Drexel 5611

Last updated
Drexel 5611
New York Public Library for the Performing Arts
Drexel 5611 front cover.jpg
Drexel 5611
Type Music manuscript
Datelate 1650s-early 1660s
Place of originEngland
Compiled by3 anonymous copyists (the first thought to be Thomas Heardson, the third thought to be Albertus Byrne)
Size11.5 × 7.75 × .75 inches (29.2 × 19.7 × 1.9 cm)
Accession1888 by the Lenox Library (now part of the New York Public Library)

Drexel 5611 is a 17th-century music manuscript compilation of works written for virginal. Dating from either the end of the Commonwealth period or the early Restoration period (when collections of keyboard music were rare [1] ), it is an important source for English keyboard music. [2] It also includes a handful of works by French composers, reflecting the growing interest among English musicians in contemporary French keyboard music.

Contents

Belonging to the New York Public Library, it forms part of the Music Division's Drexel Collection, located at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts. Following traditional library practice, its name is derived from its call number. [3]

Date

Jeffrey Mark, a librarian with the New York Public Library and the first to write about Drexel 5611, observed that the manuscript contains three works by French composers, indicating that it was compiled during the reign of Charles II of England. [4] Musicologist Barry Cooper suggested that the bulk of the manuscript dates from approximately 1655–1670 with the final thirteen works dating later. Surveying numerous manuscripts containing French harpsichord music, Bruce Gustafson suggested "circa 1664?" [5]

In her discussion of the manuscript, Candace Bailey noted that Gerald Hendrie (editor of an edition of Orlando Gibbons's keyboard music) observed that Gibbons's composition "The Queen's Command" exists both in Drexel 5611 and in British Library manuscript Add. 31723, and that the latter source was copied from the former. [6] [7] A note in the Add. 31723 manuscript indicates: "transcribed from an ancient ms. of 1657." Bailey wonders that, if Drexel 5611 is that 1657 manuscript, does the date mentioned in the note represent a beginning or termination date? Bailey observed that if the 1657 termination date is correct, Drexel 5611 represents the earliest sources of music composed by Matthew Locke. [8] Bailey concluded her discussion by establishing dating at "1650s or early 1660s." [9]

Physical description

The dimensions of Drexel 5611 measures 11.5 × 7.75 × .75 inches (29.2 × 19.7 × 1.9 cm). [4] It contains 89 works written out over 159 pages. [9]

The manuscript's title page is preceded by a tipped-in image of Gibbons by engraved by J. Caldwell and published about 1750—apparently the work of a later owner. (The engraving is the same as included in John Hawkins's A General History of the Science and Practice of Music published in 1776. [10] )

Watermarks

Bruce Gustafson identified six watermarks present in Drexel 5611: [5]

Gustafson watermark numberVisual descriptionPossible source
51 [11] Foolscap with seven-point bell collar, facing right, with figure "4" and three circlesno information
71 [12] Cardinal's hatno information
72 [12] Horn in crowned wreath with initials "IGD"English origin [13]
86 [14] Large posts with grapes (fir cone?) and trefoil crown; no discernable initialsPossibly of German origin [15]
87 [16] Large pot (single-handled, left) with U-shaped top, initials "O [Q?] R"no information
88 [16] Large post (single-handled, right) with U-shaped top, initials not discernableno information

Robert Klakowich [17] believed that the paper of Drexel 5611 was probably of French or German origin. He based this assumption on knowing that Holland was the main paper distributor for Europe during the mid-17th century, importing paper from France, Switzerland, Germany and Italy, and then redistributing it. (Holland would not be a paper manufacturer until the last two decades of the seventeenth century.) [18]

Provenance

Allmaine by Thomas Heardson, the first work found in the manuscript Drexel 5611 Drexel 5611 no 1 Heardson.JPG
Allmaine by Thomas Heardson, the first work found in the manuscript Drexel 5611

Jeffrey Mark observed that seven of the final ten works in Drexel 5611 were composed by Albertus Bryne. He thus surmised that the manuscript was once owned by Bryne, who became organist of Westminster Abbey after 1666. [4] That the signature of no. 83 is less neat than that of the copyist of the surrounding works led Mark to assume it was Bryne's signature. [4]

