Epuli Aloh Mathias

Last updated

Chief Epuli Aloh Mathias is Paramount Chief of the Bakossis in the south-west region of Cameroon. [1] His jurisdiction covers all the thirteen Bassossi villages. [1] In addition, he is a judge in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Cameroon. [2] [3] [4] As of 7 June 2017, the Higher Judicial Council headed by president Paul Biya nominated Chief Justice Epuli Aloh Mathias to preside the Judicial Bench of the Supreme Court of Cameroon. [5] [6] After graduating from the National School of Administration and Magistracy (ENAM), he steadily rose through the ranks of the judiciary, working in many jurisdictions in the country. Furthermore, he has worked in helping develop key legislature, providing an insight into the customs and traditions of legal practice and how they were harmonized with local laws in the former West Cameroon under British rule. [1]

In governance, his main focus has been on increasing the literacy rate in Bassossi villages by building schools, improving access to quality healthcare by encouraging more Bassossis to undertake healthcare studies, and above all, vigorously promoting environmental conservation within Bassossi communities. [7]

As of 2012, he has been holding a series of meetings to evaluate progress made in preventing poaching and illegal logging, an ongoing challenge in Bassossi land. [8] [9] [10]

Justice Chief Epuli Aloh Mathias is fluent in spoken and written English and French. He also speaks a slew of local languages, including "Nsuase". [1]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Canada</span> Highest court of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural, hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual, hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of India</span> Highest constitutional body in India

The Supreme Court of India is the supreme judicial authority of India and is the highest court of the Republic of India under the constitution. It is the most senior constitutional court, has the final decision in all legal matters except for personal laws and interstate river disputes, and also has the power of judicial review. The Chief Justice of India is the Head and Chief Judge of the Supreme Court, which consists of a maximum of 34 judges, and has extensive powers in the form of original, appellate and advisory jurisdictions. New judges here are uniquely nominated by existing judges and other branches of government have neglible say as the court follows collegium system for appointments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Pakistan</span> Highest authority court of Pakistan

The Supreme Court of Pakistan is the apex court in the judicial hierarchy of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of Final Appeal (Hong Kong)</span> Final appellate court of Hong Kong

The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal is the final appellate court of Hong Kong. It was established on 1 July 1997, upon the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, replacing the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council as the highest judicial institution under Hong Kong law. As defined in Articles 19 and 85 of the Basic Law of Hong Kong, the Court of Final Appeal "exercises judicial power in the Region independently and free from any interference." The Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance and the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Rules set out the detailed functions and procedures of the court.

The court system of Canada forms the country's judiciary, formally known as "The King on the Bench", which interprets the law and is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iowa Supreme Court</span> Highest court in the U.S. state of Iowa

The Iowa Supreme Court is the highest court in the U.S. state of Iowa. The Court is composed of a Chief Justice and six Associate Justices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the Philippines</span> Highest court in the Philippines

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the Philippines. The Supreme Court was established by the Second Philippine Commission on June 11, 1901 through the enactment of its Act No. 136, an Act which abolished the Real Audiencia de Manila, the predecessor of the Supreme Court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of New South Wales</span> Superior court of New South Wales, Australia

The Supreme Court of New South Wales is the highest state court of the Australian State of New South Wales. It has unlimited jurisdiction within the state in civil matters, and hears the most serious criminal matters. Whilst the Supreme Court is the highest New South Wales court in the Australian court hierarchy, an appeal by special leave can be made to the High Court of Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Court (Hong Kong)</span> Superior court of record with unlimited civil and criminal jurisdiction in Hong Kong

The High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is a part of the legal system of Hong Kong. It consists of the Court of Appeal and the Court of First Instance; it deals with criminal and civil cases which have risen beyond the lower courts. It is a superior court of record of unlimited civil and criminal jurisdiction. It was named the Supreme Court before 1997. Though previously named the Supreme Court, this Court has long been the local equivalent to the Senior Courts of England and Wales and has never been vested with the power of final adjudication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oklahoma Supreme Court</span> One of the two highest judicial bodies in the U.S. state of Oklahoma

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma is a court of appeal for non-criminal cases, one of the two highest judicial bodies in the U.S. state of Oklahoma, and leads the judiciary of Oklahoma, the judicial branch of the government of Oklahoma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial system of Turkey</span> National court system of the Republic of Turkey

The judicial system of Turkey is defined by Articles 138 to 160 of the Constitution of Turkey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chief Justice of Gibraltar</span>

