How to Be Perfect

Last updated

How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question
How to Be Perfect Front Cover.jpg
Front cover
Author Michael Schur
LanguageEnglish
GenreNon-fiction
Publisher Simon & Schuster
Publication date
2022
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint, e-book
Pages304 pages
ISBN 1982159316

How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question is a 2022 non-fiction book by American television producer and author Michael Schur. The book provides an introduction to many philosophical arguments on the concept of ethics, told largely in layman's terms and in a humorous tone. Schur had done extensive research into the subject for his television show The Good Place , and following its conclusion decided to write the book to summarize and pass along much of what he had learned. The book was well-received by some critics, with The New York Times Book Review calling it "a perfect starter course in analyzing why human beings do what we do". [1]

Contents

Background

Schur, who had previously worked as an executive producer on television shows such as Parks and Recreation and Brooklyn Nine-Nine , got the idea for a show based around moral philosophy when he was once stuck in traffic. He witnessed motorists using the emergency lane to bypass the traffic jam, and conceived a world where such acts deducted "points" from a person's morality score. The idea of an ethical score sheet eventually led to his creation of The Good Place , a show in which a numerical score calculated on one's deeds in life determines which afterlife the Good Place or Bad Place one is sent to after death. The show saw success both commercially and critically and aired for four seasons on NBC. [2]

Following the end of the show's run, Schur did not feel finished discussing the topic of ethics, and decided a book would work to continue with the subject in a different medium. Schur believed that his background as a comedy writer gave him the opportunity to make material that has historically been written in an opaque style more accessible and engaging. [2] He recruited the assistance of political philosopher Todd May, who had worked as a consultant on The Good Place, and who receives credit on the book's title page for being in charge of "philosophical nitpicking". [3] The resulting book has been called a "companion piece" to the television show. [2]

Synopsis

The book's format parallels that of many introductory textbooks on ethics, with individual chapters summarizing separate philosophical arguments on morality. Schur eschews the standard dry tone of philosophy texts, however, opting instead for a narrator who is funny and passionate. [4] He states that the book seeks to "wade into some deeply confusing and painful applications of moral philosophy ... But in a fun way!" [5]

The book's thirteen chapters aim to provide contemporary context to philosophical debates that, in some cases, have gone on for centuries. [1] It begins with a relatively straightforward question the first chapter is titled "Should I Punch My Friend in the Face for No Reason?" and progresses through more and more complex ethical conundrums and their respective arguments. [5] Schur covers utilitarianism, deontology, existentialism, virtue ethics, and more, all while wryly bemoaning the original authors' "infuriatingly dense prose", including one paper he calls a "seventy-five-page-long migraine". [1] [3] [4] Schur deliberately uses a light tone and humorous anecdotes to make the subject material more "palatable" for a broad audience; [3] a sort of "honey on the medicine cup" intended to keep readers' attentions. [6]

After introducing the basic philosophical arguments and then applying them to potential real-world situations, Schur concludes by attempting to explain the actual importance of moral philosophy in our day-to-day lives. [6] He argues that perfection is unrealistic, and that trying to attain it robs one of enjoying life and its pleasures. [3] Rather, people would be better off striving to live more ethical lives, using pieces of the various philosophical viewpoints as a collective moral guide. [3] Schur encourages the reader to be constantly and willingly trying to learn, develop, and become better people. [6]

Reception

How to Be Perfect debuted at the second spot on The New York Times Best Seller list and received mostly positive reviews. [6] Julian Baggini, writing for The Wall Street Journal , compared it favorably to the "comedy gold" of The Good Place, and said the book is "an enjoyable next step" for fans of that show and "for anyone else who wants to learn about moral philosophy while avoiding the usual dry earnestness." [4] The New York Times Book Review called it "clear and approachable" and especially praised the audiobook version, the cast of which includes Kristen Bell, Ted Danson, Manny Jacinto, and Jameela Jamil of The Good Place. [1] The Los Angeles Review of Books , while calling it a "remarkably companionable book", proposed that Schur's use of "ironic humor" may cause a reader to be unsure of when to take him at his word and when he is being tongue-in-cheek. [6] The Times Literary Supplement called Schur "engaging company" but admits "some may find the brash comedic tone jarring". [3]

Related Research Articles

Ethical naturalism is the meta-ethical view which claims that:

  1. Ethical sentences express propositions.
  2. Some such propositions are true.
  3. Those propositions are made true by objective features of the world.
  4. These moral features of the world are reducible to some set of non-moral features.

