Eugene Local Measure 51

Last updated

Eugene local measure 51
May 23, 1978
Referendum petition - measure repealing Ordinance No. 18080, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svgYes22,89863.04%
Light brown x.svgNo13,42736.96%
Valid votes36,325100.00%
Invalid or blank votes00.00%
Total votes36,325100.00%

Eugene Local Measure 51 was a 1978 petition calling for a referendum in Eugene, Oregon, to repeal Ordinance no. 18080, which prohibited sexual orientation discrimination in the city. [1] VOICE (Volunteer Organization in Community Enactments) created and campaigned for the petition, and gathered enough signatures to force a referendum vote. Measure 51 passed with 22,898 votes for and 13,427 against. [1] This bill's passage garnered national attention, with Miami anti-gay activist Anita Bryant's telegram congratulating VOICE on the victory. It is the earliest example of 35 ballot measures to limit gay rights in Oregon. [2]

Contents

Ordinance no. 18080

On October 24, 1977, the Eugene City Council heard the proposition of Ordinance no. 18080, an amendment to the Eugene Human Rights Ordinance. This ordinance would add sexual orientation to the list of classes protected against discrimination in the areas of housing, public accommodation, and employment. The Eugene Human Rights Council approved the ordinance. [3]

The president of the Human Rights Council told the city council that the proposal wouldn’t endorse any non-majority sexual behavior. He also stated that it would not outlaw any prejudices but would only help protect citizens' constitutional rights. Other proponents of the bill shared personal experiences of discrimination as evidence for why the resolution was needed.

The opposition argued that allowing homosexual behavior would erode the morality of the Eugene community. People also feared that homosexuals were attempting to infiltrate the school system and that the passage of this ordinance would increase the number of child molestation cases. [3]

During closed discussion between the council members, Council Member Williams suggested adding an amendment to the ordinance to allow sexual orientation to be considered when employing people who work with children, specifically between the ages of 12 and 15, due to a concerns that having homosexual role models during formative years would influence children to become gay. Other members disagreed stating that the concerns were based on unreasonable fears, rather than any evidence. [3]

The vote for adding the amendment failed, but the main ordinance passed with a non-unanimous vote, requiring second hearing. [3] Before the second hearing, VOICE started gathering signatures for petitions to trigger a referendum. [4] In the primary election of November 28, 1977, Measure 18080 passed. [5] The Register-Guard had an article the next day saying, "that wasn’t the last the community will hear of the issue." [6]

Measure 51

A plan for repeal for Ordinance no.18080 began only 14 hours after it was passed at the November 28, 1977, City Council meeting. [4] [6] VOICE led a rigorous campaign against the ordinance. Enough signatures were gathered, and it was added to the Primary Election Ballot as Local Bill Measure 51. Repeal of Ordinance no. 18080 would legalize discrimination based on sexual orientation in housing, jobs, and public accommodations.

Eugene Citizens for Human Rights were the main opponents of the measure. They argued that the LGBT community needed protection against and a guarantee they won’t be discriminated against for their sexual orientation. However, VOICE argued that the ordinance gave the LGBT community unfair privileges and would encourage inappropriate public conduct. [7] Organizers used door-to-door canvassing to educate likely opponents of Measure 51 on gay visibility. [8] : 52 

A public debate was planned at Junction City High School, which was well known for hosting fair debates on controversial subjects. However, the debate was cancelled due to complaints from parents. [9]

On May 19, 1978, Martin Rosenberg of the Capital Journal wrote, "Network television news crews, newspaper reporters and national news magazine writers have descended on the city in recent days." [10]

The primary was held on May 23, 1978. Eugene Mayor Gus Keller read the results of the vote: 22,898 for the repeal, and 13,427 against, [1] thus repealing Ordinance no. 18080. [11]

After the win VOICE campaign organization leader Lynn Greene said, "The idea that this is a human rights issue is a facade and people recognized that." [7] The Associated Press carried the story that Miami anti-gay activist Anita Bryant sent a telegram to Larry Dean, congratulating VOICE and "the Christian public and all the citizens of Eugene who worked and voted against legalized immorality". [12]

The Dispatch of Lexington, North Carolina, explored reasons why voters in Eugene and elsewhere repealed such laws passed by legislators, quoting Arthur C. Warren, a board member of the Sexual Law Reporter: "I think in all cases legilators are more intelligent—less exposed to the myths." [13]

St. Paul and Wichita also held referendums on LGBT rights in 1978. [8] : 43  Though these were local measures, they sparked a national conversation. Gay rights activists created a Tri-Cities Defense Fund to fundraise jointly against all three referendums. [8] : 60  After Measure 51 passed, activists in San Francisco held a protest against it. [14] Terry Bean, one of the Eugene gay activists who advocated against Measure 51, later went on to co-found the Human Rights Campaign and the LGBTQ Victory Fund. [2]

See also

Related Research Articles

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 1978.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 1992.

