Hannay angle

In classical mechanics, the Hannay angle is a mechanics analogue of the geometric phase (or Berry phase). It was named after John Hannay of the University of Bristol, UK. Hannay first described the angle in 1985, extending the ideas of the recently formalized Berry phase to classical mechanics. ^[1]

Consider a one-dimensional system moving in a cycle, like a pendulum. Now slowly vary a slow parameter ${\displaystyle \lambda }$, like pulling and pushing on the string of a pendulum. We can picture the motion of the system as having a fast oscillation and a slow oscillation. The fast oscillation is the motion of the pendulum, and the slow oscillation is the motion of our pulling on its string. If we picture the system in phase space, its motion sweeps out a torus.

The adiabatic theorem in classical mechanics states that the action variable, which corresponds to the phase space area enclosed by the system's orbit, remains approximately constant. Thus, after one slow oscillation period, the fast oscillation is back to the same cycle, but its phase on the cycle has changed during the time. The phase change has two leading orders.

The first order is the "dynamical angle", which is simply ${\displaystyle \int _{0}^{T}\omega (\lambda ){\dot {\lambda }}dt}$. This angle depends on the precise details of the motion, and it is of order ${\displaystyle O(T)}$.

The second order is Hannay's angle, which surprisingly is independent of the precise details of ${\displaystyle {\dot {\lambda }}}$. It depends on the trajectory of ${\displaystyle \lambda }$, but not how fast or slow it traverses the trajectory. It is of order ${\displaystyle O(1)}$. ^[2]

Hannay angle in classical mechanics

The Hannay angle is defined in the context of action-angle coordinates. In an initially time-invariant system, an action variable ${\displaystyle I_{\alpha }}$ is a constant. After introducing a periodic perturbation ${\displaystyle \lambda (t)}$, the action variable ${\displaystyle I_{\alpha }}$ becomes an adiabatic invariant, and the Hannay angle ${\displaystyle \theta _{\alpha }^{H}}$ for its corresponding angle variable can be calculated according to the path integral that represents an evolution in which the perturbation ${\displaystyle \lambda (t)}$ gets back to the original value ^[3] $${\displaystyle \theta _{\alpha }^{H}=-{\frac {\partial }{\partial I_{\alpha }}}\oint \!{\boldsymbol {p}}\cdot {\frac {\partial {\boldsymbol {q}}}{\partial \lambda }}\mathrm {d} \lambda =-\partial _{I_{\alpha }}\iint \omega }$$ where ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {p}}}$ and ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {q}}}$ are canonical variables of the Hamiltonian, and ${\displaystyle \omega }$ is the symplectic Hamiltonian 2-form.

Example

Foucault pendulum

Further information: Geometric phase § The Foucault pendulum

The Foucault pendulum is an example from classical mechanics that is sometimes also used to illustrate the Berry phase. Below we study the Foucault pendulum using action-angle variables. For simplicity, we will avoid using the Hamilton–Jacobi equation, which is employed in the general protocol. ^[4]

We consider a plane pendulum with frequency ${\displaystyle \omega }$ under the effect of Earth's rotation whose angular velocity is ${\displaystyle {\vec {\Omega }}=(\Omega _{x},\Omega _{y},\Omega _{z})}$ with amplitude denoted as ${\displaystyle \Omega =|{\vec {\Omega }}|}$. Here, the ${\displaystyle z}$ direction points from the center of the Earth to the pendulum. The Lagrangian for the pendulum is $${\displaystyle L={\frac {1}{2}}m({\dot {x}}^{2}+{\dot {y}}^{2})-{\frac {1}{2}}m\omega ^{2}(x^{2}+y^{2})+m\Omega _{z}(x{\dot {y}}-y{\dot {x}})}$$ The corresponding motion equation is $${\displaystyle {\ddot {x}}+\omega ^{2}x=2\Omega _{z}{\dot {y}}}$$$${\displaystyle {\ddot {y}}+\omega ^{2}y=-2\Omega _{z}{\dot {x}}}$$ We then introduce an auxiliary variable ${\displaystyle \varpi =x+iy}$ that is in fact an angle variable. We now have an equation for ${\displaystyle \varpi }$: $${\displaystyle {\ddot {\varpi }}+\omega ^{2}\varpi =-2i\Omega _{z}{\dot {\varpi }}}$$ From its characteristic equation $${\displaystyle \lambda ^{2}+\omega ^{2}=-2i\Omega _{z}\lambda }$$ we obtain its characteristic root (we note that ${\displaystyle \Omega \ll \omega }$) $${\displaystyle \lambda =-i\Omega _{z}\pm i{\sqrt {\Omega _{z}^{2}+\omega ^{2}}}\approx -i\Omega _{z}\pm i\omega }$$ The solution is then $${\displaystyle \varpi =e^{-i\Omega _{z}t}(Ae^{i\omega t}+Be^{-i\omega t})}$$ After the Earth rotates one full rotation that is ${\displaystyle T=2\pi /\Omega \approx 24h}$, we have the phase change for ${\displaystyle \varpi }$$${\displaystyle \Delta \varphi =2\pi {\frac {\omega }{\Omega }}+2\pi {\frac {\Omega _{z}}{\Omega }}}$$ The first term is due to dynamic effect of the pendulum and is termed as the dynamic phase, while the second term representing a geometric phase that is essentially the Hannay angle $${\displaystyle \theta ^{H}=2\pi {\frac {\Omega _{z}}{\Omega }}}$$