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Gibraltar is one of the four judges who make up the supreme court of Gibraltar. Previously the Chief Justice was appointed by the Governor of Gibraltar on the advice of the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Under the 2006 Constitution the Governor, on the advice of the Judicial Service Commission, makes the appointment on behalf of the Monarch.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Pakistan</span>

The judiciary of Pakistan is a hierarchical system with two classes of courts: the superior judiciary and the subordinate judiciary. The superior judiciary is composed of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the Federal Shariat Court and five High Courts, with the Supreme Court at the apex. There is a High Court for each of the four provinces as well as a High Court for the Islamabad Capital Territory. The Constitution of Pakistan entrusts the superior judiciary with the obligation to preserve, protect and defend the constitution. Neither the Supreme Court nor a High Court may exercise jurisdiction in relation to Tribal Areas, except otherwise provided for. The disputed regions of Azad Kashmir and Gilgit–Baltistan have separate court systems.

The judiciary of India is a system of courts that interpret and apply the law in the Republic of India. India uses a common law system, first introduced by the British East India Company and with influence from other colonial powers and Indian princely states, as well as practices from ancient and medieval times. The constitution provides for a single unified judiciary in India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial officers of the Republic of Singapore</span> Wikimedia list article

The judicial officers of the Republic of Singapore work in the Supreme Court and the State Courts to hear and determine disputes between litigants in civil cases and, in criminal matters, to determine the liability of accused persons and their sentences if they are convicted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial system of China</span>

The judicial branch, organized under the constitution and law, is one of five organs of power elected by the People's Congress, in the People's Republic of China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of the Czech Republic</span> Overview of court system in Czech Republic

The Judiciary of the Czech Republic is set out in the Constitution, which defines courts as independent institutions within the constitutional framework of checks and balances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Judicature (Barbados)</span>

The Supreme Court of Judicature of Barbados is the highest judicial body in the country of Barbados. It is made up of the High Court and the Court of Appeals.

Law in the Republic of Vanuatu consists of a mixed system combining the legacy of English common law, French civil law and indigenous customary law. The Parliament of Vanuatu is the primary law-making body today, but pre-independence French and British statutes, English common law principles and indigenous custom all enjoy constitutional and judicial recognition to some extent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bakossi people</span>

The Bakossi people are a Bantu ethnic group that live on the western and eastern slopes of Mount Mwanenguba and Mount Kupe in the Bakossi Mountains of Cameroon. They number about 200,000, mostly engaged in subsistence farming but also producing some coffee and cocoa.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Sone, Andrew Ewang (2007). Readings in the Cameroon Criminal Procedure Code. Presses univresitaires d'Afr. ISBN   978-9956-444-34-2. Archived from the original on 2 September 2022. Retrieved 2 October 2020.
  2. Supreme Court of Cameroon website Archived 12 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine [ full citation needed ]
  3. Archived 2 September 2022 at the Wayback Machine Republic of Cameroon, The proceedings of the head of state, Decree no. 2009/075, 18 February 2009 (In French). Retrieved 13 March 2012
  4. Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine Supreme Court of Cameroon, Allocution 10, 21 March through 24 March 2006. (In French). Retrieved 13 March 2012. (Says Mathias is a judge of the Supreme Court)
  5. "Epuli Mathias Aloh: Retour à la maison". Archived from the original on 7 August 2017. Retrieved 25 June 2017.
  6. "Décret N°2017/277 du 7 juin 2017 portant nomination de Magistrats au Siège de la Cour Suprême" (in French). Republic of Cameroon. Archived from the original on 2 September 2022. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  7. "BACDA-UK General Assembly Meeting 31st March 2012-Reading," Archived 2012-12-21 at the Wayback Machine retrieved 13 March 2012. (Mentions Chief Justice Epuli Aloh Mathias. His "emphasis in governing" not found.Just lists him among "prominent persons" of the Bakossi.)
  8. "A vision for biodiversity conservation in Central Africa. Appendix A: Descriptions of biologically important areas." Archived 14 May 2012 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 13 March 2012. (No mention found of Mathias)]
  9. Greenpeace: "Forest crime file: Corporate crimes, April 3003. Chainsaw criminal reef." Archived 2008-08-28 at the Wayback Machine (No mention found of Mathias). Retrieved 13 March 2012]
  10. Project of independent observer in support of forest law enforcement in Cameroon. "Report of the independent observer No. 065En" Global Witness. 23 May 2003. Archived 2 March 2011 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 13 March 2012. (No mention found of Mathias)]