Cuban Assets Control Regulations

Last updated

The Cuban Assets Control Regulations, (CACR) 31 CFR 515, generally regulate relations between Cuba and the U.S. and are the main mechanism of domestic enforcement of the United States embargo against Cuba. [1]

Contents

President Kennedy enacted the Cuban Assets Control Regulations on July 8, 1963. [1] Its authority comes from the Trading with the Enemy Act, passed in 1917, which gives the President the authority to allow or deny property transfers between the United States and citizens of enemy nations. [2] In 1950, the Department of Treasury established the Office of Foreign Assets Control in order to administer and enforce economic sanctions consistent with the Trading with the Enemy Act. [3] The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has the authority to regulate and amend the CACR to be consistent with the policies and goals of the executive administration.  

The Regulations prohibit any person subject to U.S. jurisdiction from dealing in any property in which Cuba or a Cuban national has an interest. All property of Cuba and Cuban nationals in the possession or control of persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction is "blocked." Blocking is a "complete prohibition against transfers or transactions of any kind." [4] Payments, transfers, withdrawals, or other dealings are prohibited with regard to blocked property unless authorized by the Treasury Department. [4] Except as specifically authorized by the Secretary of the Treasury, the Cuban Assets Control Regulations prohibited all transactions dealing with property in which Cuba has any interest in whatsoever, direct or indirect. [5] [4]  The Regulations allow the Office of Foreign Assets Control to interpret these "trade" regulations to cover not just standard trade between nations, but also to extend to travel-related expenditures that effectively make it illegal for an individual to travel to Cuba. [6] [7]

While previously under the exclusive control of the Executive, The Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 1996, known better as the Helms-Burton Act, explicitly codified the embargo into legislation. [6] The bill language specifically states “all restrictions under part 515 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, shall be in effect upon the enactment of this Act." [8] The President was left broad discretion to establish such categories and limitations on travel to Cuba. [6] However, through this codification only Congress retains the power to fully remove the embargo. [8]

Background/ History

Prior to the Cuban Revolution of 1959, the U.S. had a long history of seeking relations with Cuba for its own economic gain. [9] By 1952, U.S. companies were the largest foreign investors in Cuba, owning much of the land and resources. [10] The United States interest in Cuban land and resources continued to increase under Batista's rule, as 59% of exports went to, and 76% of the imports came from, the United States before 1959. [10] After the Revolution, Fidel Castro consolidated power and declared Cuba a communist country. President Dwight D. Eisenhower formally recognized the new Cuban government led by Castro shortly after his coming to power. [10] However, relations between the U.S and Cuba quickly turned as the Castro government began nationalizing U.S. companies in Cuba and took ownership over property previously held by U.S. investors. [10] The first of many economic sanctions relating to the embargo against Cuba was enacted in 1960, and in January the following year President Eisenhower formally ended U.S. relations with Cuba. [10]

Tensions with Cuba rose after the Bay of Pigs invasion, where the CIA secretly trained and supported Cuban dissidents attempt to overthrow the Cuban government, but were captured and defeated in less than three days. [11] In 1961, President Kennedy, with support from legislation, issued further economic restrictions to strengthen the embargo. [12] In 1962, U.S. relations reached an all time low as it was announced that the Soviet Union placed nuclear missiles in Cuba (commonly known as the Cuban Missile Crisis). Less than a year after the  Cuban Missile Crisis was resolved, President Kennedy enacted the Cuban Assets Control Regulations in July 1963. [1] The objective of the CACR was to strip Cuba of any U.S. revenue. [10] Its provisions were comprehensive and effectively ended all economic exchange with Cuba, including travel.

