]

The first civil suit, Ingersoll v. Arlene's Flowers, was filed by Plaintiffs Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed, a gay couple, after Barronelle Stutzman, the owner of Arlene's Flowers, denied floral arrangements for their wedding. The couple had been customers of Stutzman's shop for nine years, but when they asked her to provide flowers for their wedding, the florist declined, citing her Christian beliefs. [7] [8] The same-sex couple who had been denied access to Stutzman's services, Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed, were represented by the ACLU in their lawsuit against the business on grounds of discrimination per the anti-discrimination laws of the state of Washington. [9] Attorneys for the ACLU proposed a settlement in the suit with the following conditions: Stutzman making a public apology, donating $5,000 to a local LGBT youth center, and a promise to no longer refuse service to customers based on their sexual orientation. [10] The legal group representing Stutzman, Alliance Defending Freedom, countered the settlement offer, stating she should not be required to violate her religious beliefs. [11]

The second suit against Stutzman was a consumer protection suit filed by state Attorney General Bob Ferguson. [12] The premise of the suit, State of Washington v. Arlene's Flowers, was filed by Ferguson in order to uphold the state's Consumer Protection Act. [13] Upon settlement, the decision would bring a $2,000 fine under the Washington Consumer Protection Act, a $1 payment for costs, and agreement not to discriminate in the future. Stutzman, however, responded that she would not comply, with her counsel citing the state's constitution in regard to "freedom of conscience in all matters of religious sentiment". [14] Following Stutzman's response, Benton County Superior Court Judge Alexander Ekstrom ruled on January 7, 2015 that she could be sued in her personal capacity. [15]

A third lawsuit, Arlene's Flowers v. Ferguson, was filed as a countersuit by Stutzman to claim financial hardship she suffered as a result of the previous two lawsuits. [12]

Judge Ekstrom ruled on February 18, 2015 that Stuzman had violated the state's anti-discrimination law in both cases. [16] [17] The next day, Stutzman's lawyers announced they would appeal the ruling. [18] On March 27, 2015, Judge Ekstrom ordered Stutzman to pay a $1,000 fine and $1 for court costs and fees. [19] [20]

Via GoFundMe, Stutzman received over $174,000 in individual donations [21] before the website removed her donation page citing a violation of their terms of service. GoFundMe stated their policy bars fundraising campaigns it deems discriminatory. [22]

On November 15, 2016, state Attorney General Ferguson personally argued the case before the Washington Supreme Court; the hearing was held before an audience at an auditorium on the campus of Bellevue College. [23] On February 16, 2017, the state Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Stutzman, holding that her floral arrangements do not constitute protected free speech, and that providing flowers to a same-sex wedding would not serve as an endorsement of same-sex marriage. [24] Rejecting Stutzman's Free Exercise Clause claim, Justice Sheryl Gordon McCloud wrote, "this case is no more about the access to flowers than civil rights cases were about access to sandwiches." [25] [26]

Following the state high court's decision, Stutzman filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States, asking the Court to hear the case. [27] During this case, a similar case, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission , had made its way to the Supreme Court, and which was decided in early June 2018. The ruling was made on procedural grounds in that the bakery owner's religious views were treated with hostility by the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, and remanded that a new hearing be made. Stutzman, on this news, stated that she had also found her religious views treated with hostility by the state of Washington, and sought a similar rehearing. On June 25, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court granted the petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment, and remanded the case to the Supreme Court of Washington for further consideration in light of the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision. [28] [29] On June 6, 2019, the Washington Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Stutzman again, finding no evidence of religious animus. [30] [31] Stutzman's attorneys once again requested the U.S. Supreme Court to take her case, [32] [33] but certiorari was denied in July 2021. [34]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Same-sex marriage in the United States</span>

The availability of legally recognized same-sex marriage in the United States expanded from one state (Massachusetts) in 2004 to all fifty states in 2015 through various court rulings, state legislation, and direct popular votes. States each have separate marriage laws, which must adhere to rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States that recognize marriage as a fundamental right guaranteed by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as first established in the 1967 landmark civil rights case of Loving v. Virginia.

The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), formerly the Alliance Defense Fund, is an American conservative Christian legal advocacy group that works to expand Christian religious liberties and practices within public schools and in government, outlaw abortion, and oppose LGBTQ rights. ADF is headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona, with branch offices in several locations including Washington, D.C., and New York. Its international subsidiary, Alliance Defending Freedom International, with headquarters in Vienna, Austria, operates in over 100 countries.

Liberty Counsel is a 501(c)(3) Christian ministry that engages in strategic litigation to promote evangelical Christian values. Liberty Counsel was founded in 1989 by its chairman Mathew Staver and its president Anita L. Staver, who are attorneys and married to each other. The Southern Poverty Law Center has listed Liberty Counsel as an anti-LGBT hate group, a designation the group has disputed. The group is a Christian ministry.

Same-sex marriage has been legal in Florida since January 6, 2015, as a result of a ruling in Brenner v. Scott from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida. The court ruled the state's same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional on August 21, 2014. The order was stayed temporarily. State attempts at extending the stay failed, with the U.S. Supreme Court denying further extension on December 19, 2014. In addition, a state court ruling in Pareto v. Ruvin allowed same-sex couples to obtain marriage licenses in Miami-Dade County on the afternoon of January 5, 2015. In another state case challenging the state's denial of marriage rights to same-sex couples, a Monroe County court in Huntsman v. Heavilin stayed enforcement of its decision pending appeal and the stay expired on January 6, 2015. Florida was the 35th U.S. state to legalize same-sex marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bob Ferguson (politician)</span> 18th Attorney General of Washington

Robert Watson Ferguson is an American lawyer and politician serving as the 18th attorney general of Washington. A member of the Democratic Party, he was first elected in 2012 and re-elected in 2016 and 2020. Prior to being attorney general, Ferguson was a member of the King County Council.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBTQ rights in Washington (state)</span>

The state of Washington is seen as one of the most progressive states in the U.S. in regard to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) rights; with jurisprudence having evolved significantly since the late 20th century. Same-sex sexual activity was legalized in 1976. LGBTQ people are fully protected from discrimination in the areas of employment, housing and public accommodations; the state enacting comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation regarding sexual orientation and gender identity in 2006. Same-sex marriage has been legal since 2012, and same-sex couples are allowed to adopt. Conversion therapy on minors has also been illegal since 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Liberty Institute</span> American religious liberty advocacy organization

First Liberty Institute is a nonprofit Christian conservative legal organization based in Plano, Texas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sheryl Gordon McCloud</span> American judge (born 1955)

Sheryl Gordon McCloud is an American lawyer who has served as a justice of the Washington Supreme Court since 2013. She was elected to replace outgoing Associate Justice Tom Chambers on Seat 9 of the Washington Supreme Court, winning 55.24% of the vote and defeating former Associate Justice Richard B. Sanders. When she took the bench in 2013,it gave the Washington Supreme Court a female majority.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts</span> 1993 state laws in the United States

State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts are state laws based on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), a federal law that was passed almost unanimously by the U.S. Congress in 1993 and signed into law by President Bill Clinton. The laws mandate that religious liberty of individuals can only be limited by the "least restrictive means of furthering a compelling government interest". Originally, the federal law was intended to apply to federal, state, and local governments. In 1997, the U.S. Supreme Court in City of Boerne v. Flores held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act only applies to the federal government but not states and other local municipalities within them. As a result, 21 states have passed their own RFRAs that apply to their individual state and local governments.

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States which ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. The 5–4 ruling requires all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with equal rights and responsibilities. Prior to Obergefell, same-sex marriage had already been established by statute, court ruling, or voter initiative in 36 states, the District of Columbia, and Guam.

Indiana Senate Bill 101, titled the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), is a law in the U.S. state of Indiana, which allows individuals and companies to assert as a defense in legal proceedings that their exercise of religion has been, or is likely to be, substantially burdened.

