Blade off testing

Last updated
Blade containment and rotor unbalance
166393main Jan07 BladeOutTest.jpg
Damaged engine case from blade-out testing. Credit: NASA
PurposeEnsures that failure of rotating fan and compressor blades in turbine engines does not cause consequential failures in critical aircraft systems
Year started1964 (1964)

Blade off testing or blade out testing is a specific form of air safety testing required by the Federal Aviation Administration and other safety agencies to certify safety performance of jet engines. The tests require engine manufacturers to carry out at least two tests of the engine, to make sure that the engine can survive a compressor or fan blade breaking off within the engine and a turbine blade breaking off within the engine, without fragments being thrown through the outside enclosure of the engine, creating an uncontained engine failure.

Contents

In the United States, the tests are required by Title 14, Part 33 Subpart F, Section 33.94 of the US Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Blade containment and rotor unbalance tests. [1] [2] Equivalent test requirements are provided in the Certification Specifications for Engines (CS-E), published by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).

Design

One of the most challenging component design and certification requirements for commercial jet engines is to mitigate the effects of a "blade-out" rotor failure event, which can result in catastrophic loss of aircraft and/or passengers. Engine blade-out occurs when a sudden change in speed causes a fluctuation in rotor spin and resulting blade overstress condition, or when a blade, or group of blades, fails due to fatigue from repeated cyclic stresses. Testing rotor dynamics and blade-out conditions to ensure safe operation is extremely expensive, time consuming and labor intensive. The testing usually requires a specially prepared compressor or turbine blade with an embedded small explosive charge, to separate it on command during the test. [3]

The tests and standard do not require that the engines continue to operate after the blade failures, only that no fragments penetrate the engine outer casing and that it does not vibrate badly enough during its shutdown that it will tear loose from the aircraft, barring other failures. [4] The Society of Automotive Engineers have prepared reports detailing the number of blade-out failures. [5] [6]

There are two approaches to contain debris following a blade-out event: either a hard-wall, which is designed to withstand and deflect shrapnel, or a soft-wall, which is designed to arrest and retain shrapnel. The hard-wall is an older approach dating from the 1970s and tends to be heavier than the soft-wall because it is generally a heavy metal ring; the soft wall generally uses a resilient outer containment layer made from a composite material such as aramid fiber, which requires a larger space to allow the composite layer to expand slightly. In addition, a hard wall to retain solid metal blades generally requires a prohibitively heavy ring, so hard walls are usually used with hollow metal or composite blades. [7]

A typical hard steel containment ring varied in thickness up to 3⁄8 inch (9.5 mm) at a weight of 410 pounds (190 kg); [8] : 3, 5  A "stratified containment structure" with a low resistance layer to trap the debris, surrounded by a high resistance layer to maintain the containment shape and minimize further interaction with the remaining turbine blades, was proposed in a 1979 NASA study. [8] : 9–11  A compressed air gun was used to fire blade projectiles into several different containment designs to test "stratified" concept designs incorporating composite materials. [8] : 33, 43–77 

A 1976 study included an evaluation of the armor required to contain the energy from 1 blade, 2 blade, and 4 blade fragments of the compressor and turbine stages of General Electric CF6 and Pratt & Whitney JT9D engines; although the 4 blade fragment was unlikely to occur, containing it would have required a steel plate 1.212 inches (30.8 mm) thick, adding 110 to 195 pounds (50 to 88 kg) per engine. The study concluded that redundant armor could be added to the airframe in addition to engine-mounted containment, but at a substantial weight penalty of 2,500 or 3,000 pounds (1,100 or 1,400 kg) for 3 or 4 engine aircraft, respectively. [9] : 1–3  A companion study for engine-mounted armor concluded the weight of a containment to resist a 4 blade fragment would have to increase by approximately 410 pounds (190 kg) in addition to the 510 pounds (230 kg) of containment material already provided, most of which would be required for the fan section. [10] : 17–19 

