Family policy in Japan

Last updated

The percentage of births to unmarried women in selected countries, 1980 and 2007. As can be seen in the figure, Japan has not followed the trend of other Western countries of children born outside of marriage to the same degree. Percentage of birth to unmarried women, selected countries, 1980 and 2007.png
The percentage of births to unmarried women in selected countries, 1980 and 2007. As can be seen in the figure, Japan has not followed the trend of other Western countries of children born outside of marriage to the same degree.

Family policy in the country of Japan refers to government measures that attempt to increase the national birthrate in order to address Japan's declining population. [2] It is speculated that leading causes of Japan's declining birthrate include the institutional and social challenges Japanese women face when expected to care for children while simultaneously working the long hours expected of Japanese workers. [3] Japanese family policy measures therefore seek to make childcare easier for new parents.

Contents

History

Prewar policies

Japanese family policy in the early twentieth century was limited. [4] Japanese industrialisation was originally localised in the textile production sector which relied heavily on the participation of women. This prompted female workers to campaign for the institution of childcare services for employees. In the 1890s, coal mines and spinning factories introduced daycare centers (kōjō takujisho) for their workers. [5] [6] These early daycare centers were directed towards low-income families and did not offer educational services. [7] They were also primarily run privately by individuals or interest groups who were given government subsidies.

The Japanese government frequently introduced reforms during periods of rapid industrialisation and war, but slowed its efforts during times of peace. [8] The Russo-Japanese War (1904-1905) caused the prevalence of daycare centers to increase to 2,200. These 2,200 centers decreased to 18 by 1912. [5] The number of daycare centers also fluctuated in correlation with female participation in the workforce. [9] As construction slowly replaced textiles and mining as the dominant industry, the workforce became more male-dominated and many daycare centers were closed.

The Factory Act of 1911 set minimum standards for health and safety by limiting the workday to twelve hours for women and children, as well as introducing a five-week maternity leave policy. [4] Its revision in 1923 decreased the work day to eleven hours for women and children, added breaks for nursing women, and extended maternity leave by four weeks of prenatal leave and six weeks of postnatal leave. [10]

The rice riots of 1917 and 1918 prompted an increase in social spending. [7] [5] By 1923, 65% of the Home Ministry's social projects budget was distributed to orphanages, clinics, and daycare centers.

Early postwar policies

Family policies became more progressive in the postwar era; several new policies were introduced by American officials during the U.S. occupation of Japan. [7] [11]

The Labor Standards Law (1947) attempted to alleviate gender discrimination by eliminating wage discrimination and ensuring equal treatment (byōdō taigū) by imposing penalties on offending employers. [12] The law guaranteed women twelve weeks of paid (60% of their regular wage) maternity leave. This program is financed by the Japanese healthcare system. However, the law indirectly causes employers to hire less women as it bars women from working potentially hazardous or overnight jobs, and heavily limited the hours they were allowed to work overtime. [7]

The 1947 Child Welfare Law introduced benefits such as provisions for daycare centers and mother-child housing to accommodate those widowed and orphaned during World War II. [13] These benefits were originally provided only to those who demonstrated need, but the program was eventually extended to include all children. [6] This expansion in coverage created problems as demand for services exceeded supply, ultimately causing issues between the Ministry of Education (which oversaw kindergartens) and the Ministry of Health and Welfare (which oversaw childcare more generally). [7]

Revisions to the law in 1951 limited access to state-funded childcare to children who were “lacking care” (hoiku ni kakeru kodomo) and established a placement system (sochi seido) with varying fees calculated by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Childcare centers managed by the state and non-profit groups conformed to the eight hours of care a day mandated by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and could only accept children through the placement program. [7] However, the eight hours of care a day provided frequently failed to meet the needs of parents with full-time jobs.

Late postwar era

Prior to the 1990s, the Japanese family policy was based on the assumption that men were the breadwinners of the family. [14] The policy focused on achieving stable family structures which relied on the full-time employment of men. In response to economic difficulties and the declining fertility rate, changes to the policy become inevitable. The social policy has expanded to address care responsibility, child benefits, the well being of families with children, and childcare. In recent years, major concerns about the fertility rate and childcare services has arisen from the Japanese public and government. There have been successive reforms to the child benefit system based on these concerns. [15] Japan's state-sponsored child benefit programs are not necessarily intended to reduce childhood poverty, rather the child benefit system is mainly focused on increasing the national fertility rate and economic development.

