Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co. | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Decided June 18, 1962 | |
Full case name | Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co. |
Citations | 370 U.S. 238 ( more ) |
Holding | |
When a union is liable for damages for violation of the no-strike clause, its officers and members are not liable for these damages. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | White, joined by unanimous |
Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
Taft-Hartley Act |
Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co., 370 U.S. 238(1962), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that, when a union is liable for damages for violation of the no-strike clause, its officers and members are not liable for these damages. [1] [2]
In this case, the court recognized Section 301 of the Taft-Hartley Act as a Congressional abrogation of the Danbury Hatters' Case.
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .