Contingent contract

Last updated December 06, 2022

A contingent contract is an agreement that states which actions under certain conditions will result in specific outcomes.^[1] Contingent contracts usually occur when negotiating parties fail to reach an agreement. The contract is characterized as "contingent" because the terms are not final and are based on certain events or conditions occurring.^[2]

A contingent contract can also be viewed as protection against a future change of plans.^[2] Contingent contracts can also lead to effective agreement when each party has different time preferences. For example, one party may desire immediate payoffs, while the other party may be interested in more long-term payoffs.^[1] Further, contingency contracts can foster an agreement in negotiations involving resolute differences of expectations about the future.^[2] Section 31, chapter III of the Indian contract act of 1872 defines a contingent contract.

Use

Contingent contracts can be used in many types of settings such as work, school, home, etc. In regards to work, a common example of contingent contracts comes in the form of job negotiations. It usually involves the opportunity to discuss salary, position, promotion, etc. However, contingent contracts can often include negotiations regarding flextime, job sharing, responsibilities, etc. Although contingent contracts concerning employment packages are more the exception than the norm, these types of negotiations can be very successful, allowing both parties to walk away feeling very satisfied with the newly agreed upon arrangement.^[3]

The following examples are everyday agreements that may occur in the workplace:

The employee and employer agree on a 1% bonus increase at the end of the year if the employee receives all excellent marks on her performance review.
The employee will be allowed to work two days a week from home after having worked at the company for one year, and if he submits all reports on time.
The employee will receive full insurance coverage after having worked at the company for one full year, with less than five sick days.^[4]

The following example illustrates a behavioral contract between a teenager and parents to be used in the home:

The teenager agrees to attend all classes, complete homework on time, return home before curfew, communicate with parents in a respectful manner, etc.
If the teenager violates any of the agreed upon rules, he will choose to suffer the consequences which involve being grounded, no television or Internet, not using the family car, etc.
The parents agree that if the teenager performs the agreed upon behaviors, then the teenager will be able to keep his privileges.

A contingent contract can be used to create enormous benefit to both parties. One advantage would be that it limits the loss that would occur if the contract failed. Another would be that it wouldn't make one party gain more at the expense of the other. This leads to an increase in trust between both parties, which would allow them to have more beneficial negotiations in the future.^[2]

Features

In order to be most effective, contingent contracts should possess some of the following characteristics:

The objectives for each party involved must be aligned.^[1]
The promise is based on an uncertain event: the action required of one party is only dependent upon the occurrence of some event in the future.^[5]
The event must be minor to the contract: the performance of a promise is not the event; rather it is part of the contract.^[5]
The event is independent of the promising party: the occurrence of an event is not controlled by the promising party's will or desire.^[5]
The agreements should be formalized in writing with appropriate legal counsel.
The parties must mutually decide how the terms of agreement will be measured.^[1]

A contingency contract can also be viewed as protection against a future change of plans

Value

Necessary is because the contract is built on expected differences from each party. Each party can leverage their differences through bets that lead to both sides winning.^[2] However, contingent contracts do not increase integrative value, rather they affect distribution value.^[6] Contingency contracts can create value by causing each negotiating party to stop arguing about their different beliefs. Both parties will be better off because they are each confident in their beliefs, ideas or projections.^[2]

Risks and challenges

Contingency contracts can be beneficial for both parties by producing value and motivating performance, however there are some situations in which contingency contracts are not the best solution. Here are some limitations:^[2]

Contingency contracts could be threatening if the other party possesses or has access to more valuable information than you. For example, it would be unfair if one party wanted to bet on the basis of ratings because they have better access to that information.
Contingency contracts can be risky if both parties are not in agreement of how to measure objectively. For example, define clearly what it means to promote an employee "if she does well" because each party may have different ideas or opinions about whether the contract has been met. This can lead to disagreement, which can cause great distress to the relationship between the parties.^[6]
Contingency contracts can be dangerous if there are unequal incentives for each party. For example, there should be incentives for both parties to act in ways that are compatible with your agreement, thereby creating a win-win situation for both parties.

Related Research Articles

A non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is a legal contract or part of a contract between at least two parties that outlines confidential material, knowledge, or information that the parties wish to share with one another for certain purposes, but wish to restrict access to. Doctor–patient confidentiality, attorney–client privilege, priest–penitent privilege and bank–client confidentiality agreements are examples of NDAs, which are often not enshrined in a written contract between the parties.

Negotiation is a dialogue between two or more people or parties to reach the desired outcome regarding one or more issues of conflict. It is an interaction between entities who aspire to agree on matters of mutual interest. The agreement can be beneficial for all or some of the parties involved. The negotiators should establish their own needs and wants while also seeking to understand the wants and needs of others involved to increase their chances of closing deals, avoiding conflicts, forming relationships with other parties, or maximizing mutual gains.

In negotiation theory, the best alternative to a negotiated agreement or BATNA refers to the most advantageous alternative course of action a party can take if negotiations fail and an agreement cannot be reached. The BATNA could include diverse situations, such as suspension of negotiations, transition to another negotiating partner, appeal to the court's ruling, the execution of strikes, and the formation of other forms of alliances. BATNA is the key focus and the driving force behind a successful negotiator. A party should generally not accept a worse resolution than its BATNA. Care should be taken, however, to ensure that deals are accurately valued, taking into account all considerations, such as relationship value, time value of money and the likelihood that the other party will live up to their side of the bargain. These other considerations are often difficult to value since they are frequently based on uncertain or qualitative considerations rather than easily measurable and quantifiable factors.

In the social sciences, bargaining or haggling is a type of negotiation in which the buyer and seller of a good or service debate the price or nature of a transaction. If the bargaining produces agreement on terms, the transaction takes place.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hedge (finance)</span> Concept in investing

A hedge is an investment position intended to offset potential losses or gains that may be incurred by a companion investment. A hedge can be constructed from many types of financial instruments, including stocks, exchange-traded funds, insurance, forward contracts, swaps, options, gambles, many types of over-the-counter and derivative products, and futures contracts.

The principal–agent problem refers to the conflict in interests and priorities that arises when one person or entity takes actions on behalf of another person or entity. The problem worsens when there is a greater discrepancy of interests and information between the principal and agent, as well as when the principal lacks the means to punish the agent. The deviation from the principal's interest by the agent is called "agency costs".

A psychological contract, a concept developed in contemporary research by organizational scholar Denise Rousseau, represents the mutual beliefs, perceptions and informal obligations between an employer and an employee. It sets the dynamics for the relationship and defines the detailed practicality of the work to be done. It is distinguishable from the formal written contract of employment which, for the most part, only identifies mutual duties and responsibilities in a generalized form.

An employment contract or contract of employment is a kind of contract used in labour law to attribute rights and responsibilities between parties to a bargain. The contract is between an "employee" and an "employer". It has arisen out of the old master-servant law, used before the 20th century. Employment contracts relies on the concept of authority, in which the employee agrees to accept the authority of the employer and in exchange, the employer agrees to pay the employee a stated wage.

A real estate contract is a contract between parties for the purchase and sale, exchange, or other conveyance of real estate. The sale of land is governed by the laws and practices of the jurisdiction in which the land is located. Real estate called leasehold estate is actually a rental of real property such as an apartment, and leases cover such rentals since they typically do not result in recordable deeds. Freehold conveyances of real estate are covered by real estate contracts, including conveying fee simple title, life estates, remainder estates, and freehold easements. Real estate contracts are typically bilateral contracts and should have the legal requirements specified by contract law in general and should also be in writing to be enforceable.

The foundations of negotiation theory are decision analysis, behavioral decision-making, game theory, and negotiation analysis. Another classification of theories distinguishes between Structural Analysis, Strategic Analysis, Process Analysis, Integrative Analysis and behavioral analysis of negotiations.

The theory of the firm consists of a number of economic theories that explain and predict the nature of the firm, company, or corporation, including its existence, behaviour, structure, and relationship to the market. Firms are key drivers in economics, providing goods and services in return for monetary payments and rewards. Organisational structure, incentives, employee productivity, and information all influence the successful operation of a firm in the economy and within itself. As such major economic theories such as Transaction cost theory, Managerial economics and Behavioural theory of the firm will allow for an in-depth analysis on various firm and management types.

A contingent fee is any fee for services provided where the fee is payable only if there is a favourable result. Although such a fee may be used in many fields, it is particularly well associated with legal practice.

