Federal Charter School Program

Last updated

The Federal Charter School Program was created in 1994, as an amendment to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The purpose of the program is to provide federal funding to state or local education agencies that manage the development and execution of charter schools within the USA.

Contents

Historical context

A charter is simply the "grant of authority or rights, stating that the granter formally recognizes the prerogative of the recipient to exercise the rights specified." In other words, a charter is the approval of one party to another party's application to exercise rights. A charter school then, is simply a school that applies to exercise certain actions and are granted that right by an authority (usually a local or state education agency.) Charter school supporters argue that the increased autonomy of charter schools allows for more effective management, and a louder voice for stakeholders that can shape how charter schools are run.

The term "charter schools" was first brought into the public eye when "delegates to the 1988 national convention of the American Federation of Teachers [had] 'proposed that local school boards and unions jointly develop a procedure that would enable teams of teachers and others to submit and implement proposals to set up their own autonomous public schools within their school buildings...'" [1] Ray Budde had introduced the idea earlier that year in his publication "Education by Charter: Restructuring School Districts," in which he suggested that faculty or administrators could develop charters for specific programs within schools; the idea of developing actual charter schools stemmed from his original proposal. However, Albert Shanker transformed the idea into creating entire charter-based schools while he was president of the American Federation of Teachers, from 1974 to 1997.

In 1991, Minnesota enacted the first state law authorizing charter schools. A year later, the nation's first charter school (City Academy High School) opened. California became the second state to pass a law authorizing charters, in 1992.

As of 2021-2022 there were an estimated 7,800 public charter schools in 46 states and the District of Columbia, with approximately 3.7 million students [2] 7.4 percent of all public school students attended a charter school in the 2021-2022 school year. [3]

Generally, states that are poorer and have more powerful teachers' unions lobbying groups are less likely to pass charter school legislation. Higher income populations are more likely to organize and successfully lobby for charter school legislation. [4]

Charter schools today

Today's charter schools are centered within urban areas, and generally accept a higher proportion of low-achieving, low-income students. In general, they are small – with about 60% enrolling fewer than 200 students (in comparison, only about 16% of traditional public school enroll fewer than 200 students), and have a slightly lower proportion of students with disabilities and who are limited in English proficiency. [5]

While most charter schools continue to be run by independent organizations, there is an increasing number of "name-brand" charter schools, run by organizations such as KIPP (The Knowledge is Power Program), EdVisions or Big Picture. The creation of these management organizations develops from the philosophy that there needs to be a way to quickly replicate the success of charter schools if they are truly going to transform education. These organizations seek to franchise charter schools – or build individually managed units that follow the basic philosophy and regulations of a central organization – in order to grow their charter school model.

The Federal Charter School Program

The politically charged momentum of charter schools is partially due to the fact that it has gained supporters from both sides of the political spectrum; liberals support the idea of "accountable reform" within the public school system, while conservatives support a system that competes with traditional public schools. State and local support of charter schools is inextricably embroiled within parochial politics, and affected by the needs, desires, and incentives posed by local education systems. [6] Accordingly, attitudes towards charter schools vary by state, and it is difficult to make a general statement about charter schools in the national political imagination. [7] Ray Budde, in his 1996 article "The Evolution of the Charter Concept" explained that while the stakeholders in a traditional public school district may not be inclined to introduce reforms for altruistic or idealistic reasons, they might "restructure the establishment if they felt that they were under severe pressure and that not changing would have more serious consequences than changing." [8] Budde's 15-year-old prediction has proved true, as many urban school systems have been pushed to adopt drastic reform measures solely to stop students from fleeing to charter schools.[ citation needed ]

While many states were quick to jump on the charter school legislation bandwagon, there was no federal legislation addressing the movement until 1994. In 1994, under the Clinton administration, the basic Charter Schools Program (CSP) was created as an amendment to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. The purpose of the program was to provide funds to State Education Agencies (SEA) in order to create and support charter schools. Four years later, the program was amended in the "Charter Schools Expansion Act" of 1998. The act was widely supported in both houses, with an 84% vote in the House of Representatives, and a 100% vote in the Senate. [9]

