Banco de Bilbao v Sancha

Last updated

Banco de Bilbao v Sancha
Republican forces during the Battle of Irun.jpg
Spanish Civil War
Court Court of Appeal
Full case nameBanco de Bilbao v Sancha, Banco de Bilbao v Rey
Decided17 March 1938
Citation(s)[1938] 2 KB 176
Court membership
Judges sitting Greer LJ, MacKinnon LJ and Clauson LJ
Keywords

Banco de Bilbao v Sancha, Banco de Bilbao v Rey [1938] 2 KB 176 is a judicial decision of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales relating to the conflict of laws and the authority of a party to represent a corporation. The court upheld the general rule that the persons who have authority to represent a corporation are determined by the law of the corporate domicile of the corporation in question. [1] [2]

Contents

The dispute arose because of the events of the Spanish Civil War. Although the UK government recognised the Republican forces as the lawful government of Spain, in practice the revolutionary forces under General Franco had de facto control of Bilbao, where Banco de Bilbao was based. The Court accepted that for these purposes the laws passed by the government of General Franco should be treated as the laws which regulate the areas under their control, including Bilbao and Banco de Bilbao. [2]

Facts

The two defendants, Luis Sancha and Antonio Rey, were employees of the Banco de Bilbao at its London branch. In March 1937 Pedro Albisu presented himself at the bank's London branch and asserted he was now the duly accredited representative of the bank in London, and had power to take charge of all the property and affairs of the London branch. The two defendants refused to comply. An action was then commenced in the name of the bank for an injunction to compel Sancha and Rey to comply.

Previously, on 6 October 1936 a law had come into force in the Basque country, in which Bilbao was located, amending the constitution of all banks in the territory, and making provision for the appointments of new boards of directors. Pursuant to this law a new board purported to take office on 5 January 1937. It was this new board which was alleged to have appointed Albisu.

Sancha and Rey disputed the validity of these actions. The law which had been passed was passed by the Revolutionary government of General Franco. General Franco and the revolutionary government were on one side of the Spanish Civil War. The other was the Republican government of Spain. The UK recognised the Republican government as the official government of all of Spain. At the time of the hearing at first instance (before Lewis J) control over Bilbao remained with the Republican government. But by the time the case came before the Court of Appeal, Franco's forces had control of the city.

Decision

High Court

At first instance Lewis J held that the laws purportedly passed by Franco's government were ineffective as they did not comply with Spain's constitution. The bank appealed

Court of Appeal

By the time the matter came before the Court of Appeal, Franco's forces had assumed control of Bilbao. The Court of Appeal accepted that they had been in charge of the city since 19 June 1937. It was recognised that Franco's government "exercised de facto administrative control" over the city and most of the Basque region at the time the appeal was heard. Subsequently, on 22 August 1937 the Republican government passed its own decree moving the corporate seat of all banks from Bilbao to either Valencia or Barcelona.

Clauson LJ gave the decision of the Court.

He began his judgment by remonstrating on a matter of procedure. When a legal case involved a dispute as to who was legally in control of one of the parties, then that should normally be disposed of as a preliminary issue. This has not been done in this case, meaning the Court had to proceed on the assumption that Albisu could represent the bank in the proceedings even though that was the very question to be decided.

He then affirmed that "the question of what body of directors have the legal right of representing the Banco de Bilbao ... must depend in the first place on the articles under which it is constituted." [3] and that the proper interpretation and operation of those articles was a matter for the law prevailing in the domicilio social (or corporate home) of the bank. [4]

The question then was which laws governed Bilbao, as the corporate home of the bank. He noted that the UK government recognised the Republican government of Spain as the lawful government, but that "the insurgent Government of General Franco as the Government de facto of the area in which Bilbao is situate." He then applied the rule in Luther v Sagor [1921] 3 KB 532 that the acts of a government which has de facto control of an area cannot be dismissed as the acts of a usurping government. Similarly, the court must treat the acts of the Republican government as a mere nullity in that area because they can exercise no de facto control. [5]

The court also referred to various notarial documents presented by Albisu as proof of his authority. The court dismissed these as they were merely statements by the notary that a person had appeared before them and asserted that a resolution had been passed granting Albisu authority. There was no separate documentation to prove that, and saying something before a notary does not make it more probative than saying the same thing to the court.

Outcome

Despite ruling in their favour on the matter of law, the Court dismissed the appeal on the grounds that the bank had failed to prove their case.

Authority

The case has been cited with approval on numerous occasions, including by the House of Lords [6] and the Supreme Court, [7] and is generally accepted as correct as a statement of the law.

