Howard H. Shore | |
---|---|
Superior Court Judge of San Diego County in California | |
San Diego Deputy District Attorney | |
Howard H. Shore is a Superior Court Judge of San Diego County,California for Department SD-15. [1] Shore's remarks were widely covered by the media after he announced that the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution did not apply to chalk on the sidewalk,and he prohibited the defendant from mentioning terms like "First Amendment" or "free speech" during the trial. [2]
In October 2011,former U.S. Senator staffer Jeff Olson started protesting outside branches of Bank of America in San Diego. In response,bank official and former police officer Darell Freeman informed Olson that his credit union account at California Coast would be canceled if he continued to demonstrate,though Olson followed up with his bank and learned that wasn't true. [3] [4]
Olson continued to protest,and in February 2012 he started writing anti-bank messages in chalk on the sidewalk in front of Bank of America branches. For the next six months,he visited a bank a few times a week to write slogans on the sidewalk such as "Stop big banks," "No thanks,big banks," and "Matthew 21:12" (a Bible verse where Jesus drove out bankers from the temple). In another case,Olson drew an octopus with bundles of cash held in its tentacles. [4] [5]
On August 28,2012,Olson was contacted by Officer Bill Miles on behalf of the San Diego Gang Unit and he stopped protesting soon after. It was reported that Olson had completely stopped protesting by the time Bob Filner was elected San Diego Mayor in November 2012. [4]
On January 7,2013,the bank official (Freeman) requested that Officer Miles and then City Attorney Jan Goldsmith take action on Olson's case,even though he had stopped protesting. [4]
On April 16,2012,the city filed 13 counts of vandalism against Olson based on previous incidents reported by Freeman. Judge Shore was assigned to the case. Each count of vandalism on the document had a suggested sentence range of "1 Yr/$1,000," indicating that Olson was facing a possible 13 years in prison plus a fine of $13,000 for the 13 chalk offenses. Although that was the theoretical maximum,local prosecutors and defense attorneys familiar with such cases were aware that the actual sentence,if convicted,would probably include a fine and some community service. [6] [7]
Mayor Filner at the time said the case was a "waste of taxpayer money." [4] [7]
On May 16,Olson was offered a plea bargain to reduce his crimes to infractions,which would have given him a punishment of 32 hours of community service,a mandatory eight-hour seminar on behavior,a requirement to pay Bank of America $6,299 in restitution,a requirement to waive his Fourth Amendment rights regarding search and seizures,and a loss of his driver's licence for 3 years. [8] Olson turned down the plea bargain.
On June 5,2013,Judge Shore granted a motion by Deputy City Attorney Paige Hazard,which prohibited Olson's attorney Tom Tosdal from using any of the following terms during the trial:"First Amendment," "free speech," "political speech," "public forum," "free expression," or "expressive conduct." Media reports decried that Olson would not be allowed to claim his first amendment rights. [2] However,Judge Shore stated that he was bound by precedent—specifically the published decision of the California Court of Appeal in Huntingdon Life Sciences,Inc. v Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty USA,Inc.(2005)129 Cal.App.4th 1228,a case involving California's anti-SLAPP statute (strategic lawsuit against public participation). In a complex,lengthy decision,the Court of Appeal found certain activities of the employee to be constitutionally protected,but held,as to the vandalism,"Vandalism,of course,is not a legitimate exercise of free speech rights,and if the complaint arose only from such conduct it would not be subject to an anti-SLAPP motion." 129 Cal.App.4th at p. 1245.
Olson was offered another plea bargain a week and a half later,on June 18,where pleading guilty to a single count of vandalism would reduce his sentence to three years probation,require him to pay restitution (undetermined amount),require he clean graffiti for 24 hours,and lose his driver's license for two years. Again,Olson turned down the plea bargain. [8]
Olson's trial began on June 26,2013. Soon after,several media reports decried the suggested sentences as excessive,including in The LA Times, [9] the San Diego Reader, [10] NPR, [11] Gawker, [12] New York Daily News [13] and The Huffington Post. [14] [15]
Shore objected to the reports that defense counsel and defendant were making statements to the media while the trial was ongoing,and issued a gag order that prohibited Olson or any witnesses involved with the case from having any contact with the media. He stated his concern that the case was being tried in the media,and that the comments could reach the jurors,who were bound by their oath to decide the case based only on the evidence presented at trial. He remarked to the defense that they probably wouldn't appreciate the prosecutor making statements to the media about why the defendant should be found guilty. [6]
Within a few days,approximately 30,000 people had signed a petition to stop the prosecution,and NPR showed that 95% of 15,000 people polled believed the charges were not justified. [7]
After the jury deliberated for two hours,Olson was found not guilty of all 13 charges. [5]
The lead prosecutor,Paige Hazard,blamed Olson for turning down the plea offers and wasting taxpayer resources. An official statement from the City Attorney's Office criticized Olson for forcing the city to take the case to trial. [8]
In 2010,Judge Shore ruled that a dispensary operator named Jovan Jackson was prohibited from using California's state medical marijuana law as part of his defense in a case for three charges of possession and sale of cannabis. Shore was required to interpret the meaning of the language in MMPA (Medical Marijuana Program Act (California Health and Safety Code 11362.7 et. seq.) that allowed a defense for patients "who associate for the purpose of collectively cultivating medical marijuana." Judge Shore conducted a pre-trial hearing,and heard testimony that the collective to which Jackson belonged had 1674 members,only a few of whom were involved in cultivation. Shore held that the association was not formed for the purpose of cultivation,but for distribution. Jackson was convicted of a felony,and Judge Shore ordered him to pay a $5,000 fine,serve 6 months in jail,and serve 3 years of probation. [16] In October 2012,the Court of Appeal reviewed Judge Shore's decision not to allow the collective cultivation defense,and Jackson's felony conviction was reversed. People v. Jackson (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 525. The Court did not expressly disagree with Judge Shore's analysis,but held that,because there was no established definition of the language Judge Shore was called upon to interpret,the issue should have gone to the jury. Jackson was retried before another judge,and was allowed to use the defense,but was nonetheless convicted of all charges by the jury. [17] [18]
In United States law,an Alford plea,also called a Kennedy plea in West Virginia,an Alford guilty plea,and the Alford doctrine,is a guilty plea in criminal court,whereby a defendant in a criminal case does not admit to the criminal act and asserts innocence,even if the evidence presented by the prosecution would be likely to persuade a judge or jury to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This can be caused by circumstantial evidence and testimony favoring the prosecution and difficulty finding evidence and witnesses that would aid the defense.
Sara Jane Olson is an American far-left activist who was a member of the Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA) in 1975. The group disbanded and she was a fugitive for decades before being arrested. In 2001,she pleaded guilty to attempted murder related to a failed bombing plot. In 2003 she pleaded guilty to second-degree murder related the death of a customer during a botched bank robbery the SLA committed in California. Known then as Soliah,she was also accused of helping a group hide Patty Hearst,a kidnapped newspaper heiress,in 1974. After being federally indicted in 1976,Soliah was a wanted fugitive for several decades. She lived for periods in Zimbabwe and the U.S. states of Washington and Minnesota.
A plea bargain is an agreement in criminal law proceedings,whereby the prosecutor provides a concession to the defendant in exchange for a plea of guilt or nolo contendere. This may mean that the defendant will plead guilty to a less serious charge,or to one of the several charges,in return for the dismissal of other charges;or it may mean that the defendant will plead guilty to the original criminal charge in return for a more lenient sentence.
Thomas Arthur Mesereau Jr. is an American attorney known for defending Michael Jackson in his 2005 child molestation trial,as well as Mike Tyson,Bill Cosby and,in 2023,Danny Masterson,a case in which Mesereau was sanctioned by the judge
A school shooting occurred on November 8,2005 at Campbell County Comprehensive High School in Jacksboro,Tennessee,United States,when a 15-year-old freshman student shot the school principal and two assistant principals. One assistant principal,Ken Bruce,died as a result of the shooting.
The Green Scare is legal action by the US government against the radical environmental movement,that occurred mostly in the 2000s. It alludes to the Red Scares,periods of fear over communist infiltration of US society.
Thomas Selby Ellis III is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,appointed by Ronald Reagan.
Strickland v. Washington,466 U.S. 668 (1984),was a landmark Supreme Court case that established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel is violated by that counsel's inadequate performance.
Bonnie Michelle Dumanis was the District Attorney of San Diego County,California. She held the office 2003 to 2017. Dumanis is a Republican,though the office she held was officially nonpartisan. She was the first openly gay or lesbian DA in the country. She was the first woman and the first Jewish District Attorney in San Diego.
A criminal defense lawyer is a lawyer specializing in the defense of individuals and companies charged with criminal activity. Some criminal defense lawyers are privately retained,while others are employed by the various jurisdictions with criminal courts for appointment to represent indigent persons;the latter are generally called public defenders. The terminology is imprecise because each jurisdiction may have different practices with various levels of input from country to country. Some jurisdictions use a rotating system of appointments,with judges appointing a private practice attorney or firm for each case.
Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky,559 U.S. 356 (2010),is a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that criminal defense attorneys must advise noncitizen clients about the deportation risks of a guilty plea. The case extended the Supreme Court's prior decisions on criminal defendants' Sixth Amendment right to counsel to immigration consequences.
Jan Ira Goldsmith is a Republican politician from San Diego,California,United States who served as the San Diego City Attorney from 2008 to 2016.
Plea bargaining in the United States is very common;the vast majority of criminal cases in the United States are settled by plea bargain rather than by a jury trial. They have also been increasing in frequency—they rose from 84% of federal cases in 1984 to 94% by 2001. Plea bargains are subject to the approval of the court,and different States and jurisdictions have different rules. Game theory has been used to analyze the plea bargaining decision.
A citizen’s right to a trial by jury is a central feature of the United States Constitution. It is considered a fundamental principle of the American legal system.
Amy Sauber Berman Jackson is an American attorney and jurist serving as a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
Judy Clare Clarke is an American criminal defense attorney who has represented several high-profile defendants such as Ted Kaczynski,Eric Rudolph,Dzhokhar Tsarnaev,Joseph Edward Duncan,Zacarias Moussaoui,Jared Lee Loughner,Robert Gregory Bowers,Burford Furrow,Lisa Montgomery and Susan Smith.
Glasser v. United States,315 U.S. 60 (1942),was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on two issues of constitutional criminal procedure. Glasser was the first Supreme Court decision to hold that the Assistance of Counsel Clause of the Sixth Amendment required the reversal of a criminal defendant's conviction if his lawyer's representation of him was limited by a conflict of interest.
People v. Jovan Jackson,210 Cal.App.4th 525 (2012) is a landmark decision by the Fourth Appellate District of California,which affirmed that persons that associate to collectively cultivate medical marijuana are entitled to a legal defense as provided by California Senate Bill 420. The decision has defined medical marijuana law in the state of California.
Lafler v. Cooper,566 U.S. 156 (2012),was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the Sixth Amendment standard for reversing convictions due to ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining. The Court ruled that when a lawyer's ineffective assistance leads to the rejection of a plea agreement,a defendant is entitled to relief if the outcome of the plea process would have been different with competent advice. In such cases,the Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment requires the trial judge to exercise discretion to determine an appropriate remedy.
The two criminal trials of Paul Manafort were the first cases brought to trial by the special counsel's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Manafort served as campaign chair for the Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign from June 20 to August 19,2016. In July 2017,the FBI conducted a raid of Manafort's home,authorized by search warrant under charges of interference in the 2016 election. Manafort and his business assistant Rick Gates were both indicted and arrested in October 2017 for charges of conspiracy against the United States,making false statements,money laundering,and failing to register as foreign agents for Ukraine. Gates entered a plea bargain in February 2018.