Forum (alternative dispute resolution)

Last updated

Forum, formerly known as the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) is an American organization that provides arbitration and mediation services to businesses, based at its Minneapolis headquarters and offices in New Jersey. The organization was founded in 1986. As of 2008, the National Arbitration Forum administered over 200,000 cases a year, most of which were consumer debt collection cases. [1] In 2009, the National Arbitration Forum ceased administration of new consumer arbitrations as part of a consent decree with the Attorney General of Minnesota Lori Swanson concerning the NAF's ties with debt collection firms. [2] The company maintains a panel of over 1,600 arbitrators and mediators who are attorneys and former judges located across the United States and in 35 countries around the world. [3] Panelists arbitrate and mediate the disputes.

Contents

The company is an "approved dispute resolution service provider" of ICANN domain name disputes [4] and has handled more than 7,600 cases. [5]

History

The NAF was founded in 1986 as a subsidiary of another company, Equilaw, which subsequently went bankrupt in 1994. NAF survived the bankruptcy and appears to have grown rapidly in recent years. [6] The NAF and Lawyers Associated Worldwide (LAW) work together on an international level. [7] The National Arbitration Forum is located in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Domain name disputes

An approved domain name dispute program provider for ICANN, the NAF has administered over 10,000 domain name disputes since 1999. [8] The number of domain name disputes administered is on the rise, up 143 cases from 2006 to 2007. The NAF deals predominantly with registered domain names that are abused by parties who have no legitimate rights to them. Some of the famous trademarks involved in NAF domain name dispute resolutions include Los Angeles Angels, Disney, Hershey's Kisses, Jimmy Buffett, and Univision, most recently Bill Clinton. [9]

Controversy

Consumer advocacy groups and attorneys frequently claim that the National Arbitration Forum is the most biased against consumers of the major arbitration organizations.

In its June 16, 2008 cover story, Business Week published an in-depth look at credit collection arbitrations at NAF. The story describes how NAF markets itself to collection lawyers and then works with them in ways that raise questions about its impartiality. [10]

Public Citizen study

In 2007, non-profit consumer advocacy group Public Citizen criticized the National Arbitration Forum, including its fee schedule and alleged bias. [11]

According to a July 2008 Navigant analysis of the Public Citizen data, [12] 26,665 arbitrations out of a total of 33,948 arbitrations were either heard or dismissed (i.e. excluding settlements). According to the analysis, of these 26,665 arbitrations, consumer parties were reported to have prevailed outright or had the case against them dismissed in 8,558 cases (32.1%). In an additional 4,376 cases (16.4%), the arbitrator did not award the full amount demanded by the business.

In March 2010, [13] a study of the National Arbitration Forum's record of panelist appointments for domain name disputes was published. [14] It raised concern that a small handful of the NAF's roster panelists were appointed to hear disproportionately many cases. In one instance, a single panelist was appointed to hear 949 cases, or about 10% of all NAF domain name dispute cases ever heard. In August 2012, the study was updated and it showed a continued concentration of panellists appointments wherein seven NAF-selected panelists were appointed to hear nearly half of all cases. [15]

Legislation and lawsuits against NAF

City of San Francisco lawsuit

In March 2008, the City of San Francisco filed a lawsuit against the National Arbitration Forum on behalf of its citizens, accusing the arbitrator of unfairly favoring credit card companies in disputes with their customers. [1] The city alleged that the NAF was practicing unethically and wrongly with such specific concerns as ignoring evidence, inflating awards and declining hearing requests by consumers. [16] The lawsuit said that between January 2003 and March 2007, consumers won 0.2% of the 18,075 arbitration cases in California that were not dropped, settled or otherwise dismissed. [1]

Businessweek's allegations of bias

In June 2008, Businessweek made broad claims of NAF's bias in favor of consumer creditors and hidden conflict of interest. According to the article, NAF markets itself to consumer credit providers, collection agencies and law firms. [17]

Minnesota Attorney General lawsuit

On July 14, 2009, the Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson brought a lawsuit against the National Arbitration Forum for consumer fraud, deceptive trade and false statements in advertising. [18] Key to their complaint was allegations that the NAF had deliberately hidden its ties to the businesses it represented and actively encouraged their naming as mandatory arbitrators in contracts. [19] The National Arbitration Forum countered that its arbitrators were independent practitioners, which ensured that its arbitration was impartial. [20] However, citing legal costs, the National Arbitration Forum agreed the week after the filing to stop accepting consumer debt collection cases for arbitration. [21] [22] According to the Minnesota Attorney General, the National Arbitration Forum's settlement with the State of Minnesota required the company to stop handling current consumer arbitrations and to not process or administer new consumer arbitrations after July 24, 2009. [23]

