| Grafton v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Decided May 27, 1907 | |
| Full case name | Grafton v. United States |
| Citations | 206 U.S. 333 ( more ) |
| Holding | |
| The Double Jeopardy Clause is not violated when the first conviction came from a court without jurisdiction to try the offense. Also, the separate sovereigns exception to the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply in a U.S. territory because an insular area is not a sovereign state. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
Grafton v. United States, 206 U.S. 333(1907), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause is not violated when the first conviction came from a court without jurisdiction to try the offense. Also, the separate sovereigns exception to the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply in a U.S. territory because an insular area is not a sovereign state. [1]
After a soldier stationed in the Philippine Islands territory was court-martialed on a charge of manslaughter, he was acquitted. After that, he was indicted by the provincial court in Iloilo on murder charges. The soldier plead autrefois acquit to assert double jeopardy as a defense. The court rejected his plea. On appeal, that rejection was reversed and the defendant was released. [1]
| | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (September 2025) |
The Supreme Court issued an opinion on May 27, 1907. [1] [2]
| | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (September 2025) |
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .