Famine Inquiry Commission

Last updated
Bengal famine victim, 1943 Bengal famine 1943 photo.jpg
Bengal famine victim, 1943

The Famine Inquiry Commission, also known as the Woodhead Commission, was appointed by the Government of British India in 1944 to investigate the 1943 Bengal famine. [1] Controversially, it declined to blame the British government and emphasised the natural, rather than man-made, causes of the famine. [2]

Contents

After Archibald Wavell arrived as Viceroy of India in October 1943, he encountered sustained demands from Indian politicians for an inquiry into the ongoing famine. He stated that British inaction caused incalculable damage to the British empire's reputation. [3] Leopold Amery, secretary of state for India, worried that an inquiry would be "disastrous". If an inquiry had to be held, it should focus not on Indian financing of the war effort—which he believed was responsible for the famine—but instead on the food supply and population growth to the exclusion of political considerations. [4] The commission was finally appointed in 1944, chaired by Sir John Woodhead, a former civil servant [1] [5] and friend of Amery's who had previously led the Palestine Partition Commission. Other members included a representative each from the Hindu and Muslim communities, a nutrition expert, and Sir Manilal Nanavati, the former deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India. The hearings were acrimonious and held in camera . [6] Reportedly, the commission's members were ordered to destroy the transcripts of the proceedings following the publication of their report, but Nanavati declined to do so. [7]

The commission published its report in May 1945, [1] absolving the British government of most of the blame for the deaths during the famine. [2] According to the inquiry, shortage in the rice harvest was one of the main causes of the famine. It also found that the shortage only amounted to three weeks and that shortage had been more serious in 1941, a year in which there had been no famine. [8] The report acknowledged some failures in British price controls and transportation efforts [6] but reserved its most forceful finger-pointing for local politicians in the (largely Muslim) [9] provincial Government of Bengal: [10] As it stated, "...after considering all the circumstances, we cannot avoid the conclusion that it lay in the power of the Government of Bengal, by bold, resolute and well-conceived measures at the right time to have largely prevented the tragedy of the famine". [11] The Famine Inquiry Commission's position with respect to charges that prioritised distribution aggravated the famine is that the Government of Bengal's lack of control over supplies was the more serious matter. [12] American writer Madhusree Mukerjee questions the accuracy of some of the inquiry's figures, claiming that the final report altered the figures from some sources. [13] The estimate of the number of deaths, at 1.5 million, is much lower than the commonly accepted estimates today. [6]

At the time, Indian nationalists – though notedly not Gandhi [ citation needed ] – were infuriated with the report and blamed Britain for the famine. [14] According to developmental economics professor Siddiqur R. Osmani [15] and Amrita Rangasami, [16] the report was "designed to exonerate the administration from any blame for the famines" by focusing on a FAD (food availability decline) explanation. [17] [4] Mukerjee writes that Bengali administrators exhibited a sophisticated understanding of famine, specifically the role of taxation and speculation in causing them, but the Famine Inquiry Commission ignored this aspect. [4] In her opinion, the "Famine Commission’s best efforts were directed not towards explaining the famine, but towards obscuring the role played by His Majesty’s government in precipitating and aggravating" it. [7] Cormac Ó Gráda refers to "the muted, kid-glove tone" of the report, stating that wartime circumstances led the commissioners to omit criticism of the British government for allegedly failing to send additional supplies. [18] According to Benjamin Siegel, the commission reached correct and nuanced conclusions, but "the political imperatives of the day won out" in the final report. [6] Economist Peter Bowbrick defends the report's accuracy, which he considers "excellent... [i]n spite of the deficiencies of their market analysis" and much superior to that of Amartya Sen's writing. [19]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Famine (Ireland)</span> Famine in Ireland from 1845 to 1852

The Great Famine, also known within Ireland as the Great Hunger or simply the Famine and outside Ireland as the Irish Potato Famine, was a period of starvation and disease in Ireland lasting from 1845 to 1852 that constituted a historical social crisis which subsequently had a major impact on Irish society and history as a whole. The most severely affected areas were in the western and southern parts of Ireland--where the Irish language was dominant--and hence the period was contemporaneously known in Irish as an Drochshaol, which literally translates to "the bad life" and loosely translates to "the hard times". The worst year of the famine was 1847, which became known as "Black '47". During the Great Hunger, roughly 1 million people died and more than 1 million more fled the country, causing the country's population to fall by 20–25% between 1841 and 1871. Between 1845 and 1855, at least 2.1 million people left Ireland, primarily on packet ships but also on steamboats and barques—one of the greatest exoduses from a single island in history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Famine</span> Widespread scarcity of food

A famine is a widespread scarcity of food, caused by several factors including war, natural disasters, crop failure, widespread poverty, an economic catastrophe or government policies. This phenomenon is usually accompanied or followed by regional malnutrition, starvation, epidemic, and increased mortality. Every inhabited continent in the world has experienced a period of famine throughout history. During the 19th and 20th century, Southeast and South Asia, as well as Eastern and Central Europe, suffered the greatest number of fatalities. Deaths caused by famine declined sharply beginning in the 1970s, with numbers falling further since 2000. Since 2010, Africa has been the most affected continent in the world by famine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leo Amery</span> British Conservative politician (1873–1955)

Leopold Charles Maurice Stennett Amery, also known as L. S. Amery, was a British Conservative politician and journalist. During his career, he was known for his interest in military preparedness, British India and the British Empire and for his opposition to appeasement. After his retirement and death, he was perhaps best known for the remarks he made in the House of Commons on 7 May 1940 during the Norway Debate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Victor Hope, 2nd Marquess of Linlithgow</span> British politician, agriculturalist and colonial administrator (1887–1952)

Victor Alexander John Hope, 2nd Marquess of Linlithgow, was a British Unionist politician, agriculturalist, and colonial administrator. He served as Governor-General and Viceroy of India from 1936 to 1943. He was usually referred to simply as Linlithgow.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frederick Lindemann, 1st Viscount Cherwell</span> British physicist

Frederick Alexander Lindemann, 1st Viscount Cherwell, was a British physicist who was prime scientific adviser to Winston Churchill in World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bengal famine of 1943</span> Famine in British India during World War II

The Bengal famine of 1943 was an anthropogenic famine in the Bengal province of British India during World War II. An estimated 2.1–3 million people died, in the Bengal region, from starvation, malaria and other diseases aggravated by malnutrition, population displacement, unsanitary conditions and lack of health care. Millions were impoverished as the crisis overwhelmed large segments of the economy and catastrophically disrupted the social fabric. Eventually, families disintegrated; men sold their small farms and left home to look for work or to join the British Indian Army, and women and children became homeless migrants, often travelling to Calcutta or other large cities in search of organised relief.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Famine in India</span> Phenomenon of famines in the Indian subcontinent

Famine had been a recurrent feature of life in the South Asian subcontinent countries of India and Bangladesh, most notoriously under British rule. Famines in India resulted in more than 30 million deaths over the course of the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries. Famines in British India were severe enough to have a substantial impact on the long-term population growth of the country in the 19th and early 20th centuries.

Claims of media bias in South Asia attract constant attention. The question of bias in South Asian media is also of great interest to people living outside of South Asia. Some accusations of media bias are motivated by a disinterested desire for truth, some are politically motivated. Media bias occurs in television, newspapers, school books and other media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orissa famine of 1866</span> One of the biggest famines in India

The Orissa famine of 1866 affected the east coast of India from Madras northwards, an area covering 180,000 miles and containing a population of 47,500,000; the impact of the famine, however, was greatest in the region of Orissa, now Odisha, which at that time was quite isolated from the rest of India. In Odisha, the total number who died as a result of the famine was at least a million, roughly one third of the population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of major famines in India during British rule</span> Timeline of major famines in South Asia from 1765 to 1947

The timeline of major famines in India during British rule covers major famines on the Indian subcontinent from 1765 to 1947. The famines included here occurred both in the princely states, British India and Indian territories independent of British rule such as the Maratha Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chronology of the Great Famine</span>

The chronology of the Great Famine documents a period of Irish history between 29 November 1845 and 1852 during which time the population of Ireland was reduced by 20 to 25 percent. The proximate cause was famine resulting from a potato disease commonly known as late blight. Although blight ravaged potato crops throughout Europe during the 1840s, the impact and human cost in Ireland – where a third of the population was entirely dependent on the potato for food but which also produced an abundance of other food – was exacerbated by a host of political, social and economic factors which remain the subject of historical debate.