History

United States

The original issue of the Airworthiness Standards for Aircraft Engines ( 14 CFR 33 ) on June 10, 1964 included a durability requirement in Part 33.19 [11] to ensure "the design of the compressor and turbine rotor cases must provide for the containment of damage from rotor failure." [12] A series of superseding advisory circulars (ACs) were issued in 1965, [13] 1968, [14] and 1970 [15] to provide guidance to demonstrate compliance to the requirements of the Airworthiness Standards. The 1965 guidance in AC 33-1 noted the favorability of "puncture resistant rotor housings or separate armor adequate to contain broken rotor blades and stator vanes" and engine rotor and bearings strong enough "to provide a strength margin for a period of shutdown and low speed windmilling when large unbalances typical of damaged rotor blading occur," but was more concerned with the mitigation of damage following foreign object ingestion. [13] By 1970, AC 33-1B provided more concrete acceptance criteria for the containment, which should be able to prevent "significant rupture or hazardous distortion of the engine casing and the expulsion of blades through or beyond the edge of the engine case or shield." [15]

Amendment 10 to the Airworthiness Standards was published by the Federal Aviation Administration on February 23, 1984, which modified the durability requirement of 33.19 by adding that "energy levels and trajectories of fragments resulting from rotor blade failure that lie outside the compressor and turbine rotor cases must be defined" and by moving some requirements for blade off testing from the advisory circulars to a new regulation ( 14 CFR 33.94 ). [1] [16]

The containment requirement and testing requirement were imposed after review of the history of uncontained engine failures which caused serious damage to aircraft, consequent to the July 19, 1989 United Airlines Flight 232 (UA232) accident. That accident did not originate from a fan blade off but from a defect in the fan rotor disk on the Number 2 (tail) General Electric CF6 engine, resulting in a loss of hydraulic power to the flight control actuators and crash landing of that aircraft. One of the recommendations in the resulting National Transportation Safety Board investigation report was to amend 14 CFR 33 to require an evaluation of engine components; the evaluation would determine which components, if they should fracture and separate, could pose a significant threat to aircraft structures and systems. [17] : 106  After the UA232 accident, the FAA issued AC 33-5 on June 18, 1990. [4]

The UA232 accident also led to new Airworthiness Standards safety analysis requirements, defining "non-containment of high energy debris" as a hazardous engine effect in Part 33.75, [18] which was added by Amendment 24 on September 4, 2007; [19] Amendment 24 also reconciled the United States standards with contemporary European standards. [20] [21] AC 33-1B was canceled in 2015 after being superseded by newer regulations and ACs. [15]

Europe

The equivalent blade off test requirements were specified in Compressor and Turbine Blade Failure: Subpart E, Section 810 of the Joint Aviation Requirements for Engines (JAR-E), developed and issued by the Joint Aviation Authorities. [22] JAR-E was superseded by the identically-structured Certification Specifications for Engines (CS-E), initially endorsed and issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency on October 24, 2003; [23] the same Subpart E and Section 810 of CS-E apply for blade off testing. Amendment 6 of CS-E 810 states that for a turbine engine to be certified, "it must be demonstrated that any single compressor or turbine blade will be contained after Failure and that no Hazardous Engine Effect can arise as a result of other Engine damage likely to occur before Engine shut down following a blade Failure." [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

The Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) are rules prescribed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) governing all aviation activities in the United States. The FARs comprise Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). A wide variety of activities are regulated, such as aircraft design and maintenance, typical airline flights, pilot training activities, hot-air ballooning, lighter-than-air aircraft, man-made structure heights, obstruction lighting and marking, model rocket launches, commercial space operations, model aircraft operations, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and kite flying. The rules are designed to promote safe aviation, protecting pilots, flight attendants, passengers and the general public from unnecessary risk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turbofan</span> Airbreathing jet engine designed to provide thrust by driving a fan

The turbofan or fanjet is a type of airbreathing jet engine that is widely used in aircraft propulsion. The word "turbofan" is a portmanteau of "turbine" and "fan": the turbo portion refers to a gas turbine engine which achieves mechanical energy from combustion, and the fan, a ducted fan that uses the mechanical energy from the gas turbine to force air rearwards. Thus, whereas all the air taken in by a turbojet passes through the combustion chamber and turbines, in a turbofan some of that air bypasses these components. A turbofan thus can be thought of as a turbojet being used to drive a ducted fan, with both of these contributing to the thrust.

