Bartley-Fox Law

Last updated

The Bartley-Fox Law (also known as the Bartley-Fox Amendment) is a Massachusetts law that sets a one-year mandatory minimum sentence for anyone found to be illegally carrying a firearm. It was passed by the Massachusetts General Court in 1974 and took effect in April 1975. Studies on its effectiveness have been mixed, and its strict provisions have been subject to criticism.

Massachusetts State in the northeastern United States

Massachusetts, officially the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, is the most populous state in the New England region of the northeastern United States. It borders on the Atlantic Ocean to the east, the states of Connecticut and Rhode Island to the south, New Hampshire and Vermont to the north, and New York to the west. The state is named after the Massachusett tribe, which once inhabited the east side of the area, and is one of the original thirteen states. The capital of Massachusetts is Boston, which is also the most populous city in New England. Over 80% of the population of Massachusetts lives in the Greater Boston metropolitan area, a region influential upon American history, academia, and industry. Originally dependent on agriculture, fishing and trade, Massachusetts was transformed into a manufacturing center during the Industrial Revolution. During the 20th century, Massachusetts's economy shifted from manufacturing to services. Modern Massachusetts is a global leader in biotechnology, engineering, higher education, finance, and maritime trade.

Massachusetts General Court legislature of Massachusetts

The Massachusetts General Court is the state legislature of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The name "General Court" is a hold-over from the earliest days of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, when the colonial assembly, in addition to making laws, sat as a judicial court of appeals. Before the adoption of the state constitution in 1780, it was called the Great and General Court, but the official title was shortened by John Adams, author of the state constitution. It is a bicameral body. The upper house is the Massachusetts Senate which is composed of 40 members. The lower body, the Massachusetts House of Representatives, has 160 members. It meets in the Massachusetts State House on Beacon Hill in Boston.

Contents

Background and passage

The Bartley-Fox Law was co-sponsored by, and named after, Speaker of the Massachusetts House of Representatives David M. Bartley and retired judge J. John Fox. [1] [2] The text mandates a one-year prison sentence for anyone convicted of possession of a firearm without a license in the state of Massachusetts, [3] [4] and added two years to the sentence of anyone convicted of committing a crime with a gun. [5] Bartley-Fox passed the Massachusetts General Court without any significant opposition, [6] becoming the first such law ever to be enacted in the United States. [7] The law was originally intended to come into effect in January 1975, but Bartley led an effort to delay it until April 1 to ensure that the state's citizens were fully aware of the significant penalties. [4]

David M. Bartley American politician

David Michael Bartley is a U.S. politician and educator who served as a member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives from 1963–1975, Speaker of the Massachusetts House of Representatives from 1969 to 1975, Secretary of Administration and Finance from 1981–1983, and President of Holyoke Community College from 1975 to 2004. In 1974, along with J. John Fox, he co-sponsored the Bartley-Fox law, which passed that year and took effect on April 1, 1975. The law requires judges to sentence people convicted of illegally carrying a gun to at least one year in jail.

J. John Fox was an American judge known for his central role in the founding of the University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, Massachusetts.

Firearm Gun for an individual

A firearm is a portable gun designed for use by a single individual. It inflicts damage on targets by launching one or more projectiles driven by rapidly expanding high-pressure gas produced by exothermic combustion (deflagration) of chemical propellant. If gas pressurization is achieved through mechanical gas compression rather than through chemical propellant combustion, then the gun is technically an air gun, not a firearm.

To accomplish this, Bartley-Fox was accompanied by extensive publicity of the fact that the ban on unlicensed possession of handguns would now be strictly enforced. [8] [9] As part of the campaign, TV spots aired beginning in February 1975 with the slogan "If you are caught with a gun, you will go to prison for a year and nobody can get you out." [10] [11] Despite these efforts, newspapers reported in April that authorities were "swamped" with individuals trying to obtain the legally required gun licenses and firearm identification cards. [4] [6]

In July 1975, Bartley and Fox authored an op-ed in The New York Times, where they stated that the law was "designed to remove the temptation to carry guns and thereby reduce the chance that they will be used ... Only the person who insists on carrying a weapon without legal authority need fear this law." [2] Two months later, they wrote a letter to the editor of the same paper after the two attempted assassinations of US President Gerald Ford:

An op-ed, short for "opposite the editorial page", is a written prose piece typically published by a newspaper or magazine which expresses the opinion of an author usually not affiliated with the publication's editorial board. Op-eds are different from both editorials and letters to the editor.

Letter to the editor letter sent to a publication

A letter to the editor is a letter sent to a publication about issues of concern from its readers. Usually, letters are intended for publication. In many publications, letters to the editor may be sent either through conventional mail or electronic mail.

After each assassination or assassination attempt, "gun control" prompts a brief flurry of outrage at the promiscuous use of guns in our society. People express serious interest in controlling gun abuse. Then, as the gun lobbyists go to work and apathy and resignation set in, the problem disappears from public view. We renew our interest only when a gun barrel is pointed at a President. / Any society with a sane firearms policy would have prevented the woman who tried to kill President Ford from carrying a gun. The lenient way in which illegal possession of firearms is treated by courts is one reason for the rapid rise in crime. ... / Since the [Bartley-Fox Law] has been in effect, police officers report fewer guns on Massachusetts streets. It should serve as a model for national legislation. ... / It is another chance to consider the plight not only of Presidents but of average citizens faced with uncontrolled gun abuse. [12]

Effects

Politically, the Bartley-Fox Law was criticized by both sides of the United States' gun debate. Pro-gun advocates like the National Rifle Association (NRA) opposed it for placing restrictions on a person's ability to carry a gun, with one NRA spokesperson stating that "it only affects the lawful gun owner, who is turned into a criminal." Gun control advocates, on the other hand, opposed the law's one year mandatory minimum sentence. [13] Still, a 1981 Gallup opinion poll indicated that 62% of Americans would support state-level legislation like Bartley-Fox, although 58% would oppose any law that would ban handguns—including Massachusetts, which in the same year rejected such a measure for the seventh straight time. [14] [15] Also in 1981, the administration of Governor Edward J. King removed what they called "unfriendly" signs on Massachusetts state borders that advertised the Bartley-Fox Law, in an effort to increase tourism. [16]

Gun politics is an area of American politics defined by two primary opposing ideologies about civilian gun ownership. People who advocate for gun control support increasing regulations related to gun ownership; people who advocate for gun rights support decreasing regulations related to gun ownership. These groups often disagree on the interpretation of laws and court cases related to firearms as well as about the effects of firearms regulation on crime and public safety. It is estimated that U.S. civilians own 393 million firearms, and that 35% to 42% of the households in the country have at least one gun. The U.S. has the highest estimated number of guns per capita, at 120.5 guns for every 100 people.

National Rifle Association American nonprofit organization

The National Rifle Association of America (NRA) is a gun rights advocacy group based in the United States. Founded in 1871, the group has informed its members about firearm-related legislation since 1934, and it has directly lobbied for and against firearms legislation since 1975.

Gun control laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms

Gun control is the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians.

Early research and reporting on the law's effects was mixed. In May 1975, one month after Bartley-Fox went into effect, The New York Times reported that year-over-year gun violence was down for April—a "fragmentary kind of statistic, the sort of preliminary number from which it is dangerous to generalize," in the paper's view, but Massachusetts officials saw it as the "first faint suggestion that the tough new legislation may work." [17] One year later, James Vorenberg released a report concluding that in the first year of the law, it had not significantly affected Massachusetts' violent crime rate, nor had it significantly reduced the rate at which guns were used in robberies and other premeditated crimes. [9] [18]

A 1977 study by James A. Beha, II concluded that after the law had taken effect, people were being sentenced to prison for illegally carrying firearms five times more often than before it had taken effect. [8] His findings also indicated that criminal justice officials did not frequently attempt to evade the mandatory sentences imposed by the law; instead, people charged with illegal carrying of firearms were generally either convicted in accordance with the law, or were found not guilty. [10] [19] Another 1977 study by Deutsch and Alt reported that the law was associated with a decline in gun assaults and armed robberies, [20] though this finding has been challenged by other researchers. [10] In 1979, Glenn L. Pierce, William J. Bowers, and other researchers reported that the law reduced the rate of gun assault and armed robbery in Boston, and that it also had the unintended effect of increasing citizens' reporting of crime there. [21] [22] Similarly, Pierce and Bowers reported in 1981 that the law reduced the rate of gun assaults and criminal homicides in Boston, but that the punishments actually imposed by the law did not seem to be responsible for this reduction. They also reported that the decline in gun assaults was more than offset by an increase in non-gun armed assaults. [23] [24] [25]

In 1983, James Q. Wilson argued in The Atlantic that:

In sum, the Bartley-Fox law seems, at least during the years in which its effect was studied, to have increased the risk associated with carrying a gun, to have reduced the frequency with which guns were casually carried, and thereby to have reduced the rate at which certain gun-related crimes were committed. [26]

In 1986, the law was subject to criticism after Sylvester Lindsey, a Massachusetts citizen from Cambridge, was sentenced to the one-year mandatory minimum sentence after using an unlicensed gun in an undisputed case of self-defense. In a unanimous opinion, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court stated that there was no leeway in the law for the court to consider any alternative, even though "it is possible that the defendant is alive today only because he carried a gun that day for protection." The controversy led to a series of articles in The Boston Globe , and Lindsey's sentence was eventually commuted by the Massachusetts Governor's Council. [27] [28]

In 1989, the Globe noted that crime had increased significantly in the lower-income neighborhoods of Boston, leading "some public officials to question whether Bartley-Fox has lived up to its promise." The same article noted that some officials had been critical of the law for not being tough enough, stating, "The one-year mandatory jail term, officials say, applies to people who illegally carry a firearm on their person, but not to those who unlawfully maintain a gun on private property." [29] One year later, the Globe reported that increased enforcement of the law had resulted in a reduction in the number of pending cases working through Boston's legal system, from 86 to 8. In addition the force caught 36 fugitives who had been evading their prison sentences, and were able to remove 16 names due to court acquittals and deaths. [30]

In a 1997 book Targeting Guns: Firearms and Their Control, criminologist Gary Kleck argues that even if one assumes that the Bartley-Fox Law was effective in reducing crime in Massachusetts, this may not mean that different mandatory sentencing gun-carrying laws would be effective if they were implemented elsewhere. [31] A 2004 National Research Council report concluded that "collectively, this body of research seems to suggest [that the Bartley-Fox Law had] a broad impact on gun crime in Boston. However, it is unclear whether the firearms sentencing enhancement or the mandatory sentence for illegal gun-carrying generated the impact." [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

Gun laws and policies regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification and use of small arms by civilians. Many countries have restrictive firearm policies, while a few have permissive ones. According to GunPolicy.org, the only countries with permissive gun legislation are: Austria, Azerbaijan, Chad, Republic of Congo, Honduras, Micronesia, Namibia, Nigeria, Pakistan, Senegal, Switzerland, Tanzania, the United States, Yemen and Zambia, although several other countries including Canada and the Czech Republic, despite theoretically being restrictive, are shall-issue countries. Countries with a strong gun culture may afford civilians a right to keep and bear arms, and have more-liberal gun laws than neighboring jurisdictions. Countries which regulate access to firearms will typically restrict access to certain categories of firearms and then restrict the categories of persons who may be granted a license for access to such firearms. There may be separate licenses for hunting, sport shooting, self-defense, collecting, and concealed carry, with different sets of requirements, permissions, and responsibilities.

The Sullivan Act is a gun control law in New York State that took effect in 1911. The law required licenses for New Yorkers to possess firearms small enough to be concealed. Private possession of such firearms without a license was a misdemeanor, and carrying them in public was a felony. The act was named for its primary legislative sponsor, state senator Timothy Sullivan, a notoriously corrupt Tammany Hall politician.

