Behavioral public administration

Last updated

Behavioral Public Administration (BPA) is the study of psychological methods and findings in political administrative settings, that is, cognitive and decision biases and discriminations by bureaucrats, the interaction between citizens and bureaucrats, and the psychological effects of public service failure. [1]

Contents

It is the study of behaviors and methodology for administrative purposes. It attempts to better understand the cycle of causes and consequences after putting orders or laws into motion to govern or administrate one or many humans within a specific group. It is an interdisciplinary academic discipline that studies public administration "from the micro-level perspective of individual and group behavior and attitudes." [2]

Components of study

Behavioral public administration has three main components:

  1. As analysis units (or the framework within which the analysis will be carried out), it makes use of both individual and group citizens, public sector workers, and managers.
  2. The conduct and viewpoints of these groups are highlighted.
  3. To research public administration, it combines ideas from the behavioral sciences and psychology. [2] The behavioral approach to public administration uses psychological theories and methods to study the attitudes and behaviors of citizens, public professionals, and public managers. It is a complement to traditional public administration research, adding the ability to make more detailed theories in addition to the previously dominant big-picture theories of public administration. [3] By drawing on these insights, the approach attempts to improve knowledge and the skill of practitioners in public administration and academia.

The application of psychology in the behavioral approach, for instance, may provide insight into raising citizens' performance views. To what degree nudging is an effective policy instrument is another example of how the inclusion of psychology might assist. Since it provides insights into how theories developed in controlled environments hold up when tested in complex public environments, the integration of public administration and psychology can also benefit psychologists. This makes the behavioral approach very beneficial to policy-makers and public officials. [2]

History and development

The Journal of Behavioral Public Administration was established in response to the increasing amount of research being conducted at the nexus of psychology and public administration. Its inaugural issue was released in 2018. [4] The journal, edited by professors Sebastian Jilke, Joanna Lahey, Kenneth J. Meier, and William G. Resh, [5] [6] is dedicated to behavioral and experimental research in public administration.

Scholars like [[Herbert A.] set the precedent for behavioral research in public administration. Simon]]. [2] Simon states that "decision-making is the heart of the administration, and that the vocabulary of administrative theory must be derived from the logic and psychology of human choice." [7] Other public administration scholars have also argued for a tighter connection between the fields of psychology and public administration. [2] [8]

Some of the leading research studies on BPA are Performance information in politics: How framing, format, and rhetoric matter to politicians’ preferences (2019) by Martin Bækgaard, Street-Level Bureaucrats as Individual Policymakers: The Relationship between Attitudes and Coping Behavior toward Vulnerable Children and Youth (2017) by Siddhartha Baviskar and Søren C. Winter, and The Creativity of Coping: Alternative Tales of Moral Dilemmas among Migration Control Officers (2018) by Lisa Marie Borrelli and Annika Lindberg.

The application of psychological theories and methods in public administration is becoming more common, but it is still less common than in other academic fields like economics, political science, and management studies. [2] Within these research domains, psychology-based subfields have developed, such as behavioral economics, industrial and organizational psychology, and political psychology..

While the number of psychology-informed research studies in public administration might be small, the number is increasing. [2] [9] Public administration scholars have begun incorporating theories from the field of psychology into the study of public leadership and public service motivation, transparency, public service competition, public choice, blame avoidance among policymakers, performance information, and trust of civil servants. The methods and measurement techniques used to study public administration have, to an increasing extent, become influenced by the practices of the psychological field, most notably seen as in the more frequent use of experiments.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herbert A. Simon</span> American political scientist, economist, sociologist, and psychologist

Herbert Alexander Simon was an American political scientist whose work also influenced the fields of computer science, economics, and cognitive psychology. His primary research interest was decision-making within organizations and he is best known for the theories of "bounded rationality" and "satisficing". He received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1978 and the Turing Award in computer science in 1975. His research was noted for its interdisciplinary nature and spanned across the fields of cognitive science, computer science, public administration, management, and political science. He was at Carnegie Mellon University for most of his career, from 1949 to 2001, where he helped found the Carnegie Mellon School of Computer Science, one of the first such departments in the world.

Political science is the scientific study of politics. It is a social science dealing with systems of governance and power, and the analysis of political activities, political thought, political behavior, and associated constitutions and laws.

Social psychology is the scientific study of how thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others. Social psychologists typically explain human behavior as a result of the relationship between mental states and social situations, studying the social conditions under which thoughts, feelings, and behaviors occur, and how these variables influence social interactions.

Bounded rationality is the idea that rationality is limited when individuals make decisions, and under these limitations, rational individuals will select a decision that is satisfactory rather than optimal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Behavioral economics</span> Academic discipline

Behavioral economics is the study of the psychological, cognitive, emotional, cultural and social factors involved in the decisions of individuals or institutions, and how these decisions deviate from those implied by classical economic theory.

Red tape is an idiom referring to regulations or conformity to formal rules or standards which are claimed to be excessive, rigid or redundant, or to bureaucracy claimed to hinder or prevent action or decision-making. It is usually applied to governments, corporations, and other large organizations. Things often described as "red tape" include filling out paperwork, obtaining licenses, having multiple people or committees approve a decision and various low-level rules that make conducting one's affairs slower, more difficult, or both. Red tape has been found to hamper organizational performance and employee wellbeing across countries and contexts by a meta-analysis and meta-regression in 2021, and especially internal red tape imposed by the organization itself on its employees was identified as particularly harmful. A related concept, administrative burden, refers to the costs citizens may experience in their interaction with government even if bureaucratic regulations or procedures serve legitimate purposes.