This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights that took place in the year 1977.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1978 California Proposition 6</span> Defeated ballot initiative on the California state ballot, sponsored by John Briggs, 1978

California Proposition 6, informally known as the Briggs Initiative, was a ballot initiative put to a referendum on the California state ballot in the November 7, 1978 election. It was sponsored by John Briggs, a conservative state legislator from Orange County. The failed initiative sought to ban gays and lesbians from working in California's public schools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Romania</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in Romania may face legal challenges and discrimination not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Attitudes in Romania are generally conservative, with regard to the rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender citizens. Nevertheless, the country has made significant changes in LGBT rights legislation since 2000. In the past two decades, it fully decriminalised homosexuality, introduced and enforced wide-ranging anti-discrimination laws, equalised the age of consent and introduced laws against homophobic hate crimes. Furthermore, LGBT communities have become more visible in recent years, as a result of events such as Bucharest's annual pride parade and Cluj-Napoca's Gay Film Nights festival.

The Oregon Citizens Alliance (OCA) was a conservative Christian political activist organization, founded by Lon Mabon in the U.S. state of Oregon. It was founded in 1986 as a vehicle to challenge then–U.S. Senator Bob Packwood in the Republican primaries, and was involved in Oregon politics from the late 1980s into the 1990s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Save Our Children</span> US anti-gay political coalition formed in 1977

Save Our Children, Inc. was an American political coalition formed in 1977 in Miami, Florida, to overturn a recently legislated county ordinance that banned discrimination in areas of housing, employment, and public accommodation based on sexual orientation. The coalition was publicly headed by celebrity singer Anita Bryant, who claimed the ordinance discriminated against her right to teach her children biblical morality because the ordinance specifically required parochial Christian schools, like the one her children attended, to hire openly homosexual teachers. It was a well-organized campaign that initiated a bitter political fight between gay activists and Christian fundamentalists. When the repeal of the ordinance went to a vote, it attracted the largest response of any special election in Dade County's history, passing by a more than 2-to-1 margin. In response to this vote, a group of gay and lesbian community members formed Pride South Florida, now known as Pride Fort Lauderdale, an organization whose mission was to fight for the rights of the gay and lesbian community in South Florida.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights at the United Nations</span>

Discussions of LGBT rights at the United Nations have included resolutions and joint statements in the United Nations General Assembly and the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), attention to the expert-led human rights mechanisms, as well as by the UN Agencies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Michigan</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Michigan enjoy the same rights as non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Michigan, as is same-sex marriage. Discrimination on the basis of both sexual orientation and gender identity is unlawful since July 2022, was re-affirmed by the Michigan Supreme Court - under and by a 1976 statewide law, that explicitly bans discrimination "on the basis of sex". The Michigan Civil Rights Commission have also ensured that members of the LGBT community are not discriminated against and are protected in the eyes of the law since 2018 and also legally upheld by the Michigan Supreme Court in 2022. In March 2023, a bill passed the Michigan Legislature by a majority vote - to formally codify both "sexual orientation and gender identity" anti-discrimination protections embedded within Michigan legislation. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed the bill on March 16, 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Minnesota</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Minnesota have the same rights and responsibilities as non-LGBT people. Minnesota became the first U.S. state to outlaw discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in 1993, protecting LGBT people from discrimination in the fields of employment, housing, and public accommodations. In 2013, the state legalized same-sex marriage, after a bill allowing such marriages was passed by the Minnesota Legislature and subsequently signed into law by Governor Mark Dayton. This followed a 2012 ballot measure in which voters rejected constitutionally banning same-sex marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Pennsylvania</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania enjoy most of the same rights as non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Pennsylvania. Same-sex couples and families headed by same-sex couples are eligible for all of the protections available to opposite-sex married couples. Pennsylvania was the final Mid-Atlantic state without same-sex marriage, indeed lacking any form of same-sex recognition law until its statutory ban was overturned on May 20, 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Arizona</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in the U.S. state of Arizona may face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Arizona, and same-sex couples are able to marry and adopt. Nevertheless, the state provides only limited protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Several cities, including Phoenix and Tucson, have enacted ordinances to protect LGBT people from unfair discrimination in employment, housing and public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Nebraska</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Nebraska may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Nebraska, and same-sex marriage has been recognized since June 2015 as a result of Obergefell v. Hodges. The state prohibits discrimination on account of sexual orientation and gender identity in employment and housing following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County and a subsequent decision of the Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission. In addition, the state's largest city, Omaha, has enacted protections in public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Idaho</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in the U.S. state of Idaho face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT people. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Idaho, and same-sex marriage has been legal in the state since October 2014. State statutes do not address discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBT people is illegal under federal law. A number of cities and counties provide further protections, namely in housing and public accommodations. A 2019 Public Religion Research Institute opinion poll showed that 71% of Idahoans supported anti-discrimination legislation protecting LGBT people, and a 2016 survey by the same pollster found majority support for same-sex marriage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Alaska</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Alaska may face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT Alaskans. Since 1980, same-sex sexual conduct has been allowed, and same-sex couples can marry since October 2014. The state offers few legal protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, leaving LGBT people vulnerable to discrimination in housing and public accommodations; however, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County established that employment discrimination against LGBT people is illegal under federal law. In addition, four Alaskan cities, Anchorage, Juneau, Sitka and Ketchikan, representing about 46% of the state population, have passed discrimination protections for housing and public accommodations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fairness Campaign</span>