In metaphilosophy and ethics, metaethics is the study of the nature, scope, ground, and meaning of moral judgment, ethical belief, or values. It is one of the three branches of ethics generally studied by philosophers, the others being normative ethics and applied ethics.

Normative ethics is the study of ethical behaviour and is the branch of philosophical ethics that investigates questions regarding how one ought to act, in a moral sense.

Moral relativism or ethical relativism is used to describe several philosophical positions concerned with the differences in moral judgments across different peoples and cultures. An advocate of such ideas is often referred to as a relativist.

Moral realism is the position that ethical sentences express propositions that refer to objective features of the world, some of which may be true to the extent that they report those features accurately. This makes moral realism a non-nihilist form of ethical cognitivism with an ontological orientation, standing in opposition to all forms of moral anti-realism and moral skepticism, including ethical subjectivism, error theory, and non-cognitivism. Moral realism's two main subdivisions are ethical naturalism and ethical non-naturalism.

Integrity is the quality of being honest and showing a consistent and uncompromising adherence to strong moral and ethical principles and values. In ethics, integrity is regarded as the honesty and truthfulness or earnestness of one's actions. Integrity can stand in opposition to hypocrisy. It regards internal consistency as a virtue, and suggests that people who hold apparently conflicting values should account for the discrepancy or alter those values.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Virtue ethics</span> Normative ethical theories

Virtue ethics is a philosophical approach that treats virtue and character as the primary subjects of ethics, in contrast to other ethical systems that put consequences of voluntary acts, principles or rules of conduct, or obedience to divine authority in the primary role.

Descriptive ethics, also known as comparative ethics, is the study of people's beliefs about morality. It contrasts with prescriptive or normative ethics, which is the study of ethical theories that prescribe how people ought to act, and with meta-ethics, which is the study of what ethical terms and theories actually refer to. The following examples of questions that might be considered in each field illustrate the differences between the fields:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Is–ought problem</span> Philosophical problem articulated by David Hume

The is–ought problem, as articulated by the Scottish philosopher and historian David Hume, arises when one makes claims about what ought to be that are based solely on statements about what is. Hume found that there seems to be a significant difference between descriptive statements and prescriptive statements, and that it is not obvious how one can coherently transition from descriptive statements to prescriptive ones.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Applied philosophy</span> Branch of philosophy

Applied philosophy is a branch of philosophy that studies philosophical problems of practical concern. The topic covers a broad spectrum of issues in environment, medicine, science, engineering, policy, law, politics, economics and education. The term was popularised in 1982 by the founding of the Society for Applied Philosophy by Brenda Almond, and its subsequent journal publication Journal of Applied Philosophy edited by Elizabeth Brake. Methods of applied philosophy are similar to other philosophical methods including questioning, dialectic, critical discussion, rational argument, systematic presentation, thought experiments and logical argumentation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alasdair MacIntyre</span> Scottish philosopher (born 1929)

Alasdair Chalmers MacIntyre is a Scottish-American philosopher who has contributed to moral and political philosophy as well as history of philosophy and theology. MacIntyre's After Virtue (1981) is one of the most important works of Anglophone moral and political philosophy in the 20th century. He is senior research fellow at the Centre for Contemporary Aristotelian Studies in Ethics and Politics (CASEP) at London Metropolitan University, emeritus Professor of Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame, and permanent senior distinguished research fellow at the Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture. During his lengthy academic career, he also taught at Brandeis University, Duke University, Vanderbilt University, and Boston University.

