Financial Ombudsman Service (Australia)

Last updated

Financial Ombudsman Service
Predecessor
  • Financial Industry Complaints Service
  • Banking and Financial Services Ombudsman
Successor Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA)
Formation1 July 2008 (2008-07-01)
Dissolved31 October 2018 (2018-10-31)
Type Ombudsman
Location
Region served
Australia
Membership
Australian banks, insurers, credit providers, financial advisers and planners, debt collection agencies and other businesses that provide financial products and services
Chief Ombudsman
David Locke
Affiliations Australian Securities & Investments Commission
Staff (2016 [1] : 16 )
293 FTE
Website www.fos.org.au [ dead link ]

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) was a member-funded Australian ombudsman service that provided external dispute resolution for consumers who were unable to resolve complaints with member financial services organisations. The Financial Ombudsman Service was superseded in 2018 by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA).

Contents

Prior to being dissolved, in 2016 the FOS had approximately 5,500 licensed member organisations that included banks, insurers, credit providers, financial advisers and planners, debt collection agencies and other businesses that provide financial products and services; together with an additional 8,000 authorised credit representatives. The Service was governed by its term of reference which allowed for it to hear matters within six years of the first knowledge of a financial loss and for the Service to award remedies capped at A$309,000. In 2015–6, the FOS received 34,095 disputes and closed 32,871 disputes; a seven per cent increase on the number of disputes received during the previous year and a five per cent decrease on the number of disputes closed. [1] : 4 

The FOS was led by the Chief Ombudsman, David Locke. He is supported by lead ombudsmen for banking and finance, general insurance, and investment and advice; with ten other ombudsmen supporting various functional areas and disputes.

History

Foundation

The FOS was established on 1 July 2008 following the merger of the Financial Industry Complaints Service (FICS) with the Banking and Financial Services Ombudsman (BFSO) and Insurance Ombudsman Service (IOS); all of which were industry self-regulatory bodies. [2] Two additional schemes chose to merge with the FOS later in 2009, the Credit Union Dispute Resolution Centre and the Insurance Brokers Disputes Limited. [2]

Senate complaint

In 2015 a complaint was raised in Submission 134 to the Senate committee on the scrutiny of financial advice concerning six conversations between the Ombudsman and a consumer's representative, who had recorded the telephone conversation. Submission 134 made it clear that there were differences between the telephone recordings and the working notes of those conversations made by the Ombudsman.[ citation needed ] Thereafter the Ombudsman was reported by media as having confirmed "the decision to refer the matter to a court given the complexity of the dispute, the inability of the FOS to cross examine all relevant witnesses and compel the production of information from third parties, as well as the need to engage experts", [3] even though in recordings of the conversations the same Ombudsman said the only reason to dismiss the complaint was lack of staff, that the complaint had merit and that if the FOS had staff they would have ruled the dispute inside jurisdiction. [4] [5] It was this decision that subsequently resulted in Supreme Court proceedings to challenge the jurisdictional decision of the FOS not to handle the particular complaint.

The FOS did not respond in substance. ASIC did not respond to the questions and, since the filing, other senators called for the FOS to explain the circumstances. ASIC appeared before the Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services on 16 March 2015, where it stated that the Court dealt with the issue of the misleading file notes. [6] On 19 June 2015, the Supreme Court of Victoria found in the FOS's favour but it did not address the discrepancies in materials. The Court stated in its judgment that it did not examine any issues beyond the actual decision of the FOS itself, thus it did not examine any materials (including the file notes and the recordings), nor did it dealt with any allegations of misconduct. [7] The FOS released a media statement attempting to dismiss the allegations and rely on the ruling by the court. [8] The statement did not address allegations in the submission about misleading file notes presented in the discovery phase of a trial. [4] Following media coverage of this case there were calls by a number of Australian senators, including Senator Nick Xenophon, for the FOS to be disbanded and replaced with a government funded body. [5] [4] [9]

