Cuban Assets Control Regulations

Last updated

The Cuban Assets Control Regulations, (CACR) 31 CFR 515, generally regulate relations between Cuba and the U.S. and are the main mechanism of domestic enforcement of the United States embargo against Cuba. [1]

Contents

President Kennedy enacted the Cuban Assets Control Regulations on July 8, 1963. [1] Its authority comes from the Trading with the Enemy Act, passed in 1917, which gives the President the authority to allow or deny property transfers between the United States and citizens of enemy nations. [2] In 1950, the Department of Treasury established the Office of Foreign Assets Control in order to administer and enforce economic sanctions consistent with the Trading with the Enemy Act. [3] The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has the authority to regulate and amend the CACR to be consistent with the policies and goals of the executive administration.  

The Regulations prohibit any person subject to U.S. jurisdiction from dealing in any property in which Cuba or a Cuban national has an interest. All property of Cuba and Cuban nationals in the possession or control of persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction is "blocked." Blocking is a "complete prohibition against transfers or transactions of any kind." [4] Payments, transfers, withdrawals, or other dealings are prohibited with regard to blocked property unless authorized by the Treasury Department. [4] Except as specifically authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury, the Cuban Assets Control Regulations prohibited all transactions dealing with property in which Cuba has any interest in whatsoever, direct or indirect. [5] [4]  The Regulations allow the Office of Foreign Assets Control to interpret these "trade" regulations to cover not just standard trade between nations, but also to extend to travel-related expenditures that effectively make it illegal for an individual to travel to Cuba. [6] [7]

While previously under the exclusive control of the Executive, The Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, known better as the Helms-Burton Act, explicitly codified the embargo into legislation. [6] The bill language specifically states “all restrictions under part 515 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, shall be in effect upon the enactment of this Act." [8] The President was left broad discretion to establish such categories and limitations on travel to Cuba. [6] However, through this codification only Congress retains the power to fully remove the embargo. [8]

Background/ History

Prior to the Cuban Revolution of 1959, the U.S. had a long history of seeking relations with Cuba for its own economic gain. [9] By 1952, U.S. companies were the largest foreign investors in Cuba, owning much of the land and resources. [10] The United States interest in Cuban land and resources continued to increase under Batista's rule, as 59% of exports went to, and 76% of the imports came from, the United States before 1959. [10] After the Revolution, Fidel Castro consolidated power and declared Cuba a communist country. President Dwight D. Eisenhower formally recognized the new Cuban government led by Castro shortly after his coming to power. [10] However, relations between the U.S and Cuba quickly turned as the Castro government began nationalizing U.S. companies in Cuba and took ownership over property previously held by U.S. investors. [10] The first of many economic sanctions relating to the embargo against Cuba was enacted in 1960, and in January the following year President Eisenhower formally ended U.S. relations with Cuba. [10]

Tensions with Cuba rose after the Bay of Pigs invasion, where the CIA secretly trained and supported Cuban dissidents attempt to overthrow the Cuban government, but were captured and defeated in less than three days. [11] In 1961, President Kennedy, with support from legislation, issued further economic restrictions to strengthen the embargo. [12] In 1962, U.S. relations reached an all time low as it was announced that the Soviet Union placed nuclear missiles in Cuba (commonly known as the Cuban Missile Crisis). Less than a year after the  Cuban Missile Crisis was resolved, President Kennedy enacted the Cuban Assets Control Regulations in July 1963. [1] The objective of the CACR was to strip Cuba of any U.S. revenue. [10] Its provisions were comprehensive and effectively ended all economic exchange with Cuba, including travel.

Travel License under CACR

Licenses and authorization dealing with travel and transactions under the CACR are available and regularly being amended in order to be consistent with the policies of the current President’s administration. [7] A full list of travel licenses and travel-related transactions authorized by the Cuban Assets Control Regulation can be found under the Code of Federal Registration, title 31, subtitle B, chapter 5, part 515, section 560. [13]

As of 2020,  travel to Cuba may be authorized either by a general license or on a case-by-case basis by a specific license for travel related to the following activities:

  1. Family visits; [14]
  2. Official business of the U.S. government, foreign governments, and certain intergovernmental organizations; [15]
  3. Journalistic activity; [16]
  4. Professional research and professional meetings; [17]
  5. Educational activities; [18]
  6. Religious activities; [19]
  7. Public performances, clinics, workshops, athletic and other competitions, and exhibitions; [20]
  8. Support for the Cuban people; [21]
  9. Humanitarian projects; [22]
  10. Activities of private foundations or research or educational institutes; [23]