Kaman Corporation is an American aerospace company, with headquarters in Bloomfield, Connecticut. It was founded in 1945 by Charles Kaman. During the first ten years the company operated exclusively as a designer and manufacturer of several helicopters that set world records and achieved many aviation firsts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pratt & Whitney PW4000</span> High-bypass turbofan aircraft engine

The Pratt & Whitney PW4000 is a family of dual-spool, axial-flow, high-bypass turbofan aircraft engines produced by Pratt & Whitney as the successor to the JT9D. It was first run in April 1984, was FAA certified in July 1986, and was introduced in June 1987. With thrust ranging from 50,000 to 99,040 lbf, it is used on many wide-body aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric GE90</span> High-bypass turbofan aircraft engine

The General Electric GE90 is a family of high-bypass turbofan aircraft engines built by GE Aviation for the Boeing 777, with thrust ratings from 81,000 to 115,000 lbf. It entered service with British Airways in November 1995. It is one of three options for the 777-200, -200ER, and -300 versions, and the exclusive engine of the -200LR, -300ER, and 777F. It was the largest jet engine, until being surpassed in January 2020 by its successor, the 110,000 lbf (490 kN) GE9X, which has a 6 in (15 cm) larger diameter fan. The GE90, however, is still more powerful than its successor, the GE9X.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Propfan</span> Type of aircraft engine

A propfan, also called an open rotor engine, or unducted fan, is a type of aircraft engine related in concept to both the turboprop and turbofan, but distinct from both. The design is intended to offer the speed and performance of a turbofan, with the fuel economy of a turboprop. A propfan is typically designed with a large number of short, highly twisted blades, similar to the (ducted) fan in a turbofan engine. For this reason, the propfan has been variously described as an "unducted fan" (UDF) or an "ultra-high-bypass (UHB) turbofan."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric GEnx</span> Turbofan jet engine

The General Electric GEnx is an advanced dual rotor, axial flow, high-bypass turbofan jet engine in production by GE Aviation for the Boeing 787 and 747-8. The GEnx is intended to succeed the CF6 in GE's product line.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric CF6</span> Turbofan aircraft engine family

The General Electric CF6, US military designations F103 and F138, is a family of high-bypass turbofan engines produced by GE Aviation. Based on the TF39, the first high-power high-bypass jet engine, the CF6 powers a wide variety of civilian airliners. The basic engine core also powers the LM2500 and LM6000 marine and power generation turboshafts. It is gradually being replaced by the newer GEnx family.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Light-sport aircraft</span> Category of lightweight aircraft that are simple to fly

A light-sport aircraft (LSA), or light sport aircraft, is a fairly new category of small, lightweight aircraft that are simple to fly. LSAs tend to be heavier and more sophisticated than ultralight aircraft, but LSA restrictions on weight and performance separates the category from established GA aircraft. There is no standard worldwide description of an LSA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce Trent 1000</span> British turbofan engine, developed from earlier Trent series engines

The Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 is a high-bypass turbofan engine produced by Rolls-Royce plc, one of the two engine options for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, competing with the General Electric GEnx. It first ran on 14 February 2006 and first flew on 18 June 2007 before a joint EASA/FAA certification on 7 August 2007 and entered service on 26 October 2011. Corrosion-related fatigue cracking of intermediate pressure (IP) turbine blades was discovered in early 2016, grounding up to 44 aircraft and costing Rolls-Royce at least £1.354 billion.