The Fairness Campaign is a Louisville, Kentucky-based lobbying and advocacy organization, focusing primarily on preventing discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. The Fairness Campaign is recognized by the IRS as a 501(c)(4) organization. The organization is a member of the Equality Federation.

SAVE is a grassroots nonprofit political advocacy organization located in Miami, Florida. Founded in 1993, the organization's stated mission is to "promote, protect and defend equality for people in South Florida who are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender."

The Christian Civic League of Maine is a political lobbying group founded to support prohibition of alcohol and later advocating for various conservative Christian policies in the government of the US state of Maine. It is the Focus on the Family affiliate organization for Maine, and its policy priorities today resemble that of this parent organization. It has worked to oppose same-sex marriage and adoption, to censor pornography, to oppose gambling, to legally permit LGBT employment discrimination, and to support conversion therapy.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Eugene Election History". eugene-or.gov. July 2, 2018. p. 36. Retrieved February 28, 2020.
  2. 1 2 Nicola, George (April 10, 2013). "Oregon Anti-Gay Ballot Measures". GLAPN. Retrieved March 3, 2020.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Henry, Charles (October 24, 1977). "10/24/1977 Meeting". coeapp.eugene-or.gov. Retrieved February 28, 2020.
  4. 1 2 Henry, Charles (October 26, 1977). "10/26/1977 Meeting". coeapps.eugene-or.gov. Retrieved February 28, 2020.
  5. ↑ Henry, Charles (November 28, 1977). "11/28/1977 Meeting". coeapps.eugene-or.gov. Retrieved February 28, 2020.
  6. 1 2 "City passes gay rights amendment". Register Guard. November 29, 1977. pp. 1A–2A. Retrieved May 5, 2020– via Google News.
  7. 1 2 Nelson, Don (May 24, 1979). "Defeat leaves gay rights backers undeterred". Eugene Register-Guard. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  8. 1 2 3 Stone, Amy (2012). Gay rights at the ballot box. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN   9780816675487.
  9. ↑ Thoele, Mike (May 23, 1978). "High school probably won't hear gay debate". Eugene Register-Guard. Retrieved March 2, 2020.
  10. ↑ Rosenberg, Martin (May 19, 1978). "Rights vote puts Eugene on spot". The Capital Journal. p. 1. Retrieved May 6, 2020.
  11. ↑ "Eugene voters repeal gay-rights ordinance". Albany Democrat-Herald. May 24, 1978. p. 11. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  12. ↑ "Anita Bryant praises Eugene". Albany Democrat-Herald. May 24, 1978. p. 11. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  13. ↑ "Voters reject homosexual rights, but why?". The Dispatch. Lexington, North Carolina. May 29, 1978. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  14. ↑ Shilts, Randy (2008). The mayor of Castro Street. St. Martin's Griffin. p. 220. ISBN   9780312560850.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.