For years, National Arbitration Forum ("NAF") falsely held itself out as an independent provider of neutral arbitration services in consumer debt matters, unaffiliated with any person or entities within or outside the collection industry. However, NAF has been investigated by Minnesota local and state prosecutors for working alongside Mann Bracken authorizing illegitimate arbitration awards against consumers, deceiving the courts and the public. Both NAF and Mann Bracken concealed their relationship and the financial relationship with their common group owner known as Accretive. [24]

See also

Related Research Articles

Arbitration, in the context of the law of the United States, is a form of alternative dispute resolution. Specifically, arbitration is an alternative to litigation through which the parties to a dispute agree to submit their respective evidence and legal arguments to a third party for resolution. In practice, arbitration is generally used as a substitute for litigation. In some contexts, an arbitrator has been described as an umpire. Arbitration is broadly authorized by the Federal Arbitration Act. State regulation of arbitration is significantly limited by federal legislation and judicial decisions applying that law.

The American Arbitration Association (AAA) is a non-profit organization focused in the field of alternative dispute resolution, providing services to individuals and organizations who wish to resolve conflicts out of court, and one of several arbitration organizations that administers arbitration proceedings. The AAA also administers mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution. It is headquartered at the Equitable Building in New York City.

Online dispute resolution (ODR) is a form of dispute resolution which uses technology to facilitate the resolution of disputes between parties. It primarily involves negotiation, mediation or arbitration, or a combination of all three. In this respect it is often seen as being the online equivalent of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). However, ODR can also augment these traditional means of resolving disputes by applying innovative techniques and online technologies to the process.

The Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) is a process established by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) for the resolution of disputes regarding the registration of internet domain names. The UDRP currently applies to all generic top level domains, some country code top-level domains, and to all new generic top-level domains.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arbitration clause</span> Contract clause requiring parties to resolve disputes via arbitration

In contract law, an arbitration clause is a clause in a contract that requires the parties to resolve their disputes through an arbitration process. Although such a clause may or may not specify that arbitration occur within a specific jurisdiction, it always binds the parties to a type of resolution outside the courts, and is therefore considered a kind of forum selection clause.

Gordon Sumner, p/k/a Sting v Michael Urvan was the 2000 dispute before World Intellectual Property Organization between Sting, a prominent English musician and actor, and Michael Urvan, an American gamer, about ownership rights on the domain name "sting.com". The domain name was registered in 1995 by Urvan, who used the monikers "Stingray" and "Sting", to support his gaming activities. Urvan was the first individual to successfully defend against a domain name dispute brought against an individual by a celebrity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arbitration</span> Method of dispute resolution

Arbitration is a formal method of dispute resolution involving a third party neutral who makes a binding decision. The third party neutral renders the decision in the form of an 'arbitration award'. An arbitration award is legally binding on both sides and enforceable in local courts, unless all parties stipulate that the arbitration process and decision are non-binding.

A debt buyer is a company, sometimes a collection agency, a private debt collection law firm, or a private investor, that purchases delinquent or charged-off debts from a creditor or lender for a percentage of the face value of the debt based on the potential collectibility of the accounts. The debt buyer can then collect on its own, utilize the services of a third-party collection agency, repackage and resell portions of the purchased portfolio, or use any combination of these options.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lori Swanson</span> American politician

Lori Swanson is an American lawyer and politician who served as the attorney general of Minnesota from 2007 to 2019. She was the first female attorney general elected in Minnesota. In 2018, she ran for Governor of Minnesota with running mate U.S. Representative Rick Nolan finishing in third place in the Democratic-Farmer-Labor primary.

RegisterFly was a New Jersey (U.S.) based internet hosting and domain name registrar that had their ICANN-accredited status terminated in March 2007.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is a private American corporation that acts as a self-regulatory organization (SRO) that regulates member brokerage firms and exchange markets. FINRA is the successor to the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD) as well as to the member regulation, enforcement, and arbitration operations of the New York Stock Exchange. The U.S. government agency that acts as the ultimate regulator of the U.S. securities industry, including FINRA, is the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Herbert Jay Stern</span> American judge (born 1936)

Herbert Jay Stern is a trial lawyer, with a national practice in civil and criminal litigation, as well as mediation and arbitration. Earlier in his career, Stern served as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and as the United States Judge for Berlin.

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR), or external dispute resolution (EDR), typically denotes a wide range of dispute resolution processes and techniques that parties can use to settle disputes with the help of a third party. They are used for disagreeing parties who cannot come to an agreement short of litigation. However, ADR is also increasingly being adopted as a tool to help settle disputes within the court system.

Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning contract law and arbitration. The case arose from a class action filed in Florida against a payday lender alleging the loan agreements the plaintiffs had signed were unenforceable because they essentially charged a higher interest rate than that permitted under Florida law.

Peter Bowman "Bo" Rutledge is the Herman E. Talmadge Chair of Law and the former dean of the University of Georgia School of Law in Athens, Georgia. An American attorney, academic, and a specialist in international business transactions, international dispute resolution, litigation, arbitration, and the U.S. Supreme Court, he served as a law clerk for Associate U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas in 1998.

<i>Lamparello v. Falwell</i> 2005 American legal case

Lamparello v. Falwell, 420 F.3d 309, was a legal case heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concerning allegations of cybersquatting and trademark infringement. The dispute centered on the right to use the domain name fallwell.com, and provides discussion on cybersquatting as it applies to criticism of a trademark.

<i>Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd.</i>

Satyam Infoway Ltd. v. Sifynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. was the first case to be decided by the Supreme Court of India on the issue of domain name protection, and dealt with two businesses employing variations on the same mark ("Sify") in their respective domain names.

Disputes between consumers and businesses that are arbitrated are resolved by an independent neutral arbitrator rather than in court. Although parties can agree to arbitrate a particular dispute after it arises or may agree that the award is non-binding, most consumer arbitrations occur pursuant to a pre-dispute arbitration clause where the arbitrator's award is binding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zak Muscovitch</span> Canadian intellectual property lawyer (born 1971)

Zak Muscovitch is a Canadian intellectual property lawyer. He is the founder of Domain Name Law Reports and has represented clients before domain name arbitrations in cases against companies like Google, Torstar, and Molson.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trademark Clearinghouse</span> Database of trademarks for gTLDs

The Trademark Clearinghouse is a database of validated and registered trademarks established by ICANN to assist trademark holders prevent infringing behavior in the Domain Name System. In combination with the Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS), it is the second significant attempt by ICANN to handle the "Trademark Dilemma". The first attempt was the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Berner, Robert; Grow, Brian (June 4, 2008). "Banks vs. Consumers (Guess Who Wins)". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on August 9, 2012. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  2. ↑ Berner, Robert (2009-07-19). "Big Arbitration Firm Pulls Out of Credit Card Business". Business Week. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  3. ↑ National Arbitration Forum : Locations
  4. ↑ "List of Approved Dispute Resolution Service Providers - ICANN". www.icann.org. Retrieved 2023-06-27.
  5. ↑ Domain Magazine
  6. ↑ Citizen.org
  7. ↑ Lawyers world wide
  8. ↑ Domains
  9. ↑ DN Forum
  10. ↑ Business Week
  11. ↑ MacLeery, Laura (October 11, 2007). "New Public Citizen Report Shows that Credit Card Companies Set an Arbitration Trap to Ensnare Consumers". Public Citizen. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  12. ↑ Institute for Legal Reform
  13. ↑ Domain Name Dispute Stats Reveal Concern Over Panelist Appointment
  14. ↑ Dnattorney.com web site
  15. ↑ DNattorney.com Domain Name Dispute Study, August, 2012
  16. ↑ "National Arbitration Forum case". San Francisco City Attorney. Archived from the original on 1 February 2014. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  17. ↑ Businessweek``, 5 June 2008,
  18. ↑ Swanson, Lori (July 14, 2009). "State of Minnesota v. National Arbitration Forum, et al. Complaint" (PDF). State of Minnesota. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 June 2012. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  19. ↑ Weiss, Debra Cassens (July 15, 2009). "Minn. AG Sues Credit Card Arbitration Company, Claims Hidden Industry Ties". ABA Journal. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  20. ↑ Chu, Kathy; McGraw, Taylor (July 15, 2009). "Minnesota lawsuit claims credit card arbitration firm has ties to industry". USA Today. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  21. ↑ Abeska, Timothy J. (December 2, 2013). "Two Recent Cases Address What Happens When the Arbitral Forum Selected by the Parties is Not Available". National Law Review. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  22. ↑ "State of Minnesota v. National Arbitration Forum et al., Consent Judgment" (PDF). Voice of San Diego. 17 July 2009. Retrieved 18 December 2013.
  23. ↑ "National Arbitration Forum Settlement with Minnesota Attorney General". The Federalist Society. 11 August 2009.
  24. ↑ "Goodbye Mann Bracken. A Debt Collection Company Worth Going Bankrupt". Get Out of Debt Guy. 14 January 2010.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.