The purpose of the program is to provide funds to "plan, design and implement new charter schools, as well a to disseminate information on successful charter schools" [10] in order to "expand the number of high-quality charter schools available to students across the Nation." [11] Through the creation of the CSP the Federal government recognized the power of charter schools to transform the public education system by both challenging traditional public schools to improve their quality of education, as well as by "enhance[ing] parent and student choices among public schools and give[ing] more students the opportunity to learn to challenging standards." [12] The advent of charter schools reflects the rise of parental choice and accountability regarding education policy. [13]

CSP Funding

In 1995, its first year of providing funds, the CSP provided $4,539,548 of appropriations to nine applicants. Since then, the program has drastically increased the funds it provides, but has not drastically increased the number of recipients – meaning more funding is going to the same number of applicants. For example, In 2010, the highest spending year of CSP, the program awarded $138,004,339 of appropriations to twelve recipients. The awards per recipient for 2010 ranged from about $1.3 million to about $51.9 million. [14] The CSP in general approves applications for funds from SEAs that oversee charter schools. However, in the case that a state does not apply for funding, or is denied funding, individual charter schools may apply directly to the CSP. [15] Once SEA's have received funds, they may not sub-grant the award to a charter school unless it meets the following criteria:

  1. It is exempt from significant State or local rules that 'inhibit the flexible operation and management' of public schools
  2. It is created by a developer as a public school, and is operated under public supervision and direction.
  3. It operates in "pursuit of a specific set of educational objectives."
  4. It provides either elementary or secondary education, or both.
  5. It is not affiliated with a sectarian school or religious institution. (However, like other public schools, charter schools may enter into partnerships with religious groups for secular purposes, like tutoring or recreational activities.)
  6. It does not charge tuition.
  7. It complies with the Age Discrimination Act of 1975.
  8. Parents choose to send their children to the school, and that if more students apply than can be accommodated they are chosen through a lottery.
  9. It agrees to comply with the same federal and state audit requirements of traditional public schools.
  10. It meets all applicable federal, state and local health and safety requirements.
  11. It operates in accordance with state law.
  12. It has a written performance contract with an authorized public chartering agency in the state, which includes a description of how student performance will be measured, and can be compared to assessments required of traditional public schools. [16]

These funds may be used for up to three years. In addition, the SEA may reserve up to 5 percent of funds for administrative expenses, and up to 10 percent to support dissemination activities (or activities that help open new public schools, including charter schools.) [15]

In 2010, the Obama administration renewed the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (which includes the Charter School Program), but with strengthened accountability measures. In a press release entitled "Public School Choice" the administration explained that the program would provide competitive grants to state education agencies or local education agencies that managed charter schools, but that applications would be evaluated based on "record of past success in funding, supporting authorizing, managing, or operating (as relevant) high-performing public charter schools or other high-performing autonomous public schools; their record of cutting off funding to or closing low-performing charter schools...; and their commitment to improving the quality of their schools in the future." [17]

Debate

The growth of the charter school movement has been paralleled by the growth of an accountability movement within the public education system. If charter schools have the potential of being the future "public schools," then we must confirm that they are running more effectively than the traditional school. As a result, many accountability studies have been conducted on the effectiveness of charter schools. Many accounts state that overall charter schools are doing a good job in meeting their goals. A study by the Center for Education Reform showed that between the mid 1990s and the fall of 2000, most charters were "doing the job they were designed to do, with 88 major reports now showing that charter schools are improving education for American kids." [18]

Stakeholders seem to uphold this consensus, as shown in a study conducted by the Columbia Teachers College of parental evaluations of traditional public schools and charters in Washington D.C. In the survey, "parents with children in charter schools rated their teachers, principals, facilities, and schools higher than their traditional public school counterparts." While this satisfaction could be influenced by the fact that parents chose to send their students to the school (and are therefore more likely to approve of the school), it is also noted in the study that "many charter schools have a culture that provides parents opportunities to influence school management, and to become more involved with the processes of school governance and functioning." [19]

However, there are many who claim that overall, there is no evidence that charter schools perform better than traditional schools – and that charter schools have other adverse effects on public school students. Tal Levy, in his essay entitled "Charter School Legislation and the Entitlement of Race" argues that the high number of minority students that enroll in charter schools actually deepens segregation within the public school system. He states "70% of African American students in charter schools attend intensely segregated minority schools compared to 34% of African American public school students." [20]

Related Research Articles

Education reform is the name given to the goal of changing public education. The meaning and education methods have changed through debates over what content or experiences result in an educated individual or an educated society. Historically, the motivations for reform have not reflected the current needs of society. A consistent theme of reform includes the idea that large systematic changes to educational standards will produce social returns in citizens' health, wealth, and well-being.

