Going steady

Last updated

Going steady is when two romantic partners agree to an exclusive relationship. [1] Growing in prevalence in the United States after World War II, this pattern became mainstream in high schools and colleges in the 1950s. [2] Its popularity continued through the 1980s, with teenagers beginning to go steady at progressively earlier ages. However, the label "going steady" fell into disuse in the 1970s. [3]

Contents

Definitions

A survey of college students in 1955 found a distinction between "going steadily" with someone, which indicated dating the same person repeatedly, and "going steady" which indicated a formalized or explicit agreement. [4] Going steady often involved an exchange of clothing or jewelry which would be worn to announce the state of the relationship. [3] Couples might exchange identification bracelets or "friendship rings". [5]

Sociologists include group recognition of the couple's status as part of the definition of going steady. [4]

According to A Girl's Guide to Dating and Going Steady (1968), a couple are going steady when they were "seeing each other exclusively one or more times a week for a fairly long period of time." [6] Another researcher defined it as "the stage when both partners come to a mutual implicit understanding that dating will exclude others." [7]

From playing the field to going steady

Going steady was a theme in adolescent and young-adult novels of the 1950s and 1960s. Young adult romance novels.jpg
Going steady was a theme in adolescent and young-adult novels of the 1950s and 1960s.

Before World War II, high school and college students generally dated multiple people, colloquially called "playing the field". Dating patterns involved variety and competition, and multiple partners were a signal of popularity. Sociologists characterize this form of dating as "competitive". [3] In 1937, sociologist Willard Waller, based on a study at Penn State College, described it as a "Rating and Dating Complex" in which males and females were rated in popularity by themselves and their peers on characteristics such as having money and good clothes, belonging to the best sorority or fraternity, and dating the "right" people, [8] although later researchers question whether Waller's observations reflected as widespread a pattern as he implied and note that some individuals chose to pair off exclusively before it became the style. [9] [10]

Steady dating began to supplant casual dating in the 1940s. [3] During the war, there was a rapid move away from "competitive" dating (having the most and best dating partners) and toward committed relationships (going steady). [3] There is speculation that the emphasis on early marriage during and after WWII was linked to the impulse to go steady. [11] Some historians credit the shortage of male partners during the war; however, the end of the war did not end the practice, and going steady became even more pervasive after the war ended. [12] Going steady was a frequent theme in popular teen novels of the time. [13] High school students were expected to enter committed heterosexual relationships or become socially marginalized. [3] Sociologist Wini Breines characterizes it as "a routinized sexual system that controlled and punished female spontaneity and ensured that young women followed the prescribed steps to marriage". [14]

A study in the 1950s found that three-fourths of the girls and more than half of the boys in grades 11 and 12 had gone steady, many for a year or longer. [3] A 1959 Ladies' Home Journal article was titled "If You Don't Go Steady, You're Different". [11] A study in the 1980s of high school in Connecticut found 81% of girls and almost 70% of boys had gone steady. [3] Daly, in the 1951 Profiles of Youth, quotes a high school principal: "In this school, a girl either goes steady or she doesn't date at all. And after two or three dates with one boy, she's considered going steady whether she wants to or not." [5]

Peer opinions

The trend toward having a single, exclusive romantic partner was accompanied by growing disapproval among peers of those who dated multiple partners. [12] Sexual experimenting outside of the steady relationship had the consequence of being labelled promiscuous. [14]

While a small study in 1940 and 1941 found some peer disapproval of going steady, by 1960 it was widely accepted and only a small minority of peers disapproved. [2] Contemporary studies found that going steady was viewed as a stage toward marriage by some participants, while to others it was a common social behavior with no goal of marriage. [2] The seriousness of intent when going steady often differed between classes: students with plans to attend college took a high school steady relationship less seriously than working class students who would be more likely to view it as a relationship that might progress to marriage. [3]

