Clusters of Innovation

Last updated

Clusters of Innovations (COI) have been defined in 2015 as "global economic hot spots where new technologies germinate at an astounding rate and where pools of capital, expertise, and talent foster the development of new industries and new ways of doing business." [1]

Contents

Concept

The definition of a clusters of innovation (COI) is an evolution of the original concept of Business cluster which Michael Porter had proposed in 1990 as a "Geographically proximate group of interconnected companies and associated institutions in a particular field" [2]

The most noticeable difference is the term innovation, which did not appear in the 1990 concept, although implied, because companies and other entities within the ecosystem and their relationships stimulate the development of new technologies and accelerate learning. [3] Porter's emphasis was on competitive advantage achieved through easier access to skills, suppliers, customers, specialized information, and complementary products and services which leads to lower costs and higher quality. In Porter's definition "industrial homogeneity" was a crucial aspect to distinguish amongst clusters, e.g. leather fashion, wine, microelectronics. [4]

COI combines the previous concept of business cluster, enriched with new findings and analytical tools to better understand the level of dynamism of some clusters, above all Silicon Valley, the continued emergence of start ups, the continued generation of ideas and solutions and the "blooming" of more industrial fields within the cluster. [1]

Clusters of innovation can also cause leapfrogging to occur.

Features

The COI is a "special ecosystem"[ according to whom? ] hinges on the interrelation between a number factors:[ citation needed ]

Synergy with educational and research institutions

Educational and research institutions, in particular universities can foster innovation as knowledge creation and diffusion centers, providing companies with valuable background expertise and skilled workers, and being a source of entrepreneurial activities and entrepreneurs that these activities generate. [5]

Universities reinforce an entrepreneurial culture by fostering creativity, experimentation, risk and acceptance of business failure. At Silicon Valley both local universities, Stanford and Berkeley, played a key role. Stanford University's dean, Frederick Emmons Terman was very active in fostering entrepreneurial initiatives, by offering support, collaboration and networking, but also in undertaking directly commercial activities. Stanford university's decision in 1951 to open the Stanford Research Park on its land was a milestone in the development of Silicon Valley and gave numerous firms the opportunity to settle in a stimulating and prosperous environment. Berkley was more devoted to produce high quality research and education, which resulted in the creation of a new generation of entrepreneurs like the founders of Intel. [1]

Support from public institutions

Although the artificious creation of business agglomerations has often proven unsuccessful, public institutions, beside nationwide programs and policies, have significantly contributed to the development of localized clusters through various measures such as resources provision, investments and commissioning. [5]

Research shows that support from government and public institutions can take more shapes. In some cases, public institutions' impact on clusters has been indirect. For example, the investments of the US Defence department in Silicon Valley helped the initial development of the incipient electronic industry. In other cases, public institutions have been more active either by fostering the growth of existing clusters, through infrastructure development, universities funding and provision of grants and loans, or by transforming and equipping a geographical area to host a new cluster as for example in Barcelona where the creation of the business district 22@ was the result of an extensive urban renewal of the neighbourhood Poblenou. [1]

Access to financing

Many examples show that the traditional bank oriented finance system is a severe hindrance to innovative entrepreneurship as it tends to be very risk averse. Innovation clusters need players who help translate creativity into commercial innovation which means on the one hand placing the emphasis on opportunities rather than on safe investment and on the other hand providing companies with business support. This model, which describes how venture capital firms operate, is vital to nurture the multitude of entrepreneurial activities of a business cluster. [1] [5]

The presence of multinational companies

Despite their image of powerful entities overshadowing smaller payers, multinational companies often have provided valuable contribution to business clusters through R&D, training and development for local workers and spin off companies. [5] This contribution has recently received a further boost with the emergence of the open innovation model which promotes ideas and knowledge sharing as a means to generate improvement and win-win outcomes.

Interpersonal networks

The close proximity of the various players of an innovation cluster fosters a flow of interactions which facilitates all activities connected with entrepreneurship such as recruitment, supply, financing and business development. [6] Amongst several factors, an element which has been the focus of attention of many researchers, as closely associated with innovation, is knowledge sharing. [5] An interesting analysis of this concept proposes the distinction between "Component knowledge" and "Architectural knowledge". [7]

Component knowledge refers to identifiable parts of the organization and can be broken down into distinctive areas, such as engineering, design, scientific, etc. This knowledge is relatively easy to transfer.

Architectural knowledge is the unique knowledge that the organization develops to coordinate the overall system and integrate its component knowledge. Since this knowledge is tightly tied with the organization history and identity, it tends to remain private. However, through interactions and informal contacts the firms within a cluster develop a "cluster level architectural knowledge" [7] which oversees all their interdependencies. This knowledge facilitates the transfer, absorption and utilization of component knowledge among the companies of the cluster and at the same time makes it more difficult for external companies to access it and as such accelerates innovation within the cluster and provides it with an advantage towards external competitors. [7]

Shared values and alignment of interests

An agglomeration of firms becomes an ecosystem when a set of recognized formal and informal rules and norms is in place. The former are subordinate to the latter as they tend to mirror values and codes of conduct which informally govern the interactions amongst the actors of the system. [8] Crucial for the establishment and prosperity of entrepreneurial activities is a culture that promotes venture, risk and accepts business failure. An innovation cluster requires an even stronger propensity towards these values as they are instrumental for "the germination of new technologies at an astounding rate". Likewise this high degree of dynamism is achieved in an atmosphere of trust, informal interactions and collaboration accompanied by alignment of interests at all levels. At firm's level hierarchical layers become blurred as well as the boundaries between ownership and workforce. Contribution from all parties is encouraged as a means to generate innovation and compensation mechanisms are designed for this purpose. The traditional wage and benefits system is replaced by new reward measures which include equity participation. Stock options plans facilitate and reinforce the perception of a common path between founders, managers and employees. At inter-firm level the sophistication of the pursued objectives together with a global vision favour not only partnerships between suppliers and customers and complementary transactions but also horizontal cooperation between competitors who benefit from each other's contribution to lay the foundations for new horizons. Finally, firms and investors are also aligned. Venture capitalists share the destiny of their clients for part of their journey and provide them with their business expertise while, at the same time, adding further motivational grip through staged funding supply and other financial measures. [9]

Mobility of people

Innovation requires a constant movement of people who transfer their skills, experiences and knowledge across entities stepping from a setting to another, for example from education to employment, from employment to entrepreneurship, from entrepreneurship to venture capital etc. However, to attain the amount of energy, creativity and mix of talents necessary to empower the cluster with innovative drive, internal mobility must be accompanied by an inflow of external resources from other geographical areas within and outside the country. [5]

Being global

The employment of foreign workers within the cluster shows its openness but it does not explain another element incorporated in the definition of COI: being global. This means looking at the entire globe as a market from the very beginning despite taking advantage of local conditions. But it also means international exchange of resources and synergies through Networks of COI (NCOI) defined as "connections between individuals, firms, universities, research centers, and other organizations in geographically dispersed COI". [9] Three types of international linkages have been identified:

Super-COI

Through covalent bonds and long-distance relationships two or more clusters can engage in such a close collaboration that they could be assimilated to a single cluster or to a "Super Cluster of Innovation (Super-COI)". [9] Two examples are the Silicon Valley-Taiwan and Silicon Valley-Israel Super Clusters. The first is the result of social and professional connections that Taiwanese people returning home from Silicon Valley brought with them and consequent specialisation of the Taiwanese cluster as product manufacturer for Silicon Valley firms. The second stems from the traditional ties between US and Israel's large pool of engineering and scientific resources with subsequent specialisation of Israel as R&D centre hosting and providing support to Silicon Valley's companies. [1]

Implications

The above factors have been observed as important ingredients for an innovation cluster. This could suggest that the replication of these conditions would be sufficient to create a successful cluster. In reality there is no one size- fits all solution. There are considerable economic, political, cultural and institutional differences between geographic areas which strongly influence the shape and development of clusters.

A clear and strong commitment towards entrepreneurship and innovation is not sufficient without fertile ground in respect of infrastructure, education, social values, legal system etc. However even where all the basic conditions seem to exist there could be specific aspects which block the process of spontaneous formation of innovation clusters. For example, in Germany till 1990s government attention was mainly directed towards the traditional sector. This together with a bank oriented financial system and a culture of low inclination towards risk prevented the creation of an in-house Silicon Valley model. Since then a great deal of measures to overcome these obstacles have been adopted although the distance with Silicon Valley remains considerable. [10]

There are more recipes to build a successful innovation cluster and the factors described above play to some extent and at some point an important role although their dosage varies. The input from external actors, in particular public institutions, can be pivotal as a means of cluster generation and development but cannot overturn the rule that innovation is a bottom up process.