A school voucher, also called an education voucher in a voucher system, is a certificate of government funding for students at schools chosen by themselves or their parents. Funding is usually for a particular year, term, or semester. In some countries, states, or local jurisdictions, the voucher can be used to cover or reimburse home schooling expenses. In some countries, vouchers only exist for tuition at private schools.

School choice is a term for education options that allow students and families to select alternatives to public schools. It is the subject of fierce debate in various state legislatures across the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charter schools in the United States</span> Taxation-funded privately-run schools

Charter schools in the United States are primary or secondary education institutions which receive government funding but operate with a degree of autonomy or independence from local public school districts. Charter schools have a contract with local public school districts or other governmental authorizing bodies that allow them to operate. These contracts, or charters, are how charter schools bear their name. Charter schools are open to all students, depending on capacity, and do not charge tuition. 7.4 percent of all public school students attended a charter school in the 2021-2022 school year.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Secondary education in the United States</span> Last six years of statutory formal education before higher level education

Secondary education is the last six or seven years of statutory formal education in the United States. It culminates with twelfth grade. Whether it begins with sixth grade or seventh grade varies by state and sometimes by school district.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">No Child Left Behind Act</span> 2002 United States education reform law; repealed 2015

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) was a U.S. Act of Congress promoted by the Presidency of George W. Bush. It reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and included Title I provisions applying to disadvantaged students. It mandated standards-based education reform based on the premise that setting high standards and establishing measurable goals could improve individual outcomes in education. To receive federal school funding, states had to create and give assessments to all students at select grade levels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elementary and Secondary Education Act</span> 1965 US law

The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was passed by the 89th United States Congress and signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on April 11, 1965. Part of Johnson's "War on Poverty", the act has been one of the most far-reaching pieces of federal legislation affecting education ever passed by the United States Congress, and was further emphasized by the revised No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.

The District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) is the local public school system for Washington, D.C. It is distinct from the District of Columbia Public Charter Schools (DCPCS), which governs public charter schools in the city.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) was a measurement defined by the United States federal No Child Left Behind Act that allowed the U.S. Department of Education to determine how every public school and school district in the country was performing academically according to results on standardized tests. As defined by National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), AYP was "the amount of annual achievement growth to be expected by students in a particular school, district, or state in the U.S. federal accountability system, No Child Left Behind (NCLB)." AYP has been identified as one of the sources of controversy surrounding George W. Bush administration's Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Private schools were not required to make AYP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Jersey Department of Education</span> New Jersey state agency

The New Jersey Department of Education administers state and federal aid programs affecting more than 1.4 million public and non-public elementary and secondary school children in the state of New Jersey. The department is headquartered in the Judge Robert L. Carter Building in Trenton.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bilingual Education Act</span> Language education law of the United States

The Bilingual Education Act (BEA), also known as the Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Amendments of 1967, was the first United States federal legislation that recognized the needs of limited English speaking ability (LESA) students. The BEA was introduced in 1967 by Texas senator Ralph Yarborough and was both approved by the 90th United States Congress and signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson on January 2, 1968. While some states, such as California and Texas, and numerous local school districts around the country already had policies and programs designed to meet the special educational needs of elementary and secondary school students not fluent in the English language, this act signaled that the federal government now also recognized the need for and value of bilingual education programs in U.S. public education. In 1969 there was a 50% drop out rate among Mexican American students who struggled to keep up with their English-speaking peers in school; Representative Tony Abril argued that the Bilingual Education Act would reduce this number. Passed on the heels of the Civil Rights Movement, its purpose was to provide school districts with federal funds, in the form of competitive grants, to establish innovative educational programs for students with limited English speaking ability.