Child Benefit Act

The Child Benefit Act was implemented in 1972. [16] At first, it was an income-tested benefit [17] targeted to lower income groups in Japan. The Child Benefit Act began with 3000 yen as a contribution from local authorities. [18]

The developments of Child Benefit in Japan.png

Government reconsidered its aim and based on an ideology of self-reliance and strong family ties during the oil crisis in the middle of 1970s, they started to target the children who most needed the benefit by increasing the amount of reward money. [16]

The Child Benefit Act has two policy goals. [19] The first goal is to provide financial security for children, and the second goal is to support the well-being and development of children.

Before 1990, the benefits were only paid to the family of the children until they turned 3 years old. There was a payment of 5,000 yen for the first and second child in the family ($50 a month for the 1st child). Since the eligibility benchmark has been raised, there has also been an increase of the amount of money paid in benefit. Since 2005, only the average earning family can claim this benefit. [18] Families are paid up to $2,448.98 [20] for giving birth to a child since the enactment of the act. In addition, some Japanese employers offer bonuses to their employees for having babies. [21]

Gender-based division of labor

Labour force participation rate (15-64 age) in Japan, by sex Labour force participation rate in Japan.svg
Labour force participation rate (15-64 age) in Japan, by sex

In Japan, caring for young and old people has traditionally been the responsibility of the family. This norm has caused work-family conflict due to its labor division. [23] When raising a child people need access to workers’ income and benefits. Japanese Family Policy has changed its policy in response to the increasing number of working women and the low fertility rate and the work family-conflict. The policy tries to release working mothers from the anxiety and stress of child rearing [24] and encourage childbearing by offering maternity leave, part-time jobs, and being able to work at home.

Family policies in Japan are seen to contribute to reaching equality through gender labor and societal roles. [25] Parental and childcare policies are meant to provide higher income but result in increase in mother-service at work and lower home involvement with children. [26] The issue that continues the lack in female employment derives from grandparental care and low fertility rates. For the “womenomics” in Japan, the participation rate of labor force has reached its highest point in 2014 than last fifteen years. It is 66.0% according to OECD. “Womenomics is the promotion of economic empowerment for women”. [27] Work contracts encounter restrictions due to length of stay and the child reaching age one. Take-up rate is affected when parental leave policies are not taken advantage of since it lowers economic standing and reduces job continuity.

PL Take-Up Rate and Employment Rate after PL.png

Post-war labor concerns with the distribution of power amongst father and mother. “[Men form the core of the labor force and women provide social care that takes place at the family and societal levels]”. [25] Gender segregation longitudinal studies have covered the interconnection between family, work, and reproduction repercussions. “Fathering Japan is an organization that provides seminars and events to private citizens, groups and corporations, functions as the contact point for an active community of fathers, and produces material on participatory fatherhood”. [25]

Maternal assistance varies with tradition, religion, and women's preference. [26] Friendly policies are meant to promote a work-life balance and provide parental satisfaction to accomplish stronger family ties. Women's spousal economic dependency on men has decreased due to the change in housewife expectations. Japan aims to put more women into the labor force as a strategy to increase the output of Japan's economic growth and improvement in women's income too.

Parental Leave/ Child Care Leave Law (1992) [28]

In November 2001, this law was partially revised to prohibit business owners from firing, laying off, or downgrading their employees who have applied for this child care leave.

