Dupree v. Younger

Last updated

Dupree v. Younger
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Decided May 25, 2023
Full case nameDupree v. Younger
Docket no. 22-210
Citations598 U.S. ___ ( more )
Holding
A post-trial motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 is not required to preserve for appellate review a purely legal issue resolved at summary judgment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas  · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor  · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch  · Brett Kavanaugh
Amy Coney Barrett  · Ketanji Brown Jackson
Case opinion
MajorityBarrett, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Fed. R. Civ. P. 50

Dupree v. Younger, 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a post-trial motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50 is not required to preserve for appellate review a purely legal issue resolved at summary judgment. [1] [2]

Contents

See also

References

  1. Dupree v. Younger,No. 22-210 , 598 U.S. ___(2023).
  2. "Court rules for Maryland prison official on procedural issue". SCOTUSblog. May 31, 2023. Retrieved November 14, 2024.

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .