Battle of Silistra

Last updated
Battle of Silistra
Part of Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria
63-manasses-chronicle.jpg
Rus' invasion of Bulgaria
Datespring 967/968 [1] [lower-alpha 1]
Location
Result

Rus' victory

Belligerents
Bulgaria Kievan Rus
Commanders and leaders
Peter I of Bulgaria [2] Sviatoslav Igorevich
Strength
30,000 [3] [4] [5] [6] 10,000 [5] [6] -60,000 [7] [8]
Casualties and losses
Heavy Heavy

The Battle of Silistra occurred in the spring of 968 near the Bulgarian town of Silistra, but most probably on the modern territory of Romania. It was fought between the armies of Bulgaria and Kievan Rus' and resulted in a Rus' victory. Upon the news of the defeat, the Bulgarian emperor Peter I abdicated. The invasion of the Rus' prince Sviatoslav was a heavy blow for the Bulgarian Empire, which by 971 lost its eastern provinces to the Byzantine Empire.

Contents

Origins of the conflict

From the 940s the Magyars began repeatedly to launch pillage raids into the Bulgarian Empire. Emperor Peter I was unable to stop them and as the Byzantines were unwilling to send any help he finally allied with the Magyars and gave them safe passage through Bulgaria to attack Byzantine Thrace. In 968 the Byzantine emperor Nikephoros II Phokas paid the Kievan knyaz Sviatoslav Igorevich to attack Bulgaria in answer of the alliance between the Bulgarian emperor Peter I and the Magyars.

Battle

Sviatoslav Igorevich gathered 10,000 or 60,000 troops and started his campaign in the early spring of 968. He met the Bulgarians, who were less than his army , near Silistra. The battle continued the whole day and until dark the Bulgarians seemed to have overwhelmed the Kievans, but, elated by Sviatoslav's personal example, the latter were victorious. The loss forced the Bulgarian tsar to shut himself up in Druster. During this time, Svetoslav plundered the Bulgarian lands unhindered, but soon a message about a Pecheneg attack on Kiev made him return to his homeland, taking with him a rich booty. [9]

Aftermath

The Rus' forces continued their victorious campaign. According to the Bulgarian historian Vasil Zlatarski, Sviatoslav seized 80 towns in northeastern Bulgaria. They were looted and destroyed but not permanently occupied. Tsar Peter I suffered an epileptic stroke when he received news of the defeat. [10] The Rus' wintered at Pereyaslavets, [11] while the Bulgarians retreated to the fortress of Dorostolon (Silistra). [12] Sviatoslav Igorevich was eventually forced to return to Kiev after Bulgarian diplomacy inspired the Pechenegs to besiege his capital. During his absence, the new Bulgarian army managed to temporarily recapture the fortress of Pereyaslavets and repulse the Rus' garrisons from the remaining conquered fortresses out of the Bulgarian lands [13] .

Siege

The reality of what happened during the siege remains a debatable issue, Russian sources claim that after the victory in the battle, the Rus' warriors took the remaining Dorostolon and other cities in Bulgaria, [5] [7] [14] Bulgarian sources claim that the Bulgarians successfully repelled the siege of the Rus. [15] [16] [17] Some sources do not mention the siege at all after the battle. [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">969</span> Calendar year

Year 969 (CMLXIX) was a common year starting on Friday of the Julian calendar, the 969th year of the Common Era (CE) and Anno Domini (AD) designations, the 969th year of the 1st millennium, the 69th year of the 10th century, and the 10th and last year of the 960s decade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">968</span> Calendar year

Year 968 (CMLXVIII) was a leap year starting on Wednesday of the Julian calendar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sviatoslav I</span> Prince of Kiev from 945 to 972

Sviatoslav or Svyatoslav I Igorevich was Prince of Kiev from 945 until his death in 972. He is known for his persistent campaigns in the east and south, which precipitated the collapse of two great powers in Eastern Europe, Khazaria and the First Bulgarian Empire. He conquered numerous East Slavic tribes, defeated the Alans and attacked the Volga Bulgars, and at times was allied with the Pechenegs and Magyars (Hungarians).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samuel of Bulgaria</span> Tsar of the First Bulgarian Empire from 997 to 1014

Samuel was the Tsar (Emperor) of the First Bulgarian Empire from 997 to 6 October 1014. From 977 to 997, he was a general under Roman I of Bulgaria, the second surviving son of Emperor Peter I of Bulgaria, and co-ruled with him, as Roman bestowed upon him the command of the army and the effective royal authority. As Samuel struggled to preserve his country's independence from the Byzantine Empire, his rule was characterized by constant warfare against the Byzantines and their equally ambitious ruler Basil II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Kleidion</span> 1014 battle of the Byzantine–Bulgarian Wars

