Corning Glass Works v. Brennan | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Decided June 3, 1974 | |
Full case name | Corning Glass Works v. Brennan |
Citations | 417 U.S. 188 ( more ) |
Holding | |
Although women plaintiffs worked at different times in the day, compared to male colleagues, the working conditions were "sufficiently similar" and the discrimination claim was allowed. "Working conditions" means both "surroundings" and "hazards." | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Marshall |
Dissent | Burger, joined by Blackmun, Rehnquist |
Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
Corning Glass Works v. Brennan, 417 U.S. 188(1974), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that although women plaintiffs worked at different times in the day, compared to male colleagues, the working conditions were "sufficiently similar" and the discrimination claim was allowed. "Working conditions" means both "surroundings" and "hazards." [1]
Brennan and others, who were employed at the Corning Glass Works, claimed unlawful discrimination because men worked on night shifts and were paid more, while women were only allowed to work on day shifts and were paid less. The employer argued that there was no unequal pay, because the jobs were different: the time of day when work was performed should be considered when determining if 'working conditions' were sufficiently similar. They argued this was a legitimate defense, that pay differences result from a seniority or merit system unrelated to sex under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 USC §206(d)(1).
![]() | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2025) |
The Supreme Court issued an opinion on June 3, 1974. [1]
![]() | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (August 2025) |