Hospital, patients, health, territories

Last updated

Hospital, patients, health, territories is the official name of a French bill presented on 22 October 2008 by Roselyne Bachelot, minister of Health, Youth, Sports and Associative Life. The bill is commonly called bill HPST (acronym of the French phrase) or bill Bachelot. The bill is the first stage of the Hospital 2012 Plan, launched by French President Nicolas Sarkozy, aiming to revamp the French health care system. The bill seeks to guarantee better and equal access to care for all French people, regardless of their geographic location. This reform needed a complete overhaul of the hospital's organization, which caused strong protests among the staff.

Contents

Initial project

The bill contains four main points, as defined by its official title. It would modernize the hospitals, giving them more financial means to carry out their mission and rehauling their territorial and internal organization. It would also favor research and education. Care provision would be reorganized through coordination between hospitals and cities to guarantee better access to care. The bill would also organize it at a regional level. It would finally reinforce prevention against all addictions, especially for young people and women.

The bill focus on measures to improve the health of young people. [1] Minors (less than 18) would be forbidden from drink alcohol, and encouraged to eat fruits and vegetables.

The bill would favor better access to good-quality care by implementing a better distribution of doctors throughout the national territory. The provision of care would be organized at a regional level. Financial incentives would be provided in regions lacking health care to appeal to doctors. Private sector practitioners fear the bill would limit their freedom of installation.

The bill finally implements strong decision-making authorities in hospitals, stating that there is currently no defined executive power. Directors will, therefore, see their powers strengthened at the expense of the boards and local elected officials. They will control the hiring of doctors and their pay.

The opening of frontiers between hospital and city medicine is a more controversial point. The bill would cause the mergings and reconversion of many hospitals and the specialization of care provided by some hospitals. Resources and technical means would be polarized in significant hospitals. At the same time, small structures are encouraged to find other orientations and to specialize, notably in the rehabilitation of disabled people and in the care of older people. Also, private organizations will be forced to provide their care to any people, acting as a public service.

On a larger scale, regional health agencies will be implemented. They would centralize powers currently exercised by health agencies such as Regional Hospital Agencies (ARH), the Ddass or Health Insurance. Led by the regional prefects, they would manage the overall delivery of care, whether private, hospital or medico-social.

Immediate reactions

Professionals and health care users have reacted to the bill Bachelot.

Reactions over the modernization of the system were rather negative. The trade union Sud-Santé have expressed concerns about the future of the French health system, arguing the law would submit it to capital gains. [2] The organization denounced the dismantling of health public service and the privatization of health care institutions. [3] The Confédération des syndicats médicaux (CSMF) greeted the expected reform of the hospital brought by the bill, which would finally reorganize and modernize the whole system, but denounced the "nationalization" of the health system, arguing the future regional health agencies will be omnipotent. [4] The CSMF proposed various amendments. [5] [6] The Coordination to defend public hospitals declared they were satisfied by the modernization of the system but feared the bill would liberalize the provision health care.

There was also discontentment about the reorganization of the system on a regional level (creation of ARS). The National Coordination Committee for the Defense of hospitals argued the reform would worsen the unequal access to care, depriving a portion of the population from health services. [7] They condemned the closure of hospitals planned by the bill. [8] The Interassociative Committee on health (Ciss) approved of the end of little structures, judged as dangerous. The organization is dubious about the quality of care provided by these establishments. [9]

The measures to improve the access to care were also subject to controversy. The National Federation of Workers and disabled (FNATH) approved of the reform of the hospital, but They announced they would propose amendments to ensure the presence of representatives of patients in the supervisory boards of the hospitals. Practitioners fear the bill will liberalize the system with financial constraints for them. [10] There was a massive rejection of the bill by both private-sector and public-service practitioners. [11] The CSMF said the bill would impose a "tax" for medics working in densely populated regions with many infrastructures and resources. [12] [13] However, the Hospital federation (FHF) have fully approved the measures for medics.

The measures on alcohol were less polemical. The FNATH expressed their disappointment, having expected measures about health at work. [14] [15] The National Association of prevention of addictiveness and alcoholism (Anpaa) has given its full support to the measures limiting alcohol for young people.