Travel License under CACR

Licenses and authorization dealing with travel and transactions under the CACR are available and regularly being amended in order to be consistent with the policies of the current President’s administration. [7] A full list of travel licenses and travel-related transactions authorized by the Cuban Assets Control Regulation can be found under the Code of Federal Registration, title 31, subtitle B, chapter 5, part 515, section 560. [13]

As of 2020,  travel to Cuba may be authorized either by a general license or on a case-by-case basis by a specific license for travel related to the following activities:

  1. Family visits; [14]
  2. Official business of the U.S. government, foreign governments, and certain intergovernmental organizations; [15]
  3. Journalistic activity; [16]
  4. Professional research and professional meetings; [17]
  5. Educational activities; [18]
  6. Religious activities; [19]
  7. Public performances, clinics, workshops, athletic and other competitions, and exhibitions; [20]
  8. Support for the Cuban people; [21]
  9. Humanitarian projects; [22]
  10. Activities of private foundations or research or educational institutes; [23]

Amendments to the CACR in the 21st Century

Biden Administration

Office of Foreign Assets Control amended the Cuban Assets Control Regulations to implement elements of the policy announced by the Biden Administration on May 16, 2022, to increase support for the Cuban people. [24] The rule authorizes “group people-to-people educational travel to Cuba and removes certain restrictions on authorized academic educational activities, authorizes travel to attend or organize professional meetings or conferences in Cuba, removes the $1,000 quarterly limit on family remittances, and authorizes donative remittances to Cuba.” [24]

Trump Administration

The Trump Administration took a more conservative approach to U.S.-Cuba relations. Even before taking office, Trump promised to reverse the Obama administration's policies calling it a  “completely one-sided deal with Cuba." [25] The reversal included restricting most general licenses for people-to-people travel including individual people-to-people educational travel [26] and group people-to-people educational travel. [27] Restrictions on lodging, paying for lodging, or making reservations for lodging at certain properties in Cuba was also added. [28] OFAC amended the CACR under Trump to eliminate U-Turn transactions. [29] Finally, under Trump the OFAC eliminating nonfamily remittances. [30]

Obama Administration

The Obama administration made the most substantial steps in easing the embargo by relaxing as many of the CACR provisions as his authority as the President allowed. [10] Starting on September 8, 2009, OFAC amended the CACR to allow U.S residents to make unlimited trips to visit their relatives in Cuba, and could provide unlimited financial aid to family members living in Cuba. [31] U.S residents were also allowed to send other types of gifts to their families living in Cuba, including clothing and personal hygiene items. [31] In addition, the U.S. government began to grant licenses to U.S. companies so they could provide cellular and television services to Cuba, and allowed Americans to pay for their Cuban relatives to access such services.

Further amendments came in 2011 that expanded permissible travel by allowing religious organizations to sponsor travel to Cuba under a general license, restored and facilitated educational exchanges through a variety of measures, and increased the scope of licenses granted for journalistic activity. [32] New measures allowed nonfamily members to send remittances (as much as $ 500 a quarter) to Cubans so long as they were not provided to senior Cuban government officials or senior members of the Cuban Communist Party. [32] Finally, the new measures allowed U.S. airports to apply for permission to provide services for licensed chartered flights traveling to Cuba. [32]

On January 16, 2015, OFAC once again amended the CACR. The CACR amendments made it easier for the twelve categories of individuals authorized to travel to Cuba to do so, as it permitted them to visit Cuba under a general license, meaning that they would no longer need to apply for a specific license. [33] The new CACR amendments also raised the limit on nonfamily remittances to Cuba from $500 to $ 2,000 per quarter, and allowed U.S. banks to open accounts at Cuban banks to simplify the processing of authorized transactions. [33]

January 27, 2016, new CACR changes removed some restrictions on authorized exports to Cuba, further removed restrictions on travel to Cuba for authorized purposes by allowing some arrangements with Cuban airlines, and authorized more financial transactions related to professional meetings, disaster response projects, informational materials, and transactions related to professional media or artistic productions in Cuba. [34]

The final amendments under the Obama administration were implemented March 16, 2016, OFAC amended the CACR to implement a series of measures designed to "further facilitate travel to Cuba for authorized purposes, expand the range of authorized financial transactions, and authorize additional business and physical presence in Cuba." [10]

Bush Administration

Under the W. Bush administration the CACR expanded the general license to visit close relatives in Cuba by broadening the definition of "close relative" to include anyone within three degrees of relation. [35] The Bush changes also authorization travelers to carry up to $ 3,000 in remittances, $ 300 for each individual eligible to receive remittances. [35] Amendments to the CACR at this time reflected the goal to aid in the peaceful transition to democracy in Cuba by facilitating "humanitarian" transactions with independent groups in Cuba dedicated to that same goal. [36] These transactions included construction contracts to erect buildings for such groups, and the provision of "civic education" and training in community organizing. [36]