Klein, dba Sweet Cakes by Melissa, v. Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries was a legal case against a cake shop in Gresham, Oregon, in the United States. The cake shop gained widespread press attention in January 2013 when it turned away customers who wanted cakes for a same-sex wedding, who then made a complaint to the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, claiming their civil rights under the Oregon Equality Act had been infringed.

Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 584 U.S. 617 (2018), was a case in the Supreme Court of the United States that dealt with whether owners of public accommodations can refuse certain services based on the First Amendment claims of free speech and free exercise of religion, and therefore be granted an exemption from laws ensuring non-discrimination in public accommodations—in particular, by refusing to provide creative services, such as making a custom wedding cake for the marriage of a gay couple, on the basis of the owner's religious beliefs.

Kimberly Jean Davis is an American former county clerk for Rowan County, Kentucky, who gained international attention in August 2015 when she defied a U.S. federal court order to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

In the United States, a religious freedom bill is a bill that, according to its proponents, allows those with religious objections to oppose LGBT rights in accordance with traditional religious teachings without being punished by the government for doing so. This typically concerns an employee who objects to abortion, euthanasia, same-sex marriage, civil unions, or transgender identity and wishes to avoid situations where they will be expected to put those objections aside. Proponents commonly refer to such proposals as religious liberty or conscience protection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles LiMandri</span> American lawyer (born 1955)

Charles LiMandri is an American lawyer. In a case that made national headlines, he litigated against the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in the defense of the Mount Soledad Cross in San Diego. The battle over the religious symbol, which lasted more than 25 years, is one of the longest in the history on the United States. Limandri has a private law practice, and in 2002 he founded the Freedom of Conscience Defense Fund to pay for his pro bono work on behalf of religious freedom.

Kristen Kellie Waggoner is an American attorney. She has been president and CEO of Alliance Defending Freedom, a right-wing Christian legal advocacy group, since 2022.

Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, 593 U.S. 522 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with litigation over discrimination of local regulations based on the Free Exercise Clause and Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The specific case deals with a religious-backed foster care agency that was denied a new contract by the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, due to the agency's refusal to certify married same-sex couples as foster parents on religious grounds.

303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, 600 U.S. 570 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court decision that dealt with the intersection of anti-discrimination law in public accommodations with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In a 6–3 decision, the Court found for a website designer, ruling that the state of Colorado cannot compel the designer to create work that violates her values. The case follows from Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 584 U.S. 617 (2018), which had dealt with similar conflict between free speech rights and Colorado's anti-discrimination laws but had been decided on narrower grounds.