Timeline of events

Evolution and debates

Following the legal procedure in France, the bill was first examined by the National Assembly, then by the Senate.

Discussions in the National Assembly

The discussions in the National Assembly started on 10 February 2009 and ended on 18 March.

Some deputies expressed their reservations about the partnership between public and private, fearing that the participation of the private sector in public service would be a privatization of the provision of care. The initial bill proposed that the directors of the Health Regional Agencies (to be created by the bill) would be the persons in charge of entrusting missions to private clinics in case of deficiency. The deputies approved of this measure. The initial bill proposed the creation of a statute for private clinics entrusted with public service missions, but an amendment modified this status. The initial status "private participating to the hospital public service public" (PSPH) was replaced by "private health institution of collective interest." The Assembly also approved the new way hospitals would be managed. They will be overseen and will have to publish annual reports on the quality of the care provided.

In March 2009, the Parliament debated on the consequences of the prevention plan provided by the bill. Roselyne Bachelot tried to convince the deputies to spare advertising agencies, arguing that firms of other countries have no restrictions. While a report on obesity had been issued in September 2008, [25] the deputies rejected an amendment banning advertisements during television programs for children.

The National Assembly voted the interdiction to sell alcohol to people under 18, against 16 previously, but it officially authorized advertising of alcohol on the web: advertisers are allowed to advertise alcohol on the web and fat and sweet food on television in any program. However, websites dedicated to young people are excluded from this authorization, and also sport associations websites. In addition, advertising will have to be neutral and not intrusive (pop-up, for example). The assembly voted on an amendment to adopt this decision. The Assembly also decided to approve of the fight against binge drinking.

The Association for the Prevention in Alcohol and Addiction (Anpaa) and the French Society of Public Health (SFSP) disapproved of the decision about advertisers, arguing advertising is the major cause of child obesity. [26] They denounced the inconsistency of the bill, which does not implement any restriction, and criticized the influence of lobbies. In particular, representants of the wine industry had expressed their concern about the bill. [27] On 3 March, 23 scientific societies and 17 associations had signed an appeal to parliamentarians to restrict advertising in television for children. [28]

This point is the most polemical of the bill, for it imposed regulations for practitioners. After much debate, the deputies ruled the liberty of settlement would be preserved for medicals. Medicals of regions with important resources would be incited to move to disadvantaged areas. However, they will have financial sanctions ("contributions of solidarity") if they refuse. Medicine students would receive incentives if they choose to settle in disadvantages regions. The Trade union of Liberal Medical (SML) had proposed amendments to guarantee the liberty of settlement for practitioners. [29] [30] The SML said the medicals would be controlled by powerful ARS, and wrote a letter to Roselyne Bachelot. [31] The CSMF criticized the financial sanctions the bill would impose, and call them the "Bachelot tax". [32] They proposed amendments to avoid the imposition of a numerus closus for medic by the ARS. [33] They said the bill threatened the profession., [34] and declared they very disappointed the "Bachelot tax" was maintained. [35] The organization (which is the first trade union of practitioners) accused Rosely,e Bachelot of wanting to destroy their profession. [36]

Discussions in the Senate

The official discussions started on 11 May, but a senatorial commission had examined the bill previously. Another discussion is to take place on 20 May.

The senatorial commission release a report, called the "Marescaux report", which proposed various amendments on the title I of the bill, i.e. on measures regarding the reform of the hospitals centers. The report focused on the management of hospitals and criticized the overwhelming power the directors of hospitals would get with the bill. The report said the executive must not be concentrated in the hands of one single person. physicians regarding the governance of the centers. It recalled the three missions of hospitals: teaching, research and care, and said medicals, teachers and researchers should participate in the management of care centers. The government proposed amendments following this report.

