Fimbrian legions

Last updated

The Fimbrian or Valerian legions were two Roman legions which served and fought in all three wars against King Mithridates of Pontus, one of the Roman Republic's chief adversaries during the 80s, 70s and 60s BC. They became a body of long serving legionaries known for their fierce fighting reputation and also, more infamously, for mutiny and abandoning their commander. The legions take their name from the consul Lucius Valerius Flaccus, who first recruited them in 86 BC, and from his subordinate, Gaius Flavius Fimbria, who took command of the legions after inciting a mutiny and murdering Flaccus.

Contents

Valerian/Fimbrian legions
Active86 BC–66 BC
Country Roman Republic
Branch Roman Army
Type Roman Legions
Size10,000 legionaries (2 legions)
Engagements First Mithridatic War
Second Mithridatic War
Third Mithridatic War
Commanders
Notable
commanders		 Lucius Valerius Flaccus
Gaius Flavius Fimbria
Lucius Licinius Lucullus
Lucius Licinius Murena
Pompey

Formation and first mutiny

In 86 BC, the populares, in control of the Roman government, dispatched suffect consul Lucius Valerius Flaccus with an army to the province of Asia as a political countermeasure to Lucius Cornelius Sulla, their main opponent. Sulla was campaigning in Greece and Macedon fighting against the forces of king Mithridates of Pontus (see: First Mithridatic War). [1] Flaccus probably employed experienced troops, drawing his recruits from veterans of the recent Social War, but due to a lack of funds he was only able to raise two legions. In 86 or 85 BC, Flaccus took his legions through northern Macedonia and Thrace to the Hellespont (to cross over into Asia Minor). Flaccus was unpopular with his troops and by the time they had reached the Bosporus, Gaius Flavius Fimbria, one of his legates (lieutenants), taking advantage of Flaccus’s absence, incited a mutiny. Flaccus returned to his army, failed to put down the mutiny, tried to flee, but was hunted down and executed. Fimbria cut off his head and hurled it into the sea. The Valerians now became the Fimbrians. [2]

The First Mithridatic War

Following the mutiny, Fimbria and his men decided to continue their journey in the hopes of defeating Mithridates and redeeming their treasonous behavior [the mutiny] in the eyes of the Roman government. Arriving in Asia Minor, the Fimbrians plundered their way towards Pergamum, Mithridates's Asian capital. When Mithridates sent an army to protect the city, Fimbria managed to take the Pontic forces by surprise and annihilated them. With the relief army destroyed, he then laid siege to Pergamum. Upon learning of the defeat, Mithridates decided to head for Pontus in order to raise another army.

As Mithridates awaited his fleet at Pitane on the northwestern coast of Asia Minor, the Fimbrians surprised him again, appearing at the gates of Pitane and besieging the town. Soon after a Roman fleet arrived under the command of Lucius Licinius Lucullus, a legate of Sulla. Although this fleet could have completed the encirclement and prevented Mithridates from escaping Pitane, Sulla—the chief political opponent of Fimbria's faction in Rome—had signed a separate armistice with Mithridates and Lucullus did not interfere when the Pontic fleet arrived to evacuate the king. [3]

Mutiny against Fimbria

After failing to capture Mithridates, Fimbria allowed his troops to pillage several cities, most prominently razing Ilium to the ground. Unfortunately for Fimbria, Sulla and his much larger army eventually approached and laid siege to Fimbria's camp. At this point Fimbria's men turned on him, once again deserting their commander. After a failed attempt at arranging Sulla's assassination, Fimbria committed suicide. When Sulla left Asia Minor to fight another civil war in Italy, he left the Fimbrians in Asia Minor to guard the Roman provinces. [4]

The Second Mithridatic War

In 83 BC one of Mithridates' generals, Archelaus, defected to the Romans. Archelaus convinced Lucius Licinius Murena, the Roman general tasked with protecting Bithynia, that Mithridates was planning another war with Rome. Murena marched his army, including the Fimbrians, across the river Halys into Pontic territory. This operation was less an invasion than a large-scale raid for plunder. The next year Murena repeated his actions, looting as many as 400 villages before Mithridates counterattacked. The Pontic king defeated the Roman force and drove Murena back to Bithynia. Subsequently, Aulus Gabinius, a representative of Sulla, arrived from Rome with instructions to cease all hostilities. This concluded the Second Mithridatic War. [5]

Mytilene

In the aftermath of the Second Mithridatic War the city of Mytilene on Lesbos refused to pay tribute to Rome. According to the Romans the people of Mytilene also supported the Cilician pirates who were becoming a real menace in the Mediterranean. Lucullus, whom Sulla had left in charge of Asia province, launched an attack on the city, defeating Mytilene’s forces in a pitched battle before its walls. [6] Since the Fimbrians were left under Lucullus’s command by Sulla, Lucullus probably used them in his attack on Mytilene. Sulla then sent one of his praetors, Marcus Minucius Thermus, to besiege Mytilene and finish the revolt before it could spread. [7] Thermus used the forces available in the province of Asia to conduct his siege. Since the Fimbrians formed the permanent garrison of Asia, they were probably involved.