The Battle of Kleidion took place on July 29, 1014, between the Byzantine Empire and the Bulgarian Empire. It was the culmination of the nearly half-century struggle between the Byzantine Emperor Basil II and the Bulgarian Emperor Samuel in the late 10th and early 11th centuries. The result was a decisive Byzantine victory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter I of Bulgaria</span> Tsar of the First Bulgarian Empire from 927 to 969

Peter I was emperor (tsar) of Bulgaria from 27 May 927 to 969. Facing the Bogomil heresy and rebellions by his brothers and also by Časlav Klonimirović early on in his reign, Peter secured more success later in life; he ensured the retreat of the invading Rus by inciting Bulgaria's allies, the Pechenegs, to attack Kiev itself. Traditionally seen as a weak ruler who lost land and prestige, recent scholarship challenges this view, emphasizing the empire's affluence and internal peace. Considered a good ruler during the Middle Ages, his name was adopted by later leaders trying to restore Bulgarian independence under Byzantine rule to emphasize legitimacy and continuity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Simeon I of Bulgaria</span> First Emperor of the Bulgars from 893 to 927

Tsar SimeonI the Great ruled over Bulgaria from 893 to 927, during the First Bulgarian Empire. Simeon's successful campaigns against the Byzantines, Magyars and Serbs led Bulgaria to its greatest territorial expansion ever, making it the most powerful state in contemporary Eastern and Southeast Europe. His reign was also a period of unmatched cultural prosperity and enlightenment later deemed the Golden Age of Bulgarian culture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boris II of Bulgaria</span> Tsar of the First Bulgarian Empire from 969 to 977

Boris II was emperor (tsar) of Bulgaria from 969 to 977.

Pereyaslavets or Preslavets was a trade city located near mouths of the Danube. The city's name is derived from that of the Bulgarian capital of the time, Preslav, and means Little Preslav. In Greek it was also known as Presthlavitza (Πρεσθλαβίτζα). Several theories exist regarding the exact location of the city: either at Preslav or in its vicinity in Bulgaria, or at Isaccea, Nufăru, Murighiol or Jurilovca in Romania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Bulgarian Empire</span> 681–1018 state in Southeast Europe

The First Bulgarian Empire was a medieval state that existed in Southeastern Europe between the 7th and 11th centuries AD. It was founded in 680–681 after part of the Bulgars, led by Asparuh, moved south to the northeastern Balkans. There they secured Byzantine recognition of their right to settle south of the Danube by defeating – possibly with the help of local South Slavic tribes – the Byzantine army led by Constantine IV. During the 9th and 10th century, Bulgaria at the height of its power spread from the Danube Bend to the Black Sea and from the Dnieper River to the Adriatic Sea and became an important power in the region competing with the Byzantine Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Dorostolon</span> Byzantine military investment of the Kievan Rus in Dorostolon

The Battle of Dorostopol or Dorystolon was fought in 971 between the Byzantine Empire and forces of Kievan Rus'. The Byzantines, led by John I Tzimiskes, were victorious.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kurya (khan)</span> Pecheneg khan

Kurya was the name of a Pecheneg prince and khan who allied with Svyatoslav I of Kiev in his campaigns in the Balkans. Later, after Svyatoslav's defeat by the Byzantine Empire, Kurya ambushed and killed the Kievan grand prince at Khortytsia. According to the Chronicle of Bygone Years, Kurya had Svyatoslav's skull made into a goblet, and gilded. Dates of his rule are unknown, but he was no longer khan somewhere around 988 CE, being succeeded by Metiga. It is also possible that he was the leader of the Pechenegs in the 968 siege of Kiev, but since a starting date is unknown, it is almost impossible to tell. Kurya appears as a villain in the 2006 animated film Prince Vladimir.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Byzantine–Bulgarian wars</span> Series of conflicts fought between the Byzantines and Bulgarians from 680 to 1355

The Byzantine–Bulgarian wars were a series of conflicts fought between the Byzantine Empire and Bulgaria which began after the Bulgars conquered parts of the Balkan peninsula after 680 AD. The Byzantine and First Bulgarian Empire continued to clash over the next century with variable success, until the Bulgarians, led by Krum, inflicted a series of crushing defeats on the Byzantines. After Krum died in 814, his son Omurtag negotiated a thirty-year peace treaty. Simeon I had multiple successful campaigns against the Byzantines during his rule from 893 to 927. His son Peter I negotiated another long-lasting peace treaty. His rule was followed by a period of decline of the Bulgarian state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Kiev (968)</span>

The siege of Kiev by the Pechenegs in 968 is narrated in pages 65.19–67.20 of the Primary Chronicle, its an account that freely mixes historical details with folklore.