The trade union of private sector medicals (SML) have proposed 40 amendments [37] aiming at promoting the professional liberties for medicals. The amendments included the suppression of the "Bachelot tax". Most of the amendments were approved of by the senators. The CSMF also proposed amendments, notably to remove the "Bachelot tax". [38]

Related Research Articles

Patient rights consist of enforceable duties that healthcare professionals and healthcare business persons owe to patients to provide them with certain services or benefits. When such services or benefits become rights instead of simply privileges, then a patient can expect to receive them and can expect the support of people who enforce organization policies or legal codes to intervene on the patient's behalf if the patient does not receive them. A patient's bill of rights is a list of guarantees for those receiving medical care. It may take the form of a law or a non-binding declaration. Typically a patient's bill of rights guarantees patients information, fair treatment, and autonomy over medical decisions, among other rights.

In legislative procedure, a rider is an additional provision added to a bill or other measure under the consideration by a legislature, which may or may not have much, if any, connection with the subject matter of the bill.

Single-payer healthcare is a type of universal healthcare in which the costs of essential healthcare for all residents are covered by a single public system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roselyne Bachelot</span> French politician

Roselyne Bachelot-Narquin, generally known as Roselyne Bachelot, is a French politician who served as Minister of Culture in the government of Prime Minister Jean Castex (2020–2022) and as Minister of Solidarity and Social Cohesion (2010–2012) in the government of Prime Minister François Fillon. She was a member of the Union for a Popular Movement, which was part of the European People's Party.

A public hospital, or government hospital, is a hospital which is government owned and is fully funded by the government and operates solely off the money that is collected from taxpayers to fund healthcare initiatives. In almost all the developed countries but the United States of America, and in most of the developing countries, this type of hospital provides medical care free of charge to patients, covering expenses and wages by government reimbursement.

Urgences-santé is the statutory public emergency medical service for the islands of Montreal and Laval, Quebec. The corporation operates a fleet of 165 vehicles and employs over 1,300 people, including 891 professional paramedics. Urgences-santé is one of the largest paramedical services in Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prostitution in France</span>

Prostitution in France was legal until April 2016, but several surrounding activities were illegal, like operating a brothel, living off the avails (pimping), and paying for sex with someone under the age of 18.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marie-Anne Montchamp</span> French politician

Marie-Anne Montchamp is a French politician who served as a member of the National Assembly, represents a constituency in the Val-de-Marne department. From 2010 to 2012, she served as Secretary of State for Solidarities and Social Cohesion under Minister Roselyne Bachelot-Narquin.

The 2009 flu pandemic, involving an outbreak of a new strain of influenza commonly known as swine flu, reached France in early May 2009.

The Stupak–Pitts Amendment was a proposed amendment to the Affordable Health Care for America Act of 2010 (AHCAA). It was submitted by Representatives Bart Stupak and Joseph R. Pitts. Its stated purpose was to prohibit the use of federal funds "to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion" except in cases of rape, incest or danger to the life of the mother. It was adopted by the House but not included in the Senate's version, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Representatives who support abortion rights said they would oppose AHCAA with the Stupak-Pitts language, and proposed to adopt PPACA. Stupak and several supporters said they would oppose PPACA without the amendment, but withdrew their opposition after President Obama promised an executive order to bar such funding. Anti-abortion groups criticized this action, saying that the executive order would not be effective.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Safiatou Thiam</span>

Safiatou Thiam is a Senegalese public health doctor, a specialist in HIV/AIDS and former Minister of Health and Disease Prevention in the government of Cheikh Hadjibou Soumaré.She later became Executive Secretary of CNLS National Council against AIDS

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law 2013-404</span>

The law opening marriage to same-sex couples, no. 2013-404 is a French law which, since 18 May 2013, grants same-sex couples the right to marry and jointly adopt children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commission on renewal and ethics in public life (France)</span> French government commission on renewal and ethics in public life

The French Commission on renewal and ethics in public life, nicknamed Jospin commission, was a think tank established in 2012 by President François Hollande to provide reforms in public life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitutional amendments under the French Fifth Republic</span>

The French constitution of 4 October 1958 was revised many times in its early years. Changes to this fundamental law have become more frequent since the 1990s, for two major reasons:

  1. public projects for institutional modernization
  2. adaptation to European Union and other international law.
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marie-Françoise Mégie</span> Canadian physician

Marie-Françoise Mégie is a Canadian physician, university professor at the Université de Montreal and member of the Independent Senators Group in the Senate of Canada. Born in Jacmel, Haiti, she moved to Quebec in 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geneviève Darrieussecq</span> French physician and politician

Geneviève Darrieussecq is a French physician and politician of Democratic Movement (MoDem) who served as Minister for People with Disabilities in the government of Prime Minister Élisabeth Borne from 2022 to 2023.

