Court of Pleas of the County Palatine of Durham and Sadberge

Last updated

The Court of Pleas of the County Palatine of Durham and Sadberge, [1] sometimes called the Court of Pleas or Common Pleas of or at Durham was a court of common pleas that exercised jurisdiction within the County Palatine of Durham (including the wapentake of Sadberge) until its jurisdiction was transferred to the High Court by the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873. Before the transfer of its jurisdiction, this tribunal was next in importance to the Chancery of Durham. [2] The Court of Pleas probably developed from the free court of the Bishop of Durham. [3] The Court of Pleas was clearly visible as a distinct court, separate from the Chancery, in the thirteenth century. [4]

Contents

Judges

The judges who went the Northern Circuit, and to whom a commission to take the assizes at Durham was directed, were judges of the court, and continued to be so, until another commission, directed to other judges, was issued for the next subsequent assizes; during which time, besides trying causes at the assizes, they held courts from time to time in London, for the purpose of granting and deciding upon rules, etc. And the judges of the court for the time being could make rules for regulating the proceedings in actions, and the mode and time of pleading; [5] or they or any two of them could adopt any such rules made by any of the superior courts at Westminster. [6] [7]

Officers

The prothonotary and his deputy were the principal officers on the civil side of the court; and his office at Durham was in fact the office of the court, where all the business out of court was transacted. The prothonotary had to keep three books; one, called the remembrance book, where the writs of pone and rules of court were entered; another, for entering the writs of summons and the appearances; and the third was an index of the names of the defendants in the two former. [8] The justices of the court could regulate the fees to be taken by the officers, and by the attorneys. [9] [10]

Jurisdiction

The jurisdiction of the Court of Pleas of Durham inside the county palatine included jurisdiction similar to the jurisdiction of the Court of Common Pleas at Westminster and the Court of King's Bench. [11]

Nothing contained in section 1 of the Durham (County Palatine) Act 1836 prejudiced or affected the jurisdiction of this court. [12]

Procedure

Court of Pleas of Durham Act 1839
Act of Parliament
Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (1837).svg
Long title An Act for improving the Practice and Proceedings of the Court of Pleas of the County Palatine of Durham and Sadberge.
Citation 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16
Dates
Royal assent 14 June 1839
Commencement 14 June 1839
Repealed15 August 1879
Other legislation
Amended by Statute Law Revision Act 1874 (No. 2)
Repealed by Civil Procedure Acts Repeal Act 1879
Status: Repealed

As to practice and proceedings in the Court of Pleas in Durham, see the act 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16 [13] (sometimes called Court of Pleas of Durham Act 1839), [14] the Common Law Procedure Act 1852 (15 & 16 Vict. c. 76), section 100 of the Common Law Procedure Act 1854 (17 & 18 Vict. c. 125), and the Common Law Procedure Act 1860 (23 & 24 Vict. c. 126).

Appeal

An appeal lay from this court to the Queen's Bench. [15]

Costs

From 1839, the practice and proceedings in the Court of Pleas of the county palatine of Durham and Sadberge, were in a main degree assimilated to those in the three Courts of Law at Westminster. [16] The costs for preparing pleadings in actions here, were by express enactment made the same as those of a like description in the Superior Courts. [17] Provisions were made as to the costs with respect to the admission upon the trial of written and printed documents, and copies; [18] taxation of costs; [19] costs on paying money into Court; [20] fees to the officers; [21] costs on motions for new trials in the Superior Courts; [22] on removal of judgments; [23] removal of causes; [24] on writs of false judgment; [25] and as to the expenses of witnesses; [26] and any rule of Court made here, could be made a rule of any of the Superior Courts of Law at Westminster. [27] [28]

Relevant legislation

See section 86 of the County Courts Act 1856 (19 & 20 Vict. c. 108). [29]

According to Baxter (note 61 at p 173), the principal statutes relating to Durham and its Court of Pleas included, amongst others, the following:

As to the process of Exigent in Durham, see the act 31 Eliz. 1. c. 9.

As to judgment in the Court of Pleas of Durham, see the act 8 Geo. 1. c. 25 and the Judgments Act 1838 (1 & 2 Vict. c. 110).

As to taking oaths and affidavits in Durham, see the act 4 Geo. 3. c. 21 [30]

As to order of Court of Pleas for examination of witnesses and interrogatories, see the Evidence by Commission Act 1831 (1 Will. 4. c. 22).

As to palatine jurisdiction and jura regalia transferred to the Crown, see the Durham (County Palatine) Act 1836 (6 & 7 Will. 4. c. 19).

As to the appointment of custos rotulorum in Durham, see the Durham (County Palatine) Act 1836 (6 & 7 Will 4. c. 19).

As to duties and salaries of Clerks of the Crown in Durham, see the Criminal Justice Act 1856 (19 & 20 Vict. c. 118).