<i>After Virtue</i> 1981 book by Alasdair MacIntyre

After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory is a book on moral philosophy by the Scottish philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre. MacIntyre provides a bleak view of the state of modern moral discourse, regarding it as failing to be rational, and failing to admit to being irrational. He claims that older forms of moral discourse were in better shape, particularly singling out Aristotle's moral philosophy as an exemplar. After Virtue is among the most important texts in the recent revival of virtue ethics.

Evolutionary ethics is a field of inquiry that explores how evolutionary theory might bear on our understanding of ethics or morality. The range of issues investigated by evolutionary ethics is quite broad. Supporters of evolutionary ethics have argued that it has important implications in the fields of descriptive ethics, normative ethics, and metaethics.

Aristotle first used the term ethics to name a field of study developed by his predecessors Socrates and Plato which is devoted to the attempt to provide a rational response to the question of how humans should best live. Aristotle regarded ethics and politics as two related but separate fields of study, since ethics examines the good of the individual, while politics examines the good of the city-state, which he considered to be the best type of community.

Secular ethics is a branch of moral philosophy in which ethics is based solely on human faculties such as logic, empathy, reason or moral intuition, and not derived from belief in supernatural revelation or guidance—a source of ethics in many religions. Secular ethics refers to any ethical system that does not draw on the supernatural, and includes humanism, secularism and freethinking. A classical example of literature on secular ethics is the Kural text, authored by the ancient Indian philosopher Valluvar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Schur</span> American television producer and writer (born 1975)

Michael Herbert Schur is an American television producer, writer, director, and actor. He was a producer and writer for the American remake of the comedy series The Office, and co-created Parks and Recreation with Office producer Greg Daniels. He created The Good Place, co-created the comedy series Brooklyn Nine-Nine, and was a producer on the series Master of None. He also played Mose Schrute on The Office. In 2021, he was one of three co-creators of the Peacock comedy series Rutherford Falls.

<i>The Moral Landscape</i> 2010 book by Sam Harris

The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values is a 2010 book by Sam Harris, in which he promotes a science of morality and argues that many thinkers have long confused the relationship between morality, facts, and science. He aims to carve a third path between secularists who say morality is subjective and religionists who say that morality is dictated by God and scripture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joshua Greene (psychologist)</span> American experimental psychologist, neuroscientist, and moral philosopher

Joshua David Greene is an American experimental psychologist, neuroscientist, and philosopher. He is a professor of psychology at Harvard University. Most of his research and writing has been concerned with moral judgment and decision-making. His recent research focuses on fundamental issues in cognitive science.

<i>The Machine Question</i> 2012 nonfiction book by David J. Gunkel

The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics is a 2012 nonfiction book by David J. Gunkel that discusses the evolution of the theory of human ethical responsibilities toward non-human things and to what extent intelligent, autonomous machines can be considered to have legitimate moral responsibilities and what legitimate claims to moral consideration they can hold. The book was awarded as the 2012 Best Single Authored Book by the Communication Ethics Division of the National Communication Association.

<i>How to Make Good Decisions and Be Right All the Time</i> 2008 English-language philosophy book by Iain King

How to Make Good Decisions and Be Right All the Time is a 2008 book by Iain King. It sets out a history of moral philosophy and presents new ideas in ethics, which have been described as quasi-utilitarianism.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Modak, Sebastian (March 13, 2022). "Explains a lot". The New York Times Book Review. p. 9.
  2. 1 2 3 Alter, Alexandra (January 24, 2022). "His new good place is writing about morality". The New York Times. p. C1.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Gubler, Simone (September 9, 2022). "How to Be Perfect: The correct answer to every moral question". Times Literary Supplement. No. 6232. p. 24.
  4. 1 2 3 Baggini, Julian (February 3, 2022). "How to Be Perfect Review: The ultimate self-improvement". The Wall Street Journal.
  5. 1 2 "How to Be Perfect: The correct answer to every moral question". kirkusreviews.com. Kirkus Media, LLC. Retrieved June 10, 2024.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Miller, Steven A. (June 26, 2022). "Fools and Philosophers: On Michael Schur's How to Be Perfect". Los Angeles Review of Books. Retrieved June 11, 2024.