Beecher v. Alabama

Last updated

Beecher v. Alabama
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided October 23, 1967
Full case nameBeecher v. Alabama
Citations389 U.S. 35 ( more )
Holding
Eliciting a confession from a suspect while he was under the influence of morphine and recovering from a gunshot wound violated the Due Process Clause.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black  · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II  · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart  · Byron White
Abe Fortas  · Thurgood Marshall
Case opinions
Per curiam
ConcurrenceBlack
ConcurrenceBrennan, joined by Warren, Douglas

Beecher v. Alabama, 389 U.S. 35 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that eliciting a confession from a suspect while he was under the influence of morphine and recovering from a gunshot wound violated the Due Process Clause. [1] [2]

Contents

Description

Although the decision was unanimous and unsigned, the four concurring justices disagreed with describing this as a violation of the Due Process Clause. The four would have described it as a violation of the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination protections, which had recently been incorporated against the states in Malloy v. Hogan . [2]

References

  1. Beecher v. Alabama, 389 U.S. 35 (1967)
  2. 1 2 Stephens, Jr., Otis H. (1973). The Supreme Court and Confessions of Guilt. pp. 149–150.