As to transfer of jura regalia of Durham to Crown, see the Durham County Palatine Act 1858 (21 & 22 Vict. c. 45).

Transfer of jurisdiction to the High Court

Section 16(10) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 provided that "there shall be transferred to and vested in" the "High Court of Justice the jurisdiction which, at the commencement of this Act, was vested in, or capable of being exercised by" the Court of Pleas at Durham. [31] This provision was repealed and replaced by section 18(2)(a)(vi) of the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925, which was to the same effect.

As to prothonotaries, district prothonotaries and other officers of the Court of Pleas, see section 78 of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873. [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873</span> 1873 UK law reorganising the English court system

The Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom in 1873. It reorganised the English court system to establish the High Court and the Court of Appeal, and also originally provided for the abolition of the judicial functions of the House of Lords with respect to England. It would have retained those functions in relation to Scotland and Ireland for the time being. However, the Gladstone Liberal government fell in 1874 before the act entered into force, and the succeeding Disraeli Conservative government suspended the entry into force of the act by means of the Supreme Court of Judicature (Commencement) Act 1874 and the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1875.

The Courts of England and Wales, supported administratively by His Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service, are the civil and criminal courts responsible for the administration of justice in England and Wales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicature Acts</span> UK laws restructuring the English-Welsh court system (1873–1899)

In the history of the courts of England and Wales, the Judicature Acts were a series of acts of Parliament, beginning in the 1870s, which aimed to fuse the hitherto split system of courts of England and Wales. The first two acts were the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 and the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1875, with a further series of amending acts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courts Act 1971</span> 1971 UK law reforming the court system of England and Wales

The Courts Act 1971 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, the purpose of which was to reform and modernise the courts system of England and Wales, as well as effectively separating the business of the criminal and civil courts.

A prothonotary is the "principal clerk of a court," from L.L. prothonotarius, from Greek protonotarios "first scribe," originally the chief of the college of recorders of the court of the Byzantine Empire, from Greek πρῶτοςprotos "first" + Latin notarius ("notary"); the h appeared in Medieval Latin. The title was awarded to certain high-ranking notaries, and was first recorded in the English language in 1447.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">County Palatine of Durham</span> Historic county of England with unique status

The County Palatine of Durham was a jurisdiction in the North of England, within which the bishop of Durham had rights usually exclusive to the monarch. It developed from the Liberty of Durham, which emerged in the Anglo-Saxon period. The gradual acquisition of powers by the bishops led to Durham being recognised as a palatinate by the late thirteenth century, one of several such counties in England during the Middle Ages. The county palatine had its own government and institutions, which broadly mirrored those of the monarch and included several judicial courts. From the sixteenth century the palatine rights of the bishops were gradually reduced, and were finally abolished in 1836. The last palatine institution to survive was the court of chancery, which was abolished in 1972.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of Common Pleas (England)</span> English court for disputes between commoners (c. 1200 – 1880)

The Court of Common Pleas, or Common Bench, was a common law court in the English legal system that covered "common pleas"; actions between subject and subject, which did not concern the king. Created in the late 12th to early 13th century after splitting from the Exchequer of Pleas, the Common Pleas served as one of the central English courts for around 600 years. Authorised by Magna Carta to sit in a fixed location, the Common Pleas sat in Westminster Hall for its entire existence, joined by the Exchequer of Pleas and Court of King's Bench.

The Court of Chancery of the County Palatine of Lancaster was a court of chancery that exercised jurisdiction within the County Palatine of Lancaster until it was merged with the High Court and abolished in 1972.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chancery Amendment Act 1858</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Chancery Amendment Act 1858 also known as Lord Cairns' Act after Sir Hugh Cairns, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that allowed the English Court of Chancery, the Irish Chancery and the Chancery Court of the County Palatine of Lancaster to award damages, in addition to their previous function of awarding injunctions and specific performance. The Act also made several procedural changes to the Chancery courts, most notably allowing them to call a jury, and allowed the Lord Chancellor to amend the practice regulations of the courts. By allowing the Chancery courts to award damages it narrowed the gap between the common law and equity courts and accelerated the passing of the Judicature Act 1873, and for that reason has been described by Ernest Pollock as "prophetic".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Procedure Act 1853</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Procedure Act 1853 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It makes provision for the giving of evidence by prisoners otherwise than at their own trial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 1877</span> Act reforming the Irish court system

The Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 1877 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that brought about a major reorganisation of the superior courts in Ireland. It created a Supreme Court of Judicature, comprising the High Court of Justice in Ireland and the Court of Appeal in Ireland. It mirrored in Ireland the changes which the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 had made in the courts of England and Wales.