Community psychology is concerned with the community as the unit of study. This contrasts with most psychology which focuses on the individual. Community psychology also studies the community as a context for the individuals within it, and the relationships of the individual to communities and society. Community psychologists seek to understand the functioning of the community, including the quality of life of persons within groups, organizations and institutions, communities, and society. They aim to enhance the quality of life through collaborative research and action.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operationalization</span> Part of the process of research design

In research design, especially in psychology, social sciences, life sciences and physics, operationalization or operationalisation is a process of defining the measurement of a phenomenon which is not directly measurable, though its existence is inferred from other phenomena. Operationalization thus defines a fuzzy concept so as to make it clearly distinguishable, measurable, and understandable by empirical observation. In a broader sense, it defines the extension of a concept—describing what is and is not an instance of that concept. For example, in medicine, the phenomenon of health might be operationalized by one or more indicators like body mass index or tobacco smoking. As another example, in visual processing the presence of a certain object in the environment could be inferred by measuring specific features of the light it reflects. In these examples, the phenomena are difficult to directly observe and measure because they are general/abstract or they are latent. Operationalization helps infer the existence, and some elements of the extension, of the phenomena of interest by means of some observable and measurable effects they have.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Thaler</span> American economist

Richard H. Thaler is an American economist and the Charles R. Walgreen Distinguished Service Professor of Behavioral Science and Economics at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. In 2015, Thaler was president of the American Economic Association.

Theoretical psychology is concerned with theoretical and philosophical aspects of psychology. It is an interdisciplinary field with a wide scope of study.

Mathematical psychology is an approach to psychological research that is based on mathematical modeling of perceptual, thought, cognitive and motor processes, and on the establishment of law-like rules that relate quantifiable stimulus characteristics with quantifiable behavior. The mathematical approach is used with the goal of deriving hypotheses that are more exact and thus yield stricter empirical validations. There are five major research areas in mathematical psychology: learning and memory, perception and psychophysics, choice and decision-making, language and thinking, and measurement and scaling.

This article is a general timeline of psychology.

Public administration theory refers to the study and analysis of the principles, concepts, and models that guide the practice of public administration. It provides a framework for understanding the complexities and challenges of managing public organizations and implementing public policies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William H. Starbuck</span>

William Haynes Starbuck graduated from Harvard University and the Carnegie Institute of Technology. He is an organizational scientist who has held professorships in social relations, sociology, business administration, and management.

Psychology encompasses a vast domain, and includes many different approaches to the study of mental processes and behavior. Below are the major areas of inquiry that taken together constitute psychology. A comprehensive list of the sub-fields and areas within psychology can be found at the list of psychology topics and list of psychology disciplines.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to social science:

Nudge theory is a concept in behavioral economics, decision making, behavioral policy, social psychology, consumer behavior, and related behavioral sciences that proposes adaptive designs of the decision environment as ways to influence the behavior and decision-making of groups or individuals. Nudging contrasts with other ways to achieve compliance, such as education, legislation or enforcement.

Tobin Im is a scholar of public administration and a professor at the Graduate School of Public Administration at Seoul National University. He specializes in public management, organization theory, and comparative administration.

James Arthur Bayton was an American psychologist. He conducted research in areas of personality, race, social issues, and consumer psychology.

References

  1. ↑ Gofen, Anat; Moseley, Alice; Thomann, Eva; Weaver, R. Kent (2021-05-04). "Behavioural governance in the policy process: introduction to the special issue". Journal of European Public Policy. 28 (5): 633–657. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1912153 . hdl: 10871/125605 . ISSN   1350-1763.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan; Jilke, Sebastian; Olsen, Asmus Leth; Tummers, Lars (2017). "Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology". Public Administration Review. 77 (1): 45–56. doi: 10.1111/puar.12609 . S2CID   147863938.
  3. ↑ Tummers, Lars; Olsen, Asmus Leth; Jilke, Sebastian; Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan (2016). "Introduction to the Virtual Issue on Behavioral Public Administration" (PDF). Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Virtual Issue (3): 1–3.
  4. ↑ Jilke, Sebastian; Meier, Kenneth J.; Van Ryzin, Gregg G. (2018). "Editorial". Journal of Behavioral Public Administration. 1: 1–3. doi: 10.30636/jbpa.11.9 .
  5. ↑ "Journal of Behavioral Public Administration". JBPA. Archived from the original on 2018-03-09. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  6. ↑ "Journal of Behavioral Public Administration - Editorial Team". JBPA. Archived from the original on 2018-03-12. Retrieved November 5, 2020.
  7. ↑ Simon, Herbert A. (1947). Administrative Behavior: Government A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Macmillan Inc. pp. xi.
  8. ↑ Olsen, Asmus Leth (2015). ""Simon Said," We Didn't Jump". Public Administration Review. 75 (2): 325–326. doi:10.1111/puar.12330.
  9. ↑ Battaglio, Paul R.; Belardinelli, Paolo; Bellé, Nicola; Cantarelli, Paola (2019). "Behavioral public administration ad Fontes: A synthesis of research on bounded rationality, cognitive biases, and nudging in public organizations". Public Administration Review. 79 (3): 304–320. doi: 10.1111/puar.12994 . S2CID   158428860.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.