Concealed carry or carrying a concealed weapon (CCW), is the practice of carrying a weapon in public in a concealed manner, either on one's person or in close proximity. Not all weapons that fall under CCW laws are lethal. For example, in Florida, carrying pepper spray in more than a specified volume of chemical requires a CCW permit, whereas everyone may legally carry a smaller, “self-defense chemical spray” device hidden on their person without a CCW permit. As of 2018 there have been 17.25 million concealed weapon permits issued in the United States.

Mandatory sentencing requires that offenders serve a predefined term for certain crimes, commonly serious and violent offenses. Judges are bound by law; these sentences are produced through the legislature, not the judicial system. They are instituted to expedite the sentencing process and limit the possibility of irregularity of outcomes due to judicial discretion. Mandatory sentences are typically given to people who are convicted of certain serious and/or violent crimes, and require a prison sentence. Mandatory sentencing laws vary across nations; they are more prevalent in common law jurisdictions because civil law jurisdictions usually prescribe minimum and maximum sentences for every type of crime in explicit laws.

Gun laws in the United States regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition. State laws vary considerably, and are independent of existing federal firearms laws, although they are sometimes broader or more limited in scope than the federal laws.

Project Exile is a federal program started in Richmond, Virginia in 1997. Project Exile shifted the prosecution of illegal technical gun possession offenses to federal court, where they carried a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in federal prison under the federal Gun Control Act of 1968, rather than in state court. Note that federal law provides for a penalty of ten years in federal prison for being a "prohibited person", i.e., a convicted felon in possession of a firearm, as well as for falsifying information in order to obtain one, or furnishing a gun to a convicted felon.

Open carry in the United States

In the United States, open carry refers to the practice of "openly carrying a firearm in public", as distinguished from concealed carry, where firearms cannot be seen by the casual observer. To "carry" in this context indicates that the firearm is kept readily accessible on the person, within a holster or attached to a sling. "Carrying" a firearm directly in the hands, particularly in a firing position or combat stance, is also known as "brandishing" and may constitute a serious crime, but that is not the mode of "carrying" discussed in this article.

Gun violence in the United States firearm related deaths by year

Gun violence in the United States results in tens of thousands of deaths and injuries annually. In 2013, there were 73,505 nonfatal firearm injuries, and 33,636 deaths due to "injury by firearms". These deaths included 21,175 suicides, 11,208 homicides, 505 deaths due to accidental or negligent discharge of a firearm, and 281 deaths due to firearms use with "undetermined intent". In 2017, gun deaths reached their highest level since 1968 with 39,773 deaths by firearm, of which 23,854 were by suicide and 14,542 were homicides. The rate of firearm deaths per 100,000 people rose from 10.3 per 100,000 in 1999 to 12 per 100,000 in 2017, with 109 people dying per day. The ownership and control of guns are among the most widely debated issues in the country.

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Malaysia that is currently suspended from being carried out. It is a mandatory punishment for murder, drug trafficking, treason, and waging war against Yang di-Pertuan Agong. Recently, the law was extended to include acts of terrorism. Any terrorists, and anyone who aids terrorists, financially or otherwise, is liable to face the death penalty. Since January 2003, the death penalty in Malaysia has been a mandatory punishment for rapists that cause death and child rapists. A 1961 law states that kidnapping carried a life sentence or a death sentence, preceded by a whipping.

In the United States, access to guns is controlled by law under a number of federal statutes. These laws regulate the manufacture, trade, possession, transfer, record keeping, transport, and destruction of firearms, ammunition, and firearms accessories. They are enforced by state agencies and the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

Douglas Preston Woodlock is a senior United States District Court of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Born in Connecticut, Woodlock graduated from Yale College and was a journalist before attending Georgetown University Law Center. After graduating, Woodlock was a lawyer in private practice and in government positions. Appointed to the federal bench in 1986, Woodlock presided over a number of noteworthy cases and was a key figure in the construction of the John Joseph Moakley United States Courthouse on the Boston waterfront. He took senior status in 2015.

Stop Handgun Violence

Stop Handgun Violence is a Boston, Massachusetts-based 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that works to reduce and prevent injuries and deaths caused by firearms in the United States. The group advocates personal responsibility, public awareness, stronger legislation, increased gun manufacturer responsibility, and strict law enforcement.