Amendments to the CACR in the 21st Century

Biden Administration

Office of Foreign Assets Control amended the Cuban Assets Control Regulations to implement elements of the policy announced by the Biden Administration on May 16, 2022, to increase support for the Cuban people. [24] The rule authorizes “group people-to-people educational travel to Cuba and removes certain restrictions on authorized academic educational activities, authorizes travel to attend or organize professional meetings or conferences in Cuba, removes the $1,000 quarterly limit on family remittances, and authorizes donative remittances to Cuba.” [24]

Trump Administration

The Trump Administration took a more conservative approach to U.S.-Cuba relations. Even before taking office, Trump promised to reverse the Obama administration's policies calling it a  “completely one-sided deal with Cuba." [25] The reversal included restricting most general licenses for people-to-people travel including individual people-to-people educational travel [26] and group people-to-people educational travel. [27] Restrictions on lodging, paying for lodging, or making reservations for lodging at certain properties in Cuba was also added. [28] OFAC amended the CACR under Trump to eliminate U-Turn transactions. [29] Finally, under Trump the OFAC eliminating nonfamily remittances. [30]

Obama Administration

The Obama administration made the most substantial steps in easing the embargo by relaxing as many of the CACR provisions as his authority as the President allowed. [10] Starting on September 8, 2009, OFAC amended the CACR to allow U.S residents to make unlimited trips to visit their relatives in Cuba, and could provide unlimited financial aid to family members living in Cuba. [31] U.S residents were also allowed to send other types of gifts to their families living in Cuba, including clothing and personal hygiene items. [31] In addition, the U.S. government began to grant licenses to U.S. companies so they could provide cellular and television services to Cuba, and allowed Americans to pay for their Cuban relatives to access such services.

Further amendments came in 2011 that expanded permissible travel by allowing religious organizations to sponsor travel to Cuba under a general license, restored and facilitated educational exchanges through a variety of measures, and increased the scope of licenses granted for journalistic activity. [32] New measures allowed nonfamily members to send remittances (as much as $ 500 a quarter) to Cubans so long as they were not provided to senior Cuban government officials or senior members of the Cuban Communist Party. [32] Finally, the new measures allowed U.S. airports to apply for permission to provide services for licensed chartered flights traveling to Cuba. [32]

On January 16, 2015, OFAC once again amended the CACR. The CACR amendments made it easier for the twelve categories of individuals authorized to travel to Cuba to do so, as it permitted them to visit Cuba under a general license, meaning that they would no longer need to apply for a specific license. [33] The new CACR amendments also raised the limit on nonfamily remittances to Cuba from $500 to $ 2,000 per quarter, and allowed U.S. banks to open accounts at Cuban banks to simplify the processing of authorized transactions. [33]

January 27, 2016, new CACR changes removed some restrictions on authorized exports to Cuba, further removed restrictions on travel to Cuba for authorized purposes by allowing some arrangements with Cuban airlines, and authorized more financial transactions related to professional meetings, disaster response projects, informational materials, and transactions related to professional media or artistic productions in Cuba. [34]

The final amendments under the Obama administration were implemented March 16, 2016, OFAC amended the CACR to implement a series of measures designed to "further facilitate travel to Cuba for authorized purposes, expand the range of authorized financial transactions, and authorize additional business and physical presence in Cuba." [10]

Bush Administration

Under the W. Bush administration the CACR expanded the general license to visit close relatives in Cuba by broadening the definition of "close relative" to include anyone within three degrees of relation. [35] The Bush changes also authorization travelers to carry up to $ 3,000 in remittances, $ 300 for each individual eligible to receive remittances. [35] Amendments to the CACR at this time reflected the goal to aid in the peaceful transition to democracy in Cuba by facilitating "humanitarian" transactions with independent groups in Cuba dedicated to that same goal. [36] These transactions included construction contracts to erect buildings for such groups, and the provision of "civic education" and training in community organizing. [36]

Clinton Administration

Following Pope John Paul II's historic visit to Cuba in 1998, the Clinton administration amended the CACR in order to “further build” on the U.S. relations with the Cuban people. [36] Such changes include allowing any individual, not just family members, to send money to Cuban households. [36] The amendments also facilitated "people-to-people contact" by streamlining visa approval for academics, athletes, and scientists. In addition, OFAC authorized sales of agricultural products and food to non-governmental entities, such as religious groups, family restaurants, and private farms. [36]

Judicial Challenge

The landmark opinion on the Cuban Assets Control Regulations comes from the 1984 Supreme Court case Regan v. Wald. [7] Respondents were American citizens who wanted to travel to Cuba. They were inhibited from doing so by a 1982 amendment to the CACR (31 CFR 515.560) which significantly narrowed permissible economic transactions in connection with travel to Cuba. [13] Respondents challenged the amendment to the general license on constitutional and statutory grounds seeking a preliminary injunction against its enforcement. [7]  