Rotation of a rigid body

In the rigid body's frame, the direction of the angular momentum moves along one of the curves drawn here. It returns to its starting direction periodically.

A free rigid body tumbling in free space has two conserved quantities: energy and angular momentum vector ${\displaystyle E,{\vec {L}}}$. Viewed from within the rigid body's frame, the angular momentum direction is moving about, but its length is preserved. After a certain time ${\displaystyle T}$, the angular momentum direction would return to its starting point.

Viewed in the inertial frame, the body has undergone a rotation (since all elements in SO(3) are rotations). A classical result states that during time ${\displaystyle T}$, the body has rotated by angle $${\displaystyle 2ET/\|{\vec {L}}\|-\Omega }$$

where ${\displaystyle \Omega }$ is the solid angle swept by the angular momentum direction as viewed from within the rigid body's frame. ^[5]

Other examples

The heavy top. ^[6] The orbit of earth, periodically perturbed by the orbit of Jupiter. ^[7] The rotational transform associated with the magnetic surfaces of a toroidal magnetic field with a nonplanar axis. ^[8]

References

1. Hannay, J H (1985-02-01). "Angle variable holonomy in adiabatic excursion of an integrable Hamiltonian". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 18 (2): 221–230. Bibcode:1985JPhA...18..221H. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/18/2/011. ISSN   0305-4470.
2. Robbins, J M (2016-10-28). "The Hannay angle, thirty years on". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 49 (43): 431002. Bibcode:2016JPhA...49Q1002R. doi:10.1088/1751-8113/49/43/431002. hdl: 1983/2992186e-5dde-4a3f-a2a9-67377afcadf9 . ISSN   1751-8113.
3. Toshikaze Kariyado; Yasuhiro Hatsugai (2016). "Hannay Angle: Yet Another Symmetry-Protected Topological Order Parameter in Classical Mechanics". J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85 (4): 043001. arXiv: 1508.06946 . Bibcode:2016JPSJ...85d3001K. doi:10.7566/JPSJ.85.043001. S2CID   119297582.
4. Khein, Alexander; Nelson, D. F. (1993-02-01). "Hannay angle study of the Foucault pendulum in action-angle variables". American Journal of Physics. 61 (2): 170–174. Bibcode:1993AmJPh..61..170K. doi:10.1119/1.17332. ISSN   0002-9505.
5. Montgomery, Richard (1991-05-01). "How much does the rigid body rotate? A Berry's phase from the 18th century". American Journal of Physics. 59 (5): 394–398. Bibcode:1991AmJPh..59..394M. doi:10.1119/1.16514. ISSN   0002-9505.
6. Park, Changsoo (2023-05-01). "Heavy symmetric tops and the Hannay angle". American Journal of Physics. 91 (5): 357–365. Bibcode:2023AmJPh..91..357P. doi:10.1119/5.0101149. ISSN   0002-9505.
7. Berry, M V; Morgan, M A (1996-05-01). "Geometric angle for rotated rotators, and the Hannay angle of the world". Nonlinearity. 9 (3): 787–799. Bibcode:1996Nonli...9..787B. doi:10.1088/0951-7715/9/3/009. ISSN   0951-7715.
8. Bhattacharjee, A.; Schreiber, G. M.; Taylor, J. B. (1992). "Geometric phase, rotational transforms, and adiabatic invariants in toroidal magnetic fields". Phys. Fluids B. 4 (9): 2737–2739. Bibcode:1992PhFlB...4.2737B. doi:10.1063/1.860145.

• Marsden, Jerrold E.; Montgomery, Richard; Ratiu, Tudor S. (1990). Reduction, Symmetry, and Phases in Mechanics. AMS Bookstore. p. 69. ISBN   0-8218-2498-8.
• C. Pisani (1994). Quantum-mechanical Ab-initio Calculation of the Properties of Crystalline Materials (Proceedings of the IV School of Computational Chemistry of the Italian Chemical Society ed.). Springer. p. 282. ISBN   3-540-61645-4.
• Karin M Rabe; Jean-Marc Triscone; Charles H Ahn (2007). Physics of Ferroelectrics: a Modern Perspective. Springer. p. 2. ISBN   978-3-540-34590-9.

External links

• Professor John H. Hannay: Research Highlights. Department of Physics, University of Bristol.