See also

Related Research Articles

The knowledge economy is an economic system in which the production of goods and services is based principally on knowledge-intensive activities that contribute to advancement in technical and scientific innovation. The key element of value is the greater dependence on human capital and intellectual property for the source of the innovative ideas, information and practices. Organisations are required to capitalise this "knowledge" into their production to stimulate and deepen the business development process. There is less reliance on physical input and natural resources. A knowledge-based economy relies on the crucial role of intangible assets within the organisations' settings in facilitating modern economic growth.

Business incubator is an organization that helps startup companies and individual entrepreneurs to develop their businesses by providing a fullscale range of services starting with management training and office space and ending with venture capital financing. The National Business Incubation Association (NBIA) defines business incubators as a catalyst tool for either regional or national economic development. NBIA categorizes its members' incubators by the following five incubator types: academic institutions; non-profit development corporations; for-profit property development ventures; venture capital firms, and a combination of the above.

A technopole, commonly referred to as a high-technology cluster, refers to a center of high-tech manufacturing and information-based quaternary industry. The term was coined by Allen J. Scott in 1990 to describe regions in Southern California which showed a rapid growth in high technology fields. This term now has a broader scope to describe regions worldwide dedicated to technological innovation. Such regions can be centers of rapid economic and technological growth as a result of agglomeration effects.

Intrapreneurship is the act of behaving like an entrepreneur while working within a large organization. Intrapreneurship is known as the practice of a corporate management style that integrates risk-taking and innovation approaches, as well as the reward and motivational techniques, that are more traditionally thought of as being the province of entrepreneurship.

Entrepreneurship education seeks to provide students with the knowledge, skills and motivation to encourage entrepreneurial success in a variety of settings.

A business cluster is a geographic concentration of interconnected businesses, suppliers, and associated institutions in a particular field. Clusters are considered to increase the productivity with which companies can compete, nationally and globally. Accounting is a part of the business cluster. In urban studies, the term agglomeration is used. Clusters are also important aspects of strategic management.

Zoltan J. Acs is an American economist. He is Professor of Management at The London School of Economics (LSE), and a professor at George Mason University, where he teaches in the Schar School of Policy and Government and is the Director of the Center for Entrepreneurship and Public Policy. He is also a visiting professor at Imperial College Business School in London and affiliated with the University of Pecs in Hungary. He is co-editor and founder of Small Business Economics, a leading academic journal.

Within international business, the diamond model, also known as Porter's Diamond or the Porter Diamond Theory of National Advantage, describes a nation's competitive advantage in the international market. In this model, four attributes are taken into consideration: factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries, and firm strategy, structure, and rivalry. According to Michael Porter, the model's creator, "These determinants create the national environment in which companies are born and learn how to compete."

The Edinburgh Stanford Link is a £6 million, 5 year initiative funded by Scottish Enterprise to foster collaborative research and commercialisation links between the Human Communication Research Centre at the University of Edinburgh and the Center for the Study of Language and Information at Stanford University. Starting in Feb 2002, the programme focuses on speech and language processing technology. There are two core parts to the Link, the commercial programme and the student programme. The former focuses on working with commercial companies and the latter focuses on fostering a culture of entrepreneurship within the University of Edinburgh. They are located in Level 8 in Appleton Tower, Crichton Street, Edinburgh.

Innovation economics is new and growing field of economic theory and applied and experimental economics that emphasizes innovation and entrepreneurship. It comprises both the application of any type of innovations, especially technological, but not only, into economic use, in classical economics this is the application of customer new technology into economic use; but also it could refer to the field of innovation and experimental economics that refers the new economic science developments that may be considered innovative. In his 1942 book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, economist Joseph Schumpeter introduced the notion of an innovation economy. He argued that evolving institutions, entrepreneurs and technological changes were at the heart of economic growth. However, it is only in recent years that "innovation economy," grounded in Schumpeter's ideas, has become a mainstream concept".

Knowledge spillover is an exchange of ideas among individuals. In knowledge management economics, knowledge spillovers are non-rival knowledge market costs incurred by a party not agreeing to assume the costs that has a spillover effect of stimulating technological improvements in a neighbor through one's own innovation. Such innovations often come from specialization within an industry.

Entrepreneurship is the creation or extraction of value. With this definition, entrepreneurship is viewed as change, generally entailing risk beyond what is normally encountered in starting a business, which may include other values than simply economic ones.

The technological innovation system is a concept developed within the scientific field of innovation studies which serves to explain the nature and rate of technological change. A Technological Innovation System can be defined as ‘a dynamic network of agents interacting in a specific economic/industrial area under a particular institutional infrastructure and involved in the generation, diffusion, and utilization of technology’.

Cluster theory is a theory of strategy.