Footnotes

  1. Lawrence Collins (2022). Dicey Morris & Collins (16th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell. para 30-145. ISBN   9780414108899.
  2. 1 2 Matthias Herdegen. "Banco de Bilbao v Sancha and Rey Case". Oxford Public International Law. Retrieved 8 February 2023.
  3. [1938] 2 KB 176 at 194.
  4. [1938] 2 KB 176 at 195.
  5. [1938] 2 KB 176 at 196.
  6. Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner & Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853 at 957.
  7. “Maduro Board” of the Central Bank of Venezuela v “Guaidó Board” of the Central Bank of Venezuela [2021] UKSC 57 at [99].

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Francisco Franco</span> Spanish dictator from 1939 to 1975

Francisco Franco Bahamonde was a Spanish military general who led the Nationalist forces in overthrowing the Second Spanish Republic during the Spanish Civil War and thereafter ruled over Spain from 1939 to 1975 as a dictator, assuming the title Caudillo. This period in Spanish history, from the Nationalist victory to Franco's death, is commonly known as Francoist Spain or as the Francoist dictatorship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Juan Carlos I</span> King of Spain from 1975 to 2014

Juan Carlos I is a member of the Spanish royal family who reigned as King of Spain from 22 November 1975 until his abdication on 19 June 2014. In Spain, since his abdication, Juan Carlos has usually been referred to as the Rey Emérito.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copa del Rey</span> Spanish association football tournament

The Campeonato de España–Copa de Su Majestad el Rey, commonly known as Copa del Rey or simply La Copa and formerly known as Copa del Presidente de la República (1932–36) and Copa del Generalísimo (1939–76), is an annual knockout football competition in Spanish football, organized by the Royal Spanish Football Federation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biscay</span> Province of Spain

Biscay is a province of Spain and a historical territory of the Basque Country, heir of the ancient Lordship of Biscay, lying on the south shore of the eponymous bay. The capital and largest city is Bilbao.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bombing of Guernica</span> Attack by military aircraft during the Spanish Civil War

On 26 April 1937, the Basque town of Guernica was aerial bombed during the Spanish Civil War. It was carried out at the behest of Francisco Franco's rebel Nationalist faction by its allies, the Nazi German Luftwaffe's Condor Legion and the Fascist Italian Aviazione Legionaria, under the code name "Operation Rügen". The town was being used as a communications centre by Republican forces just behind the front line, and the raid was intended to destroy bridges and roads. The operation opened the way to Franco's capture of Bilbao and his victory in northern Spain.

Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the policy of United States federal courts would be to honor the Act of State Doctrine, which dictates that the propriety of decisions of other countries relating to their internal affairs would not be questioned in the courts of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliament of Catalonia</span> Parliament that exercises the legislative power of the Government of Catalonia

The Parliament of Catalonia is the unicameral legislature of the autonomous community of Catalonia, Spain. The Parliament is currently made up of 135 members, known as deputies (diputats/deputats/diputados), who are elected for four-year terms or after extraordinary dissolution, chosen by universal suffrage in lists of four constituencies, corresponding to the Catalan provinces. The Parliament building is located in Ciutadella Park, Barcelona.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Teruel</span>

The Battle of Teruel was fought in and around the city of Teruel during the Spanish Civil War between December 1937 and February 1938, during the worst Spanish winter in 20 years. The battle was one of the bloodiest actions of the war, with the city changing hands several times by first falling to the Republicans and eventually being retaken by the Nationalists. In the course of the fighting, Teruel was subjected to heavy artillery and aerial bombardment. In the two-month battle, both factions together took 110,000 casualties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banco Pastor</span>

Banco Popular Pastor, S.A. was a Spanish bank. It was the second oldest banking institution in the country, after Banco Etcheverría. It failed the European stress test in 2011 as a result of the 2007–2008 financial crisis and was taken over by Banco Popular Español, which would later become Santander Bank.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Moscow gold (Spain)</span> 510 tonnes of gold transferred from Republican Spain to the Soviet Union in 1936

The Moscow Gold, or alternatively Gold of the Republic, was 510 tonnes of gold, corresponding to 72.6% of the total gold reserves of the Bank of Spain, that were transferred from their original location in Madrid to the Soviet Union a few months after the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War. This transfer was made by order of the government of the Second Spanish Republic, presided over by Francisco Largo Caballero, through the initiative of his Minister of Finance, Juan Negrín. The term also encompasses the subsequent issues relating with the gold's sale to the USSR and the use of the funds obtained. The remaining quarter of the Bank's gold reserves, 193 tonnes, was transported and exchanged into currency in France, an operation which is also known by analogy as the "Paris Gold".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">War in the North</span> 1937 Spanish Civil War campaign in northern Spain