A blade inspection method is the practice of monitoring the condition of a blade, such as a helicopter's rotor blade, for deterioration or damage. A common area of focus in the aviation industry has been the detection of cracking, which is commonly associated with fatigue. Automated blade condition monitoring technology has been developed for helicopters and has seen widespread adoption. The technique is routinely mandated by airworthiness authorities for engine inspections. Another commercial sector where such monitoring has become important is electricity generation, particularly on wind farms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turbine engine failure</span> Turbine engine unexpectedly stops producing power due to a malfunction other than fuel exhaustion

A turbine engine failure occurs when a turbine engine unexpectedly stops producing power due to a malfunction other than fuel exhaustion. It often applies for aircraft, but other turbine engines can fail, like ground-based turbines used in power plants or combined diesel and gas vessels and vehicles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pratt & Whitney PW1000G</span> Geared turbofan engine produced beginning 2007

The Pratt & Whitney PW1000G, also called the Geared Turbofan (GTF), is a high-bypass geared turbofan engine family produced by Pratt & Whitney. After many demonstrators, the program was launched with the Mitsubishi MRJ's PW1200G in March 2008, and it was first flight tested in July 2008. The first variant to be certified was the PW1500G for the Airbus A220 in February 2013. The program cost is estimated at $10 billion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Los Angeles Airways Flight 417</span> 1968 helicopter accident

Los Angeles Airways Flight 417 was a Sikorsky S-61 helicopter that crashed on August 14, 1968 in the city of Compton, California. All eighteen passengers and three crew members were killed. The aircraft was destroyed by impact and fire. According to the National Transportation Safety Board the probable cause of the accident was fatigue failure. The accident happened when the yellow blade, one of five main rotor blades, separated at the spindle which attached the blade to the rotor head. Following failure, the helicopter was uncontrollable and it fell to the ground. The fatigue crack originated in an area of substandard hardness and inadequate shot peening.

The exoskeletal engine (ESE) is a concept in turbomachinery design. Current gas turbine engines have central rotating shafts and fan-discs and are constructed mostly from heavy metals. They require lubricated bearings and need extensive cooling for hot components. They are also subject to severe imbalance that could wipe out the whole rotor stage, are prone to high- and low-cycle fatigue, and subject to catastrophic failure due to disc bursts from high tensile loads, consequently requiring heavy containment devices. To address these limitations, the ESE concept turns the conventional configuration inside-out and utilizes a drum-type rotor design for the turbomachinery in which the rotor blades are attached to the inside of a rotating drum instead of radially outwards from a shaft and discs. Multiple drum rotors could be used in a multi-spool design.

An airbreathing jet engine is a jet engine that ejects a propelling (reaction) jet of hot exhaust gases after first taking in atmospheric air, followed by compression, heating and expansion back to atmospheric pressure through a nozzle. Alternatively the reaction jet may include a cold jet of ducted bypass air which has been compressed by a fan before returning to atmospheric pressure through an additional nozzle. These engines are gas turbine engines. Engines using only ram for the compression process, and no turbomachinery, are the ramjet and pulsejet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric Passport</span> High bypass turbofan aircraft engine

The General Electric Passport is a turbofan developed by GE Aviation for large business jets. It was selected in 2010 to power the Bombardier Global 7500/8000, first run on June 24, 2013, and first flown in 2015. It was certified in April 2016 and powered the Global 7500 first flight on November 4, 2016, before its 2018 introduction. It produces 14,000 to 20,000 lbf of thrust, a range previously covered by the General Electric CF34. A smaller scaled CFM LEAP, it is a twin-spool axial engine with a 5.6:1 bypass ratio and a 45:1 overall pressure ratio and is noted for its large one-piece 52 in (130 cm) fan 18-blade titanium blisk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric GE9X</span> High-Thrust Turbofan Jet Engine

The General Electric GE9X is a high-bypass turbofan developed by GE Aviation exclusively for the Boeing 777X. It first ran on the ground in April 2016 and first flew on March 13, 2018; it powered the 777-9's maiden flight in early 2020. It received its Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) type certificate on September 25, 2020. Derived from the General Electric GE90 with a larger fan, advanced materials like ceramic matrix composites (CMCs), and higher bypass and compression ratios, it was designed to improve fuel efficiency by 10% compared to the GE90. It is rated at 110,000 lbf (490 kN) of thrust, which is 5,000 lbf less than the GE90 highest thrust variant, the GE90-115 rated at 115,000 lbf (510 kN).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric Catalyst</span>

The General Electric Catalyst is a turboprop engine by GE Aviation. It was announced on 16 November 2015 and will power the Beechcraft Denali, it first ran on December 22, 2017, and should be certified in 2023. The 850 to 1,600 hp engine aims for 20% better efficiency than its competition thanks to a 16:1 overall pressure ratio, variable stator vanes, cooled turbine blades, 3D printed parts and FADEC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southwest Airlines Flight 1380</span> Aviation accident

Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 was a Boeing 737-7H4 that experienced a contained engine failure in the left CFM56-7B engine after departing from New York–LaGuardia Airport en route to Dallas Love Field on April 17, 2018. The engine cowl was broken in the failure and cowl fragments damaged the fuselage, causing explosive depressurization of the aircraft after damaging a cabin window. Other fragments caused damage to the wing. The crew carried out an emergency descent and diverted to Philadelphia International Airport. One passenger was partially ejected from the aircraft and later died. Eight other passengers received minor injuries. The aircraft was substantially damaged.

References

PD-icon.svg This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration .

  1. 1 2 14 CFR 33.94
  2. ↑ "Section 33.94 - Blade containment and rotor unbalance tests. (Code of Federal Regulations Title 14 - Aeronautics and Space)". www.govinfo.gov. Federal Aviation Administration. January 1, 2008. Retrieved May 24, 2020.
  3. ↑ "Ares I Design and Development Underway at Glenn". Aerospace Frontiers. NASA Glenn Research Center. 2007-01-19. Retrieved 2021-03-02.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  4. 1 2 "AC 33-5: Turbine Engine Rotor Blade Containment/Durability". Federal Aviation Administration. June 18, 1990. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  5. ↑ Report on Aircraft Engine Containment, AIR4003 (Report). SAE International. January 8, 1991. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  6. ↑ Report on Aircraft Engine Containment, AIR1537A (Report). SAE International. August 1, 1996. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  7. ↑ Button, Keith (July–August 2018). "Engineering Notebook: Containing a blade-out". Aerospace America. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  8. 1 2 3 Stotler, C.L.; Coppa, A.P. (July 1979). Containment of Composite Fan Blades, Report No. NASA-CR-159544 (Report). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  9. ↑ Gunderson, C. O. (July 1977). Study to improve airframe engine rotor blade containment, Report No. FAA-RD-77-44 (PDF) (Report). U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  10. ↑ Heermann, Karl F.; McClure, Kenneth R.; Eriksson, Richard H. (August 1977). Study to improve turbine engine rotor blade containment, Report No. FAA-RD-77-100 (PDF) (Report). U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 24, 2020. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  11. ↑ 14 CFR 33.19
  12. ↑ 29 FR 7453
  13. 1 2 "AC 33-1: Turbine Engine Foreign Object Ingestion and Rotor Blade Containment Type Certification Procedures". Federal Aviation Agency. June 24, 1965. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  14. ↑ AC 33-1A: Turbine Engine Foreign Object Ingestion and Rotor Blade Containment Type Certification Procedures, Federal Aviation Agency, June 19, 1968
  15. 1 2 3 "AC 33-1B (Cancelled) - Turbine Engine Foreign Object Ingestion and Rotor Blade Containment Type Certification Procedures". Federal Aviation Administration. April 22, 1970. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  16. ↑ 49 FR 6851
  17. ↑ Aircraft Accident Report: United Airlines Flight 232, McDonnell Douglas DC-10-10, Sioux Gateway Airport, Sioux City, Iowa, July 19, 1989 | NTSB/AAR-90/06 (PDF) (Report). National Transportation Safety Board. November 1, 1990. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  18. ↑ 14 CFR 33.75
  19. ↑ 72 FR 50867
  20. ↑ 71 FR 5769
  21. ↑ 71 FR 40675
  22. ↑ "Amendment 13 to the Joint Aviation Requirements for Engines" (PDF). Joint Aviation Authorities. November 1, 2004. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 26, 2006.
  23. ↑ "CS-E / Initial issue". European Aviation Safety Agency. October 24, 2003. Retrieved 10 March 2021.
  24. ↑ "CS-E Amendment 6". European Aviation Safety Agency. July 1, 2020. Retrieved 10 March 2021. direct URL
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.