Klakowich discovered that the manuscript had once belonged to Charles Burney and was listed as lot 634 in the auction of his estate. [19] He hypothesized that Burney might have come into possession of the manuscript during the third quarter of the 18th century. [20]

The reprint of Burney auction catalog indicates that the manuscript was purchased for 5s 6d by Edward Jones (1752-1824). [21] [22]

It is not known how the manuscript came into the possession of Edward Francis Rimbault, although Klakowich made an educated guess that it could have been purchased from the Jones's auction by Rimbault's father, Stephen Francis Rimbault. [23] A musicologist and a voracious collector of British manuscripts, it is not surprising that the manuscript would become one of his holdings. After Rimbault's death in 1876, the manuscript was listed as lot 1394 in the 1877 auction catalog of his estate. [24] [25] Purchased for £16 10s, [26] the manuscript was one of about 600 lots acquired by Philadelphia-born financier Joseph W. Drexel, who had already amassed a large music library. Upon Drexel's death, he bequeathed his music library to The Lenox Library. When the Lenox Library merged with the Astor Library to become the New York Public Library, the Drexel Collection became the basis for one of its founding units, the Music Division. Today, Drexel 5856 is part of the Drexel Collection in the Music Division, now located at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts at Lincoln Center.

Copyists

Scholars have identified three different hands in the manuscript. Their lack of a definitive identity has given musicologists a chance to evaluate and hypothesize based on available evidence. Most scholars suspect that the first scribe (who entered most of the works and the index at the front of the volume) was Thomas Heardson. [9] Klakowich stated that the first copyist was responsible for nos. 1-76 and 78-86. [27] Klakowich observed that the manuscript's attributions to Heardson lack the title "Mr." which strongly suggests that Heardson himself was author and copyist. [28] Bailey noted that, although the name Thomas Heardson is associated with the manuscript, there were several people with that name from which to choose. [29] Basing her research on that of Klakowich, Bailey narrowed down the choice to one person, information about whom is elusive. He was organist at Ludlow Parish Church 1637–42, and possibly the author of the three-voice song "Gloria Patri" that appears in John Hilton's 1652 publication Catch That Catch Can. [28] [30] (The Wikipedia article Church of St. Mary Magdalene, Newark-on-Trent mentions that Heardson was master of the song school at that church 1642–49.) Comparing Drexel 5611 with a document produced by the Thomas Heardson of Ludlow Parish Church, Bailey concludes that they are the same hand, revealing the identify of Thomas Heardson. (She also suggests that he might be a brother or relative of John Heardson, organist at Lincoln Cathedral Choir in the 1630s.) [31]

Klakowich observed that the second copyist was responsible for only no. 77 on page 142 (a work by Matthew Locke). [27] He suggested that this copyist might have been an associate of Heardson's which Bailey considers a "reasonable proposal" (particularly as no other evidence presents itself). [32]

The third scribe entered works by Albertus Bryne, nos. 87-89 on pages .... [27] [9] This is particularly intriguing not just because of consecutive works by the same composer, but also because, as observed by Klakowich, the scribe appears to be the same one who penned the manuscript Ob. Mus. Sch. Ms. D.219 in the Bodleian Library. [29] Since all of the third copyist's work is that of composer Albert Bryne, Klakowich adopted Hendrie's belief and felt that Bryne is the copyist. (Klakowich felt that only the final three works are in Byrne's hand, which explains why some of the preceding works include the title "Mr." [33] )

Barry Cooper disagreed with Klakowich because of different forms of the name. Bailey attempted to reconcile the two conflicting viewpoints, noting that both manuscripts have a similar provenance (both are from Oxford), lending much weight to Bryne as the third copyist. [34]

Attributions

Klakowich identifies two main issues regarding the attributions in Drexel 5611: [27]

  1. Discrepancies between the index and the works
  2. Works found in other sources with different attributions

The number of conflicts in Drexel 5611 has led scholars to question the attributions altogether. For example, in his edition of keyboard works by Orlando Gibbons, editor Gerald Hendrie discounts all of Drexel 5611's attributions. Klakowich takes particular interest in no. 38. In Drexel 5611 the attribution is to Christopher Gibbons, whereas in other sources the composer is identified as Orlando Gibbons.