Going steady was recognized and sanctioned by peer groups, [3] and provided a form of status similar to being engaged. [15] Friends and acquaintances recognized the relationship and had expectations of acceptable behavior when going steady. For example, when one cannot attend an event, the other is expected to be absent as well. Other boys should not ask the girl out, and the girl should not date or flirt with other boys. [6]

Adult opinions

The trend of going steady was met with concern and disapproval by adults. A 1951 book, Profiles of Youth, called going steady "a national problem", and said teens' greatest concern was "whether to go steady". [16] Some parochial schools forbid the practice after Catholic leaders declared "going steady is a proximate occasion of sin". [3] Advice columnist Dorothy Dix wrote, "The custom has all of the worst features of marriage and none of its advantages." Another syndicated columnist, Doris Blake wrote "It's simply a pernicious habit grown out of we-don't-know-what that has fostered this ridiculous custom of a couple of 16, 17, or 18 year olds pairing off to the exclusion of everyone else on the dance floor." [12] Life magazine featured an article on the subject, noting that 65% of students in some high schools were going steady, [17] and a column in Boys' Life discussed the issue. [18]

The primary concern with going steady was the perception that it would lead to greater intimacy and sexual experimentation than casual dating. According to Breines, "Although the social scientific surveys indicate little evidence of a dramatic increase in sexual intercourse among teenagers in the postwar period, adults believed there was such an increase." [14] Both white teens and girls of color tended to limit their sexual activity to steady relationships. Reliable data on teen sexual behavior pre- and post-war is sparse, and historians argue whether the rate of premarital intercourse rose gradually or sharply through the 1960s. Rates of premarital pregnancy and data about venereal disease in teens over the years suggest that increasing numbers of teenagers were engaging in sexual intercourse. [11] A study in the 1990s found that there was a greater association between early sexual activity and going steady than with frequent casual dating. [19] A 2004 study also found that the majority of adolescents first have sex when going steady. Studies conflict on whether going steady had more association with use of birth control or less. [20] Littauer states "Being in love and going steady was more significant to a young woman's decision to have sex than was class, education, religion, or any other factor." [11]

A secondary concern was that going steady would inhibit teens' social development. [21] Experts warned that going steady would limit one to inadequate experience getting to know different people and could result in bad choices. A YWCA publication said a steady relationship would "reduce your opportunities for knowing other congenial people whom you might enjoy." [3] Although some experts criticize going steady as limiting a person's exposure to potential partners, "playing the field" results in only superficial exposure to those potential partners. According to Herman, "quantity and variety of experience is not necessarily a good substitute for quality, in the sense that going steady may allow more thorough and penetrating learning processes to occur." [4]

By the late 1960s, the sexual revolution of the counterculture was the new fear of adults, and going steady had become more accepted. [3]

Reasons for going steady and breaking up

Some self-reported motivations for going steady include: [4]

Reasons for ending the steady relationship include: [6]

Surveys of college women, repeated in ten-year intervals from 1958 to 1978, found an increase in both the numbers who had gone steady, earlier ages for going steady, and a large decrease in number of dating partners, as shown in the following table: [22]

YearHad gone steadyAge first went steadyMean number of partners ever dated
195868%17.053
196877%16.725
197885%15.914

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual intercourse</span> Penetrative sexual activity for reproduction or sexual pleasure

Sexual intercourse is a sexual activity typically involving the insertion and thrusting of the male penis inside the female vagina for sexual pleasure, reproduction, or both. This is also known as vaginal intercourse or vaginal sex. Sexual penetration has been known by humans since the dawn of time, and has been an instinctive form of sexual behaviour and psychology among humans. Other forms of penetrative sexual intercourse include anal sex, oral sex, fingering and penetration by use of a dildo, and vibrators. These activities involve physical intimacy between two or more people and are usually used among humans solely for physical or emotional pleasure. They can contribute to human bonding.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual abstinence</span> Act of refraining from sexual activity

Sexual abstinence or sexual restraint is the practice of refraining from sexual activity for reasons medical, psychological, legal, social, philosophical, moral, religious or other. It is a part of chastity. Celibacy is sexual abstinence generally motivated by factors such as an individual's personal or religious beliefs. Sexual abstinence before marriage is required by social norms in some societies, or by law in some countries. It is distinct from asexuality, which is a sexual orientation where people feel small or no sexual attraction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adolescence</span> Human transition from puberty to adult

Adolescence is a biological phase of transition between childhood and adulthood; it is one of the stages of human development after pre-adolescence characterized by changes on various physical, mental, social and psychological levels. Like early childhood, adolescence is a sensitive period in which normative and maladaptive patterns shape future trajectories. However, adolescence should not be confused with puberty, since puberty is part of adolescence and refers only to the biological part of the changes that enable an infant body to reproduce and bring it closer to the image of an adult. The current generation of adolescents is the largest in history with a population of 1.8 billion, they make up a quarter of the world's population. Almost 90% live in low- and middle-income countries, where they make up a much larger proportion of the population than in high-income countries, due to higher fertility rates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Virginity</span> State of a person who has never engaged in sexual intercourse

Virginity is the state of a person who has never engaged in sexual intercourse; it is considered a social construct, not an objective term with an operational definition. Social definitions of virginity therefore vary. Heterosexual individuals may or may not consider loss of virginity to occur only through penile-vaginal penetration, while people of other sexual orientations often include oral sex, anal sex, or manual sex in their definitions of losing one's virginity. The term virgin encompasses a range of definitions, as found in traditional, modern and ethical concepts. Religious rituals for regaining virginity exist in many cultures. Some men and women consider themselves born-again virgins.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teenage pregnancy</span> Childbirth in human females under the age of 20

Teenage pregnancy, also known as adolescent pregnancy, is pregnancy in a female under the age of 20.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intercrural sex</span> Non-penetrative sex using thighs

Intercrural sex, which is also known as coitus interfemoris, thigh sex, thighing, thighjob and interfemoral sex, is a type of non-penetrative sex in which the penis is placed between the receiving partner's thighs and friction is generated via thrusting. It was a common practice in ancient Greek society prior to the early centuries AD, and was frequently discussed by writers and portrayed in artwork such as vases. It later became subject to sodomy laws and became increasingly seen as contemptible. In the 17th century, intercrural sex was featured in several works of literature and it took cultural prominence, being seen as a part of male-on-male sexual habits following the trial and execution of Mervyn Tuchet, 2nd Earl of Castlehaven, in 1631.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Premarital sex</span> Sexual activity before marriage

Premarital sex is sex before marriage. Premarital sex is sex between two people who are not married to each other. Premarital sex is considered a sin by a number of religions and also considered a moral issue which is taboo in many cultures. Since the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s, it has become accepted by certain liberal movements, especially in Western countries. A 2014 Pew study on global morality found that premarital sex was considered particularly unacceptable in "Muslim Majority Countries", such as Malaysia, Jordan and Pakistan, each having over 90% disapproval, while people in Western European countries were the most accepting, with Spain, Germany, and France expressing less than 10% disapproval.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public display of affection</span> Acts of physical intimacy in the view of others

Public displays of affection (PDA) are acts of physical intimacy in the view of others. What is considered to be an acceptable display of affection varies with respect to culture and context.

Bundling, or tarrying, is the traditional practice of wrapping a couple together in a bed sometimes with a board between the two of them, usually as a part of courting behavior. The tradition is thought to have originated either in the Netherlands or in the British Isles and later became common in colonial United States, especially in Pennsylvania Dutch Country. Bundling is associated with the Amish as a form of courtship.

Casual sex is sexual activity that takes place outside a romantic relationship and implies an absence of commitment, emotional attachment, or familiarity between sexual partners. Examples are sexual activity while casually dating, one-night stands, prostitution or swinging and friends with benefits relationships.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Making out</span> American term for non-penetrative sex

Making out is a term of American origin dating back to at least 1949, and is used to refer to kissing, including extended French kissing or necking, or to acts of non-penetrative sex such as heavy petting. Equivalent terms in other dialects include the British English getting off and the Hiberno-English shifting. When performed in a stationary vehicle, it has been euphemistically referred to as parking, coinciding with American car culture.