The War in the North was the campaign of the Spanish Civil War in which the Nationalist forces defeated and occupied the parts of northern Spain that had remained loyal to the Republican government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-intervention in the Spanish Civil War</span> Foreign policy to deter interference in Spanish Civil War

During the Spanish Civil War, several countries followed a principle of non-intervention to avoid any potential escalation or possible expansion of the war to other states. That would result in the signing of the Non-Intervention Agreement in August 1936 and the setting up of the Non-Intervention Committee, which first met in September. Primarily arranged by the French and the British governments, the Committee also included the Soviet Union, Fascist Italy, and Nazi Germany. Ultimately, the committee had the support of 27 states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">State continuity of the Baltic states</span> Legal continuity of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania

The three Baltic countries, or the Baltic states – Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania – are held to have continued as legal entities under international law while under the Soviet occupation from 1940 to 1991, as well as during the German occupation in 1941–1944/1945. The prevailing opinion accepts the Baltic thesis of illegal occupation and the actions of the USSR are regarded as contrary to international law in general and to the bilateral treaties between the USSR and the three Baltic countries in particular.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Historical Memory Law</span> Spanish law passed in 2007

Law 52/2007 That recognises and broadens the rights and establishes measures in favour of those who suffered persecution or violence during the Civil War and the Dictatorship, commonly known as Historical Memory Law, is a Spanish law passed by the Congress of Deputies on 31 October 2007. It was based on a bill proposed by the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party government of Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. The Historical Memory Law principally recognizes the victims on both sides of the Spanish Civil War, gives rights to the victims and the descendants of victims of the Civil War and the subsequent dictatorship of General Francisco Franco, and formally condemns repressions of the Franco regime.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom–Venezuela relations</span> Bilateral relations

United Kingdom–Venezuela relations are the bilateral relations between the United Kingdom and Venezuela since 1821 when so-called "British Legions" of former British soldiers fought to defend the Second Republic of Venezuela against Spanish royalists in the Venezuelan War of Independence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alfredo Sáenz Abad</span> Spanish businessman (born 1942)

Alfredo Sáenz Abad is a Spanish businessman who was the CEO and Vice-Chairman of the Spanish bank Santander Group, the largest bank in the Eurozone and one of the largest banks in the world in terms of market capitalisation. He obtained his degree in Law from the University of Valladolid, and in Economics from the Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria</span> Spanish financial services company

Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A., better known by its initialism BBVA, is a Spanish multinational financial services company based in Madrid and Bilbao, Spain. It is one of the largest financial institutions in the world, and is present mainly in Spain, South America, Turkey and Italy and Romania.

A foreign legal opinion is an opinion of a law firm issued in cross-border commercial transactions certifying the effectiveness of the transaction under the applicable foreign law. Foreign legal opinions have become highly standardised over time, and most foreign legal opinions follow a fairly regimented format. The issuance of such opinions has become something of a sub-legal specialisation in itself, and books and articles are written on the subject of foreign legal opinions. A number of organisations issue template format opinions to indicate issues which are intended to be covered by such opinions, or standard form checklists for contents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Last use of capital punishment in Spain</span> Executions carried out in 1975 in Spain

The last use of capital punishment in Spain took place on 27 September 1975 when two members of the armed Basque nationalist and separatist group ETA political-military and three members of the Revolutionary Antifascist Patriotic Front (FRAP) were executed by firing squads after having been convicted and sentenced to death by military tribunals for the murder of policemen and civil guards. Spain was Western Europe's only dictatorship at the time and had been unpopular and internationally isolated in the post-war period due to its relations with Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 1940s and the fact that its autocratic leader, Francisco Franco, had come to power by overthrowing a democratically elected government. As a result, the executions resulted in substantial criticism of the Spanish government, both domestically and abroad. Reactions included street protests, attacks on Spanish embassies, international criticism of the Spanish government and diplomatic measures, such as the withdrawal of the ambassadors of fifteen European countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Junta Técnica del Estado</span> Francoist governmental organization (1936-1938)

The Junta Técnica del Estado was one of several political-administrative bodies created by General Franco in October 1936 after his appointment as head of government of rebel Spain during the Spanish Civil War. It was one of the main institutions that made up the first governmental organization created by Franco. Although it was divided into sectorial commissions, it was not a real government and was composed of personalities with little political relevance. It was successively presided over by Generals Dávila and Jordana. It disappeared with the creation of Franco's first proper government in February 1938.