The English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement Act - formerly known as the Bilingual Education Act - is a federal grant program described in Title III Part A of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which was reauthorized as the No Child Left Behind Act in 2002 and again as the Every Student Succeeds Act in 2015. This section is specifically targeted to benefit Limited English Proficient (LEP) children and immigrant youth. The statute states that LEP students must not only attain English proficiency but simultaneously meet the same academic standards as their English-speaking peers in all content areas. Federal funding is provided to assist State Education Agencies (SEAs) and Local Education Agencies (LEAs) in meeting these requirements. In 2011, ESEA Title III awards were granted to 56 SEAs and the average award given to an individual SEA was $12,158,046.

School Improvement Grants (SIGs) are grants awarded by the U.S. Department of Education to state education agencies (SEAs) under Section 1003(g) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. The SEAs, in turn, award subgrants to local educational agencies for the purpose of supporting focused school improvement efforts. In 2009, the Obama administration, and specifically U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, challenged the education community to make the lowest-achieving schools its highest priority.

Charter schools operate with considerably more independence than traditional public schools. However, Massachusetts has two kinds of charter schools - Commonwealth Charters and Horace Mann Charters. Horace Mann charter schools differ from Commonwealth charter schools as they must be located within a school district. Both kinds of charter schools are free to structure their curriculum and school environment; for instance, many charter schools fit more instructional hours into a year by running longer school days and providing instruction on weekends and during the summer. Because few charter schools are unionized, they can hire and fire teachers and administrative staff without regard to the collectively bargained seniority and tenure provisions that constrain such decisions in most public schools. Although charter students made up only 2.9 percent of U.S. public school enrollment in 2008–2009, charter enrollment has grown rapidly and seems likely to accelerate in the near future. The growth of charter schools is an important component of the contemporary education reform movement's pursuit of accountability and flexibility in public education. Proponents see charter schools' freedom from regulation as a source of educational innovation, with the added benefit of providing a source of competition that may prompt innovation and improvement in the rest of the public system. At the same time, charter schools are controversial because, after a transition period in which the state provides subsidies, they receive a tuition payment for each enrolled student paid by students' home districts. In Massachusetts, tuition payments are determined largely by the average per-pupil expenditure in sending districts. Not surprisingly, therefore, public school districts are concerned about the revenue lost when their students enroll in charter schools.

Education reform has been a topic for Kentucky government officials and citizens for over 20 years. The most significant piece of reform legislation was passed in 1990, and was known as the Kentucky Education Reform Act (KERA). This act instituted six basic initiatives, some of the most important being a focus on core subjects, community service, and self-sufficiency. Kentucky education has seen improvements in terms of equalizing funding among various schools, but still has a long way to go in becoming nationally competitive in its educational outcomes and standardized test scores.

The highly qualified teacher provision is one of the goals of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. The term highly qualified teachers (HQT) comes from the original language of Title II of the No Child Left Behind Act. Title II of NCLB designates federal funds to educational agencies for the purpose of improving the student achievement through the professional development of highly qualified teachers and principals. To qualify for this funding, states must comply with a series of conditions stipulated in NCLB, and track their progress toward goals each state sets. Title II was originally known as the Eisenhower Professional Development Program, and has undergone several reauthorizations, though the original intent has remained relatively intact. The main goals of the highly qualified teacher provision is to ensure that every classroom is staffed by a teacher deemed "highly qualified" under conditions set by NCLB. As some point out, this section of NCLB is quite at odds with the general thrust of NCLB because it focuses on school inputs rather than student outcomes. The sections of NCLB designated to HQTs allocates the majority of the funds to the states and does not clearly define at the federal level what is and what is not a highly qualified teacher, allowing for more local definitions of this term. This provision has come under much scrutiny, as it is up to states to decide how to measure highly qualified, and states are not holding their teachers to the same level of rigor across the country. Since its reauthorization in 2001, Title II has yet to reach its stated goal of ensuring that 100% of teachers in public schools in the United States are highly qualified.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia Public Charter School Board</span> School authority of the U.S. capital

