Code of Conduct for Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States

Last updated
Code of Conduct for Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States
Code of Conduct for Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.pdf
PresentedNovember 13, 2023
Date effective November 13, 2023
Signatories John G. Roberts, Jr., Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett, Ketanji Brown Jackson
SubjectCode of Conduct
Full Text
Wikisource-logo.svg Code of Conduct for Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States at Wikisource

The Code of Conduct for Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States was issued on November 13, 2023, to set "ethics rules and principles that guide the conduct" of the members of the Supreme Court. It is the first time in its history that the court has adopted a code of conduct.

Contents

The 14-page document defined five canons of conduct, discussing issues of receiving gifts, disqualification, and the participation of justices in outside activities such as speaking and teaching. [1] The code has received criticism for being relatively weak compared to the rest of the judicial, legislative and executive branches while lacking enforcement mechanisms.

Background

The code was issued during a time when the court faced great criticism, especially around the conduct of justice Clarence Thomas. It was shown that he received undisclosed gifts of luxury travel [2] and that he was involved with cases that were related to the political activities of his wife, Ginni Thomas, who worked to overturn the 2020 election results in the weeks leading up to the January 6 Capitol attack. [3]

Content

The code of conduct consists of five basic "canons" which include:

  1. A Justice Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary
  2. A Justice Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities.
  3. A Justice Should Perform the Duties of Office Fairly, Impartially, and Diligently.
  4. A Justice May Engage in Extrajudicial Activities Consistent with the Obligations of the Judicial Office.
  5. A Justice Should Refrain from Political Activity.

Reactions

A number of sitting justices have expressed public support for the adoption of a code of conduct, including Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. [4] Some critics of the Court's ethics have acknowledged the Code as a significant first step toward improving the Court's conduct and perception. [5]

Criticism

The code has been criticized for lacking enforcement mechanisms and being self-policed. [6] [7] [8] ProPublica compared the lack of a process to the one for lower-court judges that are subject to an oversight panel of other judges who review their actions against a separate Code of Conduct for federal judges. ProPublica also described the new rules as being in many ways more lenient than the ones for the legislative and the executive branches. [9] Others have criticized the court's denial of past wrongdoing in the new code, which might work to legitimize some of the scandals from the past and future. [10] [11]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the United States</span> Highest court of jurisdiction in the United States

The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all federal court cases, and over state court cases that involve a point of U.S. constitutional or federal law. It also has original jurisdiction over a narrow range of cases, specifically "all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party." The court holds the power of judicial review, the ability to invalidate a statute for violating a provision of the Constitution. It is also able to strike down presidential directives for violating either the Constitution or statutory law. However, it may act only within the context of a case in an area of law over which it has jurisdiction. The court may decide cases having political overtones, but has ruled that it does not have power to decide non-justiciable political questions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist Society</span> American conservative legal organization

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies (FedSoc) is an American conservative and libertarian legal organization that advocates for a textualist and originalist interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., it has chapters at more than 200 law schools and features student, lawyer, and faculty divisions; the lawyers division comprises more than 70,000 practicing attorneys in ninety cities. Through speaking events, lectures, and other activities, it provides a forum for legal experts of opposing views to interact with members of the legal profession, the judiciary, and the legal academy. It is one of the most influential legal organizations in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal justice</span> Justice to those who have committed crimes

Criminal justice is the delivery of justice to those who have been accused of committing crimes. The criminal justice system is a series of government agencies and institutions. Goals include the rehabilitation of offenders, preventing other crimes, and moral support for victims. The primary institutions of the criminal justice system are the police, prosecution and defense lawyers, the courts and the prisons system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prosecutor</span> Legal profession

A prosecutor is a legal representative of the prosecution in states with either the common law adversarial system or the civil law inquisitorial system. The prosecution is the legal party responsible for presenting the case in a criminal trial against the defendant, an individual accused of breaking the law. Typically, the prosecutor represents the state or the government in the case brought against the accused person.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Bar Association</span> American association of lawyers

The American Bar Association (ABA) is a voluntary bar association of lawyers and law students; it is not specific to any jurisdiction in the United States. Founded in 1878, the ABA's stated activities are the setting of academic standards for law schools, and the formulation of model ethical codes related to the legal profession. As of fiscal year 2017, the ABA had 194,000 dues-paying members, constituting approximately 14.4% of American attorneys. In 1979, half of all lawyers in the U.S. were members of the ABA. The organization's national headquarters are in Chicago, Illinois, and it also maintains a significant branch office in Washington, D.C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samuel Alito</span> US Supreme Court justice since 2006 (born 1950)

Samuel Anthony Alito Jr. is an American jurist who serves as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was nominated to the high court by President George W. Bush on October 31, 2005, and has served on it since January 31, 2006. After Antonin Scalia, Alito is the second Italian American justice to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian Judicial Council</span>

The Canadian Judicial Council is the national council of the judiciary of Canada, overseeing the country's federal judges.

Leonard Anthony Leo is an American lawyer and conservative legal activist. He was the longtime vice president of the Federalist Society and is currently, along with Steven Calabresi, the co-chairman of the organization's board of directors. Leo has been instrumental in building a network of influential conservative legal groups funded mostly by anonymous donors, including The 85 Fund and Concord Fund, which serve as funding hubs for affiliated political nonprofits. He assisted Clarence Thomas in his Supreme Court confirmation hearings and led campaigns to support the nominations of John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 Colorado Amendment 41</span>

Amendment 41 is a citizen initiative adopted by Colorado voters in the 2006 general election. Amendment 41 has three main sections.

The Supreme Court Historical Society (SCHS) is a Washington, D.C.-based private, nonpartisan, not for profit 501(c)(3) membership organization dedicated to preserving and communicating the history of the U.S. Supreme Court, increasing public awareness of the Court’s contribution to our nation’s rich constitutional heritage, and acquiring knowledge covering the history of the entire Judicial Branch. In its Opperman House Library, the Society houses collections of judicial biographies, Justices’ writings, and histories of the Court. The Society was founded in 1974 by U.S. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, who acted as its first honorary chairman until his death in 1995.

Martin Edward Whelan III is an American lawyer, legal activist and political commentator. Whelan's legal career included clerking for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and serving as a deputy assistant attorney general during the George W. Bush administration. From 2004 to 2021, he served as the president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, a conservative think tank "dedicated to applying the Judeo-Christian moral tradition to critical issues of public policy".

Legal advertising is advertising by lawyers (attorneys), solicitors and law firms. Legal marketing is a broader term referring to advertising and other practices, including client relations, social media, and public relations. It's a type of marketing undertaken by law firms, lawyers (attorneys) and solicitors that aims to promote the services of law firms and increase their brand awareness.

Judicial misconduct occurs when a judge acts in ways that are considered unethical or otherwise violate the judge's obligations of impartial conduct.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP is an American multinational law firm headquartered in Los Angeles, California. Founded in 1890, the firm includes approximately 1,400 attorneys and 1,000 staff located in 20 offices around the world, including North and South America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. The firm is known for its litigation practice, and in particular its strength in appellate law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brett Kavanaugh</span> US Supreme Court justice since 2018 (born 1965)

Brett Michael Kavanaugh is an American lawyer and jurist serving as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was nominated by President Donald Trump on July 9, 2018, and has served since October 6, 2018. He was previously a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clarence Thomas</span> U.S. Supreme Court justice since 1991 (born 1948)

Clarence Thomas is an American lawyer and jurist who serves as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. He was nominated by President George H. W. Bush to succeed Thurgood Marshall and has served since 1991. After Marshall, Thomas is the second African American to serve on the Supreme Court and has been its longest-serving member since Anthony Kennedy's retirement in 2018. Since Stephen Breyer's retirement in 2022, he is also the Court's oldest member.

The American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC) are a set of rules and commentaries on the ethical and professional responsibilities of members of the legal profession in the United States. Although the MRPC generally is not binding law in and of itself, it is intended to be a model for state regulators of the legal profession to adopt, while leaving room for state-specific adaptations. All fifty states and the District of Columbia have adopted legal ethics rules based at least in part on the MRPC.

Harlan Rogers Crow is an American-Kittitian real estate developer. He is the former chairman and CEO of the Trammell Crow Company, which was founded by his father, Trammell Crow. His father was described as the “largest landlord in the United States” by Forbes magazine.

Legal ghostwriting is a form of unbundled legal services in the United States in which an attorney drafts a document on behalf of a client without formally appearing before the court. Instead, the client represents themself pro se.

Burson v. Freeman, 504 U.S. 191 (1992), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Tennessee law that restricted political campaigning within 100 feet of a polling place did not violate the First Amendment.

References

  1. Hurley, Lawrence (2023-11-13). "Supreme Court adopts code of conduct amid ethics scrutiny". NBC News. Retrieved 2023-11-13.
  2. Chung, Andrew; Kruzel, John (2023-10-26). "Clarence Thomas loan report spurs new ethics criticism of US Supreme Court". Reuters. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
  3. VanSickle, Abbie; Liptak, Adam (November 13, 2023). "Supreme Court Adopts Ethics Code After Reports of Undisclosed Gifts and Travel". The New York Times .
  4. Berman, Dan (2023-11-13). "Supreme Court attempts to address ethics concerns with new code of conduct but leaves many questions unanswered | CNN Politics". CNN. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
  5. "The Supreme Court's code of conduct is a good first step". The Economist. ISSN   0013-0613 . Retrieved 2023-12-02.
  6. Sherman, Mark (2023-11-13). "The Supreme Court says it is adopting a code of ethics, but it has no means of enforcement". AP News. Retrieved 2023-11-13.
  7. Pilkington, Ed (2023-11-13). "US supreme court announces ethics code amid pressure over gift scandals". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2023-11-13.
  8. Gerstein, Josh (2023-11-13). "6 things to know about the Supreme Court's new ethics code". POLITICO. Retrieved 2023-11-14.
  9. Kaplan, Joshua; Elliot, Justin; Murphy, Brett; Mierjeski, Alex (November 13, 2023). "The Supreme Court Has Adopted a Conduct Code, but Who Will Enforce It?". ProPublica.
  10. Gersen, Jeannie Suk (2023-11-21). "The Supreme Court's Self-Excusing Ethics Code". The New Yorker. ISSN   0028-792X . Retrieved 2023-11-23.
  11. Millhiser, Ian (2023-11-14). "The Supreme Court's new ethics code is a joke". Vox. Archived from the original on November 15, 2023. Retrieved 2023-11-15.