Despite criticism of the FOS, consumer advocacy group CHOICE and the government regulator, ASIC, are generally supportive of the FOS. CHOICE has stated that "while there is room for improvement, the Financial Ombudsman Service is providing an essential service of a high standard." [10] [11] Furthermore, ASIC have continued to support the FOS as an 'approved EDR scheme'. [2]

In November 2016, the FOS attempted to explain limitations to its capability to enforce its rulings when financial services providers would not or were unable to pay compensation in cases decided in a consumer's favour. In such cases, consumers may have to seek formal Court-based enforcement proceedings or assistance from the industry regulator. [12] The FOS has proposed an industry funded 'compensation scheme of last resort' be established to help pay consumers their awarded compensation if left stranded by insolvent or belligerent providers. [13]

Government review

In 2016 the government announced a review into Australia's EDR schemes for the financial system, including the FOS. [14] In November 2016 a Lower House parliamentary committee, which has a majority of incumbent government MPs, recommended a banking tribunal be established to replace the FOS, the Credit and Investments Ombudsman and the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. [15] In December 2016 an Australian Treasury appointed panel agreed that the FOS needs an added accountability mechanism in the form of an independent auditor. [16]

Dissolution

On 1 November 2018, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority launched as the one ombudsman service for all financial complaints, replacing three predecessor schemes, the Financial Ombudsman Service, the Credit and Investments Ombudsman and the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal.

Resolution process

The FOS only considered a complaint after the customer has first attempted and failed to resolve their complaint directly with their financial services provider. [17] Most disputes with financial services providers in Australia were resolved between the customer and the relevant bank, credit provider, insurance company or other financial services provider. However, if a dispute was not able to be resolved directly, FOS could then consider it.

The FOS could make an official recommendation or determination and require a financial services provider to;

The complainant (but not the financial services provider) may accept or reject the determination within 30 days of receiving it. If the complainant accepts the determination, it is binding on both parties. Dispute resolution by the FOS is free of charge for consumers.

Governance

The FOS was governed by a board of consumer representatives and financial services industry representatives. The Chair of the Board between 2015 and its dissolution was Professor the Hon. Michael Lavarch AO . The organisation was structured as a public company limited by guarantee, called the Financial Ombudsman Service Limited, which was the owner of the FOS. [19] The company was approved by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) at that time in accordance with Regulatory Guide 139. [20]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commonwealth Bank</span> Australian multinational bank

The Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA), also known as Commonwealth Bank or simply CommBank, is an Australian multinational bank with businesses across New Zealand, Asia, the United States, and the United Kingdom. It provides a variety of financial services, including retail, business and institutional banking, funds management, superannuation, insurance, investment, and broking services. The Commonwealth Bank is the largest Australian listed company on the Australian Securities Exchange as of July 2024, with brands including Bankwest, Colonial First State Investments, ASB Bank, Commonwealth Securities (CommSec) and Commonwealth Insurance (CommInsure). Its former constituent parts were the Commonwealth Trading Bank of Australia, the Commonwealth Savings Bank of Australia, and the Commonwealth Development Bank.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ANZ (bank)</span> Australian multinational bank

The Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited, commonly known as ANZ Bank, is a multinational banking and financial services company headquartered in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. It is Australia's second-largest bank by assets and fourth-largest bank by market capitalisation.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is an independent commission of the Australian Government tasked as the national corporate regulator. ASIC's role is to regulate company and financial services and enforce laws to protect Australian consumers, investors and creditors. ASIC was established on 1 July 1998 following recommendations from the Wallis Inquiry. ASIC's authority and scope are determined by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Financial Services and Markets Act 2000</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that created the Financial Services Authority (FSA) as a regulator for insurance, investment business and banking, and the Financial Ombudsman Service to resolve disputes as a free alternative to the courts.