References

  1. ↑ "Barronelle Stutzman, Arlene's Flower Shop Florist, Refuses Washington Gay Wedding Job Because Of Religion". Huffington Post . March 7, 2013. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  2. ↑ Burk, Denny (February 20, 2015). "A florist loses religious freedom, and much more". CNN . Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  3. ↑ "Washington sues florist who said no to a same-sex wedding". Los Angeles Times. 2013-04-10. Retrieved 2020-03-07.
  4. 1 2 "Florist who refused same-sex wedding job settles with couple". Associated Press . November 18, 2021. Retrieved October 3, 2022.
  5. ↑ Culverwell, Wendy (June 23, 2024). "Tri-Cities flower shop that wouldn't serve same-sex wedding has new LGBTQ-friendly owner". www.tri-cityherald.com. Retrieved October 16, 2024.
  6. ↑ "Judge refuses to recuse himself in Washington state gay wedding flowers case". Star Tribune. June 29, 2013. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  7. ↑ "Washington State Sues Florist for Declining to Beautify Same-Sex 'Wedding'". National Catholic Register . April 16, 2013. Archived from the original on May 2, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  8. ↑ "Arlene's Flowers in Richland sued by gay couple". Tri-City Herald. April 18, 2013. Archived from the original on November 12, 2013. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  9. ↑ "Ingersoll v. Arlene's Flowers [press release]". American Civil Liberties Union. February 18, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  10. ↑ Turnbull, Lornet (April 17, 2013). "State's case against florist fires up gay-marriage critics". The Seattle Times . Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  11. ↑ "Wash. florist answers ACLU lawsuit [press release]". Alliance Defending Freedom. May 21, 2013. Archived from the original on February 21, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  12. 1 2 "Wash. florist will not wilt, sues AG to reclaim religious freedom [press release]". Alliance Defending Freedom. May 16, 2013. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  13. ↑ "Wash. state attorney general sues florist for refusing to supply same-sex wedding". The Washington Times . April 11, 2013. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  14. ↑ Smith, Samuel (February 23, 2015). "Florist Who Refused Gay Wedding Offered Settlement; I Will Not Be Like Judas, Betray Jesus for Money, She Replied". The Christian Post . Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  15. ↑ "Judge: Arlene's Flowers owner can be sued in her personal capacity". Tri-State Herald. January 7, 2015. Archived from the original on April 2, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  16. ↑ "Court Rules Florist Discriminated Against Gay Couple by Refusing to Sell Flowers for Their Wedding [press release]". American Civil Liberties Union. February 19, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  17. ↑ Kaplan, Sarah (February 20, 2015). "Washington florist rejects settlement offer after court rules she can't refuse service to gay weddings". The Washington Post . Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  18. ↑ "Florist who refused to do flowers for gay wedding to appeal". Associated Press. February 19, 2015. Archived from the original on March 8, 2015. Retrieved March 7, 2015.
  19. ↑ Nunnally, Derrick (March 27, 2015). "Judge Fines Washington Florist Over Same-Sex Wedding Flowers". ABC News . Retrieved March 31, 2015.
  20. ↑ Smith, Samuel (March 30, 2015). "Christian Grandma-Florist Fined $1,001, Ordered to Work Gay Weddings but Refuses, Says She Won't Betray Jesus; State Threatens to Take Her Home, Business Away". The Christian Post . Retrieved March 31, 2015.
  21. ↑ Smith, Samuel (April 29, 2015). "GoFundMe Removes Christian Grandma-Florist Barronelle Stutzman's Fundraising Page; 2nd Christian Business Facing 'Ruin' Removed From Site This Week". The Christian Post . Retrieved August 30, 2015.
  22. ↑ Ohlheiser, Abby (May 1, 2015). "After GoFundMe shuts down Christian bakery crowdfunding, it bans 'discriminatory' campaigns". The Washington Post . Retrieved August 30, 2015.
  23. ↑ "Barronelle Stutzman Oral Arguments Washington State Supreme Court 11-15-16". November 15, 2016 – via YouTube.
  24. ↑ La Corte, Rachel (16 February 2017). "Wash. court rules against florist in gay wedding case". Detroit News. Retrieved 17 February 2017.
  25. ↑ Thompson, Lynn (16 February 2017). "Richland florist discriminated against gay couple by refusing service, state Supreme Court rules". The Seattle Times . Retrieved 18 February 2017.
  26. ↑ State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc.,389P.3d543(Wash.2017).
  27. ↑ Arlene's Flowers, Inc. v. Washington, SCOTUSblog.
  28. ↑ "(Order List: 585 U.S.)" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States. June 25, 2018.
  29. ↑ Wolf, Richard (June 25, 2018). "First cake, now flowers: Supreme Court gives florist who refused to serve gay wedding a new hearing". USA Today . Retrieved June 25, 2018.
  30. ↑ Gutman, David (6 June 2019). "Washington Supreme Court rules once more against Richland florist who refused flowers for gay wedding". The Seattle Times . Retrieved 6 June 2019.
  31. ↑ State v. Arlene's Flowers, Inc., 441P.3d1203 (Wash.2019).
  32. ↑ "SCOTUS asked – again – to take Christian florist's case". OneNewsNow.com. Archived from the original on 2019-12-27. Retrieved 2020-03-07.
  33. ↑ "Search - Supreme Court of the United States".
  34. ↑ "Order List 7/2/2021" (PDF). United States Supreme Court. Retrieved September 20, 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.