Science-to-business marketing entails the marketing of research conducted at research institutions, particularly universities, to industry or other interested parties. The acronym S2B follows a series of marketing acronyms used to shorten and popularise marketing specialisations, including (B2C) and (B2B).

East London Tech City Human settlement in England

East London Tech City is the term for a technology cluster of high-tech companies located in East London, England. Its main area lies broadly between St Luke's and Hackney Road, with an accelerator space for spinout companies at the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park.

An entrepreneurial ecosystems or entrepreneurship ecosystems are peculiar systems of interdependent actors and relations directly or indirectly supporting the creation and growth of new ventures.

Philicon Valley is a neologism for Philadelphia's version of Silicon Valley. Forbes Magazine coined the term on November 17, 1999 to refer specifically to the suburbs of Valley Forge and Wayne, Pennsylvania, which was also referred to as "Silicon Valley Forge" and "E-Valley Forge." In the Delaware Valley, many "... new-economy companies have located themselves in the suburbs along Route 202..." due to the high tax base in the city of Philadelphia. From a marketing perspective, the term has been used by Internet companies to lure potential employees in the tech sector, that markets the firm as part of a large community of like companies in a suburb of Philadelphia. "Pennsylvania Dutch Country is only about a 90 minute drive away..." noting that the area is home to "... large high-tech companies..." The lure in the region has many Penn graduates, as well as other graduates do not consider Philadelphia to be the "hot spot" and some have chosen this region as an alternative. A briefing on the region, says the area contributes to Pennsylvania being ranked eighth in hi tech employing more than 170,000 according to the Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania, WHYY-TV, and the Council for Urban Economic Development.

Innovation districts are zones in cities where public and private actors work to attract entrepreneurs, startups, business incubators, generally with the aim of revitalizing depressed downtown areas. The first, 22@ in Barcelona, Spain, was launched in 2000; as of 2019, there are more than 80 worldwide.

The triple helix model of innovation refers to a set of interactions between academia, industry and government, to foster economic and social development, as described in concepts such as the knowledge economy and knowledge society. In innovation helical framework theory, each sector is represented by a circle (helix), with overlapping showing interactions. The initial modelling has advanced from two dimensions to show more complex interactions, for example over time. The framework was first theorized by Henry Etzkowitz and Loet Leydesdorff in the 1990s, with the publication of “The Triple Helix, University-Industry-Government Relations: A laboratory for Knowledge-Based Economic Development”. Interactions between universities, industries and governments have given rise to new intermediary institutions, such as technology transfer offices and science parks, and Etzkowitz and Ledersdorff theorized the relationship between the three sectors and explained the emergence of these new hybrid organizations. The triple helix innovation framework has been widely adopted and as applied by policy makers has participated in the transformation of each sector.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Engel, Jerome S, "Global Clusters of Innovation: lessons from Silicon Valley", California Management Review, winter 2015, Vol. 57 Issue 2, pp. 36-65
  2. ↑ Porter M., "The Competitive Advantage of Nations", Harvard Business Review, March–April 1990, pp. 83-84
  3. ↑ Michael E. Porter Clusters and the New Economics of Competition Harvard Business Review. November–December 1998. retrieved 3 August 2018
  4. ↑ Porter M., Delgado M. and Stern S., "Clusters and entrepreneurship", Journal of Economic Geography 10, 2010, pp. 495-518
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Breschi S. and Malerba F., "The Geography of Innovation and Economic Clustering: Some Introductory Notes", Oxford University Press, Industrial and Corporate Change Volume 10, Number 4, 2001, pp. 817-833.
  6. ↑ Muro M. and Katz B., "The New cluster moment: how regional innovation clusters can foster the next economy", Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings, September 2010, pp. 1-59
  7. 1 2 3 Tallman S., Jenkins M., Henry N. and Pinch S., "Knowledge, Clusters, and Competitive Advantage", The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, Apr., 2004, pp. 258-271
  8. ↑ Turró A., Urbano D. and Peris-Ortiz M., "Culture and innovation: The moderating effect of cultural values on corporate entrepreneurship", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 88, October 2014, pp. 360–369
  9. 1 2 3 4 Engel S. and del-Palacio I., "Global Networks of Clusters of Innovation: Accelerating the Innovation Process", Business Horizons, 52/5, September 2009, pp.493-503
  10. ↑ Debackere K. and Andries P., "Policies to Stimulate Regional Innovation Capabilities via University-Industry Collaboration: An Analysis and an Assessment", R&D Management, March 2003, Vol. 33, pp. 209-229
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.