Parental Leave.jpg
Coverage and Enrollment Rates for Accredited Childcare.png
Employment Rate Childrearing.png

Childcare policies contain restrictions for children under six years old (coverage) and institutional credibility (accredited and non-accredited). “Accredited childcare centers must satisfy the criteria for capacity, area, the number of teachers per pupil, etc.”. [26] Subsidized childcare produce crowd funding with informal grandparental care, especially in a nuclear family oriented with the mother employed. Women's facilitation in the workforce is present but has not accommodated the difficulty of reduction in marriage, childbirth, and low capital. [25]

When associated with choices between home-work responsibilities, a mother's leisure and productivity of “human capital” is in jeopardy since it falls with the aging of a child. “In response to concerns about the falling fertility rate, the Ministry of Health and Welfare launched an emergency five-year plan in 1994 to improve daycare services, which was broadened in 1995 to a ten year plan pursued in conjunction with the Labour, Construction, and Education Ministries and named the [‘Angel Plan’]”. [29] The subsidies offer ‘administrative guidance’ in the span of 1-year leave to withhold job protection according to childbirth situation.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Child care</span> Care and supervision of children

Childcare, also known as day care, is the care and supervision of one or more children, typically ranging from two weeks to 18 years old. When describing a business class, 'daycare' is usually written as a single word. Although most parents spend a significant amount of time caring for their child(ren), childcare typically refers to the care provided by caregivers who are not the child's parents. Childcare is a broad topic that covers a wide spectrum of professionals, institutions, contexts, activities, and social and cultural conventions. Early childcare is an important and often overlooked component of child development.

Health and social welfare in Communist Czechoslovakia can be defined by increases in maternity benefits, fluctuations in birthrate and abortion rate and decreases in factors such as infant mortality. The healthcare system featured an excess of bureaucracy, small-scale corruption, failing medical infrastructure, and outdated medical supply, while the social welfare system also fell behind in areas such as housing and nurseries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Birth rate</span> Total number of live births per 1,000 divided by time period

Birth rate, also known as natality, is the total number of live human births per 1,000 population for a given period divided by the length of the period in years. The number of live births is normally taken from a universal registration system for births; population counts from a census, and estimation through specialized demographic techniques. The birth rate is used to calculate population growth. The estimated average population may be taken as the mid-year population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parental leave</span> Time taken off to care for a new child

Parental leave, or family leave, is an employee benefit available in almost all countries. The term "parental leave" may include maternity, paternity, and adoption leave; or may be used distinctively from "maternity leave" and "paternity leave" to describe separate family leave available to either parent to care for their own children. In some countries and jurisdictions, "family leave" also includes leave provided to care for ill family members. Often, the minimum benefits and eligibility requirements are stipulated by law.

Social security in Sweden is an aspect of the Swedish welfare system and consists of various social insurances handled by the National Agency for Social Insurance, and welfare provided based on need by local municipalities. Social security is the main conduit for redistribution of approximately 20% of the Swedish GDP mainly in the form of income taxes, Payroll taxes and Value added taxes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Temporary Assistance for Needy Families</span> U.S. federal aid program

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families is a federal assistance program of the United States. It began on July 1, 1997, and succeeded the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program, providing cash assistance to indigent American families through the United States Department of Health and Human Services. TANF is often regarded as just "welfare", but some argue this is a misnomer. Unlike AFDC, which provided a guaranteed cash benefit to eligible families, TANF is a block grant to states that creates no federal entitlement to welfare and is used by states to provide non-welfare services, including educational services, to employed people.

Social welfare, assistance for the ill or otherwise disabled and the old, has long been provided in Japan by both the government and private companies. Beginning in the 1920s, the Japanese government enacted a series of welfare programs, based mainly on European models, to provide medical care and financial support. During the post-war period, a comprehensive system of social security was gradually established. Universal health insurance and a pension system were established in 1960.

A mommy track is a path in a woman's life that puts priority to being a mother. It can also specifically refer to work arrangements for women in the workforce that facilitate motherhood, such as flexible hours, but at the same time usually provides fewer opportunities for career advancement. References to the mommy track often go along with being a housewife, "opting out" of the workforce, temporarily or even permanently. Women following the mommy track may be contrasted to career women who prioritize their careers more than having children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Feminism in Japan</span>

Feminism in Japan began with women's rights movements that date back to antiquity. The movement started to gain momentum after Western thinking was brought into Japan during the Meiji Restoration in 1868. Japanese feminism differs from Western feminism in that less emphasis is placed on individual autonomy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aging of Japan</span> Demographic transition of Japan that commenced in 1888