The Battle of Arcadiopolis was fought in 970 between a Byzantine army under Bardas Skleros and a Rus' army, the latter also including allied Bulgarian, Pecheneg, and Hungarian (Magyar) contingents. In the preceding years, the Rus' ruler Sviatoslav had conquered northern Bulgaria, and was now menacing Byzantium as well. The Rus' force had been advancing through Thrace towards Constantinople when it was met by Skleros' force. Having fewer men than the Rus', Skleros prepared an ambush and attacked the Rus' army with a portion of his force. The Byzantines then feigned retreat, and succeeded in drawing off the Pecheneg contingent into the ambush, routing it. The remainder of the Rus' army then suffered heavy casualties from the pursuing Byzantines. The battle was important as it bought time for the Byzantine emperor John I Tzimiskes to settle his internal problems and assemble a large expedition, which eventually defeated Sviatoslav the next year.

Kalokyros was a pretender to the Byzantine throne during the Rus'–Byzantine War (970–971) in the reigns of Nikephoros II and John I Tzimiskes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bulgarian–Hungarian wars</span> Set of conflicts between the Bulgarian Empire and the Kingdom of Hungary

The Bulgarian–Hungarian wars were a series of conflicts that occurred during the 9th–14th centuries between the First and Second Bulgarian Empires and the Magyar tribes, the Principality of Hungary and later the Kingdom of Hungary. The nearly 500-year conflict encompassed the region of Southeast Europe, or what is known today as north-western Serbia, Romania, Moldavia and northwestern Bulgaria and southwestern Ukraine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medieval Bulgarian army</span>

The medieval Bulgarian army was the primary military body of the First and the Second Bulgarian Empires, and some Puppet states of the former, like the Despotate of Dobruja. During the first decades after the foundation of the country, the army consisted of a Bulgar cavalry and a Slavic infantry. The core of the Bulgarian army was the heavy cavalry, which consisted of ca. 12,000 heavily armed riders. At its height in the 9th and 10th centuries, it was one of the most formidable military forces in Europe and was feared by its enemies. There are several documented cases of Byzantine commanders abandoning an invasion because of a reluctance to confront the Bulgarian army on its home territory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Byzantine conquest of Bulgaria</span> Invasion of the First Bulgarian Empire (968–1018)

From c. 970 until 1018, a series of conflicts between the Bulgarian Empire and the Byzantine Empire led to the gradual reconquest of Bulgaria by the Byzantines, who thus re-established their control over the entire Balkan peninsula for the first time since the 7th-century Slavic invasions. The struggle began with the incorporation of eastern Bulgaria after the Russo-Byzantine War (970–971). Bulgarian resistance was led by the Cometopuli brothers, who – based in the unconquered western regions of the Bulgarian Empire – led it until its fall under Byzantine rule in 1018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria</span> Conflict between the Kievan Rus and the First Bulgarian Empire from 967/968 to 971

Sviatoslav's invasion of Bulgaria refers to a conflict beginning in 967/968 and ending in 971, carried out in the eastern Balkans, and involving the Kievan Rus', Bulgaria, and the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantines encouraged the Rus' ruler Sviatoslav to attack Bulgaria, leading to the defeat of the Bulgarian forces and the occupation of the northern and north-eastern part of the country by the Rus' for the following two years. The allies then turned against each other, and the ensuing military confrontation ended with a Byzantine victory. The Rus' withdrew and eastern Bulgaria was incorporated into the Byzantine Empire.

References

  1. Zlatarski 1971, pp. 554–55521. For the year of Svetoslav's first campaign in Bulgaria, two data are currently known: 1) in the Russian annals with: "Vol . 6475 [by S.M. = 957 AD]. Svyatoslav is coming to Bolgary” and 2) of Ivan Skilitsa.( Skyl.—Cedr ., ibid., II, p. 372 12–14 ). The eleventh indiction gives the year 958, which lasted from 1. IX. 967 to 31. VIII. 968, hence the event refers at the latest to the month of August 968, which fully corresponds to the third data, namely the fifth year of the reign of Nicephorus Phocas: the latter ascended the throne on August 16, 963 or the 5 year ended on August 15, 968, therefore Svetoslav's march refers to the first half of August 968, i.e. before the end of the 5th year. Leo the Deacon does not give any chronological data about this event, however, from the course of the presented facts the following considerations can be made. He writes: "Having said this, he sent them [the Bulgarian envoys] to go back to the country. Sam himself, having collected an experienced [team — ] army, went against the Mizis and on the way captured the fortresses that were border [neighboring] the Romans, with an attack" ( Leo Diakonos , ibid., p. 62 10-13 ). And so the Bulgarian envoys appeared in Constantinople in the first half of 966 (in April or May), and the campaign of Nicephorus followed, as it appears from the words of Leo the Deacon, recently after their dispatch from Constantinople, i.e. in the same 966 Indeed, the Bulgarian campaign of Nicephorus, according to Ivan Skilitsa, is placed in ( Skyl.—Cedr ., ibid., p. 372 3–4 ), i.e. in June of the 10th indiction, or in 957. But that date can hardly be accepted, because Nicephorus could hardly wait after the gross violation of the peace on his part for more than a year, because, as has been said, he was afraid of being surprised by the Bulgarians in some war. Therefore, if in the given month of June we see the beginning of Nikiforov's campaign, which required at least three or four months (July, August and September), then the end of the campaign must be referred to September at the earliest; in such case as the 10th indiction, which continued from 1. IX. 955 to 31. VIII. 937, as well as the fourth year of Nicephorus' reign, which began on August 15, 935, rightly indicate that Nicephorus returned from his Bulgarian campaign in September 966 at the earliest. This conclusion makes it possible to establish another date, namely that Kalokir left Constantinople for Kherson in late 966 or early 967 and could have arrived in Kiev no earlier than the spring of the same 967, or he met Svetoslav precisely at that time, when the latter, according to N. Znoyko's calculations, returned from their long march to the east, after subduing the Vyatichi under their power, i.e. in the spring of 967. In order to prepare such a large army of 60 thousand people and the boats needed for it, Svetoslav had enough time, i.e. a whole year from the spring of 967 to the spring of 968, or he could not have gone on a campaign against Bulgaria earlier than the spring of 968; therefore, the month of August given by Ivan Skilitsa should be accepted as the end of Svetoslav's advance, when he had already settled in Northeastern Bulgaria. — That the first campaign of Svetoslav should be attributed to 968, cf. "On the death of Svyatoslav Igorevich, the great prince of Kiev", Chronolog. searches by N. Lambina, A. Kunina and V. Vasilevsky , St. Petersburg, 1876, p. 163. — N. Znoyko , O posolstve, ibid., pp. 249-252; also "Oh I walked", ibid., pp. 265-268.
  2. Kolev, Ivomir. "The fall of Preslav - the blow that shaped Bulgarian history (In Bulgarian)". Bulgarian History.
  3. Pavlov, Plamen (2014). Векът на цар Самуил[The century of tsar Samuel] (in Bulgarian). Sofia: Изток и запад. p. 33. ISBN   978-619-152-502-7.
  4. Kolev, Ivomir. "The fall of Preslav - the blow that shaped Bulgarian history (In Bulgarian)". Bulgarian History.
  5. 1 2 3 Егоршина 2023, p. 9.
  6. 1 2 Velichko et al. 1912.
  7. 1 2 Karamzin 2020, p. 62.
  8. Kolev, Ivomir. "The fall of Preslav - the blow that shaped Bulgarian history (In Bulgarian)". Bulgarian History.
  9. Kolev, Ivomir. "The fall of Preslav - the blow that shaped Bulgarian history (In Bulgarian)". Bulgarian History.
  10. Zlatarski 1971 , pp. 554–555
  11. "It is not my pleasure to be in Kiev, but I will live in Pereyaslavets on the Danube. That shall be the centre of my land; for there all good things flow: gold from the Greeks [Byzantines], precious cloths, wines and fruits of many kinds; silver and horses from the Czechs and Magyars; and from the Rus' furs, wax, honey and slaves." – Sviatoslav, according to the Primary Chronicle , Stephenson 2000 , p. 49
  12. Whittow 1996 , p. 260
  13. Pavlov, Plamen (2024). Забравеното средновековие[The forgotten Medieval ages] (in Bulgarian). Sofia: Българска история. p. 76. ISBN   978-619-7688-32-0.
  14. Gumilev 2023, p. 67.
  15. Pavlov, Plamen (2014). Векът на цар Самуил[The century of tsar Samuel] (in Bulgarian). Sofia: Изток и запад. p. 33. ISBN   978-619-152-502-7.
  16. Velikova, Neli. "Druster - the glorious palace on the Danube". Bulgarian history."However, in 969, the Kiev prince Svetoslav was in front of the walls of the city and managed to capture it".
  17. Ivanov, Ivelin. "Knyaz Svyatoslav of Kiev's 968-971 campaigns against Bulgaria in the context of the 9 th - 11 th c. Norman invasion". Research gate.21 Повесть временных лет, c. 32. I would not not focus my attention to the dispute over the location of this fortress on the Lower Danube but to the fact that Svyatoslav took advantage of the key-position of Durostorum and its defended harbor during his second campaign. In my view a thesis could be shaped that it was a plan for providing a permanent military base and even a controlled territories for settlement on the Lower Danube. Actually, it was a common Normans’ strategy in the Norman invasions in Northern and Western West Europe in the period between 9th-11th c.
  18. Wasilewski T. Historia Bułgarii. — Wrocław: Ossolineum, 1983. — P. 62. — ISBN 83-0402466-7

Bibliography

Notes

  1. Russian sources give the date 967, and Bulgarian sources 968