Adolescent sexuality is a stage of human development in which adolescents experience and explore sexual feelings. Interest in sexuality intensifies during the onset of puberty, and sexuality is often a vital aspect of teenagers' lives. Sexual interest may be expressed in a number of ways, such as flirting, kissing, masturbation, or having sex with a partner. Sexual interest among adolescents, as among adults, can vary greatly, and is influenced by cultural norms and mores, sex education, as well as comprehensive sexuality education provided, sexual orientation, and social controls such as age-of-consent laws.

The sexuality of US adolescents includes their feelings, behaviors and development, and the place adolescent sexuality has in American society, including the response of the government, educators, parents, and other interested groups.

Casual dating or a casual relationship is a physical and emotional relationship between two people who may have casual sex or a near-sexual relationship while staying loyal to each other without necessarily demanding or expecting the additional commitments of a more formal romantic relationship. Motives for casual relationships vary. There are significant gender and cultural differences in acceptance of and breadth of casual relationships, as well as in regrets about action/inaction in those relationships.

Teen dating violence is the physical, sexual, or psychological / emotional abuse within a dating relationship among adolescents. Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been a well examined and documented phenomenon in adults; however, there has not been nearly as much study on violence in adolescent dating relationships, and it is therefore not as well understood. The research has mainly focused on Caucasian youth, and, as of 2013, there are no studies which focus specifically on IPV in adolescent same-sex relationships.

The media and American adolescent sexuality relates to the effect the media has on the sexuality of American adolescents and the portrayal thereof.

Adolescent sexuality in Canada is not as well documented as adolescent sexuality in the United States; despite the proximity of the two nations, Canada has its own unique culture and generalizations about Canadian adolescent sexuality based on American research can be misleading. Because of this, several surveys and studies have been conducted which acquired information on Canadian adolescent sexuality. Surveys which provide this information include the Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), the National Population Health Survey (NPHS) and the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth (NLSCY). According to information drawn from the Canadian Community Health Survey and the National Population Health Survey, in 2005 43% of teens aged 15 to 19 reported that they had had sexual intercourse at least once.

Hookup culture is one that accepts and encourages casual sex encounters, including one-night stands and other related activity, without necessarily including emotional intimacy, bonding or a committed relationship. It is generally associated with Western late adolescent sexuality and, in particular, United States college culture. The term hookup has an ambiguous definition because it can indicate kissing or any form of physical sexual activity between sexual partners. The term has been widely used in the U.S. since at least 2000. It has also been called nonrelationship sex, or sex without dating.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fornication</span> Non-marital sexual intercourse

Fornication is generally consensual sexual intercourse between two people not married to each other. When one or more of the partners having consensual sexual intercourse is married to another person, it is called adultery. John Calvin viewed adultery to be any sexual act that is outside the divine model for sexual intercourse, which includes fornication.

Courtship practices in the United States changed gradually throughout its history. The transition from primarily rural colonies to cities and the expansion across the continent with major waves of immigration, accompanied by developments in transportation, communication, education, industrialization, and the economy, contributed to changes over time in the national culture that influenced how young people met, interacted, and married.