Cormac Ó Gráda is an Irish economic historian and professor emeritus of economics at University College Dublin. His research has focused on the economic history of Ireland, Irish demographic changes, the Great Irish Famine, and the history of the Jews in Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Upper Doab famine of 1860–1861</span>

The Doab famine of 1860–1861 was a famine in India that affected the Ganga-Yamuna Doab in the North-Western Provinces, large parts of Rohilkhand and Awadh, the Delhi and Hissar divisions of the Punjab, all in British India, then under Crown rule, and the eastern regions of the princely states of Rajputana. Up to 2 million people are thought to have perished in the famine.

<i>Churchills Secret War</i> 2010 book by Madhusree Mukerjee

Churchill's Secret War: The British Empire and the Ravaging of India during World War II is a book by Madhusree Mukerjee about the Bengal famine of 1943 during the period of British rule in India. It was published in August 2010 by Basic Books of New York, and later that month by Tranquebar Press of Chennai. The book examines the role in the famine, and subsequent partition of India in 1947, of Prime Minister Winston Churchill.

Madhusree Mukerjee is an Indian-American physicist, writer, editor, and journalist. She is the author of The Land of Naked People: Encounters with Stone Age Islanders (2003) and Churchill's Secret War: The British Empire and the Ravaging of India during World War II (2010). She is a contributor to the People's Archive of Rural India and a senior editor with Scientific American.

Ian Melville Stephens was a British journalist who was the editor of the Indian newspaper The Statesman in Kolkata, West Bengal, from 1942 to 1951. He became known for his independent reporting during British rule in India, and in particular for his decision to publish graphic photographs, in August 1943, of the Bengal famine of 1943, which claimed between 1.5 and 3 million lives. The publication of the images, along with Stephens' editorials, helped to bring the famine to an end by persuading the British government to supply adequate relief to the victims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Media coverage of the 1943 Bengal famine</span>

The Bengal famine of 1943-44 was a major famine in the Bengal province in British India during World War II. An estimated 2.1 million, out of a population of 60.3 million, died from starvation, malaria and other diseases aggravated by malnutrition, population displacement, unsanitary conditions, and lack of health care. Millions were impoverished as the crisis overwhelmed large segments of the economy and social fabric.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Racial views of Winston Churchill</span> Views and comments on race held or said by Sir Winston Churchill

Throughout his life, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill made numerous controversial statements on race, which some writers have described as racist. It is furthermore suggested that his personal views influenced important decisions he made throughout his political career, particularly relating to the British Empire, of which he was a staunch advocate and defender. In the 21st century, these views, along with those he expressed on empire, became one of the most discussed aspects of his legacy. Some academics, such as Kehinde Andrews, go so far as to suggest Churchill was "the perfect embodiment of white supremacy", while others like historian Andrew Roberts, say that Churchill could certainly be accused of paternalism, but not race-hatred.

The Iranian famine of 1942–1943 refers to a period of starvation that took place in Iran, which was under the rule of the Pahlavi dynasty. Iran at the time was occupied by the United Kingdom and Soviet Union despite being a neutral country in the Second World War.

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 Population Index 1946, p. 171.
  2. 1 2 Siegel 2018, pp. 25, 43; Ó Gráda 2008, p. 24 note 78.
  3. Limaye, Yogita (20 July 2020). "Churchill's legacy leaves Indians questioning his hero status". BBC News. Retrieved 18 October 2022.
  4. 1 2 3 Mukerjee 2014, p. 71.
  5. Ó Gráda 2009, p. 161.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Siegel 2018, p. 43.
  7. 1 2 Mukerjee 2014, p. 72.
  8. Mukerjee 2014, pp. 71–72.
  9. J. Mukherjee 2015, p. 185.
  10. Ó Gráda 2015, p. 39.
  11. Famine Inquiry Commission 1945, p. 105.
  12. Famine Inquiry Commission 1945, pp. 100–102.
  13. Mukerjee 2014, pp. 72–73.
  14. Siegel 2018, pp. 43–44.
  15. "Professor Siddiqur Osmani". Ulster University.
  16. M. Rahul (1 December 2013). "A veteran journalist recounts some prized scoops". Caravan Magazine.
  17. Osmani 1993, p. 41.
  18. Ó Gráda 2009, p. 179.
  19. Bowbrick 1985, p. 57.

Sources