The District of Columbia Public Charter School Board is the regulatory authority and sole authorizer of all public charter schools in Washington, D.C. It provides oversight to 69 independently-run nonprofits and 135 public charter schools which educate more than 45,000 students living in every ward of the city. The board is tasked with approving, monitoring, and evaluating schools, creating policies and conditions to empower educators to do their best work, and actively engaging families, schools, and communities to inform decision-making.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charter school</span> Type of school that operates independently of the local public school system

A charter school is a school that receives government funding but operates independently of the established state school system in which it is located. It is independent in the sense that it operates according to the basic principle of autonomy for accountability, that it is freed from the rules but accountable for results.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Success and Opportunity through Quality Charter Schools Act</span> United States legislative Act

The Success and Opportunity through Quality Charter Schools Act is a bill that would amend and reauthorize both the Charter School Programs and the Credit Enhancement for Charter School Initiatives under Title V of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 through fiscal year 2020 and combine them into a single authorization. This is intended to streamline and improve the grants process and increase the funding for these programs from $250 million to $300 million.

The Pennsylvania school code, section 1327, policy for school choice is, “...to preserve the primary right and obligation of the parent or parents, or person or persons in loco parentis to a child, to choose the education and training for such child.”

References

  1. ↑ Budde, Ray (1996). "The Evolution of the Charter Concept". Phi Delta Kappan. 78 (1): 72–73. JSTOR   20405708.
  2. ↑ "Center for Education Reform FAQs". March 15, 2021. Retrieved May 26, 2024.
  3. ↑ "Charter School Data Digest". Website. National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. Retrieved June 2, 2024.
  4. ↑ Levy, Tal. "Charter Schools Legislation and the Element of Race". Western Journal of Black Studies: 47.
  5. ↑ "History of the Charter School Movement".
  6. ↑ Kirst, Michael W. (2007). "Politics of Charter Schools: Competing National Advocacy Coalitions Meet Local Politics". Peabody Journal of Education. 82 (2/3): 184–203. doi:10.1080/01619560701312939. JSTOR   25594744.
  7. ↑ Lewis, W. (2013). The Politics of Parent Choice in Public Education: The Choice Movement in North Carolina and the United States. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN   978-1137312075.
  8. ↑ Budde, Ray (Sep 1996). "The Evolution of the Charter Concept". The Phi Delta Kappan. 78 (1): 72–73. JSTOR   20405708.
  9. ↑ "H.R. 2616: Charter School Expansion Act of 1998". Govtrack.US.
  10. ↑ "CHARTER SCHOOL PROGRAM STATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES (SEA) GRANT". US Department of Education. Retrieved 31 October 2011.
  11. ↑ "Charter Schools Program, Title V, Part B, Non-Regulatory Guidance". US Dept of Education: 2. July 2004.
  12. ↑ "Charter Schools Program, Title V, Part B, Non-Regulatory Guidance". US Department of Education: 6. July 2004.
  13. ↑ Tweedie, Jack (1989) "Parental Rights and Accountability in Public Education: Special Education and Choice of School," Yale Law & Policy Review: Vol. 7: Iss. 2, Article 4.
  14. ↑ "CHARTER SCHOOL PROGRAM STATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES (SEA) GRANT". US Department of Education.
  15. 1 2 "Charter Schools Program, Title V, Part B, Non-Regulatory Guidance". US Department of Education: 9. July 2004.
  16. ↑ "Charter Schools Program, Title V, Part B, Non-Regulatory Guidance". US Department of Education: 6–7. July 2004.
  17. ↑ "Public School Choice" (PDF). US Department of Education. 2010.
  18. ↑ Tal, Levy (Spring 2010). "Charter Schools Legislation and the Element of Race". Western Journal of Black Studies. 34 (1): 43. ProQuest   200394184.
  19. ↑ Schneider, Mark; Buckley, Jack; Kucsova, Simona. "Making the Grade: Comparing DC Charter Schools to Public Schools". National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education; Teachers College, Columbia University (71).
  20. ↑ Levy, Tal (Spring 2010). "Charter School Legislation and the Elements of Race". Western Journal of Black Studies. 34 (1): 43.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.