Clinton Administration

Following Pope John Paul II's historic visit to Cuba in 1998, the Clinton administration amended the CACR in order to “further build” on the U.S. relations with the Cuban people. [36] Such changes include allowing any individual, not just family members, to send money to Cuban households. [36] The amendments also facilitated "people-to-people contact" by streamlining visa approval for academics, athletes, and scientists. In addition, OFAC authorized sales of agricultural products and food to non-governmental entities, such as religious groups, family restaurants, and private farms. [36]

Judicial Challenge

The landmark opinion on the Cuban Assets Control Regulations comes from the 1984 Supreme Court case Regan v. Wald. [7] Respondents were American citizens who wanted to travel to Cuba. They were inhibited from doing so by a 1982 amendment to the CACR (31 CFR 515.560) which significantly narrowed permissible economic transactions in connection with travel to Cuba. [13] Respondents challenged the amendment to the general license on constitutional and statutory grounds seeking a preliminary injunction against its enforcement. [7]  

In a divided 5-4 opinion, the Court denied the injunction and upheld the 1982 amendment. The court held that the Trading With the Enemy Act statutorily granted the President the authority to restrict travel to Cuba. [7] The court noted that at the time of the amendment tensions were high with Cuba and the restrictions put in place out of concern for national security were based in the reality. Not only does Regan v. Wald affirm the Presidents right to place restrictions on travel to Cuba through the Cuban Assets Control Regulation, it also gave future presidents the discretionary power to implement additional restrictions against Cuba using the Cuban Assets Control Regulation. [10]

Authority

The relevant laws are:

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Office of Foreign Assets Control</span> Agency of the United States Department of the Treasury

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is a financial intelligence and enforcement agency of the U.S. Treasury Department. It administers and enforces economic and trade sanctions in support of U.S. national security and foreign policy objectives. Under Presidential national emergency powers, OFAC carries out its activities against foreign states as well as a variety of other organizations and individuals, like terrorist groups, deemed to be a threat to U.S. national security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Helms–Burton Act</span> US federal law affecting Cuban economy

The Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Libertad) Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104–114 (text)(PDF), 110 Stat. 785, 22 U.S.C. §§ 6021–6091) is a United States federal law which strengthens and continues the United States embargo against Cuba. It extended the territorial application of the initial embargo to apply to foreign companies trading with Cuba, and penalized foreign companies allegedly "trafficking" in property formerly owned by U.S. citizens but confiscated by Cuba after the Cuban revolution. It also covers property formerly owned by Cubans who have since become U.S. citizens.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States embargo against Cuba</span> Ongoing restriction on trade with Cuba by the United States

The United States embargo against Cuba prevents U.S. businesses, and businesses organized under U.S. law or majority-owned by U.S. citizens, from conducting trade with Cuban interests. It is the most enduring trade embargo in modern history. The U.S. first imposed an embargo on the sale of arms to Cuba on March 14, 1958, during the Fulgencio Batista regime. Again on October 19, 1960, almost two years after the Cuban Revolution had led to the deposition of the Batista regime, the U.S. placed an embargo on exports to Cuba except for food and medicine after Cuba nationalized the US-owned Cuban oil refineries without compensation. On February 7, 1962, the embargo was extended to include almost all exports. The United Nations General Assembly has passed a resolution every year since 1992 demanding the end of the U.S. economic embargo on Cuba, with the U.S. and Israel being the only nations to consistently vote against the resolutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Executive Order 13224</span>

Executive Order 13224 is an executive order issued by U.S. President George W. Bush on September 23, 2001, as a response to the attacks on September 11, 2001. It has been renewed every year since.

The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) are a set of United States export guidelines and prohibitions. They are administered by the Bureau of Industry and Security and regulates export and export restrictions: whether a person may export something from the U.S.; re-export something from a foreign country; or transfer something from one person to another in a foreign country. The EAR applies to physical objects - sometimes referred to as "commodities" - as well as intellectual property such as technology and software.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Emergency Economic Powers Act</span> United States federal law

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Title II of Pub. L. 95–223, 91 Stat. 1626, enacted October 28, 1977, is a United States federal law authorizing the president to regulate international commerce after declaring a national emergency in response to any unusual and extraordinary threat to the United States which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States. The act was signed by President Jimmy Carter on December 28, 1977.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Maritime Commission</span> Independent U.S. government agency

The United States Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) is an independent federal agency based in Washington, D.C., that is responsible for the regulation of oceanborne international transportation of the U.S. It is chaired by Daniel B. Maffei.

The USA PATRIOT Act was passed by the United States Congress in 2001 as a response to the September 11, 2001 attacks. It has ten titles, each containing numerous sections. Title III: International Money Laundering Abatement and Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 is actually an act of Congress in its own right as well as being a title of the USA PATRIOT Act, and is intended to facilitate the prevention, detection and prosecution of international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The title's sections primarily amend portions of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986 and the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cuba–United States relations</span> Bilateral relations

Cuba and the United States restored diplomatic relations on July 20, 2015, after relations had been severed in 1961 during the Cold War. U.S. diplomatic representation in Cuba is handled by the United States Embassy in Havana, and there is a similar Cuban Embassy in Washington, D.C. The United States, however, continues to maintain its commercial, economic, and financial embargo, making it illegal for U.S. corporations to do business with Cuba.

The USA PATRIOT Act was passed by the United States Congress in 2001 as a response to the September 11 attacks in 2001. It has ten titles, with the third title written to prevent, detect, and prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism.

Bank regulation in the United States is highly fragmented compared with other G10 countries, where most countries have only one bank regulator. In the U.S., banking is regulated at both the federal and state level. Depending on the type of charter a banking organization has and on its organizational structure, it may be subject to numerous federal and state banking regulations. Apart from the bank regulatory agencies the U.S. maintains separate securities, commodities, and insurance regulatory agencies at the federal and state level, unlike Japan and the United Kingdom. Bank examiners are generally employed to supervise banks and to ensure compliance with regulations.

Denied Trade Screening AKA: Denied Party Screening, Sanction Party Screening Denied Trade Lists: lists created and compiled by government authorities/agencies and/or organizations that warn its members/citizens/business to either beware or refrain from interacting with those individuals or entities on the lists. Further, these lists act as the foundation of establishing either notification or direct prohibition of those under the issuing authority not to contact or interact, either by communication or by business transactions or by social transactions. AKA: Denied Party Lists (DPL), Sanction Party Lists (SPL)

The Trade Sanction Reform and Export Enhancement Act (Title IX) was enacted by the United States Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 2000. The act altered regulations in regards to U.S. trade with Cuba. Under the act, the trade of certain agricultural commodities (defined and listed under section 102 of the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978) and medicine/medical devices (defined and listed under section 201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) became permitted. This act does not change any legislation in terms of receiving U.S. imports from Cuba. In addition, the act is not comprehensive and still heavily regulates what goods are exported to Cuba.

Zemel v. Rusk, 381 U.S. 1 (1965), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the right to travel and area restrictions on passports, holding that the Secretary of State is statutorily authorized to refuse to validate the passports of United States citizens for travel to Cuba and that the exercise of that authority is constitutionally permissible.

<i>United States v. Banki</i> American legal case

United States v. Banki, 685 F.3d 99 is a case related to the transfer of large amounts of money — totaling some $3.4 million — from Iran to the United States. Banki was charged with conspiracy to violate the Iranian Transactions Regulations and operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business and four other charges. Banki's defense argued these transfers were necessary to protect the family's assets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act</span> US act, aiming to deny significant foreign narcotics traffickers access to the U.S. financial system

The Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act, better known as the Kingpin Act, is landmark federal legislation in the United States intended to address international narcotics trafficking by imposing United States sanctions on foreign persons and entities involved in the drug trade.

Mahmoud Reza Banki is an Iranian-American scientist, management consultant and startup executive. Born in Tehran, Iran, Banki immigrated to the US to attend college and became a naturalized US citizen in the 1990s. In January 2010, Banki was arrested and charged with violating US sanctions against Iran by the United States Attorney's office in New York City. Ultimately Banki won his case on appeal, and it was permanently closed in July 2012. Banki spoke about his case at a TED Talk in 2014, presenting a case for change in criminal justice. As of 2015 a documentary film about the case was being made. In The Moth podcast released January 2017, Banki spoke to the personal toll of the ordeal. Banki has also spoken before various audiences for the cause of improving the criminal justice system. As of 2022, Banki was Chief Financial Officer and Chief Strategy Officer at leading streaming company Tubi. On January 20, 2021, Banki received a full and unconditional pardon from the President of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cuban thaw</span> 2015–2017 normalization of Cuba–U.S. relations

The Cuban thaw was the normalization of Cuba–United States relations that began in December 2014 ending a 54-year stretch of hostility between the nations. In March 2016, Barack Obama became the first U.S. president to visit Cuba since Calvin Coolidge, in 1928.

The United States government applies sanctions against certain institutions and key members of the Chinese government and its ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP), certain companies linked to the People's Liberation Army (PLA), and other affiliates that the US government has accused of aiding in human rights abuses. The US maintained embargoes against China from the inception of the People's Republic of China in 1949 until 1972. An embargo was reimposed by the US following the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre. From 2020 onward, the US imposed sanctions and visa restrictions against several Chinese government officials and companies, in response to the Uyghur genocide, human rights abuses in Hong Kong and Tibet, military-civil fusion, support for the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and fentanyl production.

Regan v. Wald, 468 U.S. 222 (1984) was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held by a 5–4 majority that restrictions upon travel to Cuba established as part of the Cuban Assets Control Regulations in 1963 did not violate the freedom to travel protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R 515.
  2. ↑ Trading with the Enemy Act, 12 USCS § 95a.
  3. ↑ Basic Information on OFAC and Sanctions, Office of Foreign Assets Control, https://ofac.treasury.gov/faqs/topic/1501.
  4. 1 2 3 Enrique Zamora, Impact of the Cuban Embargo on Inheritance by Cuban Nationals, 24 St. Thomas L. Rev. 525 (2012).
  5. ↑ 31 C.F.R. § 515.201(b).
  6. 1 2 3 Jarrett Barrios, People First: The Cuban Travel Ban, Wet Foot-Dry Foot and Why the Executive Branch Can and Should Begin Normalizing Cuba Policy, 11 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 1 (2011).
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Regan v. Wald, 468 U.S. 222, 224 (1984).
  8. 1 2 22 USCS § 6032(h).
  9. ↑ "How the United States Regarded the Question of Seizing Cuba in 1822--Letter from John Quincy Adams". The New York Times. 1863-10-17. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2023-02-26.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Isaac Borenstein, The Cuban Embargo Revisited: A Study of U.S. Legislative and Executive Action Towards Cuba, 51 Suffolk Univ. L. Review. 1 (2018).
  11. ↑ "Milestones: 1961–1968 - Office of the Historian". history.state.gov. Retrieved 2023-02-26.
  12. ↑ EMBARGO ON ALL TRADE WITH CUBA, 76 Stat. 1446 (1962).
  13. 1 2 31 CFR 515.560, https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-31/subtitle-B/chapter-V/part-515/subpart-E/section-515.560
  14. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.561.
  15. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.562.
  16. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.563.
  17. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.564.
  18. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.565.
  19. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.566.
  20. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.567.
  21. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.574.
  22. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.575.
  23. ↑ 31 CFR § 515.576.
  24. 1 2 87 FR 35088 (2022).
  25. ↑ Robyn C. Schowengerdt, You're Out: How OFAC'S Regulatory Changeup Enables Cuban Baseball Player Smuggling to the United States, 72 Admin. L. Rev. 305 (2020).
  26. ↑ 82 FR 51998 (2017).
  27. ↑ 84 FR 25992 (2019).
  28. ↑ 85 FR 60068 (2020).
  29. ↑ 84 FR 47121 (2019).
  30. ↑ 85 FR 67988 (2020).
  31. 1 2 74 FR 46000 (2009).
  32. 1 2 3 76 FR 5072 (2011).
  33. 1 2 80 F.R. 2291 (2015).
  34. ↑ 81 FR 4583 (2016).
  35. 1 2 31 C.F.R. § 515 (2007).
  36. 1 2 3 4 5 Alberto R. Coll, Harming Human Rights in the Name of Promoting them: The Case of the Cuban Embargo, 12 UCLA J. Int'l L. & For. Aff. 199 (2007).


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.