10-20-Life

The Florida Statute 775.087, known informally as the 10-20-Life law, is a mandatory minimum sentencing law in the U.S. state of Florida. The law concerns the use of a firearm during the commission of a forcible felony. The Florida Statute's name comes from a set of three basic minimum sentences it provides for. An ongoing public service announcement campaign has accompanied the law since its passage under the slogan "Use a gun, and you're done."

Murder of Odin Lloyd 2013 murder in North Attleborough, Massachusetts

The murder of Odin Lloyd occurred on June 17, 2013, in North Attleborough, Massachusetts. His death made international headlines when Aaron Hernandez, at the time a tight end for the New England Patriots of the National Football League, was investigated as a suspect in the case. Prior to his death, Lloyd had been a linebacker for a New England Football League (NEFL) semi-professional football team the Boston Bandits, since 2007.

Maura Healey American attorney, member of the Democratic Party and the Attorney General of Massachusetts

Maura T. Healey is an American attorney and a member of the Democratic Party, and the Massachusetts Attorney General.

Gambling in Massachusetts

Legal forms of gambling in the U.S. state of Massachusetts include casinos, parimutuel wagering on horse racing, the Massachusetts Lottery, and charitable gaming.

<i>R v Nur</i>

R v Nur2015 SCC 15 is a Canadian constitutional law case, concerning the constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences for firearm offences.