The Australian financial system consists of the arrangements covering the borrowing and lending of funds and the transfer of ownership of financial claims in Australia, comprising:

Banking in Australia is dominated by four major banks: Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, Australia & New Zealand Banking Group and National Australia Bank. There are several smaller banks with a presence throughout the country which includes Bendigo and Adelaide Bank, Suncorp Bank, and a large number of other financial institutions, such as credit unions, building societies and mutual banks, which provide limited banking-type services and are described as authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs). Many large foreign banks have a presence, but few have a retail banking presence. The central bank is the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA). The Australian government’s Financial Claims Scheme guarantees deposits up to $250,000 per account-holder per ADI in the event of the ADI failing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Financial Ombudsman Service</span> United Kingdom independent complaints body

The Financial Ombudsman Service is an ombudsman in the United Kingdom. It was established in 2000, and given statutory powers in 2001 by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, to help settle disputes between consumers and UK-based businesses providing financial services, such as banks, building societies, insurance companies, investment firms, financial advisers and finance companies.

The Superannuation Complaints Tribunal is an independent statutory body established by the Australian Government to deal with complaints about superannuation.

Australia's insurance market can be divided into roughly three components: life insurance, general insurance and health insurance. These markets are fairly distinct, with most larger insurers focusing on only one type, although in recent times several of these companies have broadened their scope into more general financial services, and have faced competition from banks and subsidiaries of foreign financial conglomerates. With services such as disability insurance, income protection and even funeral insurance, these insurance giants are stepping in to fill the gap where people may have otherwise been in need of a personal or signature loan from their financial institution.

The Energy & Water Ombudsman NSW (EWON) is the approved dispute resolution scheme for all electricity and gas customers in New South Wales, Australia, and some water customers.

The Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) was a member-funded Australian ombudsman service that provided external dispute resolution for consumers who were unable to resolve complaints with member financial services organisations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian Financial Services Licence</span> Financial license

Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) is a legal licence provided by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) enabling the operation and activities of Australian financial services businesses. It is a legal requirement for any Australian financial service business to obtain an AFSL from the day business operations begin unless provided a limited licence or exemption with special provisions under section 911A(2)(l) of the Corporations Act. The AFSL is issued by ASIC under Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act 2001, in line with its regulatory supervision of the financial services industry. Australian Financial Service Businesses must submit an application to ASIC coupled with supporting documents to be assessed. Licensees are obligated to provide efficient, honest and fair financial services under the conditions of their AFSL and the Corporations Act 2001. Failure to follow and uphold the policies under the AFSL and the Corporations Act 2001 will result in penalties against the business.

Ombudsmen in Australia are independent agencies who assist when a dispute arises between individuals and industry bodies or government agencies. Government ombudsman services are free to the public, like many other ombudsman and dispute resolution services, and are a means of resolving disputes outside of the court systems. Australia has an ombudsman assigned for each state; as well as an ombudsman for the Commonwealth of Australia. As laws differ between states just one process, or policy, cannot be used across the Commonwealth. All government bodies are within the jurisdiction of the ombudsman.

The Ombudsman for Banking Services and Investments (OBSI) is the Canadian external dispute resolution organization whose responsibility is to handle the financial disputes of consumers and small businesses that could not be resolved by the customers and the financial firms on their own. The OBSI provides the service on an impartial and independent basis, and free of charge to the consumer as an alternative to the legal system.

Financial regulation in Australia is extensive and detailed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Retail Ombudsman (United Kingdom)</span>

The Retail Ombudsman (TRO) was an Ombudsman for the retail industry in the United Kingdom from January 2015 to July 2017. Its role was to resolve disputes between retailers and retail customers.

The Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry, also known as the Banking Royal Commission and the Hayne Royal Commission, was a royal commission established on 14 December 2017 by the Australian government pursuant to the Royal Commissions Act 1902 to inquire into and report on misconduct in the banking, superannuation, and financial services industry. The establishment of the commission followed revelations in the media of a culture of greed within several Australian financial institutions. A subsequent parliamentary inquiry recommended a royal commission, noting the lack of regulatory intervention by the relevant government authorities, and later revelations that financial institutions were involved in money laundering for drug syndicates, turned a blind eye to terrorism financing, and ignored statutory reporting responsibilities and impropriety in foreign exchange trading.