In economics, a complete market is a market with two conditions:

Negligible transaction costs and therefore also perfect information,
there is a price for every asset in every possible state of the world

The term zone of possible agreement (ZOPA), also known as zone of potential agreement or bargaining range, describes the range of options available to two parties involved in sales and negotiation, where the respective minimum targets of the parties overlap. Where no such overlap is given, in other words where there is no rational agreement possibility, the inverse notion of NOPA applies. Where there is a ZOPA, an agreement within the zone is rational for both sides. Outside the zone no amount of negotiation should yield an agreement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commercial property</span> Buildings or land intended to generate a profit, either from capital gain or rental income

Commercial property, also called commercial real estate, investment property or income property, is real estate intended to generate a profit, either from capital gains or rental income. Commercial property includes office buildings, medical centers, hotels, malls, retail stores, multifamily housing buildings, farm land, warehouses, and garages. In many states, residential property containing more than a certain number of units qualifies as commercial property for borrowing and tax purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Consideration</span> Concept of legal value in connection with contracts

Consideration is a concept of English common law and is a necessity for simple contracts but not for special contracts. The concept has been adopted by other common law jurisdictions.

A venture round is a type of funding round used for venture capital financing, by which startup companies obtain investment, generally from venture capitalists and other institutional investors. The availability of venture funding is among the primary stimuli for the development of new companies and technologies.

In business dealings, transactions often occur that include variables based on future events that can be difficult to ascertain As these transactions are contingent on payments that occur in the future, and the total selling price cannot be determined as of the end of the taxable year of the sale, they are known as Contingent Payment Sales. Because of the uncertainty surrounding the final amounts of these transactions, they are difficult to evaluate for the purpose of tax liability. Section 483 of the Internal Revenue Code provides descriptions for the handling of contingent payments and interest on contingent payments.

In finance, a contingent claim is a derivative whose future payoff depends on the value of another “underlying” asset, or more generally, that is dependent on the realization of some uncertain future event. These are so named, since there is only a payoff under certain contingencies. Any derivative instrument that is not a contingent claim is called a forward commitment.

Naïve cynicism is a philosophy of mind, cognitive bias and form of psychological egoism that occurs when people naïvely expect more egocentric bias in others than actually is the case.

References

1 2 3 4 Thompson, Leigh (2012). The Truth About Negotiations. FT Press. ISBN 978-0133353440.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Bazerman, M. H.; Gillespie, J. J. (1999). "Betting on the Future: The Virtues of Contingent Contracts". Harvard Business Review. 77 (5): 155–160. PMID 10621265.
↑ Kurtzberg, Terri (2011). The Essentials of Job Negotiations: Proven Strategies for Getting What You Want. Praeger. ISBN 978-0313395840.
↑ Pathak (2007-05-01). Legal Aspects Of Business. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 978-0-07-065613-0.
1 2 3 Sharma, Ashok (2017). Business Regulatory Framework. ISBN 9789380901459.
1 2 Brett, Jeanne (2007). Negotiating Globally: How to Negotiate Deals, Resolve Disputes, and Make Decisions Across Cultural Boundaries. Wiley. p. 74. ISBN 978-0787988364.

Sources

Brett, Jeanne M. Negotiating Globally: How to Negotiate Deals, Resolve Disputes, and Make Decisions Across Cultural Boundaries. John Wiley & Sons, 2007, p. 74.
Krutzberg, Terri. Naquin, Charles. The Essentials of Job Negotiations: Proven Strategies for Getting What You Want. ABC-CLIO, 2011 p. 86-87.
Malhotra, Deepak. Bazerman, Max. Negotiation Genius: How to Overcome Obstacles and Achieve Brilliant Results at the Bargaining Table and Beyond. Random House Digital, Inc, 2008, p. 69-71.
Sharma, Ashok. Business Regulatory Framework. V.K. Enterprises, 2006, p. 87.
Thompson, Leigh. The Truth About Negotiations. FT Press, 2012, p. 122-124.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[:0-1] 1 2 3 4 Thompson, Leigh (2012). The Truth About Negotiations. FT Press. ISBN 978-0133353440.

[:1-2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Bazerman, M. H.; Gillespie, J. J. (1999). "Betting on the Future: The Virtues of Contingent Contracts". Harvard Business Review. 77 (5): 155–160. PMID 10621265.

[3] Kurtzberg, Terri (2011). The Essentials of Job Negotiations: Proven Strategies for Getting What You Want. Praeger. ISBN 978-0313395840.

[4] Pathak (2007-05-01). Legal Aspects Of Business. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 978-0-07-065613-0.

[:3-5] 1 2 3 Sharma, Ashok (2017). Business Regulatory Framework. ISBN 9789380901459.

[:2-6] 1 2 Brett, Jeanne (2007). Negotiating Globally: How to Negotiate Deals, Resolve Disputes, and Make Decisions Across Cultural Boundaries. Wiley. p. 74. ISBN 978-0787988364.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]