In a divided 5-4 opinion, the Court denied the injunction and upheld the 1982 amendment. The court held that the Trading With the Enemy Act statutorily granted the President the authority to restrict travel to Cuba. [7] The court noted that at the time of the amendment tensions were high with Cuba and the restrictions put in place out of concern for national security were based in the reality. Not only does Regan v. Wald affirm the Presidents right to place restrictions on travel to Cuba through the Cuban Assets Control Regulation, it also gave future presidents the discretionary power to implement additional restrictions against Cuba using the Cuban Assets Control Regulation. [10]

Authority

The relevant laws are:

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Office of Foreign Assets Control</span> Agency of the United States Department of the Treasury

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is a financial intelligence and enforcement agency of the United States Treasury Department. It administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions in support of U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives. Under presidential national emergency powers, OFAC carries out its activities against foreign governments, organizations, and individuals deemed a threat to U.S. national security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Helms–Burton Act</span> US federal law affecting Cuban economy

The Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Libertad) Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104–114 (text)(PDF), 110 Stat. 785, 22 U.S.C. §§ 6021–6091) is a United States federal law which strengthens and continues the United States embargo against Cuba. It extended the territorial application of the initial embargo to apply to foreign companies trading with Cuba, and penalized foreign companies allegedly "trafficking" in property formerly owned by U.S. citizens but confiscated by Cuba after the Cuban revolution. It also covers property formerly owned by Cubans who have since become U.S. citizens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Resource Conservation and Recovery Act</span> Federal law in the United States

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), enacted in 1976, is the primary federal law in the United States governing the disposal of solid waste and hazardous waste.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States embargo against Cuba</span> Ongoing restriction on trade with Cuba by the United States

The United States embargo against Cuba has prevented U.S. businesses from conducting trade or commerce with Cuban interests since 1958. Modern diplomatic relations are cold, stemming from historic conflict and divergent political ideologies. U.S. economic sanctions against Cuba are comprehensive and impact all sectors of the Cuban economy. It is the most enduring trade embargo in modern history. The U.S. government influences extraterritorial trade with Cuba.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Executive Order 13224</span> 2001 United States executive order

Executive Order 13224 is an executive order issued by U.S. President George W. Bush on September 23, 2001, as a response to the attacks on September 11, 2001. It has been renewed every year since.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States sanctions</span> Trade restrictions levied by the United States government

United States sanctions are financial and trade restrictions imposed against individuals, entities, and jurisdictions whose actions contradict U.S. foreign policy or national security goals. Financial sanctions are primarily administered by the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), while export controls are primarily administered by the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).

The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) are a set of United States export guidelines and prohibitions. They are administered by the Bureau of Industry and Security, which regulates the export restrictions of sensitive goods. The EAR apply to most U.S. origin items, foreign-produced items that incorporate controlled U.S. items, and certain "foreign-produced direct products" of U.S. items or technology,.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Emergency Economic Powers Act</span> United States federal law

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Title II of Pub. L. 95–223, 91 Stat. 1626, enacted October 28, 1977, is a United States federal law authorizing the president to regulate international commerce after declaring a national emergency in response to any unusual and extraordinary threat to the United States which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States. The act was signed by President Jimmy Carter on December 28, 1977.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Maritime Commission</span> Independent U.S. government agency

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is an independent agency of the United States government that regulates U.S. oceanborne transportation and the United States Merchant Marine. It is chaired by Louis E. Sola

The USA PATRIOT Act was passed by the United States Congress in 2001 as a response to the September 11, 2001 attacks. It has ten titles, each containing numerous sections. Title III: International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 is actually an act of Congress in its own right as well as being a title of the USA PATRIOT Act, and is intended to facilitate the prevention, detection and prosecution of international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The title's sections primarily amend portions of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 and the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cuba–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

Modern diplomatic relations between Cuba and the United States are cold, stemming from historic conflict and divergent political ideologies. The two nations restored diplomatic relations on July 20, 2015, after relations had been severed in 1961 during the Cold War. The U.S. has maintained a comprehensive trade embargo against Cuba since 1958. The embargo includes restrictions on all commercial, economic, and financial activity, making it illegal for U.S. corporations to do business with Cuba.

The USA PATRIOT Act was passed by the United States Congress in 2001 as a response to the September 11 attacks in 2001. It has ten titles, with the third title written to prevent, detect, and prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clean Air Act (United States)</span> 1963 United States federal law to control air pollution

The Clean Air Act (CAA) is the United States' primary federal air quality law, intended to reduce and control air pollution nationwide. Initially enacted in 1963 and amended many times since, it is one of the United States' first and most influential modern environmental laws.

Bank regulation in the United States is highly fragmented compared with other G10 countries, where most countries have only one bank regulator. In the U.S., banking is regulated at both the federal and state level. Depending on the type of charter a banking organization has and on its organizational structure, it may be subject to numerous federal and state banking regulations. Apart from the bank regulatory agencies the U.S. maintains separate securities, commodities, and insurance regulatory agencies at the federal and state level, unlike Japan and the United Kingdom. Bank examiners are generally employed to supervise banks and to ensure compliance with regulations.

The Trade Sanction Reform and Export Enhancement Act (Title IX) was enacted by the United States Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 2000. The act altered regulations in regards to U.S. trade with Cuba. Under the act, the trade of certain agricultural commodities (defined and listed under section 102 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978) and medicine/medical devices (defined and listed under section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) became permitted. This act does not change any legislation in terms of receiving U.S. imports from Cuba. In addition, the act is not comprehensive and still heavily regulates what goods are exported to Cuba.

Zemel v. Rusk, 381 U.S. 1 (1965), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the right to travel and area restrictions on passports, holding that the Secretary of State is statutorily authorized to refuse to validate the passports of United States citizens for travel to Cuba and that the exercise of that authority is constitutionally permissible.

<i>United States v. Banki</i> American legal case

In United States v. Banki, 685 F.3d 99 the Second Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the conviction of Mahmoud Reza Banki. Banki had been convicted of multiple crimes related to allegedly conspiring to violate United States sanctions against Iran by transferring large amounts of money — totaling some $3.4 million — from Iran to the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act</span> US anti-trafficking act

The Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, better known as the Kingpin Act, is landmark federal legislation in the United States intended to address international narcotics trafficking by imposing United States sanctions on foreign persons and entities involved in the drug trade.

Regan v. Wald, 468 U.S. 222 (1984), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held by a 5–4 majority that restrictions upon travel to Cuba established as part of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations in 1963 did not violate the freedom to travel protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 is a law enacted and was officially published by the Government of Pakistan and still applicable in Bangladesh, which was East Pakistan before independence, to regulate certain payments, dealings in foreign exchange and securities, and the import and export of currency and bullion.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R 515.
  2. ↑ Trading with the Enemy Act, 12 USCS § 95a.
  3. ↑ Basic Information on OFAC and Sanctions, Office of Foreign Assets Control, https://ofac.treasury.gov/faqs/topic/1501.
  4. 1 2 3 Enrique Zamora, Impact of the Cuban Embargo on Inheritance by Cuban Nationals, 24 St. Thomas L. Rev. 525 (2012).
  5. ↑ 31 C.F.R. § 515.201(b).
  6. 1 2 3 Jarrett Barrios, People First: The Cuban Travel Ban, Wet Foot-Dry Foot and Why the Executive Branch Can and Should Begin Normalizing Cuba Policy, 11 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 1 (2011).
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Regan v. Wald, 468 U.S. 222, 224 (1984).
  8. 1 2 22 USCS § 6032(h).
  9. ↑ "How the United States Regarded the Question of Seizing Cuba in 1822--Letter from John Quincy Adams". The New York Times. 1863-10-17. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2023-02-26.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Isaac Borenstein, The Cuban Embargo Revisited: A Study of U.S. Legislative and Executive Action Towards Cuba, 51 Suffolk Univ. L. Review. 1 (2018).
  11. ↑ "Milestones: 1961–1968 - Office of the Historian". history.state.gov. Retrieved 2023-02-26.
  12. ↑ EMBARGO ON ALL TRADE WITH CUBA, 76 Stat. 1446 (1962).
  13. 1 2 31 CFR 515.560, https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-31/subtitle-B/chapter-V/part-515/subpart-E/section-515.560
  14. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.561.
  15. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.562.
  16. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.563.
  17. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.564.
  18. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.565.
  19. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.566.
  20. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.567.
  21. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.574.
  22. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.575.
  23. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.576.
  24. 1 2 87 FR 35088 (2022).
  25. ↑ Robyn C. Schowengerdt, You're Out: How OFAC'S Regulatory Changeup Enables Cuban Baseball Player Smuggling to the United States, 72 Admin. L. Rev. 305 (2020).
  26. ↑ 82 FR 51998 (2017).
  27. ↑ 84 FR 25992 (2019).
  28. ↑ 85 FR 60068 (2020).
  29. ↑ 84 FR 47121 (2019).
  30. ↑ 85 FR 67988 (2020).
  31. 1 2 74 FR 46000 (2009).
  32. 1 2 3 76 FR 5072 (2011).
  33. 1 2 80 F.R. 2291 (2015).
  34. ↑ 81 FR 4583 (2016).
  35. 1 2 31 C.F.R. § 515 (2007).
  36. 1 2 3 4 5 Alberto R. Coll, Harming Human Rights in the Name of Promoting them: The Case of the Cuban Embargo, 12 UCLA J. Int'l L. & For. Aff. 199 (2007).


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.