The Third Mithridatic War

From 81 BC to 74 BC the Fimbrians served under several Roman governors in Asia Minor. When the Third Mithridatic War began, they were reported to be in the Roman province of Asia. Lucullus, now governor of Cilicia, was given the command of the war against Mithridates and sailed for Asia Minor. Landing at an unspecified location in Asia, he assumed command of the local Roman forces including the Fimbrians. According to Plutarch, Lucullus was the first genuine commander the Fimbrians had ever known. He refused to bribe them or bargain for their loyalty, instead insisting on discipline, rigor and military efficiency. [8]

Lucullus had planned to invade Pontus before going after Mithridates himself, but he received word that his colleague, the proconsul Marcus Aurelius Cotta, had been defeated in battle and was now under siege in Chalcedon. Lucullus altered his plans and marched to Cotta's rescue. Meanwhile, Mithridates had moved on to besieging Cyzicus. When Lucullus arrived near Cyzicus, he decided against engaging the numerically superior Pontic army. Similarly, Mithridates was reluctant to risk battle against the capable Lucullus, who eventually managed to trap the king's army on the Cyzicus Peninsula in a counter-siege. The siege of Cyzicus ended when Mithridates finally withdrew his army, weakened by disease and starvation. [9]

The next year Lucullus invaded Pontus. Here he finally allowed the Fimbrians to plunder and pillage. [10] Mithridates' army disintegrated after the Battle of Cabira, whereupon the Pontic king fled east to the court of his son-in-law king Tigranes II of Armenia. When negotiations with Tigranes failed, Lucullus invaded Armenia and won victories at Tigranocerta and Artaxata. Unable to beat Lucullus in open battle, Tigranes and Mithridates began resorting to hit-and-run tactics. Winter forced Lucullus to march westward at the end of 68 BC. After 18 years of service and 960 miles (1,500 km) of marching in the last five years, the Fimbrians refused to accompany Lucullus when he marched to besiege Nisibis in northern Mesopotamia. [11] They stayed on garrison duty in Pontus, where they were caught off guard by Mithridates when he suddenly returned to his kingdom in 67 BC at the head of a combined Armenian-Pontic army. [12] It is unclear whether the Fimbrians fought at the disastrous Battle of Zela that year, but their continued existence as two legions in 66 BC suggests that they probably did not.

Mutiny against Lucullus

After the Roman disaster at Zela, Lucullus arrived back in Pontus. He wanted to finish off Mithridates once and for all, but his troops refused to march. According to Plutarch, Lucullus's men threw their purses at his feet, saying that he was the only one profiting from the war and telling him to continue it on his own. [13] This latest mutiny was probably the result of machinations by Lucullus's brother-in-law Publius Claudius Pulcher, better known as Clodius. [14] The Fimbrians also received word from the new proconsul of Asia that the Roman Senate had discharged them from further service to Lucullus. Ultimately, Lucullus extracted from his army a promise to protect Rome's remaining possessions in the East—but their days of campaigning under him were at an end.

Fighting for Pompey and discharge

In 66 BC, the Roman general Pompey arrived in the East. Pompey had been given the command of the war against Mithridates and his allies. Pompey officially relieved Lucullus of his command and reenlisted most of his troops, including the Fimbrians. [15] In Pontus Pompey caught up with and defeated Mithridates' army at the Battle of the Lycus, but the Pontic king escaped yet again. [16] Unable to catch Mithridates, Pompey decided to attack Mithridates's allies: Tigranes, the Caucasian Iberians and the Caucasian Albanians. Before he advanced into Armenia, Pompey reduced the numbers of his army and granted some of his long-serving soldiers (almost certainly including the Fimbrians) their discharge, settling them in a new city called Nicopolis. [17]

Modern sources

Ancient sources

Related Research Articles

80s BC is the time period from 89 BC – 80 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lucullus</span> Roman politician and general (118–57/56 BC)

Lucius Licinius Lucullus was a Roman general and statesman, closely connected with Lucius Cornelius Sulla. In culmination of over 20 years of almost continuous military and government service, he conquered the eastern kingdoms in the course of the Third Mithridatic War, exhibiting extraordinary generalship in diverse situations, most famously during the Siege of Cyzicus in 73–72 BC, and at the Battle of Tigranocerta in Armenian Arzanene in 69 BC. His command style received unusually favourable attention from ancient military experts, and his campaigns appear to have been studied as examples of skillful generalship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mithridatic Wars</span> Conflicts between Rome and Pontus (88–63 BC)

The Mithridatic Wars were three conflicts fought by Rome against the Kingdom of Pontus and its allies between 88 – 63 BC. They are named after Mithridates VI, the King of Pontus during the course of the wars who initiated the hostilities after annexing the Roman province of Asia into its Pontic Empire and committing massacres against the Roman inhabitants there. Mithridates was able to organise revolts against advancing Roman troops and play off the political factions of the optimates and populares against one another in the Roman civil wars. Nevertheless, the first war ended with a Roman victory, confirmed by the Treaty of Dardanos signed by Sulla and Mithridates. Greece was restored to Roman rule and Pontus was expected to restore the status quo ante bellum in Asia Minor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Mithridatic War</span> 1st-century BC military conflict between the Roman Republic and the Kingdom of Pontus

The First Mithridatic War was a war challenging the Roman Republic's expanding empire and rule over the Greek world. In this conflict, the Kingdom of Pontus and many Greek cities rebelling against Roman rule were led by Mithridates VI of Pontus against Rome and the allied Kingdom of Bithynia. The war lasted five years and ended in a Roman victory, which forced Mithridates to abandon all of his conquests and return to Pontus. The conflict with Mithridates VI later resumed in two further Mithridatic Wars.

Lucius Licinius Murena was a Roman soldier and politician. He was notable for playing an important role in the Roman victory against the forces of Mithridates VI of Pontus at the Battle of Chaeronea in 86 BC during the First Mithridatic War and for starting another war, the Second Mithridatic War, against Mithridates in Asia Minor without the authorisation of the Roman senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Third Mithridatic War</span> War between King Mithridates IV of Pontus and the Roman Republic

The Third Mithridatic War, the last and longest of the three Mithridatic Wars, was fought between Mithridates VI of Pontus and the Roman Republic. Both sides were joined by a great number of allies, dragging the entire east of the Mediterranean and large parts of Asia into the war. The conflict ended in defeat for Mithridates; it ended the Pontic Kingdom and the Seleucid Empire, and also resulted in the Kingdom of Armenia becoming an allied client state of Rome.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Orchomenus</span> Battle between the Roman Republic and the Kingdom of Pontus

The Battle of Orchomenus was fought in 85 BC between Rome and the forces of Mithridates VI of Pontus. The Roman army was led by Lucius Cornelius Sulla, while Mithridates' army was led by Archelaus. The Roman force was victorious, and Archelaus later defected to Rome. The battle ended the Mithridatic invasion of Europe. Information on the battle is included in Plutarch's Life of Sulla, chapters 20–21.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Artaxata</span> 68 BC battle between Romans and Armenians

The Battle of Artaxata was fought near the Arsanias River in 68 BC between an army of the Roman Republic and the army of the Kingdom of Armenia. The Romans were led by proconsul Lucius Licinius Lucullus, while the Armenians were led by Tigranes II of Armenia, who was sheltering Mithridates VI of Pontus. The battle was part of the Third Mithridatic War, and was a Roman victory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siege of Cyzicus</span>

The siege of Cyzicus took place in 73 BC between the armies of Mithridates VI of Pontus and the Roman-allied citizens of Cyzicus in Mysia and Roman Republican forces under Lucius Licinius Lucullus. It was in fact a siege and a counter-siege. It ended in a decisive Roman victory.

The Battle of Cabira was fought in 72 or 71 BC between forces of the Roman Republic under proconsul Lucius Licinius Lucullus and those of the Kingdom of Pontus under Mithridates the Great. It was a decisive Roman victory.

The Battle of Lemnos was fought on the island of Lemnos in 73 BC between a Roman fleet and a Mithridatic fleet; it was a decisive event during the Third Mithridatic War. The primary chroniclers of the battle are Appian, Cicero and Memnon, but there remain debates about the specifics in these different accounts.