References

  1. ↑ Driscoll Jr., Edgar J. (1999-10-05). "J. John Fox, 95; Retired Judge Known for his Political Savvy". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 2017-08-29. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
  2. 1 2 Bartley, David M.; Fox, J. John (1975-07-27). "A Clamp on the Trigger Finger" . The New York Times. p. E17. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
  3. ↑ Knight, Michael (1981-01-21). "Studies of Gun Law Divided on Impact" . The New York Times. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
  4. 1 2 3 "Strict Massachusetts Gun Law Takes Effect". The Los Angeles Times. Associated Press. 1975-04-02. p. 16 – via ProQuest.
  5. ↑ Goldstein, Dana (2015-10-15). "Politicians Still Say Longer Prison Sentences Prevent Gun Violence — But Do They?". The Marshall Project. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
  6. 1 2 Freudberg, David (1975-04-02). "Stringent Gun Laws In Effect in Mass". The Washington Post. p. A6 – via ProQuest.
  7. ↑ Carter, Gregg Lee (2012). Guns in American Society: An Encyclopedia of History, Politics, Culture, and the Law. ABC-CLIO. p. 73. ISBN   9780313386701.
  8. 1 2 "Flashback". The Atlantic. 2000-01-20. Retrieved 2017-08-16.
  9. 1 2 Kaplan, Seth (1976-07-16). "Study Shows Massachusetts Gun Law Has Little Effect on Crime After Year". Harvard Crimson. Retrieved 2017-08-16.
  10. 1 2 3 Parisi, Francesco (2017-04-04). The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics: Volume 3: Public Law and Legal Institutions. Oxford University Press. pp. 356–7. ISBN   9780191507205.
  11. ↑ "The Law: The Guns of Boston" . Time. 1976-08-02. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
  12. ↑ Bartley, David M.; Fox, J. John (1975-09-26). "Letters to the Editor: Protecting Citizens and Public Officials" . The New York Times. p. 36. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
  13. ↑ Stevens, Charles W. (1980-06-20). "Many Are Praising Massachusetts Law Controlling Guns". The Wall Street Journal. p. 10 – via ProQuest.
  14. ↑ "Support Grows for Tough Gun Control, Poll Shows". The Los Angeles Times. 1981-04-29. p. C3 – via ProQuest.
  15. ↑ "Handgun-control bill rejected in Mass. House for 7th time". The Boston Globe. 1981-04-25. p. 1 – via ProQuest. As of 2017-08-29, the article's title in ProQuest is "[ Globe Staff ... ]: [4]".
  16. ↑ Zisson, Stephen (1981-03-19). "Mass. Gun Signs Coming Down". The Boston Globe. p. 1 – via ProQuest.
  17. ↑ Wicker, Tom (1975-05-23). "Dead Aim at the Gun Carriers" . The New York Times. p. 37. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
  18. ↑ "Strict Gun Code Found Ineffective in Curbing Crime". The Los Angeles Times. United Press International. 1975-07-14. p. 2 – via ProQuest.
  19. ↑ Wright, James D.; Rossi, Peter Henry; Daly, Kathleen. Under the Gun: Weapons, Crime, and Violence in America. Transaction Publishers. p. 290. ISBN   9781412840613.
  20. ↑ Deutsch, Stuart Jay; Alt, Francis B. (1977-11-01). "The Effect of Massachusetts' Gun Control Law On Gun-Related Crimes in the City of Boston". Evaluation Quarterly. 1 (4): 543–568. doi:10.1177/0193841x7700100402.
  21. ↑ Rossman, David (1979). "Impact of the Mandatory Gun Law in Massachusetts". Report to the National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. Retrieved 2017-08-16.
  22. ↑ Knight, Michael (1979-06-18). "Boston Study Finds Gun Law is Working" . The New York Times. p. D18. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
  23. ↑ Pierce, Glenn L.; Bowers, William J. (1981-05-01). "The Bartley-Fox Gun Law's Short-Term Impact on Crime in Boston". The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 455 (1): 120–137. doi:10.1177/000271628145500111.
  24. ↑ Cook, Philip J.; Ludwig, Jens (2002). Gun Violence: The Real Costs. Oxford University Press. p. 40. ISBN   9780195153842.
  25. ↑ Richburg, Keith (1979-06-15). "Massachusetts Law Cuts Gun Crimes, But Other Assaults Rise, Study Finds" . The Washington Post. Retrieved 2017-08-18.
  26. ↑ Wilson, James Q. (1983-09-01). "Thinking About Crime". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
  27. ↑ "Man ordered to jail for shooting attacker Supreme Court: No exception to Mass. law on handgun control" . Providence Journal. Associated Press. 1986-03-06. p. B-09. Retrieved 2017-08-29.
  28. ↑ The Boston Globe articles included:
    • Kennedy, John H. (1986-03-06). "Self Defense No Excuse for Unlicensed Gun, Court Rules". The Boston Globe. p. 31 – via ProQuest.
    • Jordan, Robert A (1986-06-15). "An Innocent Victim of Bartley-Fox Law?". The Boston Globe. p. A2 – via ProQuest.
    • Kennedy, John H. (1986-07-15). "Board Suggests Commutation in Gun Law Case". The Boston Globe. p. 17 – via ProQuest.
    • Editorial Board (1986-07-16). "Fear and Justice". The Boston Globe. p. 16 – via ProQuest.
    • Kennedy, John H. (1986-07-26). "Dukakis Seeks Commutation for Violator of Gun Law". The Boston Globe. p. 19 – via ProQuest.
    • "Hearing is Scheduled in Gun Carrying Case". The Boston Globe. 1986-07-31. p. 39 – via ProQuest.
    • Ribadeneira, Diego (1986-08-07). "Council Hears Testimony in Lindsey Case". The Boston Globe. p. 40 – via ProQuest.
    • Ribadeneira, Diego (1986-08-15). "Gun-Law Term Forgiven; Lindsey to Perform Community Service". The Boston Globe. p. 17 – via ProQuest.
  29. ↑ Rezendes, Michael (1989-11-05). "State's Gun Law Called Ineffective". The Boston Globe– via ProQuest.
  30. ↑ Sullivan, Jack (1990-10-21). "Report Says Court Backlog for Gun Cases is Smaller". The Boston Globe– via ProQuest.
  31. ↑ Kleck, Gary (1997). Targeting Guns: Firearms and Their Control. Transaction Publishers. p. 354. ISBN   9780202369419.
  32. ↑ Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review. National Research Council. 2004. p. 229. doi:10.17226/10881. ISBN   978-0-309-09124-4 . Retrieved 2017-08-29.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.