The 2021 French labor protests were a series of protests and strikes organized by the General Confederation of Labour (France) (CGT), other trade unions, and French citizens dissatisfied with the country's economic and employment conditions in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. These were followed by protests against proposed laws that would give greater powers to police.

Mohamed Belhocine is an Algerian medical scientist and professor of internal medicine and epidemiology.

Switzerland has tobacco legislation defined at federal and cantonal level. It covers protection of the population against passive smoking, restrictions on tobacco advertising, warnings on packaging and taxes.

The Act to amend the Charter of the French Language is a Quebec amending act introduced by the Landry government in 2002, which made adjustments to several provisions of Quebec's language policy. Its main objective was to rectify the Charter of the French Language in response to the recommendations of the Estates-General on the Situation and Future of the French Language in Quebec.

References

  1. 1 2 Présentation du projet de loi « Hôpital, patients, santé et territoires », Ministry of Health, Youth and Sports
  2. Pour le retrait du projet de loi Bachelot, Sud-Santé
  3. official tract, Sud-Santé
  4. Projet de Loi HPST : il faut agir là où sont les besoins de réforme, CSMF
  5. Proposed amendments, CSMF
  6. Amendments included in the bill, CSMF
  7. official tract against the bill, Coordination Nationale des Comités de Défense des Hôpitaux et Maternités de Proximité
  8. other pamphlet, Coordination Nationale des Comités de Défense des Hôpitaux et Maternités de Proximité
  9. Propositions to improve the bill, Ciss
  10. Loi Bachelot : le rejet massif des médecins, CSMF
  11. Médecins libéraux et hospitaliers : deux fronts contre le projet de loi HPST, CSMF
  12. Taxe Bachelot : la Ministre de la Santé persiste, la CSMF aussi, CSMF
  13. Taxe Bachelot : la CSMF dénonce l'escalade dans la croisade anti médecine libérale, CSMF
  14. Réforme de l'hôpital: les propositions de la FNATH (29/11/2008), FNATH
  15. Propositions to improve the bill, November 2008, FNATH
  16. Tous contre la loi Bachelot !, Sud-Santé
  17. Pour le retrait du projet de loi Bachelot, le 12 février tous dans l'action !, tract for the 12 February strike, Sud-Santé
  18. Loi Bachelot, arme de destruction massive des hôpitaux !, Sud-Santé
  19. Retrait de la loi HPST une exigence vitale pour l'avenir du service public de santé ! for the 5 March strike, Sud-Santé
  20. Official tract for the 19 March strike, National Coordination
  21. Contre la « politique de la peur » et la casse sociale, Manifestons ensemble le 19 mars, official tract for the 19 March strike, National Coordination
  22. Pour un système de santé solidaire, exigeons le retrait de la loi Bachelot!, National Coordination
  23. The call of the 25 as published in the Nouvel Observateur
  24. toll claimed by the organizations Sud-Santé
  25. Report of the mission on prevention of obesity, National Assembly
  26. Une Loi sur la santé abandonnera-t-elle un des axes majeurs de la lutte contre la consommation excessive d’alcool ?, 17 March 2009, SFSP
  27. Anpaa and SFSP communiqué, 4 March 2009
  28. Official communiqué
  29. Projet de loi HPST : Des amendements nécessaires, SML communiqué, 25|02|2009
  30. Proposed amendments, SML
  31. Open letter to Roselyne Bachelot, SML
  32. Au secours, la Taxe Bachelot revient ! , CSMF
  33. Amendments by the CSMF
  34. Loi BACHELOT : Il est encore temps d'éviter le pire ! , CSMF
  35. Taxe Bachelot : le couperet est tombé, les masques aussi , CSMF
  36. Loi Bachelot : Trop c'est trop !, CSMF
  37. Loi HPST : Les amendements du SML, SML communiqué, 24|04|2009
  38. Amendments proposed by the CSMF

Official texts