The Court of Chancery of the County Palatine of Durham and Sadberge was a court of chancery that exercised jurisdiction within the County Palatine of Durham until it was merged into the High Court in 1972.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Durham (County Palatine) Act 1836</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Durham Act 1836 was an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It abolished the temporal authority of the Bishop of Durham within the County Palatine of Durham, placing the county under lay administration. Previously, since 1075, the so-called prince-bishops had substantial powers as earls "with the right to raise an army, mint his own coins, and levy taxes".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1883</span> Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom

The Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1883 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that repealed for England and Wales statutes relating to civil procedure from 1495 to 1867 which had ceased to be in force or had become necessary. The act was intended, in particular, to facilitate the preparation of the revised edition of the statutes, then in progress.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Palatine Court of Durham Act 1889</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Palatine Court of Durham Act 1889 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It was one of the Durham County Palatine Acts 1836 to 1889. The Bill for this Act was the Palatine Court of Durham Bill. Lely said that this Act was of practical utility.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Civil Procedure Acts Repeal Act 1879</span> Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom

The Civil Procedure Acts Repeal Act 1879 was an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that repealed for the United Kingdom acts of parliament related to relating to civil procedure from 1235 to 1852 which had ceased to be in force or had become necessary. The act also abolished the offence of outlawry in English civil law. The act was intended, in particular, to facilitate the preparation of the revised edition of the statutes, then in progress.

The palatine courts of Durham were a set of courts that exercised jurisdiction within the County Palatine of Durham. The bishop purchased the wapentake of Sadberge in 1189, and Sadberge's initially separate institutions were eventually merged with those of the County Palatine.

The Court of Common Pleas of the County Palatine of Lancaster, sometimes called the Common Pleas of or at Lancaster was a court of common pleas that exercised jurisdiction within the County Palatine of Lancaster until its jurisdiction was transferred to the High Court by the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873. It was a Superior Court of Record, exercising, within the limits of the County Palatine, a jurisdiction similar to that of the superior courts of common law at Westminster.

Certain former courts of England and Wales have been abolished or merged into or with other courts, and certain other courts of England and Wales have fallen into disuse.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courts of Ontario</span> System of courts in Ontario, Canada

Courts of Ontario, Canada, date from the early to mid-17th century. French civil law courts were created in the 17th century in its colony of Canada, one of New France. British common law courts were established in 1764 in the ceded colony then known as the Province of Quebec.

References

  1. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, preamble. Archbold, Summary of the Laws of England, 1848, vol 1, p 184.
  2. Sixteenth Report of the Deputy Keeper of the Public Records. 2 June 1855. HMSO. p 48
  3. Constance M Fraser, "The Free Court of the Priors of Durham" in Christian Drummond Liddy (ed). The Bishopric of Durham in the Late Middle Ages: Lordship, Community and the Cult of St Cuthbert. The Boydell Press. Woodbridge. 2008. p 111
  4. John Bruce Williamson. The Palatine Court of Durham Act, 1889. Beavis Stewart & Co. 1890. The relevant text of this book is reprinted in a command paper at (1951) 16 Papers by command 58 (HMSO)
  5. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 15
  6. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 31
  7. Archbold, Summary of the Laws of England, 1848, vol 1, pp 184 & 185
  8. R Sept 1839, s 49
  9. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 22
  10. Archbold, Summary of the Laws of England, 1848, vol 1, p 185
  11. John Hamilton Baker. The Oxford History of the Laws of England: 1483-1558. Oxford University Press. 2003. p 292
  12. The Durham (County Palatine) Act 1836, proviso to section 1
  13. Rickards, The Statutes of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, vol 79, p 80 et seq. An Act for improving the Practice and Proceedings of the Court of Common Pleas of the County of Durham and Sadberge. Sometimes cited as 2 Vict. c. 16.
  14. Current Law Statutes 1997. Sweet and Maxwell. Volume 3. Page 43
  15. Homersham Cox. The Institutions of the English Government. H Sweet. London. 1863. p 584.
  16. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16
  17. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 32
  18. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 15
  19. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 19
  20. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 21
  21. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 22
  22. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 24
  23. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 28
  24. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 33
  25. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 34
  26. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 27
  27. 2 & 3 Vict. c. 16, s 29
  28. George Barclay Mansel. The Law and Practice as to Costs. Spettigue. London. 1840. p 131.
  29. (1877) 12 Statutes Revised, 1st Ed 1070
  30. An Act for taking and swearing affidavits to be made use of in any of the courts of the county palatine of Durham. Repealed by the Commissioners for Oaths Act 1889 (52 & 53 Vict. c. 10), Sch.
  31. William Downes Griffith and Richard Loveland Loveland. The Supreme Court of Judicature Acts, 1873, 1875, & 1877. Second Edition. Stevens and Haynes. Bell Yard, Temple Bar, London. 1877. p 12. See also p 723 for other relevant provisions.
  32. William Thomas Charley, The New System of Practice and Pleading under the Supreme Court of Judicature Acts 1873, 1875, 1877, the Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876, and the Rules of the Supreme Court, Third Edition, p 186