<i>Lex Manilia</i> Ancient Roman law

The lex Manilia was a Roman law passed in 66 BC granting Pompey the military command in the East against Mithridates VI of Pontus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kingdom of Pontus</span> 281 BC–62 AD kingdom in northern Anatolia

Pontus was a Hellenistic kingdom centered in the historical region of Pontus in modern-day Turkey, and ruled by the Mithridatic dynasty of Persian origin, which possibly may have been directly related to Darius the Great of the Achaemenid dynasty. The kingdom was proclaimed by Mithridates I in 281 BC and lasted until its conquest by the Roman Republic in 63 BC. The Kingdom of Pontus reached its largest extent under Mithridates VI the Great, who conquered Colchis, Cappadocia, Bithynia, the Greek colonies of the Tauric Chersonesos, and for a brief time the Roman province of Asia. After a long struggle with Rome in the Mithridatic Wars, Pontus was defeated.

Marcus Marius was a quaestor of the Roman Republic in 76 BC and proquaestor under Quintus Sertorius's government in exile in Spain. Marius was sent by Sertorius to Mithradates of Pontus as an advisor and military commander in the Third Mithridatic War. He is named as or more likely confused with a Varius in Appian.

The Battle of Zela, not to be confused with the more famous battle in 47 BC, was fought in 67 BC near Zela in the Kingdom of Pontus. The battle resulted in a stunning Pontic victory and King Mithridates' successful reclamation of his kingdom. Mithridates' victory was short-lived however, as within a few years he would be completely defeated by Pompey the Great.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Chalcedon (74 BC)</span>

The Battle of Chalcedon was a land and naval battle between the Roman Republic and King Mithridates VI of Pontus near the city of Chalcedon in 74 BC. It was the first major clash of the Third Mithridatic War. The Roman forces were led by Marcus Aurelius Cotta, one of the consuls for 74 BC, while Mithridates had the overall command of the Pontic forces. The Mithridatic forces were victorious on both land and sea.

The Battle of the Rhyndacus occurred in 73 BC between a Roman Republican force under the command of the proconsul Lucius Licinius Lucullus and a division of the army of Mithridates VI of Pontus as part of the Third Mithridatic War. The Romans were victorious.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quintus Bruttius Sura</span> Roman army officer

Quintus Bruttius Sura was a Roman commander who fought in the First Mithridatic War. He was the first Roman commander to successfully resist Mithridates' advance.

The siege of Heraclea was a military investment of the city of Heraclea Pontica during the Third Mithridatic War. The siege was conducted by the Roman proconsul Marcus Aurelius Cotta and the legate Gaius Valerius Triarius. They were besieging the adherents of Mithridates of Pontus, who held the city for the Pontic king. Heraclea was located on the strategically important northern land route into the kingdom of Pontus and had been taken and garrisoned by Mithridates on his retreat from the Siege of Cyzicus. The 4,000-man strong Mithridatic garrisoned was commanded by Connacorex, one of the king's generals, and held out for almost two years. After taking Heraclea, the Romans plundered the city extensively.

Gaius Valerius Triarius was a First Century BC Roman politician and general, a member of the gens Valeria. During the Third Mithridatic War he served as a legate to Lucius Licinius Lucullus, the Roman commander in charge of the war effort against king Mithridates VI of Pontus. He played a pivotal role in the capture of Heraclea Pontica, but was later defeated by Mithridates at the Battle of Zela in 67 BC.

References

  1. ↑ Brennan, The Praetorship in the Roman Republic, p. 526.
  2. ↑ Philip Matyszak, Mithridates the Great, Rome's Indomitable Enemy, pp 81-82.
  3. ↑ Philip Matyszak, Mithridates the Great, pp 85-86.
  4. ↑ Philip Matyszak, Mithridates the Great, pp 89-90.
  5. ↑ Philip Matyszak, Mithridates the Great, pp 93-96.
  6. ↑ Lee Fratatuono, Lucullus, pp 36-37; Plutarch, Life of Lucullus, IV.2-3.
  7. ↑ Lee Fratatuono, Lucullus, pp 38-39; Seutonius, Divus Iulius, II
  8. ↑ Lee Fratantuono, Lucullus, the life and campaigns of a Roman conqueror, p.51 and p.55; Sallust, Historiae III, fr.16.
  9. ↑ Lee Fratantuono, Lucullus, pp 57-61; Philip Matyszak, Mithridates the Great, pp 106-113.
  10. ↑ Philip Matyszak, Mithridates the Great, p.118.
  11. ↑ Philip Matyszak, Mithridates the Great, p.139.
  12. ↑ Philip Matyszak, Mithridates the Great, p.140.
  13. ↑ Plutarch, Life of Lucullus, 35.
  14. ↑ Lee Fratantuono, Lucullus, p.112.
  15. ↑ John Leach, Pompey the Great, p.76.
  16. ↑ John Leach, Pompey the Great, pp 79-80; Philip Matyszak, Mithridates the Great, pp 150-151.
  17. ↑ John Leach, Pompey the Great, p.82.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.