References

  1. ↑ Bailey, Jacqui (2004). Sex, Puberty, and All that Stuff: A Guide to Growing Up. New York: Barron's. p. 62. ISBN   0-7641-2992-9.
  2. 1 2 3 Poffenberger, Thomas (Jan 1964). "Three Papers on Going Steady". The Family Life Coordinator. 13 (1): 7–13. doi:10.2307/581501. JSTOR   581501.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Spurlock, John C. (2016). Youth and sexuality in the twentieth-century United States. New York. pp. 63–116. ISBN   9781138817487. OCLC   898926426.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  4. 1 2 3 4 Herman, Robert D. (1955). "The "Going Steady" Complex: A Re-Examination". Marriage and Family Living. 17 (1): 36–40. doi:10.2307/346777. ISSN   0885-7059. JSTOR   346777.
  5. 1 2 Daly, Maureen (1951). Profiles of Youth (First ed.). Curtis Publishing Company. pp. 27–34.
  6. 1 2 3 McGinnis, Thomas C. (1968). A Girl's Guide to Dating and Going Steady. Doubleday & Company. pp. 165–180. OCLC   440150.
  7. ↑ McCabe, Marita; Collins, John (Nov 1984). "Measurement of Depth of Desired and Experienced Sexual Involvement at Different Stages of Dating". The Journal of Sex Research. 20 (4): 378. doi:10.1080/00224498409551234. JSTOR   3812194.
  8. ↑ Waller, Willard (1937). "The Rating and Dating Complex". American Sociological Review. 2 (5): 727–734. doi:10.2307/2083825. ISSN   0003-1224. JSTOR   2083825.
  9. ↑ Gordon, Michael (1981). "Was Waller Ever Right? The Rating and Dating Complex Reconsidered". Journal of Marriage and Family. 43 (1): 67–76. doi:10.2307/351417. ISSN   0022-2445. JSTOR   351417.
  10. ↑ Krain, Mark; Cannon, Drew; Bagford, Jeffery (1977). "Rating-Dating or Simply Prestige Homogamy? Data on Dating in the Greek System on a Midwestern Campus". Journal of Marriage and Family. 39 (4): 663–674. doi:10.2307/350473. ISSN   0022-2445. JSTOR   350473.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Littauer, Amanda H. (2015). Bad girls: young women, sex, and rebellion before the sixties. Chapel Hill. pp. 111–142. ISBN   9781469625195. OCLC   917093638.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  12. 1 2 3 Weigel, Moira (2016). Labor of Love. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. pp. 102–127. ISBN   9780374182533.
  13. ↑ Edwards, Margaret A. (1957). "Let the Lower Lights Be Burning". The English Journal. 46 (8): 465. doi:10.2307/808421. ISSN   0013-8274. JSTOR   808421.
  14. 1 2 3 Breines, Wini (1992). Young, white, and miserable: growing up female in the fifties. Boston: Beacon Press. pp.  110–126. ISBN   0807075027. OCLC   24376633.
  15. ↑ H. Elizabeth Peters; Claire M. Kamp Dush (16 July 2009). Marriage and Family: Perspectives and Complexities. Columbia University Press. p. 24. ISBN   978-0-231-52002-7.
  16. ↑ Cart, Michael (2016). Young adult literature : from romance to realism (Third ed.). Chicago. p. 16. ISBN   9780838914762. OCLC   945729948.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  17. ↑ Time Inc (9 September 1957). LIFE. Time Inc. ISSN   0024-3019.
  18. ↑ Boy Scouts of America, Inc. (November 1967). "Boys' Life". Boys' Life. Inkprint Edition. Boy Scouts of America, Inc.: 24. ISSN   0006-8608.
  19. ↑ Cooksey, Elizabeth C. (May–June 2002). "Friendships and Early Relationships: Links to Sexual Initiation among American Adolescents Born to Young Mothers". Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 34 (3): 118–126. doi:10.2307/3097710. JSTOR   3097710. PMID   12137125.
  20. ↑ Karney, Benjamin R. (2007). Adolescent romantic relationships as precursors of healthy adult marriages: a review of theory, research, and programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp. pp. 15, 22, 65. ISBN   9780833041784. OCLC   137331441.
  21. ↑ Peisner, Eugene O. (May 1961). "A Methodology Built about the Going Steady Issue". Marriage and Family Living. 23 (2): 192–194. doi:10.2307/347741. JSTOR   347741.
  22. ↑ Bell, Robert R.; Coughey, Kathleen (Jul 1980). "Premarital Sexual Experience among College Females, 1958, 1968, and 1978". Family Relations. 29 (3): 353–357. doi:10.2307/583856. JSTOR   583856.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.