Klakowich notes that the version in Drexel 5611 is a reworking of a piece by Orlando Gibbons. He therefore solves the discrepancy by theorizing that the attribution of Christopher Gibbons may refer to him as an arranger (in this case, having made an arrangement of one of his father's works). [35] Klakowich therefore opens up the possibility that some of the attributions in Drexel 5611, rather than exclusively indicating composers, may sometimes refer to arrangers. [36]

Content

Saraband by Matthew Locke, one of his earliest known keyboard works, found in the manuscript Drexel 5611 Drexel 5611 Saraband by Locke.jpg
Saraband by Matthew Locke, one of his earliest known keyboard works, found in the manuscript Drexel 5611

In her 2003 study, Bailey described Drexel 5611 as heralding a new style in 17th-century British keyboard music. She based her observation on the manuscript's musical content, noting that the copyist had access to some of the most contemporary keyboard works of the period between the English Civil War and the Commonwealth, the frequency of dance movements, and the organization by key, composer and dance order. The manuscript's singularity stems from including the earliest known keyboard works of Matthew Locke. [9]

The majority of the eighty-nine works within Drexel 5611 are dance works. [37] Of these dance works, sixty-seven carry titles which clearly indicate their dance associations. The other sixteen contain dance characteristics but are either untitled or titled "Toy" (nos. 12, 13, 27), "For the hand" (nos. 68, 70, 71), "First, second, third" (nos. 28, 29, 31) and two have unique titles ("Gerrard's Tune" no. 30 and "Queen's Command" no. 67). [37] Combining designated works with those exhibiting particular dance characteristics, Klakowich observed that Drexel 5611 contains 31 almands, 43 corants, 8 sarabands, and 1 galliard. Before no. 77 Klakowich observes that organization of movements is not consistent. But after no. 77, he observes the frequency of the three-movement organization almand-corant-saraband. [38] This three-movement organization also exists with the works by Benjamin Rogers (nos. 32-34) and a four-movement structure for the works by Mercure (nos. 42-45).

The six non-dance works are three voluntaries (nos. 5, 55 and 56), one cantus firmus work (no. 6), the work entitled "Division" (no. 66, attributed in the manuscript to John Bull but probably composed by Orlando Gibbons), and the ground by Arthur Phillips. [37]

Organization

Allmaine by a composer identified as Mercure, exhibiting the French style of composition Drexel 5611 Allmaine by Mercure.jpg
Allmaine by a composer identified as Mercure, exhibiting the French style of composition

Mark was the first to note that Drexel 5611 used a six-line music staff, typical of organ and virginal music of the time. [39] He also noted that works in the manuscript are organized by key, leading him to propose that the manuscript was created by or for a teacher for pedagogical purposes. Advancing this idea, Mark surmised that the few works which do not adhere to this scheme were probably later additions entered on what was originally blank pages. [26] Bailey also observed the arrangement by key, adding that—within each key—works were organized by composer. Unlike most English keyboard manuscripts of the time, Bailey noted that Drexel 5611 carries composer attributions for every work (even though some of these attributions are in error). (Composer attributions were to become prevalent later in the 17th century.) [34] She observed the kind of music contained in Drexel 5611 ranges from simple settings of popular tunes to more complex works with varied repeats. [8]

Bailey theorized about the volume's organization based on the order of the works it contains. She saw a first section starting from the volume's initial page and continuing through page 65. [7] In this section she observed that the copyist must have had access to contemporary modern music of the period including the English Civil War and the Commonwealth of England. [9] She noted that the emphasis placed on dance movements "is new" as is their ordering. [9] Assuming the copyist was Heardson, Bailey observed that the manuscript begins with works by Heardson, Roberts and Facy, the latter two of whom Bailey suggested might have been colleagues. [40] She surmised that Heardson must have had brief access to works of Benjamin Rogers early during the manuscript's compilation, for his works appear (pages 58–60) but then cease while the works by Roberts and Facy continue. [7]

Bailey saw a second section from pages 66 through 130, characterized by a change of repertory that included works by foreign composers. [7] That Heardson places the works by John Mercure and those attributed to John Cobb together suggested to Bailey that he had access to these works for only a brief time. [7] She noted the two works by Thomas Tomkins on pages 90 and 92 show a significantly more intricate keyboard technique, in contradistinction to the surrounding works by Orlando Gibbons and others. [7] Although several works by La Barre and Tesure appear, they appear with less organization than the works by Mercure and Cobb. The variety of composers in this section suggests that Heardson had access to a considerable amount of music. [7]

Bailey identified the final section starting at page 131 and continuing through the end, beginning with a suite by Matthew Locke followed by ten works by Bryne. Though it might be logical to assume that all of Bryne's works are in the same hand, they are not, some being in Heardson's hand and others being in the same hand as in manuscript Mus. Sch. MS D.219 in the Bodleian Library. That Bailey calls this an enigma. [7]

Foreign influences

Musicologists have noted the inclusion of foreign music in the manuscript.(Klakowich, [41] Gustafson, Cooper 1989)

Bailey noted that works of composers John Roberts and Albertus Bryne appear to have been influenced by French keyboard style. [42] She noted that Drexel 5611 is one of only a few manuscripts that contain works by Hugh Facy. Bailey considered Facy's works were "part of the final vestiges of the contrapuntal tradition of the virginalists and evince a kinship with similar pieces by John Lugge, possibly resulting from a personal relationship with Lugge, who lived relatively nearby in Exeter." [42] The organ works by Hugh Facy included in Drexel 5611 contribute to our understanding of organ literature at a time when organs were banned in churches and cathedrals. [9]

List of contents

This table is based on Bailey whose list numbered each musical work consecutively. [43] Page 124 in the manuscript is mistakenly labeled 125; succeeding pages continue the scribe's erroneous count. Page numbers listed here adhere to the erroneous count.

Page numberWork numberTitleAttribution in manuscriptRemarks
11AllmaineTho: Heardson
22[Allmaine]T:H:title from index
33[Allmaine]Mr. Jo: Robertstitle from index
4-54[Allmaine]Mr. Robertstitle from index
6-75VoluntaryHugh: Facytitle: Hugh: Facy: Voluntary?
8-96Ave Maris stellaMr: Facy
10blank
117AllmaineMr: Roberts
128AllmaineTho: Heardson
139Corant[Tresure]
1410[Corant]La: Tresortitle from index
15-1611A GalliardMr: Facy
1712[Toy]Mr: Facytitle from index
1813[Toy]Mr: Facytitle from index
19blank
20-2114Lesson & handMr: facytitle from index
22blank
2315AllmaineTho: Heardson
2416CorantTho: Heardson
2517AllmaineMr: Jo: Robertsincorrect title in index, refers to #18
26-2718Allmaine and divisionMr: Jo: Robertstitle from index for #17
2819SarabrandMr: Roberts
29blank
30-3120[Corant]Mr: Jo: Robertstitle from index
32-3321[Corant]Mr: Jo: Robertstitle from index
34-3522CorantMr: Roberts
36-38blank
39-4123[Allmaine and division]Mr: Robertstitle from index
4224[Allmaine]Mr: Robertstitle from index
4325[Allmaine]Tho: Heardson
4426CorantTho: Heardson
4527ToyT:H:
46-4728[1st] [Allmaine]Mr: Facynumber-title from index
48-4929[2nd] [Allmaine]Mr: Facynumber-title from index
50-5130Gerrards TuneTho: Heardson
52-5731[3rd] [Corant]Mr: Facynumber-title from index
5832AllmaineRogersattributed to Rogers in index
5933CorantMr: Ben: Rogers
6034Sarb [Sarabrand]Mr: Benjamin Rogers
61blank
62-6335LessonMr: Facytitle from index
6436AllmaineTho: Heardson
6537CorantT:H:
66-6738[untitled]C.Gibbons [0. Gibbons]Possibly an arrangement by Christopher Gibbons of a work by his father Orlando Gibbons [44]
68blank
6939CorantTho: Heardson
7040[Corant][O.Gibbons]title and attribution from index; Gerald Hendrie states the work is most likely French, La Barre or Tresure [45]
71blank
72-7341CorantMercure
7441[Allmaine][Mercure]title and attribution from index
7542[Allmaine]Mercuretitle from index
7643CorantoMercure
7744Sarab[rand]Mercure
7845[Coranto]Mr. [Orlando] Gibbonstitle and "Orlando" from index; Gerald Hendrie states the work is most likely French, La Barre or Tresure [45]
7946[Coranto][Orlando Gibbons]title and attribution from index [spurious]; Gerald Hendrie states the work is most likely French, La Barre or Tresure [45]
8047[Coranto]Mr. [Orlando] Gibbonstitle and "Orlando" from index [spurious]; Gerald Hendrie states the work is most likely French, La Barre or Tresure [45]
8148AllmaineMr: Cobb
8249[Allmaine]Mr: Cobbtitle from index
8350[Coranto][Cobb]title and attribution from index
8451[Allmaine]Mr: Cobbtitle and attribution from index
8552[Allmaine]Mr: Cobbtitle from index
86blank
8753[Coranto]Mr: Cobbtitle from index
88-89blank
90-9154VoluntaryMr: Tho: Tomkins
92-9355VoluntaryMr: Tho: Tomkins
9456Corant [Allmaine]Mr: Treser
9557CorantMr: Treser
96-9758Corant [and division]Treser"and division" from index
9859Corant[Tresure]attribution from index
9960Corant[Tresure]attribution from index
100-10161CorantMr: Gibbs
10262AllmaineTreser
10363CorantLabar
104-10564CorantTreser
106-10765[untitled]Dr. Bull [O.Gibbons]*CVB and Mus. 47 (in Christ Church, Oxford) attribute to Orlando Gibbons
108-10966Queenes CommandDr. Bull [O.Gibbons]this work is attributed to Gibbons in Parthenia (published in 1621), CVB and Drexel 5612
110-11267[for the hand]Orlando Gibbonstitle from index [Portman] *Only Och 1177 (in Christ Church, Oxford) attributes to Portman, but Hendrie follows it based on style
11368CorantoLabarAttributed to "Mounsier Tresor" in index
114-11569[For the Hand]Mr: Facytitle from index
116-11770[For the Hand]T:H:
118-123blank; listed in index as two corants by Tresure
125-12671CorantoMr: Ben: CosynPage 124 mislabled 125
127blank
128-13072Coranto: Mr. LawesMr. Benjamin Coosens
131-13973GroundMr: Phillipps
14074[Allmaine]Mr. Locke
14175Coranto[? Locke]
14276SarabandMr. Lock
14377AllmaineMr: Albertus Bryne
14478CorantoA:B:
14579Sar[aband]Mr. Bryne
145-14680AllmaineAlbert Bryne
147-148blank
149-15081AllmaineMr. Bryne
15182Corant
15283[Sarabande]
153-154blank
155-15684AllmaineA BPossibly in Bryne's hand [46]
157-15885[Corant]A:B:Possibly in Bryne's hand [46]
158-15986[Sarabrand]A: BrynePossibly in Bryne's hand [46]

Works consulted

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orlando Gibbons</span> English composer and keyboard player (1583–1625)

Orlando Gibbons was an English composer and keyboard player who was one of the last masters of the English Virginalist School and English Madrigal School. The best known member of a musical family dynasty, by the 1610s he was the leading composer and organist in England, with a career cut short by his sudden death in 1625. As a result, Gibbons's oeuvre was not as large as that of his contemporaries, like the elder William Byrd, but he made considerable contributions to many genres of his time. He is often seen as a transitional figure from the Renaissance to the Baroque periods.

Louis Couperin was a French Baroque composer and performer. He was born in Chaumes-en-Brie and moved to Paris in 1650–1651 with the help of Jacques Champion de Chambonnières. Couperin worked as organist of the Church of St. Gervais in Paris and as musician at the court. He quickly became one of the most prominent Parisian musicians, establishing himself as a harpsichordist, organist, and violist, but his career was cut short by his early death at the age of thirty-five.

<i>Fitzwilliam Virginal Book</i>

The Fitzwilliam Virginal Book is a primary source of keyboard music from the late Elizabethan and early Jacobean periods in England, i.e., the late Renaissance and very early Baroque. It takes its name from Viscount Fitzwilliam who bequeathed this manuscript collection to Cambridge University in 1816. It is now housed in the Fitzwilliam Museum at Cambridge. The word virginals does not necessarily denote any specific instrument and might refer to anything with a keyboard.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matthew Locke (composer)</span> English Baroque composer

Matthew Locke was an English Baroque composer and music theorist.

Edward Francis Rimbault was a British organist, musicologist, book collector and author.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adrian Batten</span> English composer and organist

Adrian Batten was an English organist and Anglican church composer. He was active during an important period of English church music, between the Reformation and the English Civil War in the 1640s. During this period the liturgical music of the first generations of Anglicans began to diverge significantly from music on the continent. Among the genres developed during this period by Batten and other Anglican composers was the 'verse anthem', in which sections alternate between the full choir and soloists, underlain and unified by an independent organ accompaniment.

Francis Tregian the Younger (1574–1618) was an English recusant. Once thought to have been the copyist of a handful of important music manuscripts, his musical activities are the subject of dispute.

Albertus Bryne was an English organist and composer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drexel Collection</span>

The Drexel Collection is a collection of over 6,000 volumes of books about music and musical scores owned by the Music Division of The New York Public Library. Donated by Joseph W. Drexel in 1888 to the Lenox Library, the collection, located today at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts, is rich with materials on music theory and music history as well as other musical subjects. It contains many rare books and includes a number of significant 17th-century English music manuscripts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drexel 4257</span> 17th-century British music manuscript commonplace book

Drexel 4257, also known by an inscription on its first page, "John Gamble, his booke, amen 1659" is a music manuscript commonplace book. It is the largest collection of English songs from the first half to the middle of the 17th century, and is an important source for studying vocal music in its transition from Renaissance music to Baroque music in England. Many songs also provide commentary on contemporary political events leading up to the Restoration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drexel 4041</span>

Drexel 4041 is a 17th-century British music manuscript commonplace book. As described by musicologist John P. Cutts, Drexel 4041 "is a treasure-house of early seventeenth-century song and dramatic lyric worthy of the attention of any student of seventeenth-century literature and drama." It is also a major source for the work of English composer William Lawes. Belonging to the New York Public Library, it forms part of the Drexel Collection, housed in the Music Division of the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts. Following traditional library practice, its name is derived from its call number.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drexel 4175</span>

Drexel 4175, also known by an inscription on its cover, "Ann Twice, Her Book" or by the inscription on its first leaf, "Songs unto the violl and lute," is a music manuscript commonplace book. It is a noted source of songs from English Renaissance theatre, considered to be "indispensable to the rounding-out of our picture of seventeenth-century English song." It is believed to contain the original music of the song "Come Away, Hecket" as heard in Thomas Middleton's play The Witch which was used in William Shakespeare's Macbeth. Belonging to the New York Public Library, the manuscript forms part of the Music Division's Drexel Collection, located at the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts. Following traditional library practice, its name is derived from its call number.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drexel 4302</span>

Drexel 4302, also known as the Sambrook Book, based on an inscription from a former owner, Francis Sambrook, is a music manuscript containing vocal and keyboard music from Italian and British composers, documenting the transition from Renaissance to Baroque music. Though literature on the manuscript has assumed the copyist was Francis Tregian the Younger, recent analysis has demolished that hypothesis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drexel 4180–4185</span> 17th-century set of manuscript partbooks

Drexel 4180–4185 is a set of six manuscript partbooks copied in Gloucester, England, containing primarily vocal music dating from approximately 1615-1625. Considered one of the most important sources for seventeenth century English secular song, the repertoire included represents a mixture of sacred and secular music, attesting to the partbooks' use for entertainment and pleasure, rather than exclusively for liturgical use.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drexel 5856</span>

Drexel 5856 is a music manuscript containing works composed by George Frideric Handel. It is a significant primary source of the composer's work, having been copied by one of Handel's frequent copyists, John Christopher Smith, possibly as a presentation copy.

Parthenia Inviolata, or Mayden-Musicke for the Virginalls and Bass-Viol is the second book of keyboard music printed in England, containing twenty pieces scored for virginal and bass viol.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Drexel 3976</span>

Drexel 3976, also known as The Rare Theatrical, is a 17th-century music manuscript compilation of works by the composer Matthew Locke, considered by some to be "the father of all Restoration dramatic music." The manuscript is a significant source of Locke's instrumental dramatic music with many works not known through any other source, although the contexts of the individual works and the names of the plays which they are from has not been documented.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Autograph (manuscript)</span> Manuscript or document written in the authors handwriting

An autograph or holograph is a manuscript or document written in its author's or composer's hand. The meaning of autograph as a document penned entirely by the author of its content, as opposed to a typeset document or one written by a copyist or scribe other than the author, overlaps with that of holograph.

The Musical Antiquarian Society was a British society established in 1840. It published, during seven years, 19 volumes of choral music from the 16th and 17th centuries.

Joseph Warren (1804–1881) was an English musician and composer, best known as a music editor.

References

  1. Cooper 1972, p. 319.
  2. Bailey 2003, p. 74.
  3. Resource Description and Access, rule 6.2.2.7, option c (access by subscription).
  4. 1 2 3 4 Mark 1925, p. 853.
  5. 1 2 Gustafson 1979, p. 133.
  6. Gibbons 1962.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Bailey 2000, p. 61.
  8. 1 2 Bailey 2000, p. 62.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Bailey 2000, p. 52.
  10. Mark 1925, p. 854.
  11. Gustafson 1979, p. 177.
  12. 1 2 Gustafson 1979, p. 179.
  13. Similar to those listed as #2776 in Edward Ard Heawood, Watermarks, Mainly of the 17th and 18th Centuries (Hilversum: The Paper Publication Society, 1950) and #62 from Edward Ard Heawood, "Papers Used in England After 1600: the Seventeenth Century to c. 1860," The Library 11 (March 1930), p. 285-286.
  14. Gustafson 1979, p. 180.
  15. Edward Ard Heawood, "Further Notes on Paper Used in England After 1600," The Library 5 (1947), p. 119-120.
  16. 1 2 Gustafson 1979, p. 181.
  17. Klakowich 1985, p. 16-19.
  18. Klakowich 1985, p. 17.
  19. Catalogue of the Music Library of Charles Burney, sold in London, 8 August 1814, edited by A. Hyatt King, Auction catalogues of music v. 2 (Amsterdam: Frits Knuf, 1973). ISBN   9789060272619.
  20. Klakowich 1985, p. 55.
  21. Klakowich 1985, p. 57.
  22. A Catalogue of the ... Library of ... Mr. Edward Jones, Bard to the King, Containing an Extremely Rare Collection of Music and Works on Music, Pageants and Archery ... Sold by Auction, by Mr. Sotheby ... Feb. 7th, 1825. [London]: Samuel Sotheby, 1825.
  23. Klakowich 1985, p. 58.
  24. Catalogue of the Valuable Library of the Late Edward Francis Rimbault, Comprising an Extensive and Rare Collection of Ancient Music, Printed and in Manuscript ... which will be sold by auction, by Messrs. Sotheby, Wilkinson & Hodge ... on Tuesday, the 31st of July, 1877, and five following days (London: Sotheby, Wilkinson & Hodge, 1877), p. 93, lot 1394. OCLC   11988908
  25. Bailey 2000, p. 51.
  26. 1 2 Mark 1925, p. 852.
  27. 1 2 3 4 Klakowich 1985, p. 32.
  28. 1 2 Klakowich 1985, p. 28.
  29. 1 2 Bailey 2000, p. 56.
  30. Bailey 2000, p. 58.
  31. Bailey 2000, p. 59.
  32. Bailey 2000, p. 59-60.
  33. Klakowich 1985, p. 31.
  34. 1 2 Bailey 2000, p. 60.
  35. Klakowich 1985, p. 33.
  36. Klakowich 1985, p. 34.
  37. 1 2 3 Klakowich 1985, p. 52.
  38. Klakowich 1985, p. 54.
  39. Mark 1925, p. 851.
  40. Bailey 2000, p. 60-61.
  41. Klakowich 1985, p. 49ff.
  42. 1 2 Bailey 2000, p. 63.
  43. Bailey 2000, p. 65-67.
  44. Klakowich 1985, p. 33-34.
  45. 1 2 3 4 Gibbons 1962, p. 103.
  46. 1 2 3 Klakowich 1985, p. 40.