Japan has the highest proportion of elderly citizens of any country in the world. 2014 estimates showed that about 38% of the Japanese population was above the age of 60, and 25.9% was above the age of 65, a figure that increased to 29.1% by 2022. By 2050, an estimated one-third of the population in Japan is expected to be 65 and older. Population aging in Japan preceded similar trends in other countries, such as South Korea and China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Child care in the United Kingdom</span>

Child care in the United Kingdom is supported by a combination of rights at work, public sector provision and private companies. Child care is usually undertaken by the parents, and more often the mother who takes leave from employment. Early childhood education in a crèche or nursery is not freely available from the public sector, while fee-paying pre-schools are.

Social security in Germany is codified on the Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB), or the "Social Code", contains 12 main parts, including the following,

Work–family balance in the United States differs significantly for families of different social class. This differs from work–life balance: while work–life balance may refer to the health and living issues that arise from work, work–family balance refers specifically to how work and families intersect and influence each other.

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development provides data about OECD countries related to paid parental leave length, average pay rate and full-rate equivalent. Not all countries provide mothers with a pay rate equal to what they would have received if the absence had not occurred.

Luxembourg has an extensive welfare system. It comprises social security, health, and pension funds. The labour market is highly regulated, and Luxembourg is a corporatist welfare state. Enrollment is mandatory in one of the welfare schemes for any employed person. Luxembourg's social security system is the Centre Commun de la Securite Sociale (CCSS). Both employees and employers make contributions to the fund at a rate of 25% of total salary, which cannot eclipse more than five times the minimum wage. Social spending accounts for 21.9% of GDP.

Family policy in Spain refers to the implementation of public policy measures that aim to support the social actions carried out by families, as well as define family roles and relationships within Spain. These laws and services provide Spanish families with provisions regarding parental leave, childcare, family allowances, marriage, divorce, and cohabitation.

Marriage legislation has a long tradition in the Netherlands. The minimum age at marriage was set in the 1811 Civil Code, amended in 1838. Same sex marriage was allowed in 2001. The first Family Allowance Act was introduced in 1941, and provided benefits only to working families with more than two children. In 1947, the income dependency was abolished and wage earners were also entitled to an allowance for their first and second children under 18 years old. In 1963, family allowances were extended to self-employed people. Currently, all families living in the Netherlands are entitled to a family allowance if their child is younger than 18 years old. In 1956, the Netherlands passed the Nursery Education Act that funded preschool; however, in 1981, preschool was added to the standard education system. The Childcare Act of 2005 gave childcare an official framework which provided funding and supervision for many programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aging of South Korea</span> Overview of aging in South Korea

In South Korea, aging refers to an increase in the proportion of senior citizens to the total population. The term "senior citizens" include those aged 65 or older. According to Article 3 no.1 of the Framework Act on Low Birthrate of an Aging Society, the term "aging population" refers to the increasing proportion of elderly people in the entire population.

Primary responsibility for early learning, preschool and child care in Canada rests with the 13 provincial and territorial governments. Since 1984, there have been a number of unsuccessful attempts at establishing a national child care system. By 2019 in Canada, about 60% of children who were 0 to 5 years-old participated in day care arrangements. Of these, 52% were in formal day care settings and 26% were cared for by a relative in an informal setting. About 40% of parents had difficulty finding child care arrangements. As of 2016, 30% of child care operations in Canada were for-profit, which includes large single-owner corporate chains. Some federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal public funding of child care is limited to not-for-profit child care operations.

Generation Alpha is a social cohort born between the early 2010s and mid 2020s. The birth years of Generation Alpha have seen a decline in birth rates, especially in the developed world.