The Australian Financial Complaints Authority or AFCA is an Australian external dispute resolution (EDR) company for consumers who are unable to resolve complaints with member financial services organisations. It is operated as a not-for-profit company limited by guarantee and was authorised in 2018 by the then Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O'Dwyer, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Financial Ombudsman Service of the Russian Federation</span>

The Financial Ombudsman Service of the Russian Federation was created in 2018 to mediate consumer rights complaints and out-of-court disputes between consumers of financial services and financial organizations. It was created under federal law on June 4, 2018 to provide legal status of the Financial Ombudsman Service, the procedure for its activities, specific rules and regulation procedures as well as consideration of citizens’ complaints scheme and other legal relations. It was designed to help resolve disputes between consumers and financial institutions providing clients and considers claims against credit institutions, insurance organizations, microfinance institutions, credit consumer cooperatives, pawnshops and non-state pension funds on a mandatory and voluntary basis

References

  1. 1 2 "Annual Review 2015–16" (PDF). Financial Ombudsman Service. 2016. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
  2. 1 2 3 "ASIC-approved dispute resolution schemes". Australian Securities & Investments Commission. Archived from the original on 3 October 2015. Retrieved 2 October 2015.
  3. ↑ Rogers, Ian (24 November 2014). "FOS staff shortages oblige ANZ to suspend recovery action". Banking Day. Archived from the original on 23 August 2017. Retrieved 7 April 2016.
  4. 1 2 3 "The questions the Financial Ombudsman needs to answer". ABC News. 1 April 2016. Retrieved 11 June 2016.
  5. 1 2 "Calls for Financial Ombudsman Service to be disbanded over credibility issues". ABC News. 16 March 2016. Retrieved 11 June 2016.
  6. ↑ Kell, Peter; Day, Warren; Medcraft, Greg (16 March 2016). Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services. Australia: Hansard.
  7. ↑ Goldie Marketing Pty Ltd v Financial Ombudsman Services [2015] VSC 292 at 83(19 June 2015), Supreme Court (Vic,Australia)
  8. ↑ "Financial Ombudsman Service decision supported by Court" (Press release). Financial Ombudsman Service. Retrieved 2 April 2016.
  9. ↑ "Financial Ombudsman Service under fire as politicians demand change". ABC News. Australia. 17 March 2016. Retrieved 2 April 2016.
  10. ↑ "Joint submission: Independent Review of the Financial Ombudsman Service". Consumer Action. 29 October 2013. Retrieved 26 May 2016.
  11. ↑ Kollmorgen, Andy (5 September 2014). "How ombudsman services can help you". CHOICE . Retrieved 8 March 2017.
  12. ↑ "Chasing down wrongdoers is not our job: FOS". The Australian .
  13. ↑ "FOS calls for last resort compensation". Financial Observer. 24 April 2016. Archived from the original on 17 March 2017. Retrieved 16 March 2017.
  14. ↑ O'Dwyer, Kelly (8 August 2016). "Review of external dispute resolution and complaints scheme" (Press release). Australian Government. Archived from the original on 20 February 2017. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
  15. ↑ "Parliamentary Committee Calls for Banking Tribunal after Inquiry". ABC News. 24 November 2016.
  16. ↑ "FOS should be subject to investigation, report recommends". Independent Financial Advisor. 7 December 2016. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
  17. ↑ "How to complain". ASIC MoneySmart. ASIC.
  18. ↑ "How ombudsman services can help you". CHOICE. 11 January 2019.
  19. ↑ Griffiths, Tim; Mitchell, Jacqui (2012). "Financial Ombudsman Service: Dr Jekyll or Mr Hyde?". ILB. 27 (9): 130.
  20. ↑ Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 912A
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.