References

  1. ↑ "Changing Patterns of Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States". CDC/National Center for Health Statistics. May 13, 2009. Retrieved September 24, 2011.
  2. ↑ "Social Security in Japan 2014 Family Policy | IPSS". www.ipss.go.jp (in Japanese). Retrieved 2017-12-07.
  3. ↑ "A 2013 Declining Birthrate White Paper - Cabinet Office Home Page". www8.cao.go.jp. Archived from the original on 2018-03-31. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
  4. 1 2 M., Garon, Sheldon (1987). The state and labor in modern Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN   0520068386. OCLC   43476242.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. 1 2 3 Uno, Kathleen S. (1999). Passages to modernity : motherhood, childhood, and social reform in early twentieth century Japan . Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. ISBN   0824821378. OCLC   45843008.
  6. 1 2 Momose, Takashi; 百瀬孝 (1997). Nihon fukushi seidoshi : kodai kara gendai made (Shohan ed.). Kyōto-shi: Mineruva Shobō. ISBN   4623028003. OCLC   39257377.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lambert, Priscilla A. (2007-02-08). "The Political Economy of Postwar Family Policy in Japan: Economic Imperatives and Electoral Incentives". The Journal of Japanese Studies. 33 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1353/jjs.2007.0023. ISSN   1549-4721. S2CID   144568098.
  8. ↑ Araki, Takashi; 荒木尚志 (2002). Labor and employment law in Japan. 荒木, 尚志, 1959-, Nihon Rōdō Kenkyū Kikō. Tokyo: Japan Institute of Labor. ISBN   4538710180. OCLC   60743090.
  9. ↑ Josei rōdō to hoiku. Hashimoto, Hiroko, 1929-, 橋本, 宏子, 1929-. ドメス出版. 1992. ISBN   4810703363. OCLC   674779663.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  10. ↑ Kinue, Sakurai (1987). Bosei hogo undōshi. Tokyo: Domesu.
  11. ↑ W., Dower, John (2000). Embracing defeat : Japan in the aftermath of World War II. London: Penguin. ISBN   9780140285512. OCLC   60558451.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ↑ "Japan - Labour Standards Law (Law No. 49 of 7 April 1947)". www.ilo.org. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
  13. ↑ "Japan - Child Welfare Law (Law No. 164 of December 12, 1947)". www.ilo.org. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
  14. ↑ Gottfried, H (2002-03-01). "Reregulating breadwinner models in socially conservative welfare systems: comparing Germany and Japan". Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. 9 (1): 29–59. doi:10.1093/sp/9.1.29. ISSN   1072-4745.
  15. ↑ Tokoro, Michihiko. "Family policy under the new government in Japan: the case of new child benefit" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-01-09. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
  16. 1 2 "Children's Allowances in Japan" (PDF). Social Security Administration.
  17. ↑ "Japan OECD" (PDF).
  18. 1 2 The table 1 Graph
  19. ↑ "Japan: 2010 Child Allowance Law | Global Legal Monitor". www.loc.gov. Umeda, Sayuri. 2010-04-23. Retrieved 2017-12-07.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  20. ↑ "Information on recent reform of Japanese Social Policies". www.ipss.go.jp. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
  21. ↑ Rendon, Maria Jose. "Family Policy in the US, Japan, Germany, Italy, and France: Parental Leave, Child Benefits, Family Allowances, Child Care, Marriage, Cohabitation, And Divorce". contemporaryfamilies.org. Archived from the original on 2019-08-15. Retrieved 2017-12-07.
  22. ↑ OECD Labour Force Statistics 2020, OECD, 2020, doi:10.1787/23083387, ISBN   9789264687714
  23. ↑ Sumitaka, Harada (1996). The aging society, the family, and social policy. Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo.
  24. ↑ "Low Fertility and Family Policy in Japan" (PDF).
  25. 1 2 3 4 Vainio, Anna. "Japan's Family Friendly Policies: Why Fathers Matter" (PDF).
  26. 1 2 3 Yamaguchi, Shintaro (2016-07-05). "Family Policies and Female Employment in Japan" (PDF). Rochester, NY. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2634281. SSRN   2634281.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  27. ↑ Groysberg, Boris; Yamazaki, Mayuka; Sato, Nobuo; Lane, David (2017-02-01). "Womenomics in Japan".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  28. ↑ "2017 Amendment of Child/Family Care Leave Act". The American Chamber of Commerce in Japan. Retrieved 2017-12-08.[ permanent dead link ]
  29. ↑ Boling, Patricia (1998). "Family Policy in Japan". Journal of Social Policy. 27 (2): 173–190. doi:10